Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


hitchcock filmography

Vic Sage
Sep 27 2010 07:11 PM
Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Sep 28 2010 08:59 AM

- "Film your murders like love scenes, and film your love scenes like murders", Alfred Hitchcock.

Sir Alfred Hitchcock, the proverbial master of suspense, is generally considered the greatest British director of all time.

Hitch was a small, lonely, fat lad ("I was an uncommonly unattractive young man."), with an absent father and controlling mother, raised in strict catholic home. There is a story that, as a child, he was sent to the local constabulary, with a letter from his father. The policeman read the letter and immediately locked the boy up for ten minutes. After that, the sergeant let young Alfred go, explaining, "This is what happens to people who do bad things." He had a morbid fear of police from that day on. Obviously, such an upbringing would likely precipitate his later preoccupations, and so his neurotic obsessions with guilt, wrongful accusation, lost identity, voyeurism, and the linkage of sex and death formed the themes of his most iconic work.

He started out as an engineering draftsman and designer, which is evident in the visual storytelling techniques he developed ("If it's a good movie, the sound could go off and the audience would still have a perfectly clear idea of what was going on.") He then got work in the fledgling silent film industry in the UK, with some stops and starts. His first hit was the silent thriller THE LODGER, loosely based on Jack the ripper. His subsequent successes (MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH, 39 STEPS and LADY VANISHES) would catch the attention of Hollywood, and the siren's song would soon call him across the pond.

selection of UK films:
* The Lodger (1927) - silent
* Blackmail (1929) - silent & then released as UK's 1st talkie
* The Man Who Knew too much (1934) - his 1st international hit (better than the subsequent remake)
* 39 Steps (1935) - his first great film
* The Lady Vanishes (1938) - another great early film, got the attention of hollywood
* Jamaica Inn (1939) - a flop, but didn't deter Selznick

Selznick years:

Noted producer David O. Selznick brought Hitch to Hollywood to direct the gothic melodrama REBECCA, to much acclaim and success, but not without tension between the two titanic control freaks. Hitch went on to make a number of successful films during his "selznick years", though some were for other studios to whom Selznick had loaned (i.e., sold) him out. SUSPICION, NOTORIOUS and SHADOW OF A DOUBT are the best thrillers of the period. FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT, SABOTEUR and LIFEBOAT are all solid WWII-themed works, but MR & MRS SMITH is a forgettable romantic comedy, SPELLBOUND is overwrought psychobabble and PARADINE CASE an overlong courtroom drama. Gregory Peck was not one of Hitch's better leading men, as his particular brand of square-jawed heroism lacked the moral ambiguity and sly humor of his more successful colaborations with Cary Grant and Jimmy Stewart.

* Rebecca (1940) - Academy Award (Best Picture) for Selznick, not Hitch. ultimately, more a selznick movie than a Hitchcock movie (one of the few Hitch was not involved with the script's development). It has not dated well.
* Foreign Correspondent (1940) (AA nom/picture) - solid WWII anti-nazi agitprop
* Mr. & Mrs. Smith (1941) - minor screwball comedy with Carole Lombarde
* Suspicion (1941) - 1st work as a producer (AA nom/picture), and his first work with Cary Grant; solid, but a sellout ending
* Saboteur (1942) - solid WWII era "wrong man" thriller, ending atop Statue of Liberty (action scenes on iconic monuments a continuing motif)
* Shadow of a Doubt (1943) - Joseph Cotton great as psycho Uncle Charlie... Terrific; hitch's personal fave.
* Lifeboat (1944) (AA nom/director) - solid WWII drama; more theatrical than cinematic (the "single set" limitation is one he'd go back to)
* Spellbound (1945) (AA nom/director, picture) - Gregory Peck, with 1st of hitch's great "cool blondes", Ingrid Bergman, and a Dali dream sequence. Doesn't hold up at all. Freudian subtext becomes text. silly, talky.
* Notorious (1946) - Grant and Bergman are a much better pairing, Rains makes a great Cuckolded villain
* The Paradine Case (1947) - overlong courtroom flop, with Bergman & Peck

1950s-60s

Warners:

After his contract with Selznick expired, Hitchcock produced his next 2, both flops. He expiremented with extended cuts and technicolor in ROPE, loosely based on the Leopold & Loeb thrill killer case, with a miscast Jimmy Stewart as an academic. UNDER CAPRICORN was likely undone not only by its mediocrity but the worldwide scandal that Ingrid Bergman was in the middle of (as she was having an affair, and later a child, with director Roberto Rosellini). The films were released by Warner Bros, and they then produced many of his subsequent films of the period (most of which were not particularly successful). DIAL M was Hitch's first big widescreen effort, in which he used some 3D effects, though the film was not actually released in 3D version until the 1980s. It also featured the 1st work with his new "cool blonde", Grace Kelly.

* Rope (1948) - interesting filmic experiment, but dramatically flawed
* Under Capricorn (1949) - dull flop
* Stage Fright (1950) - Dietrich, minor work
* Strangers on a Train (1951) - the best of this WB period
* I Confess (1953) - Monty Clift as priest; nothing special. Hitch was not a fan of "method actors".
* Dial M for Murder (1954) -first widescreen film (3d in 1980s) and 1st with Grace Kelly; holds up pretty well.
* The Wrong Man (1956) - true story, with Henry Fonda. Its documentary feel undermines dramatic impact.

Paramount:

- "Blondes make the best victims. They're like virgin snow that shows up the bloody footprints."

Hitch did 5 films with Paramount, which were all given a theatrical re-release back in the 1980s, before being redistributed to the newly burgeoning home video market. 2 of these were two of his very best films, REAR WINDOW and VERTIGO, both with Jimmy Stewart at his most sexually disturbing and obsessed, verging on sado-masochistic.

* Rear Window (1954) (AA nom/director) - Stewart & Kelly; darkly funny, disturbing rumination on voyeurism
* To Catch a Thief (1955) - Kelly and Grant in light romantic thriller; urbane sophisticated entertainment. Kelly went on to become Princess Grace after the film.
* The Trouble with Harry (1955) - black comedy about a dead body, with a cute young shirley maclaine; silly, pointless.
* The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) - Doris Day sings "Que Sera, Sera" -- a ridiculous remake.
* Vertigo (1958) - my favorite cool blonde, Kim Novak, totally fetishized by Stewart (and Hitch). One of the greatest films ever made.
* North by Northwest (1959) - Grant and E.M.Saint, "wrong man", black comedy, freudian sexual hysteria, thrilling climax on national monument, the crop duster... its Hitch at his absolute best.
* Psycho (1960) (AA nom/director) - Hitch crossed the line from suspense to pure horror, reinventing the genre and making a fortune for his efforts... he waived his salary to take 60% of net profits when he produced it as an indie (nobody wanted to touch the project), but eventually distributed by Paramount.

Universal:

As host of his longrunning tv anthology series,"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" (1955-65), Hitch became an international celebrity bigger than any of his movies ("I was very pleased that television was now showing murder stories, because it's bringing murder back into its rightful setting - in the home").

During the late 50s, his artistic accomplishments as a flimmaker were finally being recognized in Europe by Truffaut and other french journalists-turned-filmmakers, and he became the darling of the new auteur theorists. But Hitch's health started to deteriorate in the 1960s, and his films for Universal in the mid 60s-70s mark his slow fade.

* The Birds (1963) - Tippi Hedren was his next and last "cool blonde"; still memorable depiction of an avian uprising mysteriously connected to sexual desire. Arguably his last great film.
* Marnie (1964) - Hedren with Sean Connery in a psycho-sexual thriller that harkened back to SPELLBOUND in its freudian obsessions; unsuccessful but some critical views put it in the pantheon of Hitch's best work. I disagree.
* Torn Curtain (1964) - an unsuccessful cold war thriller, this time with Julie Andrews (who was foisted upon him) and Paul Newman, who, as another "method actor", was a problem for Hitch. ("When an actor comes to me and wants to discuss his character, I say, "It's in the script"/ If he says, "But what's my motivation?", I say, "Your salary".)
* Topaz (1969) - another cold war thriller, this one had no stars and flopped
* Frenzy (1972) - hitch went back to the UK, and became more explicit in his depiction of sex and death; some said it was a return to form, others bemoaned its excesses. But he always pushed the boundaries.
* Family Plot (1976) - this goofy black comedy was Hitch's final film and an inauspicious final note.

Never having won an Oscar as a director, Hitch was finally given a lifetime award in 1967 (his speech: "thank you.") In 1979, he was knighted (When asked by a member of the press why, at his advanced age, it took so long for the British government to grant him the title of Knight, he said: "I think it's just a matter of carelessness.") He died shortly thereafter. but his work lives on, not only in film archives, but in the careers of many filmmakers who came after him and were so influenced by his remarkable output.

A baker's dozen to see:
The Man Who Knew too much (1934)
39 Steps (1935)
The Lady Vanishes (1938)
Rebecca (1940)
Shadow of a Doubt(1943)
Notorious (1946)
Strangers on a Train (1951)
Dial M for Murder (1954)
Rear Window (1954)
Vertigo (1958)
North by Northwest (1959)
Psycho (1960)
The Birds (1963)

Willets Point
Sep 27 2010 07:48 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

I always loved his appearances on Alfred Hitchcock Presents. Brilliant delivery and pointed mockery of tv commercials.

Vic Sage
Sep 28 2010 08:34 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

he designed that silhouette of himself that appeared at the beginning of each episode.

Between that, the "funeral march of a marionette" music, his deadpan, blackly funny delivery, and the macabre stories, i was totally hooked on that show. I later read his short story anthologies and magazine (he wasn't involved in these publishing efforts; he just licensed them his name, for marketing purposes), and i still have a boardgame from that time called "Alfred Hitchcock's `WHY' game". I didn't actually like his movies til i was much older

Vic Sage
Sep 28 2010 10:02 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

15-week Hitch double feature series i should have scheduled when i ran my college film series:

1) serial killers:
* The Lodger (1927)
* Frenzy (1972)

2) The wrong men:
* The 39 Steps (1935)
* The Wrong Man (1956)

3) Train movies:
* The Lady Vanishes (1938)
* Strangers on a Train (1951)

4) compare & contrast:
* The Man Who Knew too much (1934)
* The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956)

5) WWII
* Foreign Correspondent (1940)
* Saboteur (1942)

6) One set wonders:
* Lifeboat (1944)
* Rope (1948)

7) Light romance:
* Mr. & Mrs. Smith (1941)
* To Catch a Thief (1955)

8) Bluebeards:
* Suspicion (1941)
* Shadow of a Doubt (1943)

9) Freudian nightmares:
* Spellbound (1945)
* Marnie (1964)

10) Cary Grant:
* Notorious (1946)
* North by Northwest (1959)

11) Grace Kelley:
* Rear Window (1954)
* Dial M for Murder (1954)

12) black comedies:
* The Trouble with Harry (1955)
* Family Plot (1976)

13) Hitch and the "method":
* I Confess (1953)
* Torn Curtain (1964)

14) horror films:
* Psycho (1960)
* The Birds (1963)

15) the wrong one won the Oscar:
* Rebecca (1940)
* Vertigo (1958)

Edgy MD
Sep 28 2010 10:36 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

16) Mostly forgotten early dramatic adaptations:
* The Skin Game (1931)
* Juno and the Paycock (1930)

batmagadanleadoff
Sep 28 2010 01:51 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Vic Sage wrote:
he designed that silhouette of himself that appeared at the beginning of each episode.

Between that, the "funeral march of a marionette" music, his deadpan, blackly funny delivery, and the macabre stories, i was totally hooked on that show. I later read his short story anthologies and magazine (he wasn't involved in these publishing efforts; he just licensed them his name, for marketing purposes), and i still have a boardgame from that time called "Alfred Hitchcock's `WHY' game". I didn't actually like his movies til i was much older


Which version?




Vic Sage
Sep 28 2010 09:50 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

the top one... its falling apart, but i still play it with my son once in a while.

Valadius
Sep 29 2010 07:06 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

North by Northwest is one of my favorite films of all time.

Vic Sage
Sep 30 2010 08:30 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

good choice.

Benjamin Grimm
Sep 30 2010 08:32 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Not sure exactly why, but I have a special fondness for Shadow of a Doubt.

Willets Point
Sep 30 2010 09:00 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

The Trouble With Harry is a favorite of mine both for its dark humor and technicolor representation of autumn in New England.

batmagadanleadoff
Sep 30 2010 09:05 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Vic Sage wrote:

Between that, the "funeral march of a marionette" music, his deadpan, blackly funny delivery, and the macabre stories, i was totally hooked on that show. I later read his short story anthologies and magazine (he wasn't involved in these publishing efforts; he just licensed them his name, for marketing purposes), and i still have a boardgame from that time called "Alfred Hitchcock's `WHY' game". I didn't actually like his movies til i was much older


I could've written your post, except that I liked both his movies as well as his TV show from early on. I owned this Robin Wood Hitchcock book


which I plowed through repeatedly, even though the critical reviews were way over my eight year old head. But I managed to memorize the titles of every single Hitch movie. In chronological order. Backwards too.

Benjamin Grimm
Sep 30 2010 09:40 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Anyone else remember these books?

batmagadanleadoff
Sep 30 2010 09:44 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Not only do I remember those, but I read a few. The one that sticks in my memory involved a Green Ghost.

Vic Sage
Sep 30 2010 11:16 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Not sure exactly why, but I have a special fondness for Shadow of a Doubt.


maybe cuz its really good? It was Hitch's own fave of his films, apparently.

Benjamin Grimm
Sep 30 2010 11:27 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

I didn't know it was Hitchcock's favorite. I'm glad I share his taste! I suspect, though, that it wouldn't win a poll of favorite Hitchcock films. (Not sure what would... probably Psycho or The Birds.)

Vic Sage
Sep 30 2010 12:59 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

lets find out!

dgwphotography
Sep 30 2010 02:16 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Anyone else remember these books?



for a while, I had all of those...

RealityChuck
Oct 08 2010 08:29 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Vic Sage wrote:
Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Not sure exactly why, but I have a special fondness for Shadow of a Doubt.


maybe cuz its really good? It was Hitch's own fave of his films, apparently.
I think Hitch liked it for reasons other than than what was on the screen (most notably, having Thornton Wilder involved). It's second-tier Hitchcock -- good film, but not one of his greats.

I'd say his great films are North by Northwest, Psycho, Notorious, Rear Window, The 39 Steps and Strangers on a Train.

Second tier are Shadow of a Doubt, The Lady Vanishes, Saboteur, Family Plot (very underrated), The Man Who Knew Too Much (both versions) and Young and Innocent

There are also plenty of good films that don't make either of these lists.

Edgy MD
Oct 08 2010 09:23 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

I've long enjoyed Joe Queenan's take on Alfred, which was pretty much that he was as good a flimmaker as one can be without being great. Or (re-reading), he is great, but not great-great.

Pretty good work by Queenan from back when his snark content was about 40% instead of the 80-85% it runs at now that he's a brand name.

RealityChuck
Oct 08 2010 01:56 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

I've long enjoyed Joe Queenan's take on Alfred, which was pretty much that he was as good a flimmaker as one can be without being great. Or (re-reading), he is great, but not great-great.

Pretty good work by Queenan from back when his snark content was about 40% instead of the 80-85% it runs at now that he's a brand name.


He had me until this:

Carole Lombard was given a dry run in Mr. and Mrs. Smith, but she must not have been docile enough, because Hitchcock never used her again, and so she was forced to move on to more fertile fields.
Because she was dead, maybe? Mr and Mrs. Smith was her next to last film before she died in a plane crash.

RealityChuck
Oct 08 2010 02:09 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Oh, and Hitchcock's penchant for putting women in danger is due to story needs, not any dark psychological demons. His films were always about suspense, and you can't have suspense without danger. And a damsel in distress is far more dramatic than a man in trouble (and Hitchcock had plenty of them, too -- Cary Grant in North by Northwest, Robert Cummings in Saboteur, Montgomery Clift in I Confess, Henry Fonda in The Wrong Man, etc.).

Edgy MD
Oct 08 2010 02:31 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Well, (1) he confesses at the beginning that he's playing around by psychoanalyzing Hitchcock, and (2) there's something more that's going on if you if you look at the whole. For a "great" filmmaker, he didn't have to do anything. He chose these stories, these themes, and these storyboards.

And he didn't just put them in distress. Sometimes, he really fucked around with them. For high-end film-making, that's some oddball stuff.

Plus there's stuff this:

GREG GARRETT: Miss Hedren, there's a story about the little coffin that was supposedly sent to you by Hitch. Did it contain a little doll with a noose around the neck? What did that mean? Was that a joke?

TIPPI HEDREN: This is the first time I've heard about the noose around the neck. I was called in to do — have a mask made of my face. And I really didn't think anything of it, because at the make-up facility at Universal there are faces of every actor up on the wall. So I thought, well, gee, I'm just going to join all that. That's fine, that's wonderful. It's a rather painful experience to go through this, with the plaster on your face and the straws up your nose and that sort of thing. However, I weathered it through.

The outcome of that was a doll that was made for my daughter [Melanie Griffith] for a Christmas present. And the difference in this little doll was that most of the time when a doll is made of a celebrity or whatever, it's sort of a caricature of that person. This was an absolute replica of my face. Bob Dawn, who was absolutely brilliant in his field of prostheses and that sort of thing, had taken that mask and taken it down to this tiny little face, and it was absolutely perfect. The doll was then dressed in the green outfit that I wore in The Birds for six months.

Unfortunately, they put the doll in a pine box. And then it was presented to my daughter for Christmas. And my little girl, Melanie, looked at it and just blanched white, and we had to put the doll away.

Now this was not — and I truly believe this — this was not an intentional thing for Hitch to hurt my daughter. She was hurt by it. But this was not intentional on his part. I mean, he did a lot of really weird things, but this was not intentional, and there was no noose, believe me. No noose.

GARRETT: Was it a joke?

HEDREN: No, it really wasn't a joke, either. It was supposed to be a very, very, kind of wonderful, thoughtful gift. And one that had taken great thought, great effort, great expense, I'm sure. So it wasn't — I can't say that he was trying to hurt anybody. It was just unfortunate.

It's hard to think she's not being over-generous there. The guy's attitude toward women is certainly worth examining.

A lot of great directors have some mostrously strange egos. Ford did, Huston did, Cameron does. I think Scorscese does. But it's stilll worth turning a mirror on the guy supposedly turning a mirror on us.

RealityChuck
Oct 11 2010 11:36 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Off-set, Hitchcock had a penchant for practical jokes, and often played them on his female actresses (though he did them with the men, too, when is suited him).

There is, of course, a lot of blatant presentism in the assumptions of the article; the writer assumes (without realizing it) that Hitchcock was living in 2010 when he was making his films (and, of course, will deny that -- presentism is always blind to itself).

You can also pick and choose. Hitchcock's women were more often than not smart, self-assured, and very competent. There's Edna in the original The Man Who Knew Too Much (a crack shot with a gun and the only one with the nerve to take out the villain), Miss Froy in the Lady Vanishes, Sylvia in Sabotage, Charlie in Shadow of a Doubt, Connie Porter in Lifeboat, Lisa in Rear Window (as well as Stella, in a different way), Eve in North by Northwest, Blanche in Family Plot, and others. So by choosing those examples, you could argue that Hitch was a feminist.

Edgy MD
Oct 11 2010 12:07 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

He assumes Hitchcock was making his films in 2010?

RealityChuck
Oct 12 2010 11:33 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Yes.

Or, rather, he assumes that all the people involved in making Hitchcock's movies were living in 2010 and thus their behavior has to conform to current norms.

It's a very common fallacy. No one is immune to it, and, of course, people are so blind to it that they deny they're doing it.

Edgy MD
Oct 12 2010 11:42 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Well, if it's an accusation that is pointless to deny, I won't deny it. I'll just leave it as self-evidently absurd.

Vic Sage
Oct 12 2010 02:51 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

thank you.

MFS62
Oct 13 2010 10:13 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Back in the day when there were first run movie theaters on 42nd street, my friend and I cut school to see a matinee of Psycho. In the tense moment when the detective is climbing the stairs, a woman cried out "Masher! Masher! He put his hand on my knee!". The movie stopped, the lights went on, and we saw a woman (who appeared to be in her )hittting an even older looking gentleman over the head with her umbrella. The ushers came and dragged him away. The lights went out, the movie resumed and the audience was chuckling during the rest of the movie. The mood was totally ruined. But, the ending scared me so much that I slept with the lights on for a few nights afterwards. That gets my vote.

Rear Window is notable because it might be the only time Raymond Burr acted in something where someone else was in a wheelchair.


The best "Hitchcock movie" that he never made was Charade. To this day, when movies come up in conversation, some people I've spoken with still believe he directed it.

Later

RealityChuck
Oct 15 2010 08:38 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Well, if it's an accusation that is pointless to deny, I won't deny it. I'll just leave it as self-evidently absurd.
It's not absurd -- it's an issue that historians have to wrestle with all the time: making sure they don't bring their own preconceptions into their analysis.

Here's an example: In the book, The Telephone Gambit, author Seth Shulman was struck by the similarity between Bell's drawing of the telephone microphone and that of a drawing in Elisha Gray's patent application. He took that as evidence that the Bell patent was stolen. But when he first mentioned it, a colleague asked, "How do you know that this just isn't a standard way of portraying things that hundreds of inventors used?" And he was right: if no one else did a drawing like this, it's one thing; if everyone else did, it's something else. You can't draw any conclusions until you establish this point.

I've seen the same thinking right here on the board: the question was asked "Why did Casey Stengel talk about Ed Kranepool as a leadoff hitter?" Now, part of the answer is that Casey would often say things just to entertain the press. But the other part is that back in 1963, managers evaluated the batting order differently. Kranepool didn't have the OBA or the speed to be a leadoff hitter -- today. But Casey didn't look at OBA, and speed was not thought particularly important back in 1963.* Asking the question requires the assumption that Casey was looking at things the way we do now. But the person asking the question never considered this and was huffy when I pointed it out. As usual, he denied he was making the assumption that was obvious in the question.

I've seen that behavior many a time. It's one of the hardest things in the world to question your own ingrained assumptions, yet it's something that has to be done when trying to analyze the past.

So, when you're discussing Hitchcock's relation with his leading ladies, you need to view it within the context of his times and background. Things that are not acceptable today were perfectly acceptable back then (and things unacceptable back then are perfectly acceptable now). The comments in the article are similar to him condemning Hitchcock because he allowed cigarette smoking on the set. He's putting everything in a 21st century context, but that doesn't apply to things that happened 50 years ago.

*Maury Wills excepted -- his 102 the year before was considered a fluke, though teams were seeing they were useful. Casey, however, was certainly going to be old school on the subject since only had one player who topped 20 with the Yankees -- Mickey Mantle, who didn't bat leadoff (and that was in 1959, one of the few years they didn't win the pennant). Phil Ruzutto topped 15 three times during that stretch, but the team never had more than one player over ten, and some years none reached ten. So it was not surprising that Casey wouldn't think SBs meant all that much.

Benjamin Grimm
Oct 15 2010 08:44 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Watched Dial M For Murder for the first time yesterday. Very enjoyable.

Edgy MD
Oct 15 2010 08:53 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

OK, first of all, that's six paragraphs with not one citation from the article.

Seond of all, "the writer assumes Hitchcock was living in 2010" and the author holds Hitchcock to 2010 standards are two different statements. One of them is completely untenable.

Third, presenting a charge that is pointless to deny, because the perpetrators are always blind to themselves, is a cheap rhetorical trick that even a Hitchock character would recognize and scoff at.

Lastly, if you read the article, you'd see it was written in 1990, not in 2010, so the party most guilty of presentism appears to be you, though I'll resist the temptation to claim that it's pointless to deny it.

Frayed Knot
Oct 15 2010 09:59 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Watched Dial M For Murder for the first time yesterday. Very enjoyable.


I've probably seen that one more times than any other Hitchcock movie just because it seems to come around more often.
Always loved the plot that tennis dude springs on his unsuspecting ex-classmate that sets the whole thing up. It's just so positively evil.

Vic Sage
Oct 15 2010 03:18 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

did you see it in 3D?

i did, at a rep house in NYC, like 20 years ago. It gave me a headache.

Benjamin Grimm
Oct 15 2010 03:20 PM
Re: hitchcock filmography

No. I just learned about the 3D version today when reading the Wikipedia article.

I did see it in HD, though.

Vince Coleman Firecracker
Nov 08 2010 07:01 AM
Re: hitchcock filmography

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
I owned this Robin Wood Hitchcock book


which I plowed through repeatedly, even though the critical reviews were way over my eight year old head. But I managed to memorize the titles of every single Hitch movie. In chronological order. Backwards too.


I just wanted to say that as much as I love watching Hitchcock's films, I probably enjoy reading Robin Wood even more.

Oh, and I just gave a presentation last week during which I argued (with only a little tongue-in-cheek) that Robert Walker's character in Strangers on a Train was influenced by Pepe le Pew.