Master Index of Archived Threads
hitchcock filmography
Vic Sage Sep 27 2010 07:11 PM Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Sep 28 2010 08:59 AM |
- "Film your murders like love scenes, and film your love scenes like murders", Alfred Hitchcock.
|
Willets Point Sep 27 2010 07:48 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
I always loved his appearances on Alfred Hitchcock Presents. Brilliant delivery and pointed mockery of tv commercials.
|
Vic Sage Sep 28 2010 08:34 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
he designed that silhouette of himself that appeared at the beginning of each episode.
|
Vic Sage Sep 28 2010 10:02 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
15-week Hitch double feature series i should have scheduled when i ran my college film series:
|
Edgy MD Sep 28 2010 10:36 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
16) Mostly forgotten early dramatic adaptations:
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 28 2010 01:51 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
|
Which version?
|
Vic Sage Sep 28 2010 09:50 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
the top one... its falling apart, but i still play it with my son once in a while.
|
Valadius Sep 29 2010 07:06 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
North by Northwest is one of my favorite films of all time.
|
Vic Sage Sep 30 2010 08:30 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
good choice.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 30 2010 08:32 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
Not sure exactly why, but I have a special fondness for Shadow of a Doubt.
|
Willets Point Sep 30 2010 09:00 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
The Trouble With Harry is a favorite of mine both for its dark humor and technicolor representation of autumn in New England.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 30 2010 09:05 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
|
I could've written your post, except that I liked both his movies as well as his TV show from early on. I owned this Robin Wood Hitchcock book which I plowed through repeatedly, even though the critical reviews were way over my eight year old head. But I managed to memorize the titles of every single Hitch movie. In chronological order. Backwards too.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 30 2010 09:40 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
Anyone else remember these books?
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 30 2010 09:44 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
Not only do I remember those, but I read a few. The one that sticks in my memory involved a Green Ghost.
|
Vic Sage Sep 30 2010 11:16 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
|
maybe cuz its really good? It was Hitch's own fave of his films, apparently.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 30 2010 11:27 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
I didn't know it was Hitchcock's favorite. I'm glad I share his taste! I suspect, though, that it wouldn't win a poll of favorite Hitchcock films. (Not sure what would... probably Psycho or The Birds.)
|
Vic Sage Sep 30 2010 12:59 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
lets find out!
|
dgwphotography Sep 30 2010 02:16 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
|
for a while, I had all of those...
|
RealityChuck Oct 08 2010 08:29 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
||
I'd say his great films are North by Northwest, Psycho, Notorious, Rear Window, The 39 Steps and Strangers on a Train. Second tier are Shadow of a Doubt, The Lady Vanishes, Saboteur, Family Plot (very underrated), The Man Who Knew Too Much (both versions) and Young and Innocent There are also plenty of good films that don't make either of these lists.
|
Edgy MD Oct 08 2010 09:23 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
I've long enjoyed Joe Queenan's take on Alfred, which was pretty much that he was as good a flimmaker as one can be without being great. Or (re-reading), he is great, but not great-great.
|
RealityChuck Oct 08 2010 01:56 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
||
He had me until this:
|
RealityChuck Oct 08 2010 02:09 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
Oh, and Hitchcock's penchant for putting women in danger is due to story needs, not any dark psychological demons. His films were always about suspense, and you can't have suspense without danger. And a damsel in distress is far more dramatic than a man in trouble (and Hitchcock had plenty of them, too -- Cary Grant in North by Northwest, Robert Cummings in Saboteur, Montgomery Clift in I Confess, Henry Fonda in The Wrong Man, etc.).
|
Edgy MD Oct 08 2010 02:31 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
|
Well, (1) he confesses at the beginning that he's playing around by psychoanalyzing Hitchcock, and (2) there's something more that's going on if you if you look at the whole. For a "great" filmmaker, he didn't have to do anything. He chose these stories, these themes, and these storyboards.
It's hard to think she's not being over-generous there. The guy's attitude toward women is certainly worth examining. A lot of great directors have some mostrously strange egos. Ford did, Huston did, Cameron does. I think Scorscese does. But it's stilll worth turning a mirror on the guy supposedly turning a mirror on us.
|
RealityChuck Oct 11 2010 11:36 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
Off-set, Hitchcock had a penchant for practical jokes, and often played them on his female actresses (though he did them with the men, too, when is suited him).
|
Edgy MD Oct 11 2010 12:07 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
He assumes Hitchcock was making his films in 2010?
|
RealityChuck Oct 12 2010 11:33 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
Yes.
|
Edgy MD Oct 12 2010 11:42 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
Well, if it's an accusation that is pointless to deny, I won't deny it. I'll just leave it as self-evidently absurd.
|
Vic Sage Oct 12 2010 02:51 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
thank you.
|
MFS62 Oct 13 2010 10:13 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
Back in the day when there were first run movie theaters on 42nd street, my friend and I cut school to see a matinee of Psycho. In the tense moment when the detective is climbing the stairs, a woman cried out "Masher! Masher! He put his hand on my knee!". The movie stopped, the lights went on, and we saw a woman (who appeared to be in her )hittting an even older looking gentleman over the head with her umbrella. The ushers came and dragged him away. The lights went out, the movie resumed and the audience was chuckling during the rest of the movie. The mood was totally ruined. But, the ending scared me so much that I slept with the lights on for a few nights afterwards. That gets my vote.
|
RealityChuck Oct 15 2010 08:38 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
|
Here's an example: In the book, The Telephone Gambit, author Seth Shulman was struck by the similarity between Bell's drawing of the telephone microphone and that of a drawing in Elisha Gray's patent application. He took that as evidence that the Bell patent was stolen. But when he first mentioned it, a colleague asked, "How do you know that this just isn't a standard way of portraying things that hundreds of inventors used?" And he was right: if no one else did a drawing like this, it's one thing; if everyone else did, it's something else. You can't draw any conclusions until you establish this point. I've seen the same thinking right here on the board: the question was asked "Why did Casey Stengel talk about Ed Kranepool as a leadoff hitter?" Now, part of the answer is that Casey would often say things just to entertain the press. But the other part is that back in 1963, managers evaluated the batting order differently. Kranepool didn't have the OBA or the speed to be a leadoff hitter -- today. But Casey didn't look at OBA, and speed was not thought particularly important back in 1963.* Asking the question requires the assumption that Casey was looking at things the way we do now. But the person asking the question never considered this and was huffy when I pointed it out. As usual, he denied he was making the assumption that was obvious in the question. I've seen that behavior many a time. It's one of the hardest things in the world to question your own ingrained assumptions, yet it's something that has to be done when trying to analyze the past. So, when you're discussing Hitchcock's relation with his leading ladies, you need to view it within the context of his times and background. Things that are not acceptable today were perfectly acceptable back then (and things unacceptable back then are perfectly acceptable now). The comments in the article are similar to him condemning Hitchcock because he allowed cigarette smoking on the set. He's putting everything in a 21st century context, but that doesn't apply to things that happened 50 years ago. *Maury Wills excepted -- his 102 the year before was considered a fluke, though teams were seeing they were useful. Casey, however, was certainly going to be old school on the subject since only had one player who topped 20 with the Yankees -- Mickey Mantle, who didn't bat leadoff (and that was in 1959, one of the few years they didn't win the pennant). Phil Ruzutto topped 15 three times during that stretch, but the team never had more than one player over ten, and some years none reached ten. So it was not surprising that Casey wouldn't think SBs meant all that much.
|
Benjamin Grimm Oct 15 2010 08:44 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
Watched Dial M For Murder for the first time yesterday. Very enjoyable.
|
Edgy MD Oct 15 2010 08:53 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
OK, first of all, that's six paragraphs with not one citation from the article.
|
Frayed Knot Oct 15 2010 09:59 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
|
I've probably seen that one more times than any other Hitchcock movie just because it seems to come around more often. Always loved the plot that tennis dude springs on his unsuspecting ex-classmate that sets the whole thing up. It's just so positively evil.
|
Vic Sage Oct 15 2010 03:18 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
did you see it in 3D?
|
Benjamin Grimm Oct 15 2010 03:20 PM Re: hitchcock filmography |
No. I just learned about the 3D version today when reading the Wikipedia article.
|
Vince Coleman Firecracker Nov 08 2010 07:01 AM Re: hitchcock filmography |
|
I just wanted to say that as much as I love watching Hitchcock's films, I probably enjoy reading Robin Wood even more. Oh, and I just gave a presentation last week during which I argued (with only a little tongue-in-cheek) that Robert Walker's character in Strangers on a Train was influenced by Pepe le Pew.
|