Master Index of Archived Threads
McCullough live chat now..
Ashie62 Jun 01 2011 10:04 AM |
Here is the link
|
metirish Jun 01 2011 10:51 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Comment From Jerky Jerkface
|
metirish Jun 01 2011 10:52 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Here's what I don't get........answers like this, why do the fucking chat man?
|
TransMonk Jun 01 2011 11:00 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
McCullough is as douchy as any of the writers/chatters/tweeters.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 01 2011 11:15 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
||
Definitely can be. And then some.
Disagree, strongly. Unlike most of the others-- who tend, for better or worse, to stick to their talking points-- he rises to the level of the questioning. If it's FAN-caller-type-stuff, he's curt, then-- if it continues-- smarmy. If it's interesting questions-- like last time around-- then he's more insightful or thoughtfully analytic than most (if not all) of the others.
|
TransMonk Jun 01 2011 11:19 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Maybe I'm not following closely enough.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 01 2011 11:30 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 01 2011 11:37 AM |
|||
I mean, truth be told... you probably CAN do his job. That's the open secret of sports journo-ing these days, innit? It's just that he's a little bit of a smart outsider at this-- not having been steeped in the cliches of grit-and-personality-and-managerial-fortitude-win-ballgames helps a lot. He's like Chico Harlan, only with enthusiasm and a willingness to learn about the numbers.
And, in terms of informed speculation:
Thoughtful, if sobering, analysis (can you see someone like Klapisch delivering this without a kiss of smarm?):
|
Ceetar Jun 01 2011 11:37 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
My question if I bothered with these things would've been "Do you think the Mets need to add a bat while they wait for Ike and David, and do you think the Yankees would be willing to trade Cano right now given that they can just sign him back after the season?"
|
metirish Jun 01 2011 11:38 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
I assume he's talking about Texaria to the Braves from the Rangers and that package?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 01 2011 11:39 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Yeppers. Which, frankly, would be one hell of a haul for SugarPants, at this point.
|
Ceetar Jun 01 2011 11:41 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Wait, when did Alderson give notice that we're not going to try to compete until 2014 and wait until we hear it from him first?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 01 2011 11:44 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
"This is about the long haul. The Mets are not constructed to win a title in 2012. They are probably not ready to challenge in 2013. The ills and excess of the Minaya regime require a systematic cleansing that begins with drafting and developing talent. This is not about now. This is about the future, always, until Alderson gives further notice. So freaking out about the payroll dropping and the team being bad is so short-sighted, it's almost hard to fathom." I can't find that quote here. I do see a lot of stuff about "probably" and a reiteration of the whole sustainable-winner thing that Alderson mentioned as his primary aim when he took the job.
|
Edgy DC Jun 01 2011 11:52 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Long-range plans are always overstated. It's not about now, it's not about next year, it's about 2014. That's ridiculous. Teams come along at the pace they come along and fail to come along at the pace they fail. Of course they're trying to win now. Maybe they're putting more resources in this direction or that, but that doesn't mean they're cashing out one account and dumping it all in the other.
|
Ceetar Jun 01 2011 11:59 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
and so far I trust Alderson understands this. But then, I felt like Omar understood it too, but then seemed to spiral into win-now moves to justify last years win-now moves and the glue inbetween fell apart. A team with a 100-145 million dollar payroll is capable of doing both. They can make decisions that are both good for now, and later. (Keeping Reyes) They can make moves that are good for just later and get some prospects or work the draft. They can also do moves that made good now, but won't be much help later. Signing a Carlos Zambrano at the deadline for prospects he's soured on for instance.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 01 2011 12:07 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
I don't think that McCullough's necessarily talking in absolutes, that rant notwithstanding. His comments seem more about expectation, and what to look for from this group. They CAN contend this year, or next. Do they have a legit, realistic expectation of doing so? While Alderson and the gang are all about maximizing on-field output, I doubt even they would tell you that they EXPECT to win a division before 2013.
|
Ceetar Jun 01 2011 12:12 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
Honestly Zambrano's just a random name I picked off the top of my head. I'm not even sure what the list of expiring contract pitchers the Mets could go after is. I'd forgotten Big Z still has years left.
|
Edgy DC Jun 01 2011 12:13 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Reyes and Wright are of an age when, were they free agents coming from another team, would be (mostly) viewed as good signings for 2013 and 2014.
|
Ceetar Jun 01 2011 12:16 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
Pretty much. The Mets visit Milwaukee next week. Milwaukee may be one of those teams shopping for a SS. I suspect we'll hear some 'rumors' about Brewer interest in Jose Reyes, who would add a rather tasty hop profile to the Brewer lineup.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 01 2011 12:22 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Difference is, you wouldn't-- and won't-- be paying for them for 2013 and 2014. For a premium, youngish FA not coming off a down year/significant injury, you're paying for 2012-2018 (if not beyond).
|
Edgy DC Jun 01 2011 01:04 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Mmmmmmmaybe.
|
TransMonk Jun 01 2011 01:09 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
They don't really have a lot of pieces to deal if we are looking to bring back Jose's full value...although they do need a shortstop and leadoff hitter. IMO, if they were to add Reyes, they would run away with the Central.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 01 2011 04:37 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
I'd like for you to host one of those Q & A's. Your answer to your own question would be: "The Mets have plenty right now. Nick Evans and Daniel Murphy and what not will hit 25 HR's before Wright and Davis return this weekend."
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 21 2011 10:05 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/newyork/chat/_/id/39042
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 21 2011 10:06 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
||
What the hell does that mean?
|
Edgy DC Jun 21 2011 10:16 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
The real Oscar Madison would ask a followup, but sounds like he has no taste for your tone, McBone.
|
Edgy DC Jun 21 2011 10:20 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Rainy Lara gets the back of Rubin's hand.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 21 2011 10:21 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
We'll put that to the test.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 21 2011 10:25 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
||
Very douchy, Adam. First Oscar asked if he was right to sense frustration in Terry's tone regarding Ike's injury (the quote was something like "I've never seen anything like it") he gets a response that "it's complex", asks for clarification in a followup only to to be told the frustration angle is all wrong. Chat, schmat. this whole medium sucks.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 21 2011 10:29 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
He seems to be saying that the injury is more complex that the "sprain" or however it is/has been reported ... but I have no idea why he's being cryptic about it.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 21 2011 10:30 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
I do, he has no respect for his elders in the newspaper biz, that's what.
|
Ashie62 Jun 21 2011 10:41 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|||
wtf? Amputation?
|
seawolf17 Jun 21 2011 11:10 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
I've been saying all along that a package of Pelfrey/Beltran/Fodriguez would be REEEEALLY interesting to the Yankees.
|
metsmarathon Jun 21 2011 11:32 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
but what would you expect to come home with?
|
Edgy DC Jun 21 2011 11:36 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Yankees. Filthy, filthy Yankees.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 21 2011 11:44 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
They have a hot catching prospect or two, don't they?
|
seawolf17 Jun 21 2011 11:53 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
One of the catchers (Romine/Montero), one of the young pitchers (the young lefty whose name I can't remember), and probably a salary dump of some kind. Granderson, maybe? (They'd probably want to dump Burnett on us, which I wouldn't be entirely against.)
|
Ceetar Jun 21 2011 01:30 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|||
It's similar to the "I have a strong suspicion there is something else about Backman coming out which is why the Mets aren't hiring him." i.e. the guy's a bum and doesn't give me enough info.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 21 2011 01:40 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Could it be something about Ike's work ethic during rehab? I'd be surprised if that were the case, but who knows?
|
Ceetar Jun 21 2011 01:49 PM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
That guy! He's supposed to be doing nothing while wearing a boot and he's just sitting around wearing a freaking boot!
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 22 2011 10:00 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
http://www.nj.com/mets/index.ssf/2011/0 ... h_s_6.html
|
metirish Jun 22 2011 10:07 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
Blocked at work , I mean really , WTF?
|
Ceetar Jun 22 2011 10:19 AM Re: McCullough live chat now.. |
|
Did he just copy and paste the Bay question from last chat? I mean..i wouldn't describe him as being in a 'bad spot' right this moment. Good job having no idea what game of thrones is though. Even if 'see' and 'finale' should've tipped him off. a lot of mailed in 'what's for lunch' questions. (a followup on a question if anyone had asked him what's for lunch yet)
|