Master Index of Archived Threads
Irony City
Edgy DC Sep 18 2005 03:19 PM |
Tom Seaver never had knee problems despite dragging that knee on pitches his whole career. He never had shoulder problems despite throwing about a million fastballs.
|
Elster88 Sep 18 2005 03:22 PM |
I would've gone with Ironyville.
|
Zvon Sep 18 2005 04:08 PM Re: Irony City |
|
Seaver will be the first to tell you that his legs were what gave him his long lived arm. Nancy should work those legs more.
|
Frayed Knot Sep 18 2005 10:26 PM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Sep 18 2005 11:55 PM |
I think someone should have an Irony City beer in honor of this thread.
|
metirish Sep 18 2005 10:31 PM |
That's a weird bit of info form TBS/Turner South, I'm trying to think of a pitcher in the game today that has the motion of Seaver, does any starting pitcher throw like he did?
|
Edgy DC Sep 18 2005 10:35 PM |
Certainly Clemens would credit his leg drive, and keeping his legs strong.
|
Spacemans Bong Sep 18 2005 10:49 PM |
|
Everybody. The Seaver drop and drive motion has been THE taught pitching motion of the last 30 years.
|
metirish Sep 18 2005 10:54 PM |
Oh I don't know about that spaceman, am I wrong in thinking that pitchers today don't drop and drive with the legs like Seaver did, I mean they don't scrape the knees like he did.
|
metirish Sep 18 2005 10:59 PM |
Classic Seaver here in this pic....
|
mlbaseballtalk Sep 18 2005 11:30 PM Re: Irony City |
|
??? I could have sworn the knee was giving him some trouble 86-87 which led to his being DLed in the postseason and eventual retirement Granted thats an "end of the line" rather than a chronic "throughout career" thing but that is a thing Steve
|
Edgy DC Sep 18 2005 11:33 PM |
Well, the Turner people as well as I are reporting it in the light most suitable for effect, and I'm sure both joints bothered him during his career.
|
G-Fafif Sep 18 2005 11:55 PM |
|
I heard Tom say in an interview, within the last year or so, that it was his back, combined with collusion, that kept him from getting offered a contract in the winter of '86-'87. I don't remember his back being an issue as a Red Sock but he was 42 and his health wasn't top of mind following October 27, 1986. I like that almost two decades after 311 wins, 20 seasons and, as pointed out, creating a model in motion for countless power pitchers everywhere, that he still carried a twinge of regret about not being able to continue pitching
|
ScarletKnight41 Sep 19 2005 07:24 AM |
41, actually. Tom turned 42 a few weeks after the 1986 season ended.
|
G-Fafif Sep 19 2005 03:39 PM |
|
Thinkin' 'bout his free agent period, most of which came after 11/17/44.
|
old original jb Sep 19 2005 11:57 PM Isn't it Ironic. Not. |
This thread is like the Alanis Morissette song in which she depicts a number of circumstances which, while illustrating that life can give us exactly what we don't need at any given moment, contain little or no irony.
|
Edgy DC Sep 20 2005 12:04 AM |
I disagree. I used the term irony, and it is in fact ironic.
|
ScarletKnight41 Sep 20 2005 07:17 AM |
|
I know you meant to say after 11/17/86. But you can't hang a fat one over the plate like that and not expect me to take a swing ;)
|