Master Index of Archived Threads
1969 Mets VS. 2009 Mets
MFS62 Oct 29 2009 12:40 PM |
whatif?
|
Edgy DC Oct 29 2009 12:47 PM Re: 1969 Mets VS. 2009 Mets |
Cool, no injuries during the game.
|
PiggiesTomatoes Oct 29 2009 01:07 PM Re: 1969 Mets VS. 2009 Mets |
Couldn't we at least have had no injuries in Fantasyland?
|
Ashie62 Oct 29 2009 01:22 PM Re: 1969 Mets VS. 2009 Mets |
Seaver 4
|
HahnSolo Oct 29 2009 02:16 PM Re: 1969 Mets VS. 2009 Mets |
Shouldn't Clendenon have gotten the start at first against Santana, or am I getting my platoon-mates confused.
|
Edgy DC Oct 29 2009 02:25 PM Re: 1969 Mets VS. 2009 Mets |
And Delgado should have gotten the start against Seaver, but in reducing a team's season to a day, they denied Clendenon (mid-season addition) and Delgado (season-ending injury, don't you know) the start they would have gotten in the real world.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Oct 30 2009 10:28 AM Re: 1969 Mets VS. 2009 Mets |
[quote="Edgy DC":3giodn3g]And Delgado should have gotten the start against Seaver, but in reducing a team's season to a day, they denied Clendenon (mid-season addition) and Delgado (season-ending injury, don't you know) the start they would have gotten in the real world.[/quote:3giodn3g]
|
Edgy DC Oct 30 2009 10:50 AM Re: 1969 Mets VS. 2009 Mets |
Same deal, I imagine.
|
bmfc1 Oct 31 2009 10:33 AM Re: 1969 Mets VS. 2009 Mets |
As a promotion for the upcoming book on the '69 Mets, MLB Network is showing Games 2-5 of the '69 WS! Game 2: Saturday, 11:30 AM; Game 3: Saturday, 2:30 PM; Game 4: Sunday, 10:30 AM, Sunday, 8 PM; Game 5: Sunday, 12:30 PM, Monday, 3 PM.
|