So, this means that the undetectable steroids and HGH still being used help the pitchers more than the hitters?
Oh, and Baseball Reference has 4640 HR hit in [url=http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?team=TOT&lg=ML&year=1997]1997[/url] and 4876 in [url=http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?team=TOT&lg=ML&year=2008]2008[/url] (I don't know if yesterday's games are included). 2008's total is down a bit from the peak that lasted from 1999-2001, but the total is not that far off from 96, 98, 02, 05, and 07, which all had somewhere between 4850-5100 dingers. The decline in home runs has been exaggerated quite a bit- we haven't returned to the eighties, when only 3500 were being hit each year, or the 70's when 2500 was the norm. The decline in home runs is so small it might simply be a statistical fluke, but baseball announcers and pundits keep saying we're in the post-steroids era. I think it's silly to say that, and perhaps a bit self-congratulatory from the same people that were very happy to stick their heads in the sand as steroid use exploded.
|