Master Index of Archived Threads
Unraveling Like a Greek Tragedy
Edgy DC Feb 19 2009 02:01 PM |
Stan Kasten, not happy.
|
Farmer Ted Feb 19 2009 03:15 PM |
Where's Danny Almonte when you need a good quote?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Feb 19 2009 04:47 PM |
Analogy time!
|
Number 6 Feb 19 2009 08:43 PM |
OK.
|
Edgy DC Feb 19 2009 09:09 PM |
But recover it from whom? The money has brobably been split a dozen ways, spent nine times over, and under the protection of a foreign jurisdiction.
|
Number 6 Feb 20 2009 12:52 AM |
Yeah, those are good points. With all that in mind, it's easy to see why it could be more trouble than it's worth to try and source back the money and collect. If that's not an option, though, I would think that a revelation like this should at least affect any further payment doled out under the existing contract.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 20 2009 05:32 AM |
|
Not long after the success of El Duque, the Yanx decided that inking Cuban emigrees was a cost-efficient talent pipeline and signed a bunch of them. When one turned out to be not nearly the player they thought they were getting they suddenly "discovered" he was older than he claimed and took legal action as a way to get out of the multi-year deal they had given him. Kind of a slimy maneuver really after publicly ignoring the gap in Duque's real and supposed ages -- "We're shocked, SHOCKED to discover that there's age fudging going on around here"! -- but, of course, he started winning games for them almost immediately. IIRC they settled for something in between the full amount and whatever they had already paid they guy prior to getting buyer's remorse. Would be a bit tougher to recoup a one-time bonus check already issued (if that's what it is in this case) and, as I'm sure most lawyers would tell you, it's not very worthwhile to sue a poor person.
|
Edgy DC Feb 20 2009 05:33 AM |
Because at this point in the contract, the player has all the cards. The bonus money has been spent, and he's currently got a lot more to give them --- a still young skilled player of some worth --- then they're giving him, which is a crappy minor league salary to puny to mention.
|
Number 6 Feb 20 2009 03:33 PM |
Maybe it's foolish, but if I represented the Nats I'd be inclined to release him anyway and refuse to pay the remainder of the contract, even if it is puny. The huge age difference transforms the player from "good prospect" to "fringe prospect," and there are enough of the latter lying around that cutting bait to make a point would be tempting.
|
Edgy DC Feb 20 2009 05:52 PM |
I'm certain they don't intend to leave things the way they are. What I'm less certain about is what the next obvious course of action. Certainly washing their hands of him is a viable action, but they may do well to sleep on it and consider all their options.
|
Edgy DC Mar 02 2009 10:01 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Mar 04 2009 09:38 PM |
Kat O'Brien gives us something I'd like to get used to --- investigative sports journalism from <i>Newsday</i> --- as she looks at exploitative Dominican agents, or <i>buscones</i>.
|
Number 6 Mar 04 2009 06:55 PM |
[url=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/melissa_segura/03/02/dr.investigators/index.html:1whqtou0]Here's another article[/url:1whqtou0], this time by Melissa Segura of SI. She talks some about how prevalent bribing can be, as the money goes quite far (paying off an entire town to frustrate investigators, for example). She also talks a little bit about how the investigations into possible fraud are conducted, which, unsurprisingly, could be classified as "poorly."
|