Master Index of Archived Threads
Bay Reactions
Edgy DC Dec 31 2009 08:54 AM |
I don't want to do a likey/no likely poll until the ink is dry and stuff, but the WSJ just threw out a goofy blog piece entitled "Mets’ Signing of Bay Evokes Bronx Cheers in Queens."
|
MFS62 Dec 31 2009 09:19 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
One of the guys on WFAN yesterday, taling about Gammons' "Beiruit" quote (Evan Roberts?) said that Boston sportswriters have a history of trashing any Red Sock who goes to New York. He said they did it with Boggs, Damon and now Bay (he said "among others', but probably those were the only ones he could think of). The writers say the players are "over the hill", "not that good", etc.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Dec 31 2009 09:34 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
I didn't read Sherman's column, or any of the others but Greg's, but have come around to believe that Sherman is OK most days. The Post in fact kills the Snooze on columnists, though I never read the Post and buy the Snooze everyday.
|
batmagadanleadoff Dec 31 2009 10:47 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
|
The New York Times offers up another angle on the (Jason) Baywatch:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/31/sport ... ckets.html
|
Fman99 Dec 31 2009 01:24 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
|
[quote="batmagadanleadoff"]The New York Times offers up another angle on the (Jason) Baywatch:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/31/sport ... ckets.html |
dgwphotography Dec 31 2009 02:39 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
I'm going to say this up front - I like the move. I think Bay plugs a hole - he's not the final piece, but he's a much needed piece.
|
Frayed Knot Dec 31 2009 02:58 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
Of course the Mets didn't 'announce' anything. I don't think we've heard a word about this yet from them, especially seeing as how this isn't official until next week (if then).
|
dgwphotography Dec 31 2009 03:11 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
That's why I put announcement in quotes. I do think this was leaked to Francesa for that reason.
|
Frayed Knot Dec 31 2009 03:45 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
Probably was - although people basing their ticket buying decision on one signing pretty much deserve to be duped.
|
Kong76 Dec 31 2009 04:10 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
I think stuff like this has little to do with tickets sales this
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Dec 31 2009 04:16 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
What's that? A MSMish blog writer who LIKED the Bay deal for the Mets?
|
G-Fafif Dec 31 2009 04:20 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
[quote="Edgy DC"][*]Greg Prince! There's a voice of the fan that I can trust. Problem is that the Journal takes a Greg quote out of context --- the context being a blog post suggesting that folks really outghta be pretty darn happy with the reported signing of Jason Bay.[/list] |
batmagadanleadoff Jan 01 2010 09:53 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
|
Here's Jeff "The Bad Guys Won!" Pearlman's Bay Reaction:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/w ... jason.bay/
|
Ashie62 Jan 01 2010 10:36 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
I'm just going to hope he is wrong...I do agree that the dimensions of Citifield were poorly conceived.
|
Kong76 Jan 01 2010 10:36 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
Hah, a bad fit ... very original!
|
Frayed Knot Jan 01 2010 10:51 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
Saying that 'X' will suck because 'Y' did is pretty shallow thinking. Football fans/commentators are big on that sort of thing, deciding that some running back draft pick will fail because one from the same college failed to match the hype 20 years earlier like there's some sort of cosmic connection.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jan 01 2010 11:05 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
|
Dave Magadan says Bay will fit in perfectly with Mets
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jan 01 2010 11:25 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
Jeff Pearlman's thought process here seems to run like so:
|
Edgy DC Jan 01 2010 11:49 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
That last sentence of LWFS's is well put.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jan 01 2010 12:51 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
[quote="LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr"]Jeff Pearlman's thought process here seems to run like so: |
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jan 01 2010 01:21 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
[quote="batmagadanleadoff"][quote="LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr"]Jeff Pearlman's thought process here seems to run like so: |
Edgy DC Jan 01 2010 01:34 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
And seriously, would you, I, Pearlman, joelmon, Francessa, Heyman, or anybody seriously buy into it if the Mets explicitly decided to forgo making anything but cosmetic roster changes this offseason and instead focused on moving the outfield walls in --- and somehow tried to pass that off as the better way to close the competitive gap?
|
Ashie62 Jan 01 2010 03:46 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
[quote="Edgy DC":2j6k5jyo]That last sentence of LWFS's is well put.
|
Edgy DC Jan 25 2010 07:39 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
So, in a Met-like soap opera, the Jason Bay situation just won't die in Boston, as more information leaks each day about the Sox negotiations being done from a point of view of health worries.
|
metirish Jan 25 2010 07:44 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
But didn't Bay get two more opinions after the Sox Doctor and said he in fact did not need surgery?
|
Edgy DC Jan 25 2010 07:48 AM Re: Bay Reactions |
That's there. But the Sox still continued to hold the fourth year of his contract as health contingent.
|
Frayed Knot Jan 25 2010 12:07 PM Re: Bay Reactions |
btw, at the moment it's pick #56 in next year's draft that we gave up to sign Bay.
|