Master Index of Archived Threads
National League Survivor (Three to Make Two)
G-Fafif Oct 02 2010 05:59 PM |
Saturday results:
|
Edgy DC Oct 02 2010 06:14 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
I guess I've got root for the Padres, but (1) they intimidate nobody as a postseason opponent, and (2) it's kind of hard to see Cox go down in a fold under fall foliage.
|
Fman99 Oct 02 2010 07:21 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
I'm rooting against the MFY's, Phillies, and Braves, in that order. I would love to see Atlanta get bounced in game 162 on a blown Billy Wagner save.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Oct 02 2010 09:14 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
[quote="Fman99":2kzqxcww]I'm rooting against the MFY's, Phillies, and Braves, in that order. I would love to see Atlanta get bounced in game 162 on a blown Billy Wagner save.[/quote:2kzqxcww]
|
Zvon Oct 02 2010 09:23 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
Tomorrow is gonna be great baseball.
|
Gwreck Oct 02 2010 11:12 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
I see the Reds as the best chance to defeat Philly so I am rooting for them all-the-way.
|
Benjamin Grimm Oct 03 2010 04:22 AM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
I'd like to see this get resolved today; I want the Phillies eliminated as soon as possible, so I want to their potential opponent, whoever it is, to be well-rested.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 03 2010 09:15 AM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
[quote="Gwreck"]I see the Reds as the best chance to defeat Philly so I am rooting for them all-the-way. |
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Oct 03 2010 09:17 AM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
[quote="Benjamin Grimm":3gr8r6j6]I'd like to see this get resolved today; I want the Phillies eliminated as soon as possible, so I want to their potential opponent, whoever it is, to be well-rested.[/quote:3gr8r6j6]
|
Edgy DC Oct 03 2010 10:58 AM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
Oh, I think an early pounding by a team with a fraction of their salary and a fraction of their coverage would make the point very nicely.
|
Gwreck Oct 03 2010 12:12 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
[quote="SteveJRogers":oyvwq7z3]Not sure of you mean literal WS games or series, but the Tigers defeated the Pads 4 games to 1 in 1984.[/quote:oyvwq7z3]
|
Frayed Knot Oct 03 2010 02:33 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
Braves assured of at least one more game.
|
Gwreck Oct 03 2010 03:01 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
The SF-SD game is on the MLB network this afternoon.
|
The Second Spitter Oct 03 2010 04:42 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
Both NL West teams are rubbish. Even if the giants win, Lincecum's starting the playoff game against the Braves the Phils will kill them in a short series.
|
Zvon Oct 03 2010 04:44 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
[quote="The Second Spitter":2536g60o]
|
Gwreck Oct 03 2010 04:52 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
[quote="The Second Spitter":5bb5ogwp]Even if the giants win, Lincecum's starting the playoff game against the Braves the Phils will kill them in a short series.[/quote:5bb5ogwp]
|
bmfc1 Oct 03 2010 05:12 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
Damn. I hated the SF fans when I saw the Mets in SF this past July. I wanted the SOB that looked at me in my Mets gear who said "we don't want your kind here" to suffer. I now have to root for them against the Braves.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 03 2010 05:15 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
[quote="The Second Spitter":23hk8mx4]Both NL West teams are rubbish. Even if the giants win, Lincecum's starting the playoff game against the Braves the Phils will kill them in a short series.
|
Gwreck Oct 03 2010 05:20 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
What?
|
Edgy DC Oct 03 2010 05:24 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
That's at-worst stolen history. Not honoring the tributes that Raines, Staub, and Dawson earned from Montreal is sort of deleting history.
|
SteveJRogers Oct 03 2010 05:28 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
|
I'm assuming Spitter is referring to the Nats using 8 (Gary Carter), 10 (Andre Dawson, Rusty Staub) and 30 (Tim Raines) in circulation since the move from Montreal. Hence implying that the start of the franchise is 2005, not 1969.
That's fair Edge, but I'm sure to an old Dodger or Giant fan its six of one=half dozen of the other and probably would prefer how the Ravens/Browns did it.
|
The Second Spitter Oct 03 2010 05:35 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
[quote="Gwreck":qj08s2oj][quote="The Second Spitter":qj08s2oj]Even if the giants win, Lincecum's starting the playoff game against the Braves the Phils will kill them in a short series.[/quote:qj08s2oj]
|
The Second Spitter Oct 03 2010 05:58 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
Hi from between 2nd &3rd at At&t
|
Gwreck Oct 03 2010 06:46 PM Re: National League Survivor (Three to Make Two) |
I was a big fan of the free wi-fi there.
|