Master Index of Archived Threads
Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times
Edgy DC Mar 28 2011 06:06 AM |
I'd like to congratulate Rafael Santana, owner of the greatest single season among Met shortstops, and every paper in America not named to The New York Times, for being winning enough not to have this loser in the lineup this morning.
|
Ceetar Mar 28 2011 06:49 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
|
I assume he's been upgraded to a 'drivel' writer? Oh, but he has a blog!
|
metirish Mar 28 2011 07:07 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
What'as his fucking thing here?, that the Rays are idiots for trading away Pena who was crap and hitting on the Mendoza line but his team had a .611 winning percentage with him in the lineup, or that the Cardinals should have not traded away Ryan who apparnertly went into the shitter without the SS.
|
Willets Point Mar 28 2011 07:45 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
|
Because the 12 games Gardner didn't play in are just a huge fucking sample size. Could it be that Gardener played in nearly every game of the season for good team that won lots of games? On the other hand, anything that dares speak against the mystique & aura of Captain Intangibles can't be all bad.
|
Vic Sage Mar 28 2011 09:05 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
|||
pray tell, what might that be, sir?
Ah, the metaphysical art of "winning"!... apparently shared by few noble souls, like Stanky and Charlie Sheen.
oh, wait... but i thought you said... BEYOND talent, um.... metaphysics... "winner".... um, you mean the talent to have a career OB% of 4 fucking 10 might have factored into it too? gee. what a douche. the NY Times... all the news we can make fit to print.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Mar 28 2011 09:41 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
||
Ass. He's talking about ass. He likes Eckstein's patoot. Gardner's, too. And who wouldn't? They're adorable. It's the rule of sizes-- bigger is funnier, while smaller is unecquivocally cuter. Eckstein is cuter, and therefore win-nier. Also, Pena is browner than most first basemen, and brown looks healthier, so his teammates feel healthier when he's around. You can't argue this-- IT'S SCIENCE.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 28 2011 10:13 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
The sad thing is that that 'Keeping Score' column is - or at least has been - the Times' version of a Sabermetric-ish look at sports.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Mar 28 2011 10:25 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
I'd be extremely curious to see what athletes/coaches have hired him as a consultant.
|
Edgy DC Mar 28 2011 10:28 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
|
Snark all you want. You'd kill for his rolodex.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Mar 28 2011 10:38 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
I was expecting something else when I clicked on "Slump-Busting."
|
Willets Point Mar 28 2011 11:36 AM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
Geez, sounds like he works for Cunning Visions.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Mar 28 2011 01:33 PM Re: Winners Win: The Triumph of Circular Logic at the Times |
"I'M NOT AFRAID ANYMORE! I'M A WINNER!"
|