Master Index of Archived Threads
EIGHT THOUSAND!
Benjamin Grimm Aug 12 2011 07:46 AM |
BULLETIN: Assuming no rainouts, Sunday's game will be the 8000th game (including regular and postseason games) in Mets history.
|
Ceetar Aug 12 2011 07:48 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
|
The 8000th regular season game is.. what early May? 8000 games (presumably at this point) without a no-hitter.
|
Edgy DC Aug 12 2011 08:30 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
How long a winning streak do they need to get back to .500?
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 12 2011 08:48 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
|
Maybe today can be the start of a 331-game winning streak!
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 12 2011 08:50 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
Another way to look at it is that the Mets can get to .500 by winning an average of 96 games per year for the next eleven years.
|
Edgy DC Aug 12 2011 08:59 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
Just as long as they cross the finish line before I do.
|
attgig Aug 12 2011 09:19 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
hrmm...
|
metirish Aug 12 2011 09:24 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
|
I trust UMDB above all others....looks like nonohitters mixed up the numbers?
|
attgig Aug 12 2011 09:41 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
||
woops. I mixed up nonohitters, they say 7923, not 7293. and then, just adding the mets w-l record over the years, i get 7915. where'd u get 8k from? are you including post season games?
|
Ceetar Aug 12 2011 09:54 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
|
Phillies would need like 35 years of 97 wins.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 12 2011 09:58 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
||
The regular season game count is, through yesterday afternoon, 7,923.
|
Vic Sage Aug 12 2011 10:23 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
|
basically, another decade like the 80s... but more so. I'll take it!
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 12 2011 10:42 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
The Road to .500
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 12 2011 10:44 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
It seems that the Mets have largely overcome their M. Donald Grant plunge, but still haven't made up for the Casey Stengel-Wes Westrum years.
|
Edgy DC Aug 12 2011 10:49 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
I don't understand. What's that graph of stock market trends have to do with anything?
|
Met Hunter Aug 12 2011 10:59 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
Howie Rose brought up both the game total and the no hitters a couple nights ago. Did mention the spring training no hitter thrown by Gary Kroll and Gordie Richardson back in the day. Howie seems to be gushing lately over the Mets and I'm ok with it.
|
seawolf17 Aug 12 2011 11:00 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
Wow, they were so close in 1962. If only things had started differently.
|
G-Fafif Aug 12 2011 03:35 PM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
Starting with the game of April 29, 1968, a 6-5 win over the Reds at Crosley Field (Koosman over George Culver), the Mets are exactly .500 in regular season games. That's as far back as you can go at present and say that. Their record is 3,466-3,466.
|
Edgy DC Aug 12 2011 05:38 PM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
That's a good way to frame it. Try and get back to the beginning of 1968 by the end of this season. Then try and cancel 1967 next year, and so on. Then in 2017, they go 120-40 apeshit, cancel the last piece of their debt, and set an example for America.
|
G-Fafif Aug 12 2011 11:55 PM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
After Friday night's loss in Arizona, the Mets' oldest .500 start date is pushed ahead from April 29, 1968 (the 15th game of that season) to the second game of the May 12, 1968 doubleheader at Chicago, a 10-0 win over the Cubs (Selma beating Joe Niekro). From that game forward (the 28th game of 1968), the Mets are 3,460-3,460.
|
G-Fafif Aug 15 2011 01:33 AM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
June 4, 1968: The day of the California primary after which Senator Robert Kennedy was assassinated. And the furthest back one can go to and still give the Mets a composite .500 record. They entered that fateful Tuesday with a 20-27 record and beat the Cubs at Wrigley Field, 5-0 (a whole other, innocuous meaning to "Now it's on to Chicago and let's win there.").
|
Vic Sage Aug 15 2011 03:09 PM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
i don't get the point of arbitrarily saying we're .500, or above .500, since a particular moment 7 years after the franchise began. Yes, the Mets have been ok, since they've been ok. But the first 7 years happened. In fact, much of the franchise's history and culture (for good and ill) are tied up in those early years. I'm not interested in overly romanticizing those "lovable losers", but they are a part of the story. it's double-plus-ungood to pretend otherwise.
|
G-Fafif Aug 15 2011 03:17 PM Re: EIGHT THOUSAND! |
Nobody's pretending they didn't happen. Just having some fun with numbers.
|