Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Number One Reliever


1) Manny Acosta 0 votes

2) Pedro Beato 5 votes

3) Tim Byrdak 0 votes

4) D.J. Carrasco 0 votes

5) Ryota Igarashi 0 votes

6) Jason Isringhausen 6 votes

7) Michael O'Connor 0 votes

8) Bobby Parnell 11 votes

9) Johan Santana 1 votes

10) Dale Thayer 0 votes

Edgy DC
Jul 13 2011 06:41 AM

We have a void. but not shortage of options to fill it, and it's a good chance for Terry make a statement as it were.

RealityChuck
Jul 13 2011 06:50 AM
Re: Number One Releiever

Izzy until the end of the season (or until he's traded); Parnell in 2012.

Ceetar
Jul 13 2011 06:52 AM
Re: Number One Releiever

RealityChuck wrote:
Izzy until the end of the season (or until he's traded); Parnell in 2012.


I don't think anything is even close to set for 2012 yet.

It's probably going to start as Parnell, and maybe he holds on to it, but I don't think anythings going to be set in stone as that.

I voted Johan though. that'd be fun. Also, Johan (although this is still a ways off) being the guy replacing him on the roster (as they did in reverse in April) would be much better than Igarashi.

soupcan
Jul 13 2011 06:56 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Doesn't matter to me.

Give 'em all a shot and see who sticks.

TheOldMole
Jul 13 2011 07:01 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Parnell. The heat.

Benjamin Grimm
Jul 13 2011 07:01 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

soupcan wrote:
Doesn't matter to me.

Give 'em all a shot and see who sticks.


I voted Parnell, but I agree with soupcan.

metirish
Jul 13 2011 07:06 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
soupcan wrote:
Doesn't matter to me.

Give 'em all a shot and see who sticks.


I voted Parnell, but I agree with soupcan.



this...

Ceetar
Jul 13 2011 07:06 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

soupcan wrote:
Doesn't matter to me.

Give 'em all a shot and see who sticks.


Well yeah, I doubt Terry's gonna keep a guy there if he struggles just because he called him a 'closer'.

Judging by last Sunday's game, I expect it'll be Niese on days he doesn't pitch.

Edgy DC
Jul 13 2011 07:08 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

I'm kind of asking who it's going to be, rather than who we want it to be. (Maybe I should have asked that.)

metsmarathon
Jul 13 2011 07:08 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

this year, izzy's shut down righties, while parnell shuts down righties. i'd be ok with using them based on the coming matchups.

i'd be more in favor of using izzy in the 9th, but parnell in the high leverage situations that arise until izzy is traded.

TransMonk
Jul 13 2011 07:20 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Izzy until he's traded, then Parnell.

Edgy DC
Jul 13 2011 07:22 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Hmmm, Izzy just as a showcase. Interesting.

What's his entrance music? Something by bauhaus, I assume.

TransMonk
Jul 13 2011 07:26 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Edgy DC wrote:
Something by bauhaus, I assume.

BOC!

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jul 13 2011 08:28 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Yeah, the Mets will go with Izzy until he's traded to the Cardinals next week, then Bobby Pee.

But to me, Beato just sorta looks like a closer. He already has a distinct body language to him, made some bold remarks in the papers, already knows how to strike guys out, and gets the grounders.

Vic Sage
Jul 13 2011 08:35 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Yeah, the Mets will go with Izzy until he's traded to the Cardinals next week, then Bobby Pee.

But to me, Beato just sorta looks like a closer. He already has a distinct body language to him, made some bold remarks in the papers, already knows how to strike guys out, and gets the grounders.


This. Sandy is smart enough to try and boost Izzy's value and then dump him. Izzy, however, may not help matters by sucking, which he mostly has recently, after a good start.

Obviously, Parnell and Beato have the "stuff", but I'd love Terry to take the initiative to simply match relievers to situations and give the ball to the guy with the best shot in a particular circumstance.

High Leverage situation = best available pitcher.

Of course, i wanted Terry to do that with F-Rod this season, so we could keep a good arm in the pen AND avoid him vesting for 2012. But he's not that bold, and i don't think he'll do the bullpen-by-committee thing now either, despite the chance it could maximize the pen's strengths and minimize its weaknesses, without over-inflating value of 50 IP guys.

Edgy DC
Jul 13 2011 08:41 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Hopefully a few days off gets Izz back on track.

Ashie62
Jul 13 2011 09:04 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Skip Lockwood is back in training.

Til then, Beato closes, Parnell 8th inning.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jul 13 2011 09:11 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Izzy's been a lucky, lucky boy on the mound this year. Pump up the value, then sell him back to the Cards (I really like the idea of selling the best fans in the country overpriced sentiment, right after giving the Brewers the actual onfield goodstuff).

Vic Sage
Jul 13 2011 09:12 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

send him back, with smallpox-infested blankets!

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jul 13 2011 09:13 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Right as rain, pilgrim.

sharpie
Jul 13 2011 09:14 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

K-Rod to the Brewers, Izzy to the Cards, Beltran to the Pirates: who do we send to the Reds so that we can have a ringer for all contenders in the NL Central?

TransMonk
Jul 13 2011 09:19 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

sharpie wrote:
K-Rod to the Brewers, Izzy to the Cards, Beltran to the Pirates: who do we send to the Reds so that we can have a ringer for all contenders in the NL Central?

Big Pelf?

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jul 13 2011 09:21 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Misch, obviously. (For PTbNL [crossout:1qap7nbr]Harry Chiti[/crossout:1qap7nbr] Pat Misch.)

MFS62
Jul 13 2011 09:28 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Beato has shown the stuff. But IIRC earlier in the year there were several quotes from members of the organization that they are planning to send him to AAA next year (once the Rule V restriction is ended) to complete his Jedi training as a starter.
Of course, that may have been before Gee came up and the starting staff settled down.

Later

Vic Sage
Jul 13 2011 09:30 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

K-Rod to the Brewers, Izzy to the Cards, Beltran to the Pirates: who do we send to the Reds so that we can have a ringer for all contenders in the NL Central?


santana's owed more than $50m for 2012/2013 seasons. Think they'll take him? What if we package him with Bay ($35m)? Hell, i'd settle for dumping Carrasco's $1.2m for next season. Every little bit helps the Reyes fund.

Edgy DC
Jul 13 2011 09:47 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

MFS62 wrote:
Beato has shown the stuff. But IIRC earlier in the year there were several quotes from members of the organization that they are planning to send him to AAA next year (once the Rule V restriction is ended) to complete his Jedi training as a starter.
Of course, that may have been before Gee came up and the starting staff settled down.

Later


I don't recall those quotes. The Mets only got him because his development fell behind schedule due to his failure as a starter. It wasn't until last year in Bowie that he moved to the pen and showed the potential on field that he had been drafted for.

G-Fafif
Jul 13 2011 05:28 PM
Re: Number One Reliever

Just occurred to me that we had a non-K-Rod closer for a month and a half last season, Hisanori Takahashi. He had no track record in that role (15 saves in Japan in 2006, otherwise a starter there) and he was perfectly fine.

So will be somebody else.

Edgy DC
Jul 19 2011 07:00 PM
Re: Number One Reliever

Last money on the table here.

Edgy DC
Jul 19 2011 07:07 PM
Re: Number One Reliever

Showcasing Izzy in front of his potential buyers? Maybe?

TransMonk
Jul 20 2011 06:44 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Maybe. I think he's the right choice anyhow given his experience.

Ceetar
Jul 20 2011 06:46 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Edgy DC wrote:
Showcasing Izzy in front of his potential buyers? Maybe?


someone did suggest that he wanted to get to 300 saves and they'll give him the opportunity.

MFS62
Jul 20 2011 08:06 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

And while Izzy is closing, Parnell has slid quite comfortably into the "scare the crap out of the fans in the eighth inning" bullpen spot.
Later

Vic Sage
Jul 20 2011 08:24 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

TransMonk wrote:
Maybe. I think he's the right choice anyhow given his experience.


the "right choice" to do what, exactly? To help the Mets develop their next closer? No? Oh, you mean to win more games THIS year. Well, even that's a coin flip, given his peripherals (as compared to Parnell and Beato), but that can't be what Sandy has in mind for the balance of the 2011 season.

He's rebuilding Izzie's value for a deadline deal. Otherwise, this is just a stupid waste of valuable time in the development of closers for this organization's future.

Ceetar
Jul 20 2011 08:26 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Vic Sage wrote:
TransMonk wrote:
Maybe. I think he's the right choice anyhow given his experience.


the "right choice" to do what, exactly? To help the Mets develop their next closer? No? Oh, you mean to win more games THIS year. Well, even that's a coin flip, given his peripherals (as compared to Parnell and Beato), but that can't be what Sandy has in mind for the balance of the 2011 season.

He's rebuilding Izzie's value for a deadline deal. Otherwise, this is just a stupid waste of valuable time in the development of closers for this organization's future.


Yes, Parnell having to face Pujols with two on in a 2-run game hurt his development because it was in the 8th inning.

Edgy DC
Jul 20 2011 08:32 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Two on? Bases were totally jizzed, Cee.

Vic Sage
Jul 20 2011 08:35 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Yes, Parnell having to face Pujols with two on in a 2-run game hurt his development because it was in the 8th inning.


well at least we agree on something.

Ceetar
Jul 20 2011 08:44 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Edgy DC wrote:
Two on? Bases were totally jizzed, Cee.



doh, how could I forget the awesome defensive play by The 7 to keep the ball in the infield?

TransMonk
Jul 20 2011 09:03 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Pitching with a 2 run lead in the eighth vs. pitching with a 2 run lead in the ninth...what's the difference in terms of the "development of a closer"?

Ceetar
Jul 20 2011 09:06 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

TransMonk wrote:
Pitching with a 2 run lead in the eighth vs. pitching with a 2 run lead in the ninth...what's the difference in terms of the "development of a closer"?


well obviously since it was the 8th inning Parnell just couldn't get the adrenaline going, which is why he loaded the bases.

Edgy DC
Jul 20 2011 09:12 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

The sarcasm awash in this thread is enough to drown a man.

batmagadanleadoff
Jul 20 2011 09:32 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Edgy DC wrote:
The sarcasm awash in this thread is enough to drown a man.


I like it.

batmagadanleadoff
Jul 20 2011 09:33 AM
Re: Number One Reliever

Ceetar wrote:
Yes, Parnell having to face Pujols with two on in a 2-run game hurt his development because it was in the 8th inning.


I especially like this one.