Master Index of Archived Threads
It's All Royal Blue's Fault
G-Fafif May 12 2011 11:00 AM |
||
Paul Lukas gets his man: an interview with the guy who brought black into the Met color palette.
...and, even worse, what they wanted to do:
Definitely has that "could've been worse" feel to it.
|
Edgy DC May 12 2011 11:02 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Yup.
|
metsmarathon May 12 2011 11:09 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
i like the look of the black home jersey, honestly. it's not bad. i don't prefer it to the others they have on tap, but i don't hate it.
|
Edgy DC May 12 2011 11:11 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Black and royal clash. It's as simple as that. And they clash badly. Some configurations are better than others, but there's no getting around it. If you embrace the black, you've got to ditch the royal.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 12 2011 11:17 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I don't think they clash. Can black clash with anything? Can white clash with anything?
|
TheOldMole May 12 2011 11:19 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
That's what Toussaint L'Ouverture said.
|
metirish May 12 2011 11:26 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
What amazed me about the article is how the process came about , fair play to Lukas on this.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 12 2011 11:27 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I'm not sure that black and royal blue out-and-out clash... they're just weirdly assonant, if you will. And the darker the shade of blue-- as in the late-90s black stuff-- the more the visual near-rhyme rankles. (Me, anyway.)
|
Edgy DC May 12 2011 11:29 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
||
It can and does. Believe me. Believe your eyes!
'Cuz they clash. They imply sameness to the eye, and yet aren't the same, so the quality of the color is lost surrounded by a like-yet-different neighbor. It looks like something just blurred out of something else. Let me apologize in advance:
|
Ashie62 May 12 2011 11:30 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Blue and Orange..Thats it.
|
G-Fafif May 12 2011 11:35 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
The road blacks were deleted from the wardrobe after 2008.
|
metsguyinmichigan May 12 2011 11:40 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Sounds like Charlie should have been tossed out a loooooong time ago. I wonder if he was involved in the tail disaster of '93.
|
TransMonk May 12 2011 11:43 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I don't really care, but my least favorite are the black road jerseys that say "Mets". The road jerseys should say "New York".
|
HahnSolo May 12 2011 12:10 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
Not sure what you mean here. They still wear the blacks away from Citi.
|
G-Fafif May 12 2011 12:11 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
||
I was referring to the specific NEW YORK road blacks. The black METS jersey is the same home and away.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 12 2011 12:12 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault Edited 1 time(s), most recently on May 12 2011 12:14 PM |
I'm not against changing up the looks now and again, almost all orgs do it from time to time. It's just the least surprising thing in the world the the Mets did so without having thought about it all that much or at least without thinking through its effects from every perspective. Any way you look at them they are a messed-up joke of an organization.
|
G-Fafif May 12 2011 12:13 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
This one, that don't exist no more:
|
soupcan May 12 2011 12:21 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
This. Unfortunately.
|
metirish May 12 2011 12:23 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|||
are you screaming NEW YORK and METS right there?
|
Edgy DC May 12 2011 12:25 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Nice work on the handjive by Ike.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 12 2011 12:28 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Ike was born to handjive, baby.
|
G-Fafif May 12 2011 12:30 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
No, but if I were doing so at Citi Field, people would stare at me with disdain before getting back to their Blackberrys.
|
Ashie62 May 12 2011 01:25 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
||
BOC
|
themetfairy May 12 2011 01:37 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
Or he can't resist breaking into a chorus of Dov Y Melech Yisarael.... (Which is usually accompanied by hand signs)
|
themetfairy May 12 2011 01:38 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
That photo always makes me smile G :)
|
Ceetar May 12 2011 02:25 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I just don't really care about the color schemes, and would love for them to do something completely random like Orange tops..
|
HahnSolo May 12 2011 02:30 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
The whole logic behind black caps to help merchandising and catch up to the Yankees is so ridiculous. You can sell merchandise in whatever color you want. How many red, pink, powder blue, purple, orange, green Yankee caps/shirts are sold? (I see them all the time). But the Yankees don't wear them on the field.
|
Gwreck May 12 2011 06:05 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I had a chance to chat with Charlie before the Omir Santos game at Fenway in 2009 and I of course (politely) registered my unhappiness with the black. Among other things learned, Charlie indicated his belief that the players preferred the black.
|
Edgy DC May 12 2011 06:26 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Unless players=Glavine, I don't think Felon Charile honestly spoke for the room. Black absorbs heat on hot summer afternoons (and nights). Black hides a well-earned soiling of the uniform top. Black robs from rookies the pleasure of making it to the majors and seeing a glistening unblemished uniform hanging in your locker.
|
Gwreck May 12 2011 06:31 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I get that Samuels' honesty is now known to be dubious at best, but I have no reason to suspect he was making stuff up, particularly given the depth of the conversation about the uniforms. Tidbidts learned during our conversation included that it was his idea to go to the blue caps during the Mets' final game at Yankee Stadium II; that he deliberately put the Mets in blue/hats and pinstripes for "big games" in recent years (NLCS Games 6/7; last game of 2007 and 2008 seasons), etc.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 12 2011 08:06 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Oh, I'm also sure Samuels probably isn't deserving of the potential prison sentence he's looking at for hoarding Met gear in a friend's basement inasmuch as as long as the Mets had Bernie Madoff on their roster it was perfectly OK for a trusted longtime employee to help himself to dubious perks on the side.
|
Edgy DC May 12 2011 08:38 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Yeah, I certainly don't think he was lying through his purloining teeth so much as maybe seeing the world through a self-interested lens.
|
Fman99 May 12 2011 08:41 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
I've said this many times. The road jersey should have the name of the city; the home jersey the name of the team.
|
DocTee May 12 2011 08:46 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
That Toussaint line was the best of hte year.
They're "caught between the two, like a shade between two shades." -- Paul Muldroon (or is it Joyce?)
|
Edgy DC May 12 2011 09:19 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I went to my evening job and one of my regular clients, a hothead Trinidadian named Ron, shows up in a tee-shirt with Toussaint L'Ouverture on it. It's not every day you encounter L'Ouverture twice.
|
metsguyinmichigan May 12 2011 09:42 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
||
See! The MFY's can't even get this right!
|
Centerfield May 13 2011 07:32 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
||
Agreed. I love the way Dakota is checking underneath the hat to make sure it's her father. My daughter does this too. She'll be bouncing along, and then gets struck with the thought "Wait, who am I sitting on again?" and pulls my face around to make sure it's me. When Turk was traded, Edgy posted something along the lines of "Sure, we'll let them have Turk, but can we keep Dakota?" Couldn't agree more.
|
Edgy DC May 13 2011 07:41 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I'd be terrified to see what kind of 13-year-old monster she turned into.
|
batmagadanleadoff May 13 2011 07:54 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
It's gotta be the hats. Because it couldn't have been that the Yankees had overtaken the Mets in popularity by winning the World Series in '96, and by finishing no lower than second place for five straight seasons while the Mets were pelting themselves and other living things with bleach, live firecrackers and golf clubs. No. That couldn't have been it. It was the hats. Typical Wilpon Mets. Why bother to fix the team when instead, they can market it by selling the fans a phony bill of goods about how black is one of the Mets official colors according to the newfound dubious revisionist history? And don't forget to remind the fan base every seven minutes that Rey Ordonez is the Babe Ruth of fielding. Did you know that Babe Ruth wore a dark cap?
|
batmagadanleadoff May 13 2011 02:47 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
||
If Paul Lukas is reading this thread, maybe he can redial Bob Halfacre and see if Bob can recreate, from memory, the proposed design concept that would've been a complete overhaul to the Mets uniform. I'd like to see what monstrosity it was that Halfacre's sound intervention spared us from.
|
Fman99 May 13 2011 08:31 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Here it is...
|
Centerfield May 14 2011 05:19 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I don't mind the black.
|
themetfairy May 14 2011 08:31 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I agree wholeheartedly with Death To The Orange Dot!
|
soupcan May 14 2011 10:42 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Note to self: don't let CF beat me in a bidding war for majority ownership of the Mets.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 14 2011 11:44 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Soupcan has my vote.
|
G-Fafif May 14 2011 11:50 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
I adore the dot. When it was introduced, I was surprised we didn't have it for 35 years. Made all the sense in the world.
|
Rockin' Doc May 14 2011 12:35 PM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
I agree 100%. It should hold true for all teams. I'd make it a rule for all teams if I had the power to do so.
|
The Second Spitter May 18 2011 12:08 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Yet some O's fans are repulsed by the idea of having the name of their city on their jersey.
|
Edgy DC May 18 2011 06:58 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Tolerance? Sure. But tolerance of the accoutrements of the past doesn't mean advocating for the the perpetuation of them.
|
metsmarathon May 18 2011 08:25 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
i miss the racing stripes...
|
Edgy DC May 18 2011 08:29 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Did you feel that?
|
MFS62 May 18 2011 08:41 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
|
I agree with two exceptions. The teams that deserted us for California should be required to have their city names on both their home and away uniforms. Those team names "belong" here. Later
|
HahnSolo May 18 2011 10:38 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
Never, ever been a fan of the black, even the trim. But I also never quite got all the hatred for the orange dot.
|
Vince Coleman Firecracker May 19 2011 10:35 AM Re: It's All Royal Blue's Fault |
When I own the team:
|