Master Index of Archived Threads
Catch the grammatical error
TheOldMole Jun 19 2010 08:35 AM |
|
NY Times -
|
Edgy DC Jun 19 2010 08:48 AM Re: Catch the grammatical error |
The whole thing is grammatically awkward, but it seeems to me the first phrase is highly problematic, as "There" should probably be a pronoun stand in for "the Mets," but it's not.
|
TheOldMole Jun 19 2010 08:52 AM Re: Catch the grammatical error |
It's stylistically awkward, but there's only one actual grammatical error.
|
TheOldMole Jun 19 2010 08:55 AM Re: Catch the grammatical error |
"There is" in the first sentence is a syntactic expletive -- performs a syntactic role in the sentence but adds nothing to meaning.
|
Ceetar Jun 19 2010 08:56 AM Re: Catch the grammatical error |
|
I suck at grammar, but this..
It implies that the Mets were sharp against themselves. That can't be correct.
|
Edgy DC Jun 19 2010 08:57 AM Re: Catch the grammatical error |
The last phrase: "their worst" should be "its worst."
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 19 2010 08:59 AM Re: Catch the grammatical error |
Yeah, the first clause doesn't seem to connect to the second in that first sentence. A precedent for what, exactly? The Mets not finding the PlunderDome hospitable, or for opportunities for them to find it hospitable... or something else entirely?
|
TheOldMole Jun 19 2010 09:01 AM Re: Catch the grammatical error |
Edgy has it -- noun-pronoun agreement -- and yeah, the whole paragraph is a nightmare.
|
G-Fafif Jun 19 2010 11:45 AM Re: Catch the grammatical error |
Also, the Times does not use the stylistically correct "MFYS III" to refer to the building in question.
|