Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Citigroup, Mets off to a bad start

metirish
Jan 20 2009 11:30 AM

Anthony Rieber has a doozy of a column today over at Newsday.


] I'm filling in this week for Newsday's Mets beat writer, David Lennon, so my head is full of Mets thoughts. Here they are, in no particular order: -- What's the deal with that horrible Citi Field inaugural season patch? Tyler Kepner detailed in the New York Times last week about how the Mets allowed Citigroup to design the patch that will be worn on their uniform sleeves in 2009, and man is it boring. The words "Inaugural Season" are on the top half of the logo in white on a blue square. Below is an orange square with the while-lettered "2009". ( Stephen Colbert even made fun of the patch on his TV show.) Mark my words: The Mets' relationship with Citigroup is going to taint the entire first season and ruin a lot of the good feelings around the team and ballpark. The Mets are underestimating how ticked off people are at banks, financial institutions, etc. They would have been better off trying to get out of the naming-rights contract and giving Citigroup back its $400 million (over the next 20 years). Oh, right, after what Bernie Madoff allegedly did to the Wilpons, they don't have the spare cash right now. -- Which pitcher are they going to sign, Oliver Perez or Ben Sheets? Or someone else? I've always been a big Perez fan and assume the Mets will eventually sign him if only because no one else seems to be interested. Plus, and this is a big plus, he's not afraid to face the Phillies, and has pitched some of his best games against their lefty-laden lineup. And the world champs got more lefty-laden with the signing of Raul Ibanez. Andy Pettitte would be a good fallback position, but he's not particularly effective against lefthanders, and neither he nor the Mets have so far shown any inclination toward teaming up. Sheets just gets hurt too much -- when the Brewers needed him down the stretch last season, he couldn't answer the bell. Pass. Get it done with Ollie. -- How in the world could they give Duaner Sanchez a 77 percent raise? I know, it's the arbitration system, but seriously . . . isn't it time to cut bait with him, too, like they did with Heilman and Schoeneweis? They've gotten some of the stink out of that bullpen, but not all of it. Remember, when Billy Wagner went down last season, Sanchez ran under a desk and hid rather than assume the closer role. -- Is it really the best idea to return the same team other than K-Rod and Putz? I mean, if they sign Perez, it's the same top four in the rotation (Santana, Maine, Pelfrey, Perez). If they don't sign or trade for a bat, it's the same lineup as late last season. In fact, it's the same lineup as Opening Day 2008, other than Tatis or Murphy in leftfield. At least the Mets aren't waiting for Moises Alou to return from his 7,893rd DL stint. -- Thank goodness I never have to write another word about Alou's a) latest injury b) latest rehab stint in the minors c) latest return to the lineup d) next latest injury. Great guy, and a Hall of Fame talent if he could have stayed healthy, and a great hitter when he played, but even he admitted the whole thing was ridiculous. It was sad to listen to him talk about how embarrassed he was about becoming a punchline. -- Pedro Martinez is still out there as a free agent and the Mets shouldn't go anywhere near him. Petey is the single most interesting person I've met in my six years of covering baseball for Newsday. We had some chats after his father died last season, and all you had to do was listen to him and look into his eyes to see how much that affected him. His pride is enormous, but his mind and body just did not allow him to compete in 2008. To me, there's only one team that should sign him -- the Marlins. Give him a Clemens deal: Let him live in his house in Miami and pitch on his own schedule. The warm weather will be good for him, the Marlins will get some fans to show up when he pitches, and he will teach their young pitchers more about what it takes to be great than any pitching coach ever could. He's too much of a diva to be a fifth or sixth starter on the Mets and they should resist the urge to bring him back for sentimental reasons. -- And finally . . . Manny Ramirez. Should the Mets sign Manny? Of course they should. He's exactly what they need to complete their team. Will they? No, so I'm not going to waste my breath screaming about how they need to. I'll leave that to Wally Matthews. (But the Mets really do need to sign Manny if they want to win the World Series in 2009.)

Centerfield
Jan 20 2009 11:36 AM

Dear David Lennon:

Next time you take a week off, please let us know. There are several writers on this board that could do a better job filling in than the moron currently in place.

CF

TransMonk
Jan 20 2009 12:07 PM

hehehe...he said "taint"...hehehe

Edgy DC
Jan 20 2009 12:26 PM

]-- Thank goodness I never have to write another word about Alou's a) latest injury b) latest rehab stint in the minors c) latest return to the lineup d) next latest injury. Great guy, and a Hall of Fame talent if he could have stayed healthy, and a great hitter when he played, but even he admitted the whole thing was ridiculous. It was sad to listen to him talk about how embarrassed he was about becoming a punchline.


Well, technically, you don't have to write anything about anyone. But it comes across pretty falsely when he's long gone and you still pick him as a random topic. Must make for better copy than you let on.

metsguyinmichigan
Jan 20 2009 12:38 PM

Wow. That wasn't even half-assed. More like quarter-assed.

Edgy DC
Jan 20 2009 12:51 PM

Anthony Rieber's next column.

<blockquote><img src="http://www.newsday.com/media/thumbnails/columnist/2007-12/34310976-17084806.jpg" align="left">I've seen pictures of the dismantling of Shea Stadium and you wonder if the Mets will open Citifield with this big disaster next door. Leave it to the Mets!

Endy Chavez may be gone to the Mariners, but he'll always be remembered for making what, for my money, was the best catch in World Series history. I know, Willie Mays, but check the tape and see for yourself!

What ever happened to Mad Cow Disease. It seems everybody was talking about it but you haven't heard much lately. Mark my words, you haven't heard the last!

The Mets should really consider bringing back Wally Backman, or Ray Knight. Ask me what's missing and I say that old 1980s fire!

Speaking of fire, has anybody caught up with Willie Randolph lately. Sheesh!

You've been hearing a log about this Carlos Gomez kid. I say bring him up! Let's see what he's made of! You never know if someboody is ready to play in New York until they do!

Say what you want, but nothing gets you going in the morning like hot coffee!

Bye for now!</blockquote>

Fman99
Jan 20 2009 12:54 PM

"...my head is full of Mets thoughts. Here they are, in no particular order."

Lazy and idiotic.

Swing and a miss.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 20 2009 01:04 PM
Re: Citigroup, Mets off to a bad start

="Anthony Rieber"] I'm filling in this week for Newsday's Mets beat writer, David Lennon, so my head is full of Mets thoughts. Here they are, in no particular order: ...
]Mark my words: The Mets' relationship with Citigroup is going to taint the entire first season and ruin a lot of the good feelings around the team and ballpark. The Mets are underestimating how ticked off people are at banks, financial institutions, etc. They would have been better off trying to get out of the naming-rights contract and giving Citigroup back its $400 million (over the next 20 years). Oh, right, after what Bernie Madoff allegedly did to the Wilpons, they don't have the spare cash right now.
Well, leaving out the part about them being better off without the $$, the Mets are tone-deaf as to what's in the hearts of their fans. I totally agree with the point that they seem to willingly overlook any and all messages that that badly disguised advertising panel on their shirts sends.
]-- Which pitcher are they going to sign, Oliver Perez or Ben Sheets? Or someone else? I've always been a big Perez fan and assume the Mets will eventually sign him if only because no one else seems to be interested. Plus, and this is a big plus, he's not afraid to face the Phillies, and has pitched some of his best games against their lefty-laden lineup. And the world champs got more lefty-laden with the signing of Raul Ibanez. Andy Pettitte would be a good fallback position, but he's not particularly effective against lefthanders, and neither he nor the Mets have so far shown any inclination toward teaming up. Sheets just gets hurt too much -- when the Brewers needed him down the stretch last season, he couldn't answer the bell. Pass. Get it done with Ollie.
I also like Ollie and Sheets does get hurt often. Where's the controversy in that? He needn't bend in an argument about how many lefties the Phillies have to justify that, but I don't strongly disagree with his point either.
]-- How in the world could they give Duaner Sanchez a 77 percent raise? I know, it's the arbitration system, but seriously . . . isn't it time to cut bait with him, too, like they did with Heilman and Schoeneweis? They've gotten some of the stink out of that bullpen, but not all of it. Remember, when Billy Wagner went down last season, Sanchez ran under a desk and hid rather than assume the closer role.
Again, over the top but a worthy point -- Sanchez was nowhere to be found last year in the Mets' hour of need and I'm very surprised they brought him back given his performance, the half-assed rehab, his rapid decline in velocity and so on down the line. It's all upside for 09 I suppose, but I don't know why anyone would expect much of him next year.
]-- Is it really the best idea to return the same team other than K-Rod and Putz? I mean, if they sign Perez, it's the same top four in the rotation (Santana, Maine, Pelfrey, Perez). If they don't sign or trade for a bat, it's the same lineup as late last season. In fact, it's the same lineup as Opening Day 2008, other than Tatis or Murphy in leftfield. At least the Mets aren't waiting for Moises Alou to return from his 7,893rd DL stint.
This is kind of a silly point. A team shouldn't make a change just for change sake. However -- we've all seen this O struggle even with 4 guys having fantastic years, and you just can't count on all 4 to do it that well again. The Mets under Omar have a habit of fixing what went wrong last year, not addressing what might happen this year.
]-- Thank goodness I never have to write another word about Alou's a) latest injury b) latest rehab stint in the minors c) latest return to the lineup d) next latest injury. Great guy, and a Hall of Fame talent if he could have stayed healthy, and a great hitter when he played, but even he admitted the whole thing was ridiculous. It was sad to listen to him talk about how embarrassed he was about becoming a punchline.
It was embarrasing -- to everyone.
]-- Pedro Martinez is still out there as a free agent and the Mets shouldn't go anywhere near him. Petey is the single most interesting person I've met in my six years of covering baseball for Newsday. We had some chats after his father died last season, and all you had to do was listen to him and look into his eyes to see how much that affected him. His pride is enormous, but his mind and body just did not allow him to compete in 2008. To me, there's only one team that should sign him -- the Marlins. Give him a Clemens deal: Let him live in his house in Miami and pitch on his own schedule. The warm weather will be good for him, the Marlins will get some fans to show up when he pitches, and he will teach their young pitchers more about what it takes to be great than any pitching coach ever could. He's too much of a diva to be a fifth or sixth starter on the Mets and they should resist the urge to bring him back for sentimental reasons.
I totally agree with the larger point that the Mets don't owe Pedro anything, and that they are better off staying away from guys who require special handling and treatment if they can avoid it.
]-- And finally . . . Manny Ramirez. Should the Mets sign Manny? Of course they should. He's exactly what they need to complete their team. Will they? No, so I'm not going to waste my breath screaming about how they need to. I'll leave that to Wally Matthews. (But the Mets really do need to sign Manny if they want to win the World Series in 2009.)


Well, this point might be in conflict with the last. But you gotta know "not getting Manny" will be a major arrow in the writer's quiivers if and when something goes wrong in 09.

Edgy DC
Jan 22 2009 01:24 PM

Rieber tosses out the column I wrote for him and gets the white hot scoop that he can't find anything happening, but David Wright wouldn't mind if anything did, or didn't, happen.

<blockquote>There's no indication the Mets are pursuing free agent Manny Ramirez, but David Wright can't help but imagine what the team's lineup would look like with the slugger.

"I'd be on board with Manny 100 percent, assuming he put the team first," Wright said Thursday during an appearance at the Schneider Children's Hospital in New Hyde Park.

Wright said he doesn't know Ramirez well, but thinks the Mets have a good enough clubhouse mix to allow them to absorb the player who many in baseball think quit on the Red Sox last season to force a trade to the Dodgers.

"I think we have a good enough clubhouse -- I don't even know what he's like in the clubhouse -- I would hope we have a good enough clubhouse," Wright said.

Asked if he thought the Mets needed another bat, Wright said: "If we can do what we did last year, no . . . I think we'll be just fine. But a bat never hurts."</blockquote>

G-Fafif
Jan 22 2009 01:34 PM

The All-Star third baseman added puppies, daffodils and Stan Musial are all right by him, too.

metirish
Jan 22 2009 01:36 PM

I find the last line a bit confusing .Wright has become a must read quote over the years .....OK he hasn't ....

smg58
Jan 22 2009 03:10 PM

A career in politics beckons for Wright once his playing days are done...

dgwphotography
Jan 22 2009 05:02 PM

"These are your cliches. They are your friends"

metirish
Jan 22 2009 07:34 PM

Again from Reiber


] Mets' owner on Manny Ramirez: We’re not interested Mets fans -- and a Mets third baseman -- who are dreaming of seeing Manny Ramirez's big bat in the team's lineup this season got a cold splash of reality yesterday from Jeff Wilpon. Wilpon, the team's chief operating officer, told Bloomberg News that general manager Omar Minaya is not interested in signing the free-agent slugger. "I know the perception out there again is that ownership said no," Wilpon said. "I don't have the opportunity to say no because Omar hasn't brought it to me as an option. Omar and the baseball staff aren't interested." Minaya, who did not return calls seeking comment, has not indicated any interest in Ramirez all offseason. That hasn't stopped Mets fans from calling on the team to steal Ramirez away from the Dodgers, who appear to be his only option at the moment with spring training less than a month away

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 27 2009 09:45 AM

]Citi Reverses Course on $50 Million Jet Facing outrage from some lawmakers, Citigroup now says that it will not take delivery of a brand-new $50 million corporate jet. “We have no intent to take delivery of any new aircraft,” a Citigroup spokesperson told Dealbook on Tuesday morning. The bank, which has received hundreds of billions of dollars in government funds and guarantees, came under fire Monday after it emerged that the company was set to take delivery of a luxury corporate jet (built by the French, as it happens). John Hall, a Democratic congressman from New York, said he would be introducing legislation in the House on Tuesday morning calling on Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to use his power either to stop the recently rescued Citi from purchasing the corporate jet or to reimburse taxpayers to the tune of $50 million. “This is an absolute outrage, and Congress is not going to allow Citigroup to get away with this,” Mr. Hall said in a statement to Dealbook. “I voted for the financial rescue funds only under the premise that the money was desperately needed to free up the credit market.” “A $50 million private jet funded by taxpayers is not what I voted for,” he added. The jet deal also drew criticism from Michigan Senator Carl Levin. He said in a statement, “The notion of Citigroup spending $50 million on a new corporate jet, even as it is depending on billions of taxpayer dollars to survive, does not fly. To permit Citigroup to purchase a plush plane — foreign-built no less — while domestic auto companies are being required to sell off their jets is a ridiculous double standard.” Citigroup originally said that it could not comment on its aircraft, citing security reasons. It later said that it did order the new aircraft back in 2005 as part of a plan to reduce the number of aircraft it owns and to use more fuel-efficient jets to lower ongoing operating costs. Citi said that refusing delivery now would result in “millions of dollars in penalties” and that it was “exploring all of its options” for its jet fleet, including a potential sale or lease of the new aircraft. In the end, the heat from Washington appeared to be too much for Citi to handle, and it has decided to eat the penalties. But the damage may already be done. The saga over the Citi plane could be used as a rallying cry for those in Congress that want the government to have more direct control over the operations of financial institutions, like Citi, which have received billions of dollars in government aid.

soupcan
Jan 27 2009 09:49 AM

We should start a contest on what date CitiField gets a name change/new sponsor.

Benjamin Grimm
Jan 27 2009 09:53 AM

I really hope that there's a period in which it's called "Mets Field" or something like that, so that we can always call it by that name.

soupcan
Jan 27 2009 10:55 AM

I'd be perfectly happy with 'City Field'.

My favorite sponsored name was put forth by Edgy when Banco Popular was the Mets main benefactor - 'Estadio Popular'.

G-Fafif
Jan 27 2009 10:58 AM

I'd settle for Unembarrassing Name Stadium.

soupcan
Jan 27 2009 11:00 AM

="G-Fafif":15a2g3i6]I'd settle for Unembarrassing Name Stadium.[/quote:15a2g3i6]

Yeah, that'd be ok with me too.

Rockin' Doc
Jan 27 2009 11:11 AM

I like the sound of "Home of the World Champion New York Mets". A little long, but it's damn catchy.

G-Fafif
Jan 27 2009 11:14 AM

Home of The Three-Time World Champions (April 2010)
Home of The Four-Time World Champions (April 2011)
And so on...

Now that would be stadium name change we could believe in.