Master Index of Archived Threads
The Next To Fall
Newt Gingrich | 1 votes |
John Huntsman | 2 votes |
Ron Paul | 0 votes |
Rick Perry | 6 votes |
Mitt Romney | 0 votes |
Rick Santorum | 0 votes |
None of the Above | 4 votes |
Mets – Willets Point Jan 09 2012 09:10 PM |
Just a quick poll about which candidate(s) will drop out of the Republican Party presidential campaign after New Hampshire.
|
Edgy DC Jan 09 2012 09:11 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
Perry's the best bet, but I think he's focusing on South Carolinny, anyhow. I'm going with none-of-the-above. Perry's definitely my number two choice.
|
Nymr83 Jan 09 2012 09:25 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
None.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jan 09 2012 10:10 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
It would really take, what, a win or near-win for Huntsman to stick around through Florida, no?
|
Edgy DC Jan 09 2012 10:25 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
Momentum is everything. If you do better in State B than you did in State A, you'd be a fool to quit. A fool!
|
TransMonk Jan 10 2012 07:18 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
I went none as well. I imagine many of these peeps are waiting to see what the Southerners say about them in SC.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 10 2012 07:26 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
Yeah, Huntsman was the only one of them banking on New Hampshire. Even if Perry only gets 1% he's gonna stick around through South Carolina.
|
Ashie62 Jan 10 2012 09:27 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
Good call Perry 1 percent
|
Mets – Willets Point Jan 15 2012 08:45 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
|
Frayed Knot Jan 15 2012 09:47 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
I'm surprised at the timing of this coming, as it does, on the heels of his decent showing in NH, but hardly at the inevitable decision.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jan 15 2012 11:52 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
|
With another divorce for the "family values" candidate to follow?
|
Edgy DC Jan 16 2012 06:31 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
If he's the family values candidate, we all in trouble. But he's rebranded himself four of five times already in the campaign, so why not?
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 16 2012 07:06 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
I think Perry is most likely to be the next to leave.
|
G-Fafif Jan 16 2012 07:26 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
Something about a candidate who had no shot making a show of dropping out and endorsing the front-runner, while it's perfectly accepted protocol in politics, is strange. Like the Nationals calling a press conference in July and throwing their support to the Phillies.
|
themetfairy Jan 16 2012 08:46 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
|
Well, it's not like the Phillies have the potential power to give the Nationals an ambassadorship or anything.
|
G-Fafif Jan 16 2012 05:32 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
The Philadelphia Phillies today appointed the Washington Nationals as their Special Envoy to the National League Central. Observers dismissed the move as political payback for the Nationals laying down for the Phillies on the final Sunday of the 2007 season.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jan 19 2012 08:42 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
Now Perry is out too. Those of you who picked both Huntsman and Perry are winners! Of course, theoretically, someone else could drop before the next primary in SC.
|
Valadius Jan 19 2012 08:46 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
Santorum's the only one who might, and he won't.
|
Ashie62 Jan 19 2012 01:08 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
|
Romney and Paul in FL. thats it.
|
TransMonk Jan 19 2012 01:12 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
If you mean Tampa, FL in August...then Romney. That's it.
|
Frayed Knot Jan 19 2012 01:48 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
|
I picked Huntsman and Perry as my next two ... I just had them in the opposite order. Down to four now but seeing how each has his own mini-constituency there won't be the temptation to bug out at the first downturn in the polls.
|
Edgy DC Jan 19 2012 02:18 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
Not to be smart, but what's Gingrich's constituency?
|
TransMonk Jan 19 2012 02:22 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
Just today Perry said that Newt Gingrich has "the heart of a conservative reformer" and gave him his endorsement.
|
Valadius Jan 19 2012 02:24 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
Gingrich is "Angry Firebrand Guy." And that's what a lot of Republicans are looking for.
|
Frayed Knot Jan 19 2012 02:39 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
|
Yeah, even as I was writing that one I was thinking that his was most difficult to define. He never was the most conservative guy on the block even back during the brief span when he was the face of the party as the one who led them out of the 40-year minority status in the House. But he still retains some good-will among at least some conservatives for that period and that, plus being the most electable* non-Romney remaining on the board, gives him a base. * I don't think he's electable in the general but there are those who do and would certainly prefer to see him rather than the Mittster battling one-on-one against Obama.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jan 19 2012 02:41 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
Gingrich essentially shared a dual-Presidency with Clinton in the 90s. Peeps would like to see him in the big chair all on his own without a "socialist" partner interfering.
|
Nymr83 Jan 19 2012 03:19 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
The other positive, I think, for Gingrich is that he has better debate skills than the other Republican candidates. His constituency is probably being between Romney and Santorum while painting both as less experienced.
|
Edgy DC Jan 19 2012 06:15 PM Re: The Next To Fall |
So I guess we're coalescing around "Proven-on-the-National-Stage Guy" for his attempted selling label. Or, maybe, more broadly, "Proven-on-the-National-Stage Conservative-ish Guy with Ideas."
|
TransMonk Jan 20 2012 07:44 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
|
Nymr83 Jan 20 2012 07:52 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
haha nice
|
metirish Jan 20 2012 07:56 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
Not a fan of Newt but I will say this, none of this stuff seems to faze him at all, he's a talker that fella.
|
Edgy DC Jan 20 2012 07:59 AM Re: The Next To Fall |
|