Master Index of Archived Threads
we should buy the mets
Vic Sage Mar 08 2011 10:51 AM |
according to this guy...
|
metirish Mar 08 2011 10:59 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
|
Fun article ,
while in the bar getting hammered.
|
Valadius Mar 08 2011 11:58 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
Sign me up for the idea that sports teams be publicly traded.
|
Vic Sage Mar 09 2011 08:17 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
|
i'm more interested in their being publicly owned.
|
MFS62 Mar 09 2011 08:21 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
||
Interested? It sure would be interesting. I can imagine the discussions in a bar with a couple of fully lubricated owners arguing over a trade. Later
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Mar 09 2011 09:44 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
I know we're all spitballing and such... but a publicly-owned team in a league without a salary cap is a terrible idea.
|
Edgy DC Mar 09 2011 10:00 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
I'm agreeing.
|
Vic Sage Mar 11 2011 01:42 PM Re: we should buy the mets |
your AGAINST "egg cream & pizza" fridays?
|
G-Fafif Mar 11 2011 02:23 PM Re: we should buy the mets |
|
Denis Hamil takes a similar tack, sort of, here. Unfortunately timed allusion included.
|
Edgy DC Mar 11 2011 07:48 PM Re: we should buy the mets |
How are folks so pro-Shea, these days? Really?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Mar 11 2011 09:43 PM Re: we should buy the mets |
Call me a yuppie, or a square if you'd like. I come for the games. But I LIKE a tangible Hall of Fame, a stadium that allows you to watch the game while standing or moving, using a puddle-free restroom (and walkways), traversing non-death-trappy stairways and escalators, and occasionally having a BluePoint Toasted Lager with palatable, affordable food.
|
Gwreck Mar 12 2011 08:57 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
It's still a money thing. People can do without the tangible hall of fame, the good food, the good beer, the legroom/more comfortable seat, etc. if they can buy a good seat at a decent price. That's gone now.
|
batmagadanleadoff Mar 12 2011 09:27 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
If you ask me, I'd say that you can't even buy a bad seat at a decent price. The options aren't mutually exclusive. There's no reason why a fan can't have enjoyable seating, savory food choices and a hall of fame exhibit. But I'd say that seating options come first.
|
Edgy DC Mar 12 2011 09:37 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
I think it's a pretty obvious thing that the presence of Shea was something to beat the Wilpons over when the narrative was of cheapo poorer cousins, and now the absence of Shea is something to beat them over when the narrative is of overextended swindlers, and the facts or even an honest revelation of the author's opinion doesn't really enter into it.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 12 2011 11:26 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
|
The Wilpons had the most to gain from the notion that Shea was a shithole. They wanted us to believe it.
|
Edgy DC Mar 12 2011 11:39 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
That they deserve criticism for.
|
Gwreck Mar 12 2011 11:56 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
|
Of course I agree that the options aren't mutually exclusive in theory; I think they're mutually exclusive at Citi Field. This also would likely be less of an issue if either A. the Mets' last two seasons hadn't gone in the toilet (preceded by two good seasons with bad endings); and b. The economy hadn't gone in the toilet.
|
G-Fafif Mar 12 2011 12:14 PM Re: we should buy the mets |
|
You needen't apologize to me, but you will be hearing from the attorneys for Praeger-Kavanaugh-Waterbury.
|
Valadius Mar 13 2011 07:39 AM Re: we should buy the mets |
I will forever have a problem with the fact that they built a smaller stadium than the previous one in the biggest city in the country. But as much as I loved Shea, it badly needed some kind of upgrade.
|