Master Index of Archived Threads
Twitter
metirish Dec 06 2010 02:14 PM |
Who is on it?, it's like the best place now for breaking news.
|
TransMonk Dec 06 2010 02:20 PM Re: Twitter |
I've been mulling it for a while. I don't think I would ever post anything, but it does seem like it breaks some news.
|
metirish Dec 06 2010 02:24 PM Re: Twitter |
|
I thought the same thing when I signed up....I actually originally signed up to have a chance at winning a Nikon camera...you only have to weed through crap if you follow crap.... Sign up before someone takes the name Transmonk(not taken yet)
|
TransMonk Dec 06 2010 02:32 PM Re: Twitter |
Sold...I'll do it tonight.
|
seawolf17 Dec 06 2010 02:36 PM Re: Twitter |
I love Twitter. I use it personally and professionally all the time.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Dec 06 2010 02:53 PM Re: Twitter |
I don't really get it.
|
metirish Dec 06 2010 03:00 PM Re: Twitter |
|
I'm surprised you are not on it, a great way to plug your site.
|
themetfairy Dec 06 2010 03:20 PM Re: Twitter |
I was on it for a while, but for the most part the people I followed on Twitter would post the same things on Facebook. I decided to just stick with Facebook and somewhat limit my social networking time sucks.
|
Ceetar Dec 06 2010 05:38 PM Re: Twitter |
Great way to converse with fellow mets fans, and rather than randomly search out blogs and see ifa nyone has anything interesting to say, I just read my twitter feed and if there's something good, it shows up.
|
G-Fafif Dec 06 2010 05:59 PM Re: Twitter |
When you get a feel for it, Twitter's not quite as incredibly stupid as you think it is...which is as ringing an endorsement as I choose to give it.
|
TransMonk Dec 06 2010 06:42 PM Re: Twitter |
@TransMonk
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Dec 06 2010 07:05 PM Re: Twitter |
I have an account I use(d) for work for a time but to be honest it was only another thing coming in between me and doing my work. Plus my organization wasn't really supporting the effort.
|
metirish Dec 06 2010 07:31 PM Re: Twitter |
|
Not finding you at all....weird
|
Fman99 Dec 06 2010 08:11 PM Re: Twitter |
It's brainless and fun, like a fat person dancing.
|
Willets Point Dec 06 2010 08:45 PM Re: Twitter |
I try to use Twitter mainly to keep with other people in archives and records management, but I also yabber on about sports, blogs, and stupid stuff. I just followed TransMonk and Ceetar.
|
Ceetar Dec 06 2010 08:48 PM Re: Twitter |
|
That's an interesting name. I wouldn't have guessed. Okay, the rest of you. Out with it. What's your names? someone make a CPF list even.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Dec 06 2010 08:53 PM Re: Twitter |
|
Do you feel as though your "archives and records" contacts are at all interested in your views on sport? Is there a way to separate these streams?
|
Ceetar Dec 06 2010 08:58 PM Re: Twitter |
||
This is the biggest problem with Twitter. There are programs that make it very easy to separate two twitter accounts if you wanted to do so, but it's not ideal. I don't mind seeing random stuff in my feed as long as it's not excessive. it's interesting. I've unfollowed people that tweeted about soap operas too much. And a couple of people that liked to live tweet TV shows that I hadn't watched yet. Most of my follows are Mets fans or bloggers or what not, with some random others, like beer snobs, mixed in. The other random stuff is a bigger percentage now that Mets tweets are less with no real games going on. Keeps things interesting.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Dec 06 2010 09:07 PM Re: Twitter |
Yeah, I just don't see how that would work professionally, unless I operated separate accounts. Do people tend to have more than 1 twitter account?
|
Gwreck Dec 06 2010 11:19 PM Re: Twitter |
There are a lot of people who have personal and professional accounts, or similar. Like having a LinkedIn account and a Facebook account.
|
metsguyinmichigan Dec 07 2010 04:14 AM Re: Twitter |
I have two accounts, @ReporterDMurray and @MetsGuyinMich.
|
seawolf17 Dec 07 2010 05:17 AM Re: Twitter |
|
I help run the university account (@stonybrooku), and maintain a couple of searches keeping an eye out for relevant tweets. I also use it to maintain relationships with our campus media, alumni, athletics, students, etc. We have a pretty active Twitter community on campus. I also manage the CPF handle (@cranepoolforum) and the Bench handle (@thebenchtrading), both of which I'm hoping to make more active in 2011. Personally, I network with a lot of higher ed folks and other Mets folks, mostly. It's great professional development for me, considering we don't have the money to go to a lot of conferences.
|
Edgy DC Dec 07 2010 07:27 AM Re: Twitter |
And here I had no idea that people were tweeting on our behalf. What are you saying?
|
seawolf17 Dec 07 2010 07:36 AM Re: Twitter |
I sent you and Willets and JCL an e-mail about it a few weeks ago with the password, should you ever feel the need to tweet something.
|
Edgy DC Dec 07 2010 07:37 AM Re: Twitter |
Good work.
|
metirish Dec 07 2010 08:35 AM Re: Twitter |
Here is an interesting blog post about Scott Bourne, he's a photographer who has been out front on social media and the best way to utilize it , it's about photography but the principals apply.
|
Willets Point Dec 07 2010 08:49 AM Re: Twitter |
||
I don't really think anyone is interested in anything I say, to be honest. I'm thinking of becoming a qwitter.
|
metirish Dec 07 2010 08:54 AM Re: Twitter |
|||
not true...your complaining about tumblr has made for interesting reading , I've gone to your site several times from your tweets.....shoot, you are one of the more interesting people in my feed.....
|
Ceetar Dec 07 2010 09:25 AM Re: Twitter |
Atip though. No need to retweet beat writers or most other public figures. If we wanted to know what sherman or @petergriffin are saying we'd be following them ourselves
|
Willets Point Dec 07 2010 10:03 AM Re: Twitter |
Thank you for kind words. Nevertheless, I do read more than I write. Mostly I retweet things to make it easier for me to find them again later, but if someone else finds them interesting, more the better.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Dec 07 2010 04:10 PM Re: Twitter |
ok, Work JCL is following MichiganWorkGuy. I will see how this goes and copy him.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jan 23 2011 08:27 AM Re: Twitter |
|
I never got this email! Wifey is sick in bed, Lunchpail is sick on couch. I'm all atwitter @Springer66
|
metsguyinmichigan Jan 23 2011 10:32 AM Re: Twitter |
|
Cool! The MetsGuyinMich account, or my work account, reporterdmurray ?
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jan 23 2011 11:21 AM Re: Twitter |
||
My work twitty guy has been following reporterdmurray for a few weeks now. Now my non-work me is twatting metguyyinmich
|
metirish Jan 23 2011 11:27 AM Re: Twitter |
Thanks to twatter I now know that @Springer66 scratched his ass at 10:41 this morning , then went for a piss 3 minutes later......twitter is great .
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 13 2011 11:22 AM Re: Twitter |
No Irish you're following the social/baseball/etc JCL.
|
cooby Feb 13 2011 01:19 PM Re: Twitter |
Break a leg!
|
Methead Feb 13 2011 07:31 PM Re: Twitter |
|
Just followed you as a result of a link posted by The Happy Recap. My twitter is @planbvisual. I started using twitter as a professional resource / marketing tool. It works much better as a resource.
|
metirish Feb 13 2011 07:43 PM Re: Twitter |
|
been reading your articles , I never knew. @planbvisual , following you @conor_coen
|
Edgy DC Feb 13 2011 08:58 PM Re: Twitter |
Great job blowing their minds on 46.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 13 2011 09:19 PM Re: Twitter |
Rough first couple minutes I thought but I hit my stride eventually (you know, uh, you know).
|
metirish Feb 13 2011 09:23 PM Re: Twitter |
listening now , skip past the super bowl shit guys and get to Springer.
|
metirish Feb 13 2011 09:26 PM Re: Twitter |
this guy is pretty funny , he's right , on twitter today he was tweeting about Timo and Benitez
|
Edgy DC Feb 13 2011 09:28 PM Re: Twitter |
|
Yup. I'm thinking about it. Don't let 'em catch you with your pants down. Either hand 'em a bunch of questions you want to be asked or steer the conversation to what you want to talk about. You're the expert. Own the conversation. Cool job on clarifying your stance on retirement. I got a cool new idea on retirement. Retire 31 and 45, but display the circles overlapping like a Venn Diagram. The cicles would reperesent Piazza and McGraw, and overlapped area would represent Franco.
|
metirish Feb 14 2011 07:47 PM Re: Twitter Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Feb 15 2011 04:17 AM |
|
got to finish this tonight , there probably is no other Met players you could compare to Mantle in the way you were..... nice dig at the yankees who'll soon be wearing triple digits . putting down Franco's #45 Mets wearing career to one pitch was great.
|
Edgy DC Feb 14 2011 08:48 PM Re: Twitter |
They had a strange conversation about Rick Aguilera. While their larger point --- that a team doesn't need to solve every roster problem to be successful --- was solid, they were arguing that the Mets never really established anybody in the fifth rotation slot in 1986, and they were speaking of Aguilera as if he were a far more obscure figure than he is.
|
metirish Feb 15 2011 07:07 AM Re: Twitter |
I think JCL talked the host out of retiring every notable number the Mets have used, it was a fun interview , the host new his stuff as did the guest.
|
themetfairy Mar 14 2011 03:18 PM Re: Twitter |
I decided to go back to Twitter after a 2+ year absence.
|
Willets Point Mar 14 2011 05:04 PM Re: Twitter |
|
InsidePitcher replaces me. I recently deleted my account at Twitter. The noise to signal ratio is just way too high.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 14 2011 06:36 PM Re: Twitter |
||
Yuh, seems like you don't get much out of it unless you're on top of the stream all day, and there's not a lotta time for that. I do think you have to be there to be out there though.
|
metirish Mar 14 2011 06:39 PM Re: Twitter |
I find it tolerable for breaking news/score updates , which I could get elsewhere I suppose.
|
Willets Point Mar 14 2011 06:43 PM Re: Twitter |
The other thing that irritated me is that if there were people discussing something interesting, it was a pain in the ass picking through all the shortened words and following all the @'s to get to the start of the conversation . And then some of those would be replies to someone who had their tweets hidden. It must work well for people with smartphones who are on 24/7 but I guess I'm an oldster who'd rather follow a discussion on a message board or blog (or
|
metirish Mar 14 2011 07:10 PM Re: Twitter |
If i did not have a smartphone I would not be in Twitter, getting the notifications are key.
|
Ceetar Mar 14 2011 08:08 PM Re: Twitter |
I'm hooked, the constant influx of news and info is cool, and I'm not forced to 'guess' where the good posts are. If someone (beat writer or blogger or otherwise) writes something good, it finds it's way into my timeline and I can read it.
|
metirish Mar 14 2011 08:29 PM Re: Twitter |
|
so much for Google's speech to text....smart phones eh?
|
seawolf17 Mar 15 2011 05:09 AM Re: Twitter |
|
That's it. Plus, I use it professionally; there's a huge higher ed community out there. I'm not saying Twitter is easy, but once you get invested, the reward can be enormous.
|
Ceetar Mar 15 2011 07:31 AM Re: Twitter |
||
It takes a lot of work to get it right. To really filter out the noise and junk, and it's hard to do taht during the offseason because (if you're planning to use it for the Mets anyway) a lot of people that are Mets fans/tweeters, myself included, tend to go off topic a lot more when there isn't Mets stuff to talk about. I ramble about beer a bunch for instance. I try to keep it down, but some don't. I had to unfollow someone for basically live tweeting soap operas every day, and another Mets fan because she was spoiling tv shows for me that I'd recorded. Someone was live tweeting Snooki on RAW last night, which luckily i wasn't really paying attention, but a lot of "live tweeting" is generally just spammy. It can get a little annoying during Jets/Knicks/NCAA games because I don't care about any of it but plenty of Mets fans overlap and are talking about it. But those are the outliers that I ignore Twitter for a while for. I do like to keep a little variety in my feed, I try to keep it so most of it's Mets, but the odd college admissions tweet or silly celebrity (Ken Jennings is actually a really good follow, whoever recommended that, thanks) are entertaining. I only follow some of the beat writers (Popper, DiComo, and the less-beat guys like Burkhardt) because they get repetitive and negative.
|
Edgy DC Mar 15 2011 07:38 AM Re: Twitter |
Yeah, it seems like it can be abused as a place for snarky sportswriters to practice their stand-up act.
|
Ceetar Mar 15 2011 07:45 AM Re: Twitter |
|
Although it's fun to get snarky at those 'journalists' too. Although Jon Heyman is quick with the block button from what I understand.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 15 2011 08:05 AM Re: Twitter |
I may be at the tipping point for old age. I read about Twitter and I have no interest, at all, in getting involved with it. (That may change, of course, if I discover a compelling reason to take the plunge.) If I was ten or twenty years younger, I'm sure I'd be much more open to it.
|
metirish Mar 15 2011 08:11 AM Re: Twitter |
|
if you wanted to promote the UMDB it might be a good place to do it......@UMDB would be the name I suppose....
|
seawolf17 Mar 15 2011 11:38 AM Re: Twitter |
|
Hey! That's me!
|
Ceetar Mar 15 2011 12:31 PM Re: Twitter |
||
Yup, and while I couldn't care less about the Seawolves (actually, one of the friends I'm meeting down at Spring Training went there), I do find some of the "They called up and asked WHAT?" tweets pretty amusing.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 19 2011 03:13 PM Re: Twitter |
Article in today's NYTimes about a backlash against Twitterers who essentially use it not to send updates but more like boastful 'I here and you're not' messages.
|
Willets Point Mar 19 2011 05:50 PM Re: Twitter |
I'm sure SXSW is a fun event to attend, but the hype that goes with it each year just annoys the crap out of me.
|
Edgy DC Mar 19 2011 06:39 PM Re: Twitter |
Was it always a music and technology festival? Didn't it start off as a music festival alone?
|
themetfairy Mar 22 2011 08:14 AM Re: Twitter |
I'm not getting anything out of Twitter that I don't get here or from Facebook. I think I'm going to go back to ignoring the place.
|
Edgy DC Mar 22 2011 08:37 AM Re: Twitter |
Facebook, which is inaccessible to me this morn. Anybody else having problems logging on?
|
Willets Point Mar 22 2011 08:42 AM Re: Twitter |
I haven't had any problems with Facebook myself.
|
themetfairy Mar 22 2011 08:43 AM Re: Twitter |
Facebook was slow for me last night, but fine today.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 22 2011 08:44 AM Re: Twitter |
Was giving me some shit this morning. Looks okay now.
|
Edgy DC Mar 22 2011 08:52 AM Re: Twitter |
Then I've got a local problem.
|
Willets Point Mar 22 2011 09:13 AM Re: Twitter |
|
Tumblr is where it's at.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 22 2011 09:34 AM Re: Twitter |
Now I'm really confused. What's Tumblr?
|
Ceetar Mar 22 2011 09:35 AM Re: Twitter |
||
I see no use for Tumblr at all personally.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 22 2011 09:39 AM Re: Twitter |
Tumblr is a blog for people too lazy to actually write.
|
Willets Point Mar 22 2011 09:43 AM Re: Twitter |
|
Tumblr is an easy to use microblogging platform that unlike Twitter does not have an artificial limit of 140-characters and allows the user to post text, images, video, audio, and links. Also unlike Twitter where the only people who followed me were spambots for self-marketing "gurus" and purveyors of pornography, I've actually made connections with real, human beings who share my interests. There are a number of good Mets Tumblr blogs out there.
|
themetfairy Mar 22 2011 10:52 AM Re: Twitter |
What does Tumblr give you that Facebook doesn't?
|
Willets Point Mar 22 2011 11:24 AM Re: Twitter |
|
I don't know if they're really comparable as Tumblr is a blogging platform (although there is a social networking element to it as well). I feel if I post something or share a picture/video/audio/link on Tumblr I have more control over the content and how it appears and it's easier to find if I'm looking for it later on. I can never find anything on Facebook after a few weeks unless I endlessly click "older posts". Plus, Tumblr doesn't seem obsessed with compromising your personal information and sharing it with the world (unless you really want to). Anyhow, I use both Tumblr and Facebook as they serve different, sometimes complementary, purposes.
|
Ceetar Mar 22 2011 11:31 AM Re: Twitter |
||
I've made plenty of those connections via Twitter (I block or just don't follow back the bots). Many of those are also bloggers who share more stream of conscious and conversational stuff on Twitter. For me, it's a cross between Twitter and Blogging but really doesn't do either as well as the others, and that crossover just seems wasteful to me. (I do have a Tumblr, and I thought about using it while I was in Florida, but i opted to just send my pics to twitter instead) I'd be interesting to see how Tumblr performs SEO wise. It seems like it's a little more streamlined and transient and wouldn't show up as well in search engines, particularly as stuff gets pushed down.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 22 2011 11:38 AM Re: Twitter |
I'm torn between being curious about all this stuff, and thinking it's too complicated and unnecessary.
|
Willets Point Mar 22 2011 11:47 AM Re: Twitter |
For me, I'd want the email. The problem I have with Twitter is that it does require constant moderating to get anything out of it and I'd probably miss that important tweet from Grimm. On the other hand the signal to noise ratio thing plays into this for me as well. If I'm not on your daughter's softball team I don't care if the game is on or off and it's just one more piece of irrelevant information clogging my Twitter stream. For every one thing that Grimm (or anyone else) tweets that I find interesting or valuable, there's a dozen tweets I just don't care about. This doesn't make Grimm a bad person it's just that there's really no way to sort the wheat from the chaff except by constant moderation. Of course this is an advantage for many other people and a sign that I'm behind the times because I have no interest in a smart phone which would make it more viable to follow a constant stream of tweets (and even then I think it would be more work than it's worth).
|
seawolf17 Mar 22 2011 11:50 AM Re: Twitter |
Depends. My phone buzzes any time someone hits me directly (@cdorso) on Twitter, so probably there first.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 22 2011 11:55 AM Re: Twitter |
I'm thinking it would be a softball-team-only Twitter feed. I'm wondering if it's a more efficient way of communicating late-breaking news to the parents of the girls on the team.
|
Willets Point Mar 22 2011 11:55 AM Re: Twitter |
|
Well, everyone post "tweets I don't care about." So I quit following everyone. I tried Tweet Deck, but it just annoyed me to have the thing popping up constantly. I guess I'm just a person who likes to do things on my own time and my own speed which is why I like blogs and rss feeds.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 22 2011 11:56 AM Re: Twitter |
I'd probably send an email and also, copy the message to a central web address place that people would know to look for that. Like a team facebook page or a Tumblr page, where, as I understand it, you can update via your phone or email or whatever.
|
Ceetar Mar 22 2011 12:05 PM Re: Twitter |
|
You do have to cultivate it, but you don't lose followers when you're not tweeting (generally). So it's baseball season and you're particularly into a particular series and start discussing with some people you follow. Some start following you, others maybe retweet something you said or linked to and others follow you as a result. If you tag your posts with #mets you show up in certain places where random people may see. now you've got 50 followers, which isn't much, but if you take a vacation and don't say anything for three weeks, you'll still likely have 50 and the ab ility to cultivate more. Of course, if you spend your vacation tweeting about your love of hiking and the awesome trails your climbing and facts about weeds, people may unfollow you. I've been doing this over a year now and am only up to 400 followers. It's taken me a long time of following and unfollowing people to get the noise level right, and often that depends on the time of day and season.
|
seawolf17 Mar 22 2011 12:08 PM Re: Twitter |
It's adaptable, though. My wife uses a Twitter feed at work exclusively to feed the online catalog; that's all it does, just "the system is up"/"the system is down" types of updates. She has a widget on the county catalog, then, that just shows that feed; so you always know at a glance what's up.
|
themetfairy Mar 22 2011 12:14 PM Re: Twitter |
|
I assume that, while you're posting this news on Twitter, you would also post it on Facebook. In this scenario, though, I'd get the e-mail first - I get my e-mail on my phone and get notifications when I have new mail. I'd then get it on Facebook, if it was there. But I don't check Facebook nearly as often as I check my e-mail. As for Tumblr - what would it give someone who is already set with Facebook and Blogger?
|
Willets Point Mar 22 2011 12:20 PM Re: Twitter |
|
I didn't mean to imply they are the same thing. I meant that it works better for me. I used Twitter for nearly 3 years, mostly with the intention of following other people in libraries & archives. There are some interesting people out there but most of the time they're tweeting about their lunch, or their crappy day, or saying "you're great" to someone else, or doing @ replies to someone with protected tweets so I can only see half of the conversation. Most of these people also have blogs where they take the time to filter out the noise and focus in on a particular issue related to libraries or archives that I'm interested and can read when I have the time (and discuss in the comments). That's what I have the time for and that's what works for me. As you can see by my verbosity here, I also felt constrained by the 140-character limit.
|
Willets Point Mar 22 2011 12:23 PM Re: Twitter |
|
For you I don't think Tumblr would be desirable. Tumblr is easier to use and provides more opportunity to interact with other users than Blogger. Since you run a private blog I don't think this would be a feature for you.
|
Ceetar Mar 22 2011 12:32 PM Re: Twitter |
I think Twitter fits well with the 'water cooler' type discussions people have, and very well with sports and other things that you'd look for an immediate reaction from, like political speeches, or disasters for the very reason that everyone in that subset is also looking to discuss it. When the Mets are playing, or when thety sign a player, people talk about it. But if you happen to want to randomly talk about the the effect of caffeine on child development or something, the immediacy of the data isn't as important and might be better followed via blog comments or something.
|
themetfairy Mar 22 2011 12:44 PM Re: Twitter |
||
Blogger is pretty easy, so I'm chuckling at the concept of something being easier than that. And thanks for the confirmation of my suspicion that Tumblr wouldn't fit my particular needs any better than what I already am using.
|
metirish Mar 22 2011 02:16 PM Re: Twitter |
Um , asking , no begging Johan Santana to retweet you and say hi is a little bit desperate....
|
Ceetar Mar 22 2011 02:26 PM Re: Twitter |
|
yeah, that stuff is annoying.
|
metirish Mar 23 2011 08:38 AM Re: Twitter |
Here is something I like about twitter, when the Oscars of Grammies were on there was some craic to be had on twitter going back and forth commenting with Seawolf and others on the goings on...very instant, some good laughs.
|
Fman99 Mar 23 2011 10:43 AM Re: Twitter |
I honestly don't feel a need to "tweet."
|
Ceetar Mar 23 2011 12:12 PM Re: Twitter |
|
Works for things like that, sporting events, Mets game.. in the age of DVR I hate when people do that with tv shows I haven't watched yet.
|
Fman99 Mar 24 2011 09:41 PM Re: Twitter |
In an attempt to make Twitter more useful to me, I've separated my existing account into two... one (my existing one) for people who I know, or at least interact with personally online (like Ceetar, for example, whom I've never met but will keep on this list). The other, newer one, I will use to follow sportswriters, celebrities, and people whom I don't know.
|
metirish Apr 06 2011 09:17 AM Re: Twitter |
Had to drop Ken Davidoff......what an asshole....every tweet since the season started had his prediction for the MFY's to finish 93-69. I guess some people took offense to that and to be an asshole to puts it in every tweet.....people who took offense need to get a grip too.
|
Ceetar Apr 06 2011 10:02 AM Re: Twitter |
|
Never followed him anyway, but looking back looks like he responds to all criticism of the predictions with "anything is possible" His post today also says don't believe yet, it's too early. Just have fun, you're welcome to spend money on the team, but he seems to imply you shouldn't. complete with pot-shot/joke about the finances.
|
metirish Apr 08 2011 07:40 AM Re: Twitter |
@bobojedaSNY is now active on twitter
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 15 2011 01:11 PM Re: Twitter |
|
#JohnSterlingCallingHistory is just too funny to pass up. I tried a couple.
|
metirish Apr 15 2011 01:36 PM Re: Twitter |
||
yes , Sherman has been retweeting him.....
|
Ceetar Apr 15 2011 01:46 PM Re: Twitter |
@FakeJSterling: JOHN WILKES BOOTH IS IN LINCOLN'S BOX, OH MY GOODNESS GRACIOUS! #SuzynWaldmanCallingHistory #JohnSterlingCallingHistory
|
Edgy DC Apr 15 2011 01:48 PM Re: Twitter |
|
Ceetar Apr 15 2011 01:49 PM Re: Twitter |
I'm sure there's a good one for Hiroshima, but I can't get it to sound right. An A-Bomb for Tru-Man! just doesn't flow.
|
Willets Point Apr 15 2011 01:53 PM Re: Twitter |
OF ALL THE DRAMATIC THINGS I'VE EVER SEEN, JOHN WILKES BOOTH HAS SHOT THE PRESIDENT IN THE HEAD. JOHN WILKES BOOTH .... HATES THE YANKEES!
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 15 2011 02:04 PM Re: Twitter |
||
Many of them have been done several times.
|
metirish Apr 15 2011 03:03 PM Re: Twitter |
Is there any one person doing this or is it a tag #johnsterlingcallshistory
|
Willets Point Apr 15 2011 03:16 PM Re: Twitter |
What about #waynehagincallshistory?
|
Ceetar Apr 16 2011 08:59 AM Re: Twitter |
|
And Booth fires, Lincoln doesn't see him, as he's watch the stage, and what a performance it is going on there! Mrs. Lincoln screams as Booth flees, and Lincoln is down, having been shot.
|
metirish Apr 25 2011 11:12 AM Re: Twitter |
Hilarious
|
Willets Point Apr 25 2011 12:56 PM Re: Twitter |
I rejoined but am going to keep a strict discipline of following only work-related and professional development types. If this works maybe I'll start a second account for more personal and fun things.
|
Fman99 Apr 25 2011 12:58 PM Re: Twitter |
|
This is how I do it now -- my own account for interacting with people like yourself, and Ceetar, and a second one to follow journalists and people in the public eye.
|
metirish Apr 25 2011 01:06 PM Re: Twitter |
||
what about me you prick?
|
seawolf17 Apr 25 2011 01:06 PM Re: Twitter |
|||
Didn't mention me either. I say we post something saying that he's really Justin Bieber.
|
Fman99 Apr 26 2011 08:13 AM Re: Twitter |
I already follow both of you, you whiny insecure FUCKS.
|
Willets Point Jun 05 2011 06:21 PM Re: Twitter |
Okay, I'm back in the fold with a separate personal account @othemts. I followed everyone who mentioned their username in this thread. If I missed anyone, just let me know, or just follow me.
|
metirish Jul 28 2011 11:10 AM Re: Twitter |
This kid was born in the US?
|
Willets Point Jul 28 2011 11:48 AM Re: Twitter |
Many Americans are bad about using "its" and "it's". Of course he would have been fine with just "it" here.
|
Chad Ochoseis Jul 28 2011 11:53 AM Re: Twitter |
If he pitchs good, I dont care about his grammer skillz.
|
Fman99 Jul 28 2011 06:51 PM Re: Twitter |
It's was a good tweete, quit beeing dix.
|
metirish Aug 17 2011 10:54 AM Re: Twitter |
Going to dump Dickey , he's filling up my timeline with utter shite....
|
seawolf17 Aug 17 2011 11:09 AM Re: Twitter |
|
I thought his middle-of-the-night food Q&A was neat, actually.
|
metirish Aug 17 2011 12:06 PM Re: Twitter |
||
It was , problem is he's holding ten minute Q&A sessions quite a lot.
|
Ceetar Aug 17 2011 12:08 PM Re: Twitter |
|||
he's only been at it a week. I'm hoping he gets bored of us.
|
Ceetar Aug 17 2011 12:56 PM Re: Twitter |
I see @EdgyDC has joined twitter.
|
metirish Aug 17 2011 01:44 PM Re: Twitter |
|
and has nothing to say.......come on man.
|
Ceetar Aug 17 2011 02:31 PM Re: Twitter |
||
and he stealth followed me. I usually get emails for new followers.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Aug 22 2011 12:37 PM Re: Twitter |
||||
In the spirit of @dadboner's Marianas-deep commitment to a character voice, my new favorite Twitter feed.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 22 2011 12:43 PM Re: Twitter |
There was still slavery 30 years ago?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Aug 22 2011 12:48 PM Re: Twitter |
|
You'll notice, the Tweets are of a certain... flavor. But in case it isn't evident... think doofy, oversharing Tweets/Facebook statuses.
|