Master Index of Archived Threads
IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets
Gwreck Apr 19 2011 11:42 AM |
Time to turn this into a protracted winning streak.
|
metirish Apr 19 2011 11:44 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
A team that are as bad if not worse than our beloveds?
|
G-Fafif Apr 19 2011 12:08 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
|
G-Fafif Apr 19 2011 12:15 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Apr 19 2011 02:13 PM |
Reyes SS
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 01:16 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
While waiting for a KTE, here are some tidbits from today's media guide:
|
Ashie62 Apr 19 2011 03:23 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
The Astros suck...A team to beat up on.
|
Ceetar Apr 19 2011 04:59 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Bourn CF,
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 05:51 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
FC E4 5U
|
Ceetar Apr 19 2011 05:52 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
definitely! is it 5u or 4-5? or as Ted Berg said, 4-6ish-5?
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 05:56 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Gary said it was 5u. It was a nice play by David no matter what.
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 06:09 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
The 1-6-3 DP is pretty nice too.
|
Edgy DC Apr 19 2011 06:28 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Pitching progressing.
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 06:30 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Niese has been better, but the infield (Turner excluded) has helped him out a few times.
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 06:47 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Another nice defensive play to quash a jam. Thole!
|
Fman99 Apr 19 2011 06:55 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Anemic at the plate tonight.
|
Edgy DC Apr 19 2011 07:00 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
We need us some Bay.
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 07:06 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
KABOOM!!
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 07:07 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
I think with Emaus gone, Hairston may want to start looking over his shoulder.
|
Edgy DC Apr 19 2011 07:14 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Rallllleeee!
|
Edgy DC Apr 19 2011 07:17 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Bu!
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 07:18 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Yeah, I'm not sure why we didn't see Muffy there.
|
Edgy DC Apr 19 2011 07:26 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
They would have gone to a lefty, but I'm saying, whatever chases the starter sooner rather than later is good. I hate to let an opposing starter go deep in game one of a series.
|
Fman99 Apr 19 2011 07:35 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Yeesh. Balk in a run before you throw a pitch. Embarrassing.
|
Edgy DC Apr 19 2011 07:38 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
A six-one lead looks to be a tough haul.
|
Edgy DC Apr 19 2011 07:46 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
OK, Thole. Let's hit.
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 07:50 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Horseshit call!!!
|
Fman99 Apr 19 2011 08:10 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Just in? Turn her!
|
TransMonk Apr 19 2011 08:12 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
At least that torture is over.
|
bmfc1 Apr 19 2011 08:14 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Terry's better PH, Murphy, and better RP, Isringhausen, didn't get in the game and the players that were used didn't come through. Sometimes you shouldn't save your "bullets" for later in the game.
|
Fman99 Apr 19 2011 08:20 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Depressing to look outmatched so badly by a team with an equally shitty record. The reality is as long as you've got bullpen pitchers shitting on the mound, and shaky defense, combined with a lack of hitting for power and/or average, well, you're going to be those guys.
|
Edgy DC Apr 19 2011 08:26 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
Well, I have no problem with Isringhauesen staying out. I'd've like to have seen Murphy. But I think he's trying to get Hu some opportunity to get going. I just like attacking the starting pitcher until he's walking to the dugout. It's a big part of winning to me.
|
Ceetar Apr 19 2011 09:09 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
||
I agree with that. Was it because it was lefty-lefty? There are other opportunities to get Hu AB and playing time if need be. I don't know what suddenly happened to all the offense.
|
bmfc1 Apr 20 2011 03:05 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
The bases were loaded and with the Mets lack of hitting, the game was on the line. Parnell has not been good so this wasn't the opportunity to hope that he showed improvement. He gave up 3 runs and the game was over right there. Terry should have brought in Isringhausen.
|
Edgy DC Apr 20 2011 05:21 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
I agree that the game was on the line, to the extent that to get out of it would have meant that we go to the bottom of the eighth down two runs.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 20 2011 06:21 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
I didn't have a problem with the relief choice, though did with the PH choice.
|
Ceetar Apr 20 2011 06:50 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
I just had this thought, what if not PHing Murphy there was a sort of punishment for the baserunning blunders? there was enough lefty/righty/getHuAB stuff to justify it I suppose, even if I don't agree.
|
Edgy DC Apr 20 2011 06:53 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
I guess that was where I am. I don't agree with it, but I'm not ready to kill Collins for it.
|
TransMonk Apr 20 2011 06:55 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
The Mets now have the worst record in baseball. From what I've seen so far, I think the record fits the team.
|
Ceetar Apr 20 2011 07:02 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
I think they're unlikely to win 48 games or be the worst team in baseball.
|
TransMonk Apr 20 2011 07:04 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
|
soupcan Apr 20 2011 08:07 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Was there last night.
|
Gwreck Apr 20 2011 08:11 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
FYI: Mets announced that your tickets from last night can be exchanged for a free game against the Pirates, May 30-June 2.
|
metirish Apr 20 2011 08:19 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
judging for the TV it looked utterly miserable there.....no concession lines is a good thing but you'd rather have long lines and a good team.
|
Ceetar Apr 20 2011 08:25 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
I'll be there tonight myself. Gonna whip them into shape.
|
soupcan Apr 20 2011 08:29 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
Most definitely.
|
soupcan Apr 20 2011 08:31 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
I know you pride yourself on being 'optimistic', but dude they are bad all around and they are not getting better anytime soon.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 20 2011 08:41 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
I agree that the "optimism" shtick is more than played out, but do I suspect that the Mets are a better team than we've seen. But they've been so bad that even hoping for mediocrity at this point seems far fetched. Maybe at best, they'll win 75 games, and that's not nearly enough. Citi Field is going to be very quiet and empty after Labor Day, and probably not very noisy at all throughout the season.
|
Edgy DC Apr 20 2011 08:44 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
So, it's far-fetched. It's free.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 20 2011 08:47 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
True. I'll keep watching. But there's nothing wrong with acknowledging that things are looking dire.
|
Ceetar Apr 20 2011 09:00 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
||
well, they're going to get _better_..that's almost inevitable. Just shear luck will do that, but so will adding Jason Bay. I just meant that there were some games against the Nationals and the Rockies where they seemed to be leading and playing better for 7 or 8 of the innings and just blew it. The last 4-5 games though they've mostly been bad all around, all game, with small exceptions. Even Sunday they only scored 3 runs and barely hung on.
|
soupcan Apr 20 2011 09:05 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Yeah sure it's free and it doesn't hurt anyone.
|
TransMonk Apr 20 2011 09:13 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Sounds like Muffy may be in Terry's doghouse.
|
Ceetar Apr 20 2011 09:16 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
I'm not saying I'm not frustrated and pissed off. But I don't want to be. And I get annoyed when people tell me Blah blah it'll never get better. I can watch baseball that's meaningless anywhere, so if I'm not going to root for the Mets to succeed, at whatever odds, to me it's just not worth the effort. It may be a long shot for Niese to step up and strike out 200, but I'm rooting for the long shot. Worse is people telling me that I shouldn't get upset when the Mets lose because they suck. That's irrelevant. "Miracles" happen all the time in sports, and imo, rooting for one is almost what being a fanatical fan is about. Everyone is getting on the Mets and killing them. So why can't I look for the silver lining and think about why it could happen that way? I understand they suck, and are sucking, and look like they want to suck forever. But I'd rather root for the signs of hope rather than proclaiming Pagan will bat .180 or David Wright will strike out more than Niese. (Actually, I think that would bea decent "Who has more" question)
|
seawolf17 Apr 20 2011 09:20 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
In case you think losing to the Astros isn't enough and you'd like to see them lose to another awful team too.
|
Gwreck Apr 20 2011 09:21 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
*
|
TransMonk Apr 20 2011 09:22 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
I hear ya, Cee.
|
Ceetar Apr 20 2011 09:28 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
well, we wanted accountability right? I like seeing Ike develop too, and Niese too, who battled last night despite not being that good. Could we perhaps stop walking people? maybe? please? However, the stories, which I think may be last years and have the statistics updated and Collins name in for Manuel's about maybe it's time for Meija are a little annoying. As are the Daily OMG TRADE REYES NOW ones.
|
The Second Spitter Apr 20 2011 09:44 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
Christ, the Klap's like Johnny-on-the-spot when it comes to shitting on the Mets. I'm surprised he resisted the urge to throw in a reference to TWTMCB. That said, TWTMCB were infinitely more interesting to watch than this mob.....
|
metirish Apr 20 2011 09:54 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Good that he chewed Murphy out , he deserved it.
|
Edgy DC Apr 20 2011 10:01 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
How about that Thole, though? Breaking in a young catcher is hard, and doing it without a veteran catcher who knows the league sharing the load seems to be hurting Thole. None of his starters are making their pitches and he's not doing bupkis to stop the running game. Flushing needs Paulino as much as Bay, I fear.
|
soupcan Apr 20 2011 10:11 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
Hadn't thought about that lack of a veteran catcher thing. That's a good point.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 20 2011 10:12 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
PREDICTION: The Mets will eventually go on a torrid, torrid streak that coincides with Paulino's return to the team, and he will receive an inordinate amount of credit for both tangible and ineffable (handling the pitching staff, holding runners, etc.) contributions.
|
Edgy DC Apr 20 2011 10:23 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
If they can go on a rip, I don't care if the papers want to credit Wayne Hagin.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 20 2011 10:40 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
I'm sure it is true (cuz if he's faking that level of quotable knowledge he better turn in his journalistic creds) but -- a) it's deserved and I'm fine with it and b) it's not the same thing as assuming Collins is holding something over Murphy and would use it against him in PH spots. A manager who does that it hurting himself at least as much as the player. Terry has pretty much said 2B is a straight platoon situation so you assume Muffy is going to get about 2/3 of the starts at least for the time being. I write the PH last night off to a R/L move - something I wish he hadn't done but at the same time aren't going to attribute to even a temporary personal vendetta.
|
Edgy DC Apr 20 2011 10:44 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
It's great that he's got a kernel of a scoop there, but there's still about nine things wrong with that article.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 20 2011 10:57 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
So, it's a better-than-average Klap piece, is what you're saying.
|
G-Fafif Apr 20 2011 11:42 AM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
1) Love the chew out. Great vicarious theater for those of watching from the comfort of our couches and depths of our despair. 2) WTF does Klapisch know about Jerry Manuel's bones? Do we know Jerry never tried to instill fundamentals in Murphy's head? Perhaps the kid is just errantly enthusiastic by nature (a.k.a. kinda thick). 3) Time of game was 2:59. One minute longer expunges all mercy? Oh, and cesspool? Is there a kiddie porn ring being run out of Charlie Samuels' old office or something?
|
Ceetar Apr 20 2011 12:09 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
||
Well, It was according a person made aware of the exchange. Which makes it...third hand to Klap? The person that heard it, the person he made aware, and then Klap. Not that I'm doubting it, but that far removed from actually hearing it himself I wonder if he should even use quotes?
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 20 2011 12:13 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Which reminds me...
|
TransMonk Apr 20 2011 12:17 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
Agreed.
|
Edgy DC Apr 20 2011 12:23 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|||
Yeah, that and the three things listed above you by G-Fafif are about four of the nine things I was speaking of. You don't think he could have asked about two dozen folks for a corroborating statement? Murphy himself, maybe? He might have had a heckuva story, even if they all stonewalled.
|
Ceetar Apr 20 2011 12:35 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
He could've thrown some "blah blah blahs" in there at least. amateur.
|
G-Fafif Apr 20 2011 12:51 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|||
Every story Guys Burkhardt tells of that nature reminds me of Felix Unger's inspiring radio tales of heroism, albeit at a less breathtaking pace.
|
bmfc1 Apr 20 2011 12:56 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
I'm sick of Guys. They used to go to him 2 or 3 times a game but now they're up to 4 or 5 as they try to distract us from thinking about how badly the Mets are playing. And something always happens when he's talking. Save him for rain delays, pre and post-game, etc. but enough w/Guys already.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 20 2011 01:00 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Just wait-- if this continues into the summer, two or three of those will become florid, weird Keith rants.
|
soupcan Apr 20 2011 01:24 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
IF this contines into summer...?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 20 2011 01:29 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
||
Call me The Marginally-Optimistic Mets Fan.
|
metirish Apr 20 2011 01:49 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
You know what's hilarious too?, during this miserable time for the org last nights game featured several segments of some of the best nights this org has had.....Astros/Mets 86.......yes please distract us from the current team.
|
TransMonk Apr 20 2011 02:26 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Keith and Ron both said the '86 NL Championship Series was the best games they were involved in during their careers, which I assume trumps the '86 World Series.
|
Edgy DC Apr 20 2011 02:33 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
Well, Game Six, for all it's drama, turned on errors.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 20 2011 02:36 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
The tension was a lot higher in the NLCS, which made the games all the more memorable.
|
G-Fafif Apr 20 2011 03:16 PM Re: IGT 4/19/11 - Astros at Mets |
|
That's Jackson Browne, from "Disco Apocalypse". That's how Game Six of the '86 NLCS felt. The only other time I felt it was Game Six of the '99 NLCS as the Mets kept coming back. So we're 1-1 on the edge of time.
|