Master Index of Archived Threads
This Week's Going Nine - Playing Pepper Allowed
| Mark Healey Nov 06 2005 07:41 PM |
|
Discuss....
|
| Valadius Nov 06 2005 08:27 PM |
|
If Milton Bradley goes to the MFYs, the Bronx Zoo is back.
|
| OlerudOwned Nov 06 2005 09:00 PM |
|
|
|
| Johnny Dickshot Nov 07 2005 09:45 AM |
|
I was going to respond that Milton Bradley is the type of player the Mets could use, only to realize that other than being 5 years younger and perhaps, possessing more potential, he's not appreciably superior to Mike Cameron.
|
| Edgy DC Nov 07 2005 10:45 AM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Nov 07 2005 01:20 PM |
|
Of course, it is in any free agent's interest to say he's open to signing to play in New York. And it's in the interest of any fvie-and-ten guy (like Ramirez) to say he isn't open to being traded to playing there.
|
| duan Nov 07 2005 01:01 PM |
|
"I'd prolly put Cameron in center and move Beltran to a corner,"
|
| Johnny Dickshot Nov 07 2005 01:18 PM |
|
I need translation into English, but I think what he's sying is Beltran helped Floyd appear better defensively? I'd buy that at least somewhat.
|
| Mark Healey Nov 07 2005 01:44 PM |
|
|
My information has always been, regadless of what Omar has said publicly, that he'd prefer to trade Cameron than play him in RF. I think Cammy's value is so low now they may not be able to trade him untile after ST...which, unless you're getting back a younger corner OF (Melky Cabera?) makes little sense.
|
| Valadius Nov 07 2005 04:04 PM |
|
Melky Cabrera, last I checked, is a center fielder. And he stunk.
|
| Edgy DC Nov 07 2005 04:07 PM |
|
Good name, though.
|
| Mark Healey Nov 07 2005 06:51 PM |
|
|
And you're basing this on what? Two games? Actually, he was rated the minors' best defensive OF last year by Baseball America, which is why the Yankees tried to force feed him CF this year. He;s only 21-22 years old and from what I've seen of him, is a very nice prospect, especially in a corner spot. I rate him higher than Victor Diaz as an all-around player, that's for sure.
|
| Edgy DC Nov 07 2005 08:48 PM |
|
What's to enjoy about Mike and the Mad Dog? I mean there's ignorance, empty bluster, prejudice, rabble-rousing, and an absence of accountability, but what else besides that?
|
| Mark Healey Nov 08 2005 07:36 AM |
|
|
Different strokes, Edgy...I've been listening every day since the first show...and Pete Franklin before that, so I must enjoy it.
|
| Edgy DC Nov 08 2005 09:48 AM |
|
Sure, but I can give you two yahoos shouting in ignorance at half the price. Anybody could do what they do and most do. Why should they command anybody's attention?
|
| Elster88 Nov 08 2005 10:02 AM |
|
Francessa knows a thing or three.
|
| Edgy DC Nov 08 2005 10:06 AM |
|
I guess it's been a while for me.
|
| Frayed Knot Nov 08 2005 10:20 AM |
|
|
Few could and few do. Look, I'll knock those two as much as anyone when I think they deserve it, but sports radio host seems to be heading toward one of those jobs that many amatuers think they can do as well as the pros. M&MD have not only survived but thrived in NYC and in the biggest daytime time slot for over 15 years now. With over 100 radio stations avialable in this market (not to mention the introduction of satellite) the easiest thing to do is turn off a radio show and few have a talent to make people NOT turn off theirs. That's not an accident or quirk of fate. So feel free to turn yours off if they're not your cuppa, but they are in fact commanding many people's attention and are frankly 'Masterpiece Theatre' compared to most of their competitors and imitators.
|
| Yancy Street Gang Nov 08 2005 10:24 AM |
|
|
Francesca knows a lot of facts; I'll grant him that. But he doesn't draw any intelligent conclusions from those facts. Mad Dog's rants can sometimes be humorous. I was able to listen to them for 20 to 30 minutes in the car. They'd get good guests, and their interviews with the factions in the NHL strike were interesting. But if you listen to them for too long you can feel your mind going numb. As of a couple of months ago, my radio dial is no longer set to WFAN. No Imus, no Mike and the Mad Dog, no Richard Kneer on Saturday morning. I'll listen to Mets telecasts, and pre- and post-game shows, and I'll probably tune back to WFAN if the Mets make a big offseason deal, but I've found that there's much better radio out there, and I don't miss WFAN at all.
|
| Edgy DC Nov 08 2005 10:32 AM |
||
|
Yeah, again, it's been a while for me. But I've found them absolutely indistinguishable from the "imitators," who I don't think are imitating them so much as imitating some blowhard model that predated them. They survive largely because they got the right spot at the right time and don't deviate from the tired formula. Media is like that. Getting your spot and squatting it well is an accomplishment of sorts but hardly something I see worthy of praise. The same could be said about Jay Leno, Art Buchwald, and whoever now writes Barney Google and Snuffy Smith. And even those examples (the first two anyhow) could claim they were devastating once upon a time.
They get good guests because they have the best slot. Getting good guests is not in itself an example of quality that should justify them getting the best slot.
|
| Nymr83 Nov 08 2005 11:18 AM |
|
|
about football, yes. their knowledge of baseball does not go beyond that of any real fan and i'd say russo's is quite lower than that.
|
| Nymr83 Nov 08 2005 11:20 AM |
|
as far as WFAN in general goes i love Summers and Beningo, though i hate that they put him in the late morning/early afternoon asnd with sidiot, he was much better solo and he was the guy you wanted to hear sunday night after a jet loss.
|
| Elster88 Nov 08 2005 11:23 AM |
|
|
You're not up to date on your WFAN programming.
|
| Nymr83 Nov 08 2005 11:56 AM |
|
its been awhile since i've bothered tuning in to anything but Summers, what did they do now?
|