Master Index of Archived Threads
New Uni Numbers
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 09 2010 11:22 AM |
As reported on mbtn.net!
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 09 2010 11:30 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
I like 43 for Fogg and 2 for Catalonotto. I'd prefer to see Chris Carter in a 10 or a 30, perhaps.
|
metsguyinmichigan Feb 09 2010 11:31 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
The likes of R.A. Dickey in Jerry Koosman's number. Sigh.
|
Swan Swan H Feb 09 2010 11:39 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
If Frankie C. sticks he'll be the first player wearing 2 in fifteen years, according to the invaluable mbtn.com.
|
Edgy DC Feb 09 2010 11:49 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
I look forward to Bobby Valentine ripping it off his back.*
|
Ceetar Feb 09 2010 11:50 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
No guarentee the spring number will be the 40-man roster number.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 09 2010 11:53 AM Re: New Uni Numbers Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Feb 09 2010 01:14 PM |
Here's the whole gang, numerically (adding Razor Shines):
|
Edgy DC Feb 09 2010 11:55 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Chris Carter is my 8.
|
G-Fafif Feb 09 2010 11:59 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
Until they put somebody remotely Koozian in 36, I think of it as Wayne Twitchell's number. It's the mark of the journeyman for more than 30 years now. Best 36 since Kooz? Ed Lynch, probably, and Ed Lynch often sucked. After Lynch? Greg McMichael, and he often sucked more. Third place? As Alec Baldwin made clear in Glengarry Glen Ross, there is no third place. There's not even a set of steak knives.
|
metirish Feb 09 2010 11:59 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
The likes of Francisco Rodriguez(75) and Kirk Nieuwenhuis(91) must know they have no chance of making the club going north.
|
Swan Swan H Feb 09 2010 12:02 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Hey, Elmer, you wore 64 last year. No asterisk for you.
|
G-Fafif Feb 09 2010 12:03 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
A good day for BoC nominations!
|
Frayed Knot Feb 09 2010 12:35 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
In honor of the band 10CC of course.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 09 2010 12:36 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
Asterisks are for NRIs, which poor Elmer is again.
|
Ceetar Feb 09 2010 12:38 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
||
On that note, Andy Green wore 10 last spring as well.
|
Swan Swan H Feb 09 2010 12:39 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Gawtcha. Poor Elmer indeed, the asterisk stuck to him like glue.
|
bmfc1 Feb 09 2010 02:14 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Farewell to #35, DFA'd today to make room for waiver pick-up (because Minnesota made room for Orlando Hudson who should be a Met), Jason Pridie, in the name of love.
|
Valadius Feb 09 2010 03:48 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
The question I'm asking is, why are they holding onto #24? Unofficial retirement for Mays and/or Rickey?
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 09 2010 03:56 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Willie.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 09 2010 04:07 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Mays should have no say in the matter. Where has he been since 1979?
|
TheOldMole Feb 09 2010 05:02 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Two catchers with numbers under 10.
|
seawolf17 Feb 09 2010 06:57 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
How about Jason Pridie? As good a scrub as any.
|
Edgy DC Feb 09 2010 08:34 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
Mays has a say because he's holding a promise voucher, which is still good for something if only team honor. You think the media wouldn't rip the team from coast to coast if he they went back on it whether Willie cared or not?
Under a ban of sorts, isn't he?
|
batmagadanleadoff Feb 09 2010 08:37 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
Me too.
|
G-Fafif Feb 09 2010 08:44 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
I prefer limbo to scrubness, but I'd really prefer 24 be treated royally.
|
Edgy DC Feb 16 2010 07:06 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
I guess this should be obvious, but why are the wide receiver numbers off limits to spring training invitees?
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 16 2010 07:17 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
Now that I know that Ike Davis looks like Steve Garvey, I think he'd look good in a number 6. (Unless Wally Backman claims it first...)
|
Edgy DC Feb 16 2010 07:32 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
In my mind, 6 + Firstbase = Mike Marshall, and that's not pleasant math.
|
metsguyinmichigan Feb 16 2010 07:43 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
I'm in the camp that says to keep 24 on the shelf, saluting one the best players ever for his days in New York both before and after San Francisco.
|
MFS62 Feb 16 2010 09:09 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
And not a pleasant memory for me. Mike was the subject of my very first (losing) entry in the CPF song parody contest. Later
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 18 2010 11:09 AM Re: New Uni Numbers Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Feb 18 2010 11:17 AM |
|
Jacobs to 35 (Egbert to 93); Takahshi to 47 (Marshall to 94).
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 18 2010 11:11 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
I'd really prefer to see the number 50 reserved for Hawaiians.
|
metirish Feb 18 2010 11:23 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
#35 bodes well for the Jake Monster(thanks Val).
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 18 2010 11:31 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
And that's exactly the attitude I'd want him to have.
|
Edgy DC Feb 18 2010 11:34 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
And Omar declared he's been invited to try. I wouldn't any other attitude from either of them.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 18 2010 01:33 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
Hey, here's something you don't see everyday -- a mainstream media report suggesting the Mets do something stupid and presumptuous just because the MFYs did.
|
metirish Feb 18 2010 01:38 PM Re: New Uni Numbers Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Feb 18 2010 01:39 PM |
Waldstein needed Ben Shpigel to help him on this ? , I want my five minutes back....I hope this is not what we can expect form Waldstein as the NYT new Mets beat writer.....I guess PSL can be really boring , but it's only started....yikes
|
Edgy DC Feb 18 2010 01:39 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
||
See? I told you he was smart.
Dear me, why?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Feb 18 2010 01:45 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
||
"Hey, Ben?" "Yeah, Dave?" "I'm doing this thing. What number's Girardi wearing, again?" "It's 28, you fucking moron." "Thanks. You're my fact-checkin' cuz."
|
G-Fafif Feb 18 2010 01:51 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
And of course David Waldstein knew Gus Bell's number right off the top of his head. He could have said, "...according to my incredible memory for Met historical detail, Gus Bell wore 3," but obviously his source is implied and we know he didn't have to look it up at any kind of specialized site or in any kind of detailed book that delves into such subject matter.
|
Edgy DC Feb 18 2010 02:11 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Mets by the Numbers: A High-End Media Guide for Lazy Reporters
|
Frayed Knot Feb 18 2010 02:53 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
"For Mets fans, talk of any numbers besides 21 and 60, as in days on the disabled list, is a worthwhile distraction. Other suggestions for Mets inspiration or some good karma?"
|
Edgy DC Feb 18 2010 02:58 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
The Paper of Record, ladies and gents.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 24 2010 06:32 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Adam Rubin reports Barajas wearing #21
|
TransMonk Feb 24 2010 07:12 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Take that Delgado!
|
Frayed Knot Feb 24 2010 07:26 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
#21 is frequently the unofficial Puerto Rican players' number - although Barajas is a Californian.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 24 2010 07:39 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
I was arguing on the web site for him to take No. 0: It would make him seem interesting to fans, and provide a motivational reminder of the low regard with which he was held by the organization (and all of MLB) prior to his signing.
|
metsguyinmichigan Feb 24 2010 08:02 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Seems to close the door on Carlos Delgado! (As if the new round of surgery didn't do that.)
|
metirish Feb 24 2010 08:05 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
Arguing on MBTN? , cos I've not seen anything like that there.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 24 2010 08:07 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Yah, actually just a last-minute rant in the comments section last nite.
|
Ashie62 Feb 24 2010 08:18 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Why isn't #7 retired?
|
metirish Feb 24 2010 08:20 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
You know though that the Mets would never do such a thing, looking forward to the new site.
|
Edgy DC Mar 30 2010 12:54 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Elmer Dessens has worn eight different numbers for his nine different teams.
|
metirish Mar 30 2010 12:56 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
And has been rubbish in all eight numbers .
|
Ashie62 Mar 30 2010 01:01 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
It's OK, there is quite abit of rubbish going round in PSL anyway. I'm sure he is just blending in.
|
Ceetar Mar 30 2010 01:02 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Coste was 3 and is gone. Cora gonna take it back for the season?
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 30 2010 01:10 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
No, Cora was a 13 guy who was cock-blocked by Wagner till now. I think 3 could go next to Ruben Tejada.
|
Ceetar Mar 30 2010 01:55 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
Ahh. Dunno about Tejada. He seems more of a 1 to me. Maybe Davis takes 3? I don't imagine he'll stick with 76 or whatever he wore this year. Or the vomit-inducing answer, hire Mattingly to be the manager and wear 3 for the championship he'll bring us.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 30 2010 01:57 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
I'm going to campaign for Davis to be issued No. 17.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 30 2010 02:01 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
I'd like to see him as a 6. But Wally Backman may get there first.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 30 2010 02:06 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
You can't have a first baseman wear No. 6. It's too Mike Marshally.
|
batmagadanleadoff Mar 30 2010 02:13 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
It's also Stan Musially. We could use one of those.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 02 2010 08:10 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Frank Catalanotto (spelled correctly!) would be the first player to wear No. 2 since this guy. Since I basically took 1995 off from baseball, researching all this was sorta new to me.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 02 2010 08:14 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
That's kinda surprising. I guess Bobby Valentine had the number tied up for a while, but he's been gone for seven years now.
|
A Boy Named Seo Apr 02 2010 08:34 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Jeez, the 90s are a complete haze to me. Terrell Lowry? Vaguely, vaguely remember the name and the Mets were my favorite thing in the whole fuckin world, too. Cool stuff, JCL.
|
soupcan Apr 02 2010 08:39 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
Garvey was a more than serviceable #6 1B. Does Ike have hairy Popeye forearms?
|
Valadius Apr 02 2010 08:48 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
||
Popeye doesn't have hairy forearms. That would be the Goons:
|
soupcan Apr 02 2010 08:59 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 05 2010 08:31 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Frank Catalanotto says FU to No. 2, suiting up in 27 instead.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2010 08:36 AM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Maybe they're saving that number for Bobby Valentine's return.
|
Gwreck Apr 05 2010 03:53 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Tejada was in 11.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 05 2010 04:17 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
32
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2010 05:39 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
That's because he has the same initials as Jon Matlack.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 22 2010 02:43 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Some guy just pointed out the Mets have now had 4 Mannys in team history and three of them (Hernandez, Aybar, Acosta) have worn No. 36. The other, Manny Alexander, wore 6.
|
Edgy DC Apr 22 2010 02:57 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
They're mostly Manny A's also. What did Manny Acta wear?
|
Frayed Knot Apr 22 2010 03:00 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
That's too manny!
|
Gwreck Apr 22 2010 03:18 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
|
3
|
Edgy DC Apr 22 2010 05:25 PM Re: New Uni Numbers |
Kinda creepy.
|