Master Index of Archived Threads
Infield triple
Frayed Knot Aug 03 2011 06:41 PM |
A little rain-[crossout:3uab7xaf]delay[/crossout:3uab7xaf]out theatre
|
Edgy DC Aug 03 2011 07:12 PM Re: Infield triple |
Dog days, baby.
|
Frayed Knot Aug 03 2011 07:26 PM Re: Infield triple |
If I were the pitcher I'd plunk my infielders.
|
Edgy DC Aug 03 2011 08:12 PM Re: Infield triple |
Agreed but... that's not the way they do it.
|
MFS62 Aug 03 2011 08:33 PM Re: Infield triple |
That's like something a twelve year old would do to his seven year old brother's pee wee team to show them what NOT to do when playing infield.
|
Ceetar Aug 04 2011 06:42 AM Re: Infield triple |
it's amazing how long he stops at each base before advancing too. I think that might be the main reason he didn't get a triple.
|
attgig Aug 04 2011 09:27 AM Re: Infield triple |
so, how does he get to third in official scoring? advancing on the throw?
|
Edgy DC Aug 04 2011 09:29 AM Re: Infield triple |
I'm going to guess defensive indifference.
|
Ceetar Aug 04 2011 09:41 AM Re: Infield triple |
|
so yeah, basically defensive indifference. I'd have to watch again, but I guess you could award SB if at some point the fielders made moves to get the ball or cover the bag (as the third baseman kinda did)
|
Frayed Knot Aug 04 2011 10:31 AM Re: Infield triple |
Nothing in what Oakland was doing showed "indifference" though, more like bases left uncovered because they didn't think he'd go.
|
Ceetar Aug 04 2011 11:35 AM Re: Infield triple |
|
The rule doesn't seem to differentiate intentional indifference though.
|
Centerfield Aug 04 2011 11:58 AM Re: Infield triple |
It's the first inning with one out. There is no way in the world that is indifference. I'd score it a triple based on the options presented.
|
attgig Aug 04 2011 01:53 PM Re: Infield triple |
how about a single and two bases on baserunning awesomeness?
|
attgig Aug 04 2011 01:53 PM Re: Infield triple |
and speaking of...
|