Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Jeromies of Memory Reed

Edgy DC
Dec 12 2009 10:05 PM

Reed really wasn't no Endy Chavez, was he? I mean, when Endy was a fourth outfielder, but when pressed into the lineup he certainly didn't get worse, did he? As soon as outfielders started going down this year --- or, in Murphy's case, being overwhelmed by the job --- it became readily apparent that Reed wasn't fooling anybody.

Even as merely a defensive replacement, he was no great shakes. He was Darren Bragg, is what he was.

Had him here the whole year and he came up empty on PotG awards. He leaves the Mets (presumably) still looking for his first homer.

(I guess technically he's merely a free agent, and hasn't caught on with anybody else, so memories can wait. But who can sit still with a thread title like that?)

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 13 2009 05:31 AM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

I strongly got the sense that he was a part that Jerry Manuel really didn't want to use, for whatever reason.

I can't imagine they'll bring him back.

Swan Swan H
Dec 13 2009 07:28 AM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

[quote="Benjamin Grimm"]I strongly got the sense that he was a part that Jerry Manuel really didn't want to use, for whatever reason.

I can't imagine they'll bring him back.



He was bypassed in the pecking order by Cory Sullivan, which speaks for itself.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 13 2009 07:34 AM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

Bad throwing error while being Delgado's first replacement, then really fell on the depth chart. I think maybe he told Jerry he could play and Jerry never much trusted him after that.

metirish
Dec 13 2009 08:26 AM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

Look up stuck to the bench and you'll see his mug , the one time he did get a chance at playing time he didn't impress. Did he play three games in a row or something like that and that seemed to be his shot.There were plenty of games where you might have expected to see him play but he wouldn't be, weird.


Seemed like a nice enough guy though.

Centerfield
Dec 13 2009 09:00 AM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

Sucked.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 13 2009 10:22 AM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

It says something about your abiities, I think, to not be able to get off the bench in a year when Angel Berroa and Wilson Valdez see significant cameos, and to nail the worst OPS+ on the team (100+ PAs) in a year when Alex Cora and Omir Santos are leading starters.

Also, not even an INTERESTING brand of suckage.

Edgy DC
Dec 13 2009 02:05 PM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

He got into 126 games, so he wasn't quite stuck to the bench, but he only got 24 starts --- fewer, indeed, than Sullivan --- so he certainly wasn't taken seriously at any point.

That Manuel tried him before Murphy at first base (using some variation of the logic that if Murphy can't catch the ball in left, how is he going to catch it at first) is on Manuel, I think. That Murphy was actually mostly pretty good at first was a pleasant enough surprise, but it shouldn't have surprised Manuel or anybody (a) that Murphy was at least fair to average, and (b) that Reed would be cluess at first and wasting his one useful asset of being a ballhawk in the outfield.

bmfc1
Dec 13 2009 02:31 PM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

http://www.ultimatemets.com/gamedetail.php?gameno=7560

First week of the season, Reed with a PH single in the top of the 9th to tie the game (which the Mets lost in the bottom of the 9th).

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 13 2009 03:52 PM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

[quote="Edgy DC":2xzyf91n]He got into 126 games, so he wasn't quite stuck to the bench, but he only got 24 starts --- fewer, indeed, than Sullivan --- so he certainly wasn't taken seriously at any point.[/quote:2xzyf91n]

Also, 126 games, 177 PA-- it got to the point where it seemed like Manuel still kinda liked the glove, but seemed to be actively trying to keep him away from the plate. Considering how he did when he got there, I can't blame Jerry.

G-Fafif
Dec 13 2009 04:02 PM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Dec 13 2009 04:43 PM

Every year there's at least one guy I keep forgetting is on the team. This year there were several. But Jeremy Reed led the pack in this obscure regard in 2009. No offense...which seems appropriate where Jeremy is concerned.

Here's to one-year wonders from the Noughties/'00s -- Mets who spent a FULL year on Mets' active roster, no more, no less, no call-ups, no send-downs, no DL

2000: Mike Hampton
(Derek Bell removed from postseason roster after NLDS for injury; Kurt Abbott had DL stint)

2001: Desi Relaford, Kevin Appier

2002: John Valentin, Mark Guthrie

2003: Tony Clark, Jay Bell

2004: None

2005: None
(Doug Mientkiewicz and Miguel Cairo each had DL stints)

2006: Chad Bradford, Darren Oliver

2007: Aaron Sele
(David Newhan sent to minors)

2008: None

2009: Jeremy Reed
(Tim Redding, Gary Sheffield and J.J. Putz each had DL stints)

Edgy DC
Dec 13 2009 04:17 PM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

Good show.

I nominate Ricky Bottalico for 2004, though I can't say if he was on the 25-man roster the whole time.

But 2003 is tricky. I remember Tony Clark well enough. Good thumpers off the bench are rare enough in Metland. And I guess you can say Jay Bell made himself memorable by putting up such a profoundly memorably unmemorable season, but how about Graeme Lloyd?

G-Fafif
Dec 13 2009 04:43 PM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

[quote="Edgy DC":1yrv13tf]Good show.

I nominate Ricky Bottalico for 2004, though I can't say if he was on the 25-man roster the whole time.

But 2003 is tricky. I remember Tony Clark well enough. Good thumpers off the bench are rare enough in Metland. And I guess you can say Jay Bell made himself memorable by putting up such a profoundly memorably unmemorable season, but how about Graeme Lloyd?[/quote:1yrv13tf]

Jay Bell an oversight on my part. He belongs with Clark for 2003. Bottalico came up in May '04; Lloyd went in the veteran purge during the summer of '03.

Frayed Knot
Dec 13 2009 06:06 PM
Re: Jeromies of Memory Reed

Reed had a pretty good PH average IIRC -- problem was they were all singles which pretty much limited his usefulness to late-inning OF defense and when you had to PH to lead off an inning.