Master Index of Archived Threads
Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next?
Edgy DC May 04 2010 12:20 PM |
Yeah, he's biting hog right now. Wo where do we go from here, now that all of the children are growing up?
|
metirish May 04 2010 12:24 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Out of the young players you mentioned I think Evans would be best suited for the bench roll/ start a few games type deal.
|
Edgy DC May 04 2010 12:31 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Yeah, but are you ready to go ahead with Bay and Cora as your second and third centerfield options?
|
Benjamin Grimm May 04 2010 12:38 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
What about Francoeur as a backup centerfielder? My hunch is he'd do better in center than Bay.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 04 2010 12:39 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Straight swap-out for Sargelet? Then it has to be Pridie. Given that 4/5 of the starting rotation have fly-ballish tendencies, that CitiField has a somewhat spacious centerfield area, and that Bay and Francoeur aren't the rangiest rangers who ever ranged, it would be silly to skimp on defense in center, no? (He also works as a late-game-defense-sub in left and as a pretty nice pinch-runner, even if he doesn't give you much-- or any-- pop as a pinch-hitter.)
|
TransMonk May 04 2010 12:52 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
Seconded.
|
bmfc1 May 04 2010 12:52 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? Edited 1 time(s), most recently on May 04 2010 01:02 PM |
I concur w/LWFS. It's not like Pridie is a big prospect so we're not going to be upset if he sits on the bench. He's supposed to be a good fielder which obviously is important and he's hitting well (he couldn't hit worse than Matthews.)
|
metirish May 04 2010 12:54 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Bay could handle CF I think, he's been a better defensive player than I was led to believe.
|
A Boy Named Seo May 04 2010 12:57 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Pirdie's middle name is Orville so I now love him.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 04 2010 01:03 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
He's going to see that and post it on his blog.
|
metirish May 04 2010 01:03 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
Yes , by all means drive him away from the internet too......go get laid man....:)
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 04 2010 01:04 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
And I love him harder. Also... a defensive specialist whose name is phonetically superclose to a Queens-native comic-book hero known for superhuman agility? The nickname is hanging out over the plate like a Johan slider.
|
Gwreck May 04 2010 01:06 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
I'm convinced that Francouer could passably play center field as well.
|
sharpie May 04 2010 01:13 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Let both GMJ and Catalanotto go. Bring up both Pridie and Carter. Why the heck not?
|
attgig May 04 2010 01:15 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
I think Pagan is our everyday CF. If he does end up getting hurt, then we can call up Pirdie, and have an emergency type situation for that day with Frenchy in CF. Otherwise, Pagan plays every inning till Carlos comes back.... in early June.....hopefully...
|
smg58 May 04 2010 01:27 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Dukes would need time in AAA, I'd have to think. But unless there was a specific character issue behind his release from the Nationals, I'd be open to giving him a look.
|
attgig May 04 2010 01:30 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Pagan should be playing everyday, and so, the bat of the backup CF should be less of an issue. stick with the defense, and any hits that come out of them is just icing.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 04 2010 01:36 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
I'm not prepared to lose even one game because we had an inadequate center fielder out there. With Pagan's health record we can't afford to go without a replacement ready to go immediately. I suppose Frenchy could do in a pinch but I wouldn't want it like that. I guess gary is helped some by a dearth of available replacements who can hit.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 04 2010 01:50 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
They'd be bringing Pridie up to be the 5th OF/backup CF, really... and he'd presumably be doing 2 things (defense and baserunning) at an above-MLB-average level. To me, that trumps Sargelet's contributions-- namely, below-average CF defense and well-below-average hitting. (Plus, if you replace Frankie Cats with someone who brings a plus-bat, whatever you lose in terms of bench-hitting w/Pridie is leavened a bit.)
|
HahnSolo May 04 2010 02:29 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
When did Catalanotto die?
|
Frayed Knot May 04 2010 02:35 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
I said this in another thread in the last day or two -- but they got GMJ to have a "real" CF in case Pagan floated off into the ether somehow and until either Beltran returns or they find another 'real' one I don't think they're cutting ties with him and making do with some stop-gap corner guy as their ersatz CF.
|
attgig May 04 2010 03:12 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Last year of Fmart showed he needs more time in AAA, and we shouldn't mess with him (you'd think they would've learned their lesson and done the same with Meija - but that's a different topic).
|
Frayed Knot May 04 2010 03:30 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
My point about Martinez is that even if he's ready to hit at the ML level (and I don't think he is) there have always been questions about whether or not he could man CF on a regular basis. Most touts have long thought that he is destined for a corner slot.
|
TransMonk May 04 2010 03:38 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Among Adam Rubin's other doom and gloom today, we should all get used to GMJ.
|
seawolf17 May 04 2010 05:34 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Jerry -- on Mikey's show tonight -- said he's "trying to get Gary going." He's hoping to find a spot where he can slot him for Francoeur one night, then Bay the next, to see if he's going to be able to contribute anything.
|
Edgy DC May 04 2010 07:03 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
I've got no problem with that plan, in a fish-or-cut-bait kind of way. Painful up front, but the long term result is either gets going or plays himself off the team.
|
Edgy DC May 04 2010 07:13 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Fwee up, fwee down for Mejia.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 04 2010 07:14 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
Wrong thwead.
|
Edgy DC May 04 2010 07:18 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Bad fundies. Back to extended spring training for me.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 07 2010 10:49 AM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Eric Byrnes seems more likely to join Donovan's Pub than to join the Mets, at this point.
|
Ceetar May 07 2010 12:04 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
Still holding out hope that their will indeed b e a roster shake up today. No media notes yet, so still a possibility.
|
Edgy DC May 07 2010 12:17 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
I would love that, but you better be confident you have someone at AAA who can step in if/when Pagan goes down, because that's a lot of space for Bay, Franoeur, or Cora to cover more than nine innings per week.
|
Ceetar May 07 2010 12:24 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
If Pagan goes down, then you replace him. That's the same as now. Please don't tell me their plan would be to play GMJ full time... More of an issue would be if Pagan stubs his toe and would be out 3-4 days.
|
Edgy DC May 07 2010 12:40 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
I don't know what their plan would be, but I'm certain that if Pagan got hurt at the laundromat last night, Matthews would be the centerfielder today and getting the most reps there for the immediate future.
|
seawolf17 May 07 2010 12:50 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
Immediate future, yes. Like the next six games. But if GMJ went 3 for 21 in those six games, he'd be cut and Fartinez would be in CF every day, batting seventh.
|
Edgy DC May 07 2010 12:56 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
I would certainly hope so.
|
Ashie62 May 07 2010 09:13 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
The OF is fine, if it ain't broke don't fix it
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 07 2010 09:36 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
Forget defense, just for argument's sake. Matthews and Catalanotto are not only getting outhit by various other outfielders up and down the system, but are putting up worse offensive rate stats-- both of them-- than Johan and Pelf, and are only barely outhitting the starting rotation. It-- at least that portion of it-- is broke.
|
Edgy DC May 07 2010 09:47 PM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
And the actual quote is that "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds."
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 08 2010 06:35 AM Re: Matthews? Maybe not, but What's Next? |
|
I didn't want to point that out, but yeah, that's been rankling.
|