Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Wimbledon 2010

seawolf17
Jun 23 2010 01:07 PM

23 Isner (USA) vs Mahut (FRA): 6-4, 3-6, 6-7, 7-6, 51-51.

Rule at Wimbledon is that you have to win by two; match is already well past the eight hour mark and counting. Unreal. I'm watching tennis for the first time in probably decades.

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 01:36 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Drop the Mahut!

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jun 23 2010 01:42 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Holy crap

Gwreck
Jun 23 2010 01:45 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

56-56 now.

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 01:45 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Isner 56, Mahut 55. He just slapped his 96th ace.

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 01:49 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

97 aces.

Centerfield
Jun 23 2010 01:51 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Insane.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jun 23 2010 01:53 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Right now, the thought of having to serve 97 times nauseates me a little.

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 01:53 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Mahut ties it 57. Thirty-five minutes of daylight left.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jun 23 2010 01:54 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Is there a place to watch this live on my computer and if not, can someone fly out there and set one up for me?

Centerfield
Jun 23 2010 01:56 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

58-58.

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 01:59 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

I just landed.

http://atdhe.net/20580/watch-wimbledon-mahut-vs-isner

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 02:01 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

59-58 after another ace closes it out for Izner.

All accounts, though, says he's more wasted. He can still hold serve thanks to the aces, but his legs are really there.

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 02:02 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Mahut's a qualifier?

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 02:04 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Not pretty tennis.

Frayed Knot
Jun 23 2010 02:04 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

[quote="Edgy DC":2wkbptso]Mahut ties it 57. Thirty-five minutes of daylight left.[/quote:2wkbptso]

Didn't they put in lights when they installed the roof?

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 02:06 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Isner's got a match point here.

HahnSolo
Jun 23 2010 02:06 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

I think they're on an outer court.

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 02:07 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

An ace from Frenchy and it's back at deuce.

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 02:08 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

59 apiece.

Frayed Knot
Jun 23 2010 02:08 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

[quote="HahnSolo":sve784l7]I think they're on an outer court.[/quote:sve784l7]

Yeah, that makes sense.

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 02:14 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Darkness ends the match for a second straight day.

HahnSolo
Jun 23 2010 02:25 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

[quote="Edgy DC"]Darkness ends the match for a second straight day.



Wait, this match started yesterday???

Edgy DC
Jun 23 2010 02:40 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

They split four sets Tuesday. Today was all the fifth set.

Rockin' Doc
Jun 23 2010 08:56 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Unbelievable. The fans are likely exhausted just from watching this match. I can't even imagine how fatigued the two players must be. At what time tomorrow do they resume this dibilitating war of wills?

Frayed Knot
Jun 23 2010 09:09 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

6 AM









-- OK not really. It depends on how other matches go but I believe I heard it's scheduled for no earlier than 4PM local time

Caught a few highlights - amazing to see the players (especially the smaller and quicker Frenchman) diving all over the court seven hours into the set trying in vain to reach shots out of his reach.

Willets Point
Jun 23 2010 09:35 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

I don't get tennis scoring at all so all these numbers mean nothing to me except the hours.

Frayed Knot
Jun 23 2010 09:47 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Tennis scoring is confusing - particularly within a game - but basically games won are just scored by ones and it usually takes 6 to win a set.
But because the server usually wins the game he serves (particularly on grass like Wimbledon) they make it so you have to win the final set by two games (7-6 isn't good enough, you have to get to 8-6 ... or to 9-7 if you're tied at 7 each, etc.).
The most famous long match was when McEnroe beat Borg 18-16. The previous record went into the low/mid 20s somewhere. So this one wasn't just long or even record breaking long, it was fuckin' ridiculous record breaking long ... and it's not even over yet!!!!

Gwreck
Jun 24 2010 12:16 AM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Last year's men's singles final (Roddick and Federer) went 16-14 in the final set too.

soupcan
Jun 24 2010 10:19 AM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Over now: Isner wins, 70-68.

Frayed Knot
Jun 24 2010 10:22 AM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

One good thing about this thing taking so long is that John Feinstein was able to complete his book on the match, '[u:2vka15df]Hearts in Darkness[/u:2vka15df]', and also have it published by the time they were finishing up so it was available for fans to purchase as they left the grounds.

soupcan
Jun 24 2010 10:28 AM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

That's pretty good. Did you really come up with that yourself?

Edgy DC
Jun 24 2010 10:34 AM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

My stars.

Frayed Knot
Jun 24 2010 12:22 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

[quote="soupcan":1nge7fzx]That's pretty good. Did you really come up with that yourself?[/quote:1nge7fzx]

Stole the idea of the joke then tweaked it a bit. The title of said book was one of the details I added.

Edgy DC
Jun 25 2010 11:42 AM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

From today's Washington Post editorial page:


John Isner and Nicolas Mahut: Hitting themselves into history
By John Feinstein
Friday, June 25, 2010


The best moments in sports are almost always those we least expect: The U.S. hockey team stunning the Soviet Union in the Lake Placid Olympics 30 years ago; Boris Becker winning Wimbledon 25 years ago when he was too young -- 17 -- to claim the world's most important tennis title; Tom Watson coming within inches of winning the British Open when he was too old -- 59 -- to compete for a major golf championship.

And then there are those moments that involve athletes most of us have never heard of and may never hear of again; moments that come out of nowhere and hold us spellbound. That's what John Isner and Nicolas Mahut did the past three days. They began a routine first-round match at Wimbledon on Tuesday, a long way -- literally and figuratively -- from historic Centre Court. They were sent out to play on Court 18, which is tucked into a corner of the Wimbledon grounds and has seats for a mere 782 people.

When they finally shook hands at the net on Thursday after playing five sets and 183 games -- the last 138 of them in the final set -- millions of people around the world were watching and wondering when one of them would finally crack or simply collapse. To put what these two men did into perspective, consider: Before this epic match, the longest fifth set in the history of Grand Slam tennis lasted 48 games -- 90 games fewer than Isner and Mahut played. The longest match in Grand Slam tennis history before this one lasted six hours and 33 minutes. The last set between Isner and Mahut took eight hours and 11 minutes.

In terms of other sports, we're talking about a 60-inning baseball game or a 10-quarter NFL playoff game. In other words, unreal.

While the numbers will be repeated often, they are a small part of what made this match special. There was no championship at stake. These were two little-known players fighting simply for the right to advance to the second round. Isner, who won the extraordinary final set, 70-68, will do well to survive his second-round match on Friday and is the longest of long shots to be playing the glamour rounds next weekend. At 25, he has never been beyond the round of 16 in a major tournament. He came to Wimbledon seeded 23rd -- meaning he was expected only to reach the round of 32.


Mahut, who is 28, was an even longer shot. He had to survive three pre-Wimbledon qualifying matches just to get into the tournament. And yet the two men combined to play a match that transcended any ultimate historical meaning. The quality of the tennis wasn't remarkable, but the tension and grit of both players was extraordinary. Neither wanted to give in to exhaustion or to each other. That's what made it so riveting.

Tennis has become a niche sport in recent years, generally drawing attention beyond its loyal fans only on the final weekends of Grand Slam events such as Wimbledon and the U.S. Open. There are probably no more than five current tennis players the average person came name off the top of his or her head: Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Andy Roddick, Serena Williams and Venus Williams. Perhaps you might add Maria Sharapova to that list, but she's better known for selling products than winning titles these days.

Now, Isner and Mahut have carved a place for themselves in the tennis pantheon. Any tennis marathon from now on will be compared to Isner-Mahut. In fact, any marathon in any sport will be compared to what happened during their three days together on court. For tennis, the extra attention, coming right in the middle of the World Cup soccer tournament and right after the sports world had been focused on the U.S. Open golf championship, could provide a much-needed boost.

"I guess this is something Nic and I will share forever," Isner said when it was over.

He's right. And it is a memory all of us can hang on to for just about as long.

John Feinstein is a contributor to The Post and the author of Hard Courts: Real Life on the Professional Tennis Tours. His most recent book is Moment of Glory -- The Year Underdogs Ruled Golf. He blogs at www.feinsteinonthebrink.com.

Rockin' Doc
Jun 25 2010 12:43 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

John Isner was defeated today by Thiemmo De Bakker of the Netherlands in straight sets (6-0, 6-3, 6-2). It was amazing that he could even show up for the match after his historic marathon match against Nicolas Mahut.

Frayed Knot
Jun 25 2010 01:20 PM
Re: Wimbledon 2010

Isner is also 6' 8" or something ridiculous like that.