Master Index of Archived Threads
SB XLVI
Frayed Knot Jan 22 2012 08:55 PM |
Man, everything in this sport is New York & Boston ... that's twice in four years!!
|
Ashie62 Jan 22 2012 09:01 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Just 3? wow
|
Mets – Willets Point Jan 22 2012 09:07 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
East Rutherford and Foxborough, to be accurate.
|
Ceetar Jan 22 2012 09:48 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
I'm surprised it's that high. Experts are still insisting the Patriots defense is paper thin.
|
Ceetar Jan 22 2012 09:52 PM Re: SB XLVI |
With the Giants in the Super Bowl again, and the Knicks free-falling, the Mets are like on a back back burner. And the closer we get to Spring Training when there's actual games, the better.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jan 23 2012 12:47 AM Re: SB XLVI |
This is a Super Bowl I could do without. I mean, it's not QUITE the 2008 Series, but, these days, it's not quite that Tyree Catch SB, either.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 23 2012 04:23 AM Re: SB XLVI |
The only Super Bowls I ever watch are the ones with the Giants, so I'll be tuning in.
|
Ceetar Jan 23 2012 05:35 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Joe Buck is just terrific. sometime the third quarteR (and other times) Manning completed a pass to "Guess who?!" Buck exclaimed. I'm not sure why it was supposed to be a guessing game, but Buck paused like he trying to figure out who it was that caught it.
|
Edgy MD Jan 23 2012 05:53 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Giant Superbowls should be called by Summerall and Madden.
|
Frayed Knot Jan 23 2012 06:11 AM Re: SB XLVI |
||
At least once when Buck said "Guess who" it was because he initially thought it was Cruz who had made a ton of catches already and whose horn he had been honking all game. When the dude got up he realized it wasn't Cruz only then did he answer his own question by naming the actual receiver.
|
Ceetar Jan 23 2012 07:02 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Also, except for foggy cameras and everyone slipping on like every play, it was hard to tell it was raining and windy. They showed a shot of it raining at the start of Overtime and that was like the first shot they showed and Buck and Aikman never mentioned it.
|
metirish Jan 23 2012 07:12 AM Re: SB XLVI |
They won't be doing the superbowl right?, they are without equel in how bad they are.
|
Ceetar Jan 23 2012 07:23 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
NBC. Costas/Collinsworth/Michaels
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 23 2012 07:26 AM Re: SB XLVI |
By the way, I think it's great that the 49ers stadium is once again called Candlestick Park. I remember in the last years that the Giants played there it was called 3M, or something stupid like that. And when I was last in San Francisco, in 2007, I remember making a wrong turn somewhere and ending up in the stadium parking lot, and at that point it was called Monster Field (after Monster.com).
|
MFS62 Jan 23 2012 07:46 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
And, as I may have mentioned, that kind of arrogance is the reason I root against the team that shares the Jets' stadium. There was a time they wouldn't give the scores of Jets games during their game broadcasts (local anouncers). Since then, I never mention the name of their team. And root against them harder than I root against any other team. In any sport. Later
|
Edgy MD Jan 23 2012 07:54 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Because of Joe Buck.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 23 2012 08:08 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Boy, THAT sure makes a lot of sense.
|
TransMonk Jan 23 2012 08:11 AM Re: SB XLVI |
As a fan of none of the teams involved, I would have preferred to see the 49ers in the SB, but it is hard to deny that the Giants have been playing some admirable football for several weeks now.
|
metirish Jan 23 2012 08:19 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
sweet , enjoy... I tell people i'm a Jets fan adn I am but not liKe I'm a Mets fan, so , I can pull for either team, I don't despise New England because they are a huge rival and I don't dislike the Giants because they are the other team in NJ. If this game is as exciting as the last time they met in the SB then I'll be happy.
|
Nymr83 Jan 23 2012 08:34 AM Re: SB XLVI |
the nightmare of another yankees-phillies world series is here for me. i'd rather see the giants win (i guess) but i cant root for them, i'll just pull for my boxes to hit
|
MFS62 Jan 23 2012 08:38 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Believe it. Can't explain why one over the other. They're close. But its true. Later
|
sharpie Jan 23 2012 08:41 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I'll be watching it at a bar in Bocas del Toro, Panama.
|
Edgy MD Jan 23 2012 08:43 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Because of Joe Buck.
|
G-Fafif Jan 23 2012 09:37 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Giants attempting to become first team to win a Super Bowl on their fourth network, having prevailed in XXI on CBS, XXV on ABC and XLII on Fox.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jan 23 2012 09:37 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Quiet everyone, I think Edgy is writing a song.
|
Fman99 Jan 23 2012 10:16 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I know plenty of obnoxious Pats and Giants fans so I don't really care who wins. I hope it's a competitive game that will sustain my interest until the end, no small feat given the copious amounts of alcohol, homemade chili (courtesy of yours truly) and homemade potato skins (courtesy of Fwife) I intend to indulge in.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jan 23 2012 11:13 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Because the 49ers will likely be playing in a brand new football stadium in the near future, I intend to travel to SF soon, specifically to watch a Niners home game at Candlestick. The Niners are the only football team I ever rooted for and I've never been to Candlestick. It'd be a nice bonus if I can catch the Mets in town on the same trip, but I'm not counting on that because the Mets typically play at SF before the start of the NFL regular season. I also have reservations about sending this post because whenever I announce plans this early, something always goes terribly wrong. I've been told that the red section of seats in the football configured photo are the best seats to watch a football game there. That section did not appear in the baseball configuration.
|
sharpie Jan 23 2012 01:27 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Went to a bushel of baseball games and a handful of football games at the 'Stick. "The Catch" happened right in front of me sitting in an endzone seat. Certainly the most famous sporting moment I've been to.
|
Ashie62 Jan 23 2012 03:34 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Mets usually equal Jets in fandom
|
Rockin' Doc Jan 23 2012 07:57 PM Re: SB XLVI |
I've always been a Mets and Giants fan. As a child I associated them together since the Mets were in the NL and the Giants were in the NFL (vs. the AFL) prior to the merger. I really have no problem with the Jets and wish them well, unless they are playing the Giants. Now, the Yanklees are an entirely different matter. I would likely pull for the IRS over the Yankees.
|
Ceetar Jan 23 2012 08:55 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Well when the IRS went up against Jeter...they won. so, clearly you're a bandwagoner.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jan 31 2012 08:21 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Why the Super Bowl is socialist.
|
metsmarathon Jan 31 2012 08:37 AM Re: SB XLVI |
i can't entirely say why i became a mets/giants fan, though it probably stems from my grandfather. i'm pretty sure he was both a mets and giants fan, though i'm not sure how either of those came about.
|
TheOldMole Jan 31 2012 11:33 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I'll still root for the Giants, but...
|
Benjamin Grimm Jan 31 2012 11:55 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Why don't we all chip in and offer Jeter $100 to go away forever?
|
metirish Jan 31 2012 11:57 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Oh for fucks sake , is there nothing Jeter can't make better?, well, apart from herpes is there anything?
|
Frayed Knot Jan 31 2012 01:12 PM Re: SB XLVI |
At least we don't have Eli claiming to have had Derek Jeter posters on his bedroom wall back in Louisiana.
|
themetfairy Jan 31 2012 02:37 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Yet....
|
metirish Feb 01 2012 06:01 AM Re: SB XLVI |
People all over twiiter are soiling themselves because Russo and Francesa did a show together yesterday ,"they were brilliant", " why did they ever split?"......some are trying to start rumors of a full time reunion.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 01 2012 06:27 AM Re: SB XLVI |
They were brilliant???
|
Edgy MD Feb 01 2012 06:33 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Who to Un-Follow, Part I
|
Ceetar Feb 01 2012 07:00 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
This stuff is what Media Day is all about. Happens every year. They're not wrong that the show was much better when they were together, but the floor is so low.
|
Ceetar Feb 02 2012 01:30 PM Re: SB XLVI |
[url]http://brooklynbrewery.com/blog/news/bi-coastal-brewers-bet-for-the-nfc-championship/
|
MFS62 Feb 03 2012 08:36 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Despite despite my feelings for the two teams (well, at least one of them), I'm still going to watch. Here's my analysis of the game.
|
metirish Feb 03 2012 08:47 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
the extra W there in place of the L and we have Water , also important
|
Frayed Knot Feb 03 2012 10:04 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I think if the ________ can control the line of scrimmage, stay out of 3rd-and-long situations, avoid needless penalties, and win the battle of turnovers, they stand an excellent chance of winning.
|
Nymr83 Feb 03 2012 12:06 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Actually, the Giants might be OK if they end up in 3rd and long situations. in 3 playoff games so far they've converted 60% on 3rd and >5 to go but only 28% in 3rd and <5 to go! add the patriots anemic pass rush and below average secondary and you've got a recipe for Giants 3rd down success!
|
Edgy MD Feb 03 2012 12:24 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Frayed Knot Feb 04 2012 08:00 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
So obviously what the Giants need to do then anytime they have a 3rd-and-short is to simply take an intentional delay of game penalty. This not only puts them into the 3rd-and-long that they apparently crave so much but also gives them a more favorable 'Time of Possession' ratio, a factor which also contributes to winning more often. Or at least it does according to those who believe that statistics create games rather than the other way around.
|
Kong76 Feb 05 2012 07:19 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Longest two weeks in sports (except maybe the last two weeks
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 05 2012 12:11 PM Re: SB XLVI |
If I were an actual Giants fan and not a mild enthusiast, I'd be worried sick with all the predictions of imminent victory. Seems likem ost peeps are not just assuming they win but win big.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Feb 05 2012 03:02 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Garlic-buffalo and Honey-adobo (wingily tweaked Filipino mom's recipe), with homemade shallot-blue cheese. Oh, they are a GO.
|
dgwphotography Feb 05 2012 03:17 PM Re: SB XLVI |
I'm boring - Just making homemade chicken soup from scratch, pigs in a blanket, and potato skins...
|
Rockin' Doc Feb 05 2012 03:25 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Bourbon & coffee Barbecue Glazed Baby Back Pork ribs. Bourbon & Brown sugar baked beans. Fresh french bread. Potential for some bourbon liquid refreshment after dinner.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Feb 05 2012 03:27 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Oh. OH.
|
metirish Feb 05 2012 03:32 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Ribs and chicken on it's way ........wings, chips and etc
|
metirish Feb 05 2012 03:36 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Oh fuck of Dan Patrick , let's ask Eli for the hundredth time who he goes to for advice ....um maybe his brother and father, yeah they played the game Dan.
|
Edgy MD Feb 05 2012 03:46 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Giants lifer Jay Horwitz.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 05 2012 03:48 PM Re: SB XLVI |
||
Sounds good. Made glazed sesame sweet wings and regular buff style.
|
Fman99 Feb 05 2012 03:54 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Homemade beef/pork/veal chili (me) and homemade potato skins (Fwife). We be eatin good.
|
metsguyinmichigan Feb 05 2012 04:20 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Hey, Kelly Clarkston remembered all the words to the anthem. Beats Christina Aguilera!
|
MFS62 Feb 05 2012 04:24 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Two kinds of wings:
|
Ashie62 Feb 05 2012 04:27 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Barely....She made it her own.
|
metsguyinmichigan Feb 05 2012 04:43 PM Re: SB XLVI |
If I'm ARod, I'm watching this one at home with NO popcorn to be found!
|
Gwreck Feb 05 2012 06:15 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Madonna: solid but unspectacular. Not going to crack the top 5 list.
|
Edgy MD Feb 05 2012 06:33 PM Re: SB XLVI |
There's a list?
|
Gwreck Feb 05 2012 06:37 PM Re: SB XLVI |
1 U2
|
metsguyinmichigan Feb 05 2012 07:21 PM Re: SB XLVI |
You didn't like McCartney or the Stones?
|
metirish Feb 05 2012 07:57 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Heyman with two good points
|
Gwreck Feb 05 2012 07:58 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Stones were horrible. McCartney was solid but unspectacular as well. Somewhere in the 6-10 range, along with Madonna.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 05 2012 08:07 PM Re: SB XLVI |
How do you think the fans in Baltimore feel about ex-Colt Raymond Berry bringing out the trophy as if he is now or ever was part of Indianapolis history?
|
Frayed Knot Feb 05 2012 08:10 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Yup & Yup.
|
Edgy MD Feb 05 2012 08:14 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Was Mike Pagel unavailable?
|
Ceetar Feb 05 2012 08:26 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Boom, and Giants are champions. That was fun. "dream team" from Philly floundered and the team from New York took the division and the championship..you listening Mets?
|
themetfairy Feb 05 2012 09:11 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Saw the game at the home of former neighbors of ours. We drove up, giving a ride to our neighbors R and B who live across the street. R had suffered a massive heart attack last August, so the fact that he was able to join us was truly incredible.
|
SteveJRogers Feb 05 2012 09:36 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
There is an article on Johnny Unitas in the SB program as part of their spotlighting the host city and the host franchise.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Feb 05 2012 10:57 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Not so. The Giants benefited from the fact that a play occurred and took a while to do so. That there was a penalty was immaterial-to-mildly-negative for the Giants-- the key benefit was that 10 seconds ran off the clock. The key point again is, Jon Heyman is not terribly reliable when venturing outside his realm of "expertise" (and even less so if his informant's name doesn't rhyme with "Shot Whore Us").
|
metirish Feb 06 2012 05:41 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I assumed he was talking about the ten seconds?
|
Ceetar Feb 06 2012 05:55 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I wonder if that was intentional by the Giants, or merely a lucky mistake.
|
metirish Feb 06 2012 07:06 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Not to defend Heyman here but his tweets came across just like the rest of us dolts tweeting about the game.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 06 2012 07:06 AM Re: SB XLVI |
||
I immediately thought of the same thing, that the 'penalty' for this is a mere five yards plus down over while the benefit of having a 5th (or 6th, or 7th) DB is a much greater likelihood of the play failing (one which you know going in is going to be a pass). PLUS!! there isn't (at least to my knowledge) any mechanism for whistling the play dead before it happens so the defensive team gets the seconds off the clock that they really want.
I don't think he's wrong at all. The flaw in the system is that in certain situations (like last night) the clock becomes much more valuable for each team than a single score to the point where the defensive team wants the offense to score as soon as possible at the same time that the offensive team wants to NOT score. It could even be argued that the Pats should have let the Giants score much earlier like when they were out on the 20 with a full minute left -- which would have lead to a comical situation where 11 guys in blue were standing around refusing to tackle while 11 dudes in white were standing around trying not to advance.
|
metirish Feb 06 2012 07:09 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Lupica actually didn't mention Jeter.......
|
Ceetar Feb 06 2012 07:17 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|||
Sure, but I'm not a so-called 'respected authority' and Heyman's baseball tweets often come across with that 'I know better' ego as well. (at least the ones I see, since I don't follow him)
I would disagree. Take the lead when you can take the lead. There are no guarantees. The TD over the FG means they have to go at least 35 yards further down the field to win. There's always the possibility of missing/blocking the FG, muffing the snap. I'm all for trying to force them to eat up time there during the play, walk along the goal line, etc, but to not score tempts fate in my eye. I do agree that that's part of what makes baseball a 'better' game in that you're not presented with these situations where it's about strategic time outs and letting them score and other assorted things that aren't about the talent of the athletes against each other.
|
MFS62 Feb 06 2012 07:25 AM Re: SB XLVI |
There was another key "W" that I thought about, but forgot to add. It was:
|
Edgy MD Feb 06 2012 07:26 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Baseball. Make outs or play all day.
|
Ceetar Feb 06 2012 07:29 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
I'm on board with that. Let's do it. Get me the commissioner on the phone. And think about the strategy! You've got a 3rd and 8 on the opponents 35 yard line. Do you take the "sure" points and kick a field goal (which in my mind is giving up possession) or go for it?
|
Ceetar Feb 06 2012 07:31 AM Re: SB XLVI |
This would be the perfect way to 'rebalance' a game where passing has gotten out of hand. Retaining possession becomes so much more important that you'd have to incorporate more running and less passing, especially since takeaways on defense would suddenly become so much more valuable that you'd actually start training guys to do that more than just taking down guys.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 06 2012 07:32 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I'm not saying that there's a cut-n-dried point where wanting your opponent to score is [u:3l26cc3q]in fact[/u:3l26cc3q] always a better strategy.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 06 2012 07:36 AM Re: SB XLVI |
||
I wish one of the mediots who spent the better part of two weeks sticking mics in Irsay's face asking him every inane question in the book had had the guts to ask him that when they finally get around to running Peyton out of town if they're going to do so via Mayflower moving vans in the middle of the night.
|
Edgy MD Feb 06 2012 07:44 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I'd be at least a little disappointed to hear Unitas' family consented to his profile used in the promotion of the game. Not that I want people to sustain bitterness, but Unitas explicitly disowned himself from association with the Indianapolis Colts --- claiming that it was so definitively distinct from the franchise he played for that he wanted his name removed from their record books.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 06 2012 07:45 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
"That's gold Jerry ... GOLD!!"
|
Ceetar Feb 06 2012 07:49 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Earlier would've made sense I guess. (I'm merely saying Heyman was suggesting it was fact that that's the way you do it) Supposedly Eli didn't say anything to Bradshaw until he handed him the ball, and Ahmad said it didn't click until about the 2 yard line. But then, it was only second down. So in that sense I guess I get the idea of stopping on the goal line. force them to use that last time out and then you still theoretically have a really good shot at the one inch drive for a TD on 3rd which would eat up the clock if you didn't score with the 4th Down field goal as a backup.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Feb 06 2012 08:31 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Heyman is NOT right. A ten-second (or seven-second, or twelve-second) loss isn't a mandate every time there's a post-snap flag. Brady always has the option of chucking it out of bounds within a millisecond of the flag coming out-- if it's against the Giants, they save time while gaining yardage; if it's against the Pats, a positive gain likely isn't counting anyway-- but instead chose to go for the scratch-off lottery ticket downfield (the smart play in virtually every other game situation).
|
Ceetar Feb 06 2012 08:40 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
There are some that would say bunting is always a terrible option. percentage-wise it's not, but still. But that, and chess, are different in that you're not actually giving up points. Outs and chess pieces are not how the game is scored.
|
Edgy MD Feb 06 2012 08:41 AM Re: SB XLVI |
For the fans, it sure can be.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Feb 06 2012 09:26 AM Re: SB XLVI |
||
Pardon. The correct, specific baseball analogue is "conceding the run" to arrest the potential big inning (allowing a score to conserve outs/clock).
|
Ceetar Feb 06 2012 09:30 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
And teams never concede the (tying/go-ahead) run in the ninth inning. They wouldn't even do it with Ruth-Pujols-Bonds coming up in the bottom of the inning.
|
Edgy MD Feb 06 2012 09:32 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Sure, they do it all the time. Up by three, runners on first on third, you get a grounder and concede the run in order to get the sure out on the trailing runner and a chance a double play.
|
Mets – Willets Point Feb 06 2012 09:50 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I just think it's funny that Giants won because they scored a touchdown by mistake.
|
Ceetar Feb 06 2012 09:52 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
It's hilarious. Bradshaw was quoted as thinking "damn, why'd I score?" (About a Super Bowl winning touchdown!) when Brady threw that last hail mary.
|
Valadius Feb 06 2012 10:15 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Four years ago was the happiest moment for one of my teams since I started following sports as a kid. This was just gravy.
|
metsmarathon Feb 06 2012 11:24 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
a theoretical / anecdotal parallel is the rally-killing home run in baseball. you know, you've got hte opposing pitcher on the ropes, ripping double after double after double, pouring on the runs, when one of your guys does something stupid like popping hte ball over the fence and clearing hte bases. instant rally-killer. at least so the story goes. if that were truly the case, why wouldn't the pitcher getting hammered start serving up juicy meatballs hoping to induce the rally-killer? or the defensive players not chase the ball on a would-be double, allowing hte batter to kill the rally and tired hisself out all at the same time? ok, it's not reallyhte same thing, but its the case where, accoriding to some school of thought, the success of your opponenet hurts him. or some such.
|
Edgy MD Feb 06 2012 11:37 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I tell you, boys and girls, I don't have nerves of steel like Mark Harmon did in that episode of The Hardy Boys Nancy Drew Mysteries where he played a college football kicker who had the tentacles of gambling ring wrapped around him but was freed to go ahead and make that last-second kick when Nancy Drew broke up the ring and had them all arrested then somehow got down on the sidelines to inform him of his liberty BECAUSE NANCY DREW IS AWESOME.
|
G-Fafif Feb 06 2012 11:46 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Jaded professional athletes? Flight home reveals otherwise for Super Bowl XLVI champs:
|
metirish Feb 06 2012 12:08 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Has Francesa given the ratings numbers yet?
|
Frayed Knot Feb 06 2012 01:31 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
The difference with football is that, as both a timed game and an alternate possession game, you can run into situations where the team on offense doesn't want to score at the same time the team on defense has no interest in stopping them. That is the flaw.
|
Edgy MD Feb 06 2012 01:35 PM Re: SB XLVI |
The other difference is that professional football is patronized by tens of millions at a time while chess is played for perhaps hundreds.
|
metsmarathon Feb 06 2012 06:32 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
not to mention that the gints had more than a few balls pop free through teh course of the game, and were quite fortunate to not lose any of them. i don't ordinarily buy into the fates, but i sure as heck know that you do not ever, ever tempt them. the pats did, and look what happened to them. they lost the game.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 07 2012 06:44 AM Re: SB XLVI |
It appears that Gisele Bundchen is aspiring to be the next Anna Benson.
|
Ceetar Feb 07 2012 07:03 AM Re: SB XLVI |
The parade is supposed to be well attended. Company president is walking around talking about 10% of the Metro Area is supposed to be there or something.
|
Ceetar Feb 07 2012 07:11 AM Re: SB XLVI |
speaking of which, I created a "which team will have the next parade" poll
|
Edgy MD Feb 07 2012 07:19 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Every day of my life, I hold a parade for the Mets.
|
metirish Feb 07 2012 07:20 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
my heart says Mets but head says Rangers
|
Ceetar Feb 07 2012 07:26 AM Re: SB XLVI |
||
well Rangers get first dibs anyway.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 07 2012 07:51 AM Re: SB XLVI |
With the defending champ getting the honor to host the Thursday night season opener, this September's game is already scheduled for the Giants & Redskins.
|
TransMonk Feb 07 2012 08:13 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
As a Redskins fan, I would have mixed feelings about this. But Manning vs. Manning twice a year would certainly drive some revenue. In my mind, the odds are that Grossman will start the season for the Skins next season.
|
TransMonk Feb 07 2012 08:19 AM Re: SB XLVI |
I watched SB XLVI at a hotel bar in Mexico with about a dozen other Americans. In Mexico, they did not carry the NBC feed, but had two viewing options: an ESPN affiliate with English announcers but Spanish graphics and the NFL network feed with Spanish commentary but English graphics. Our room had the English feed, but the bar had the free drinks, so we watched with the Spanish commentary. Neither network showed any of the American TV commercials. They did show a commercial for the Mexican equivilant of Advil featuring Joe Montana about 15 times.
|
Mets – Willets Point Feb 07 2012 01:21 PM Re: SB XLVI |
900 pounds of Butterfingers dumped on a Boston sidewalk as a "tribute" to Wes Welker.
|
Ceetar Feb 07 2012 02:02 PM Re: SB XLVI |
lol, awesome, but Brady probably should've moved them somewhere hard to reach.
|
dgwphotography Feb 07 2012 02:05 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
I wouldn't think there were so many MFY fans there...
|
Edgy MD Feb 07 2012 02:26 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Really? I think this is for crap. Public scapegoating and piling on is using the media for bullying.
|
Benjamin Grimm Feb 07 2012 02:29 PM Re: SB XLVI |
I agree. It's just assholery.
|
Ceetar Feb 07 2012 02:32 PM Re: SB XLVI |
||
I think it's a creative way to advertise. Play on the fans misery to remind them on your product. Like stupid Manhattan Mini Storage doing the "6 pro teams and the Mets" (although I hated that..so whatever)
|
Edgy MD Feb 07 2012 02:34 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Yes, whatever.
|
Mets – Willets Point Feb 07 2012 02:36 PM Re: SB XLVI |
||
Yankees fans, Patriots fans, cut from the same cloth.
|
Edgy MD Feb 07 2012 02:40 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Oh, I think they be everywhere, with winning teams and losing ones.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 07 2012 04:24 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
In fairness to Patriots fans, this seems to be the invention of the on-line Pawn service mentioned on that sign (I had no idea such things existed) trying to capitalize on the plight of disgruntled New England football fans rather than something started by those disgruntled locals themselves. Pats fans could still be all spoiled DBs, it's just that this display alone doesn't make them so.
|
metirish Feb 07 2012 04:25 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Not a fan of butterfingers myself
|
Gwreck Feb 07 2012 05:11 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
The parade may well have been well attended but the only way they are getting 2 million in attendance there is if they are counting everyone who would have been in Manhattan anyway this morning.
|
Ceetar Feb 07 2012 05:25 PM Re: SB XLVI |
||
supposedly 2.3, which is both right around 10% and may be more than the Mets get in 81 games.
|
Mets – Willets Point Feb 07 2012 06:56 PM Re: SB XLVI |
The Mayor's Office will be issuing the pawnbrokers a violation for commercial dumping ($1000 fine). Still, free Butterfingers.
|
Ceetar Feb 07 2012 07:57 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
I don't think I'd take a free candy bar mocking my team.
|
Gwreck Feb 07 2012 08:42 PM Re: SB XLVI |
|
Got a link? Note that the NYPD has long since refused to give official crowd size estimates but I bet somebody will try. I found one story that suggested that as many as 1 million people expected.
|
Ceetar Feb 07 2012 08:57 PM Re: SB XLVI |
||
no, saw it tweeted, by one of the Giants I think.
|
metsmarathon Feb 07 2012 09:33 PM Re: SB XLVI |
||
i love the mets, but i'll gladly take a jumbo-sized butterfinger bar any day. i regret typing those words.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 08 2012 06:47 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Hey, it's not like the groups that put on events like this are ever prone to blowing up crowd size for their own pr purposes.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Feb 08 2012 08:06 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|||
Granted, that's a publicity stunt.
|
Edgy MD Feb 08 2012 08:23 AM Re: SB XLVI |
You know, if I booked a party anyway, I'd go to it. The problem is that private affair that it is, everybody and his sister has a camera in their pocket. A videocamera. So your discrete affair is dancing on somebody else's grave of self-pity.
|
Ceetar Feb 08 2012 08:27 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
They killed Beltran when he was in the process of building a freaking school. I don't get worked up about this stuff. People celebrate in different ways, people grieve in different ways. Who am I to judge?
|
Edgy MD Feb 08 2012 08:32 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Maybe you're someone who cares about the people being killed.
|
Ceetar Feb 08 2012 08:35 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
if I hunted down and bitch-slapped every idiot that was killing athletes for stupid reasons, I'd never have any time to watch said athletes.
|
Edgy MD Feb 08 2012 08:42 AM Re: SB XLVI |
We all seem to have plenty of time for our opinions nonetheless.
|
metsmarathon Feb 08 2012 08:52 AM Re: SB XLVI |
fans are idiots. the keep forgetting that athletes are actual humans, real live persons, just like hte rest of us, and that their sport is something that's typically very important to them, and it's their job and their passion.
|
Edgy MD Feb 08 2012 08:59 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Yabbut who are you to judge?
|
Ceetar Feb 08 2012 09:01 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
and my opinion is I don't really have much feeling about athletes do when they're not doing the on the field/court/pitch/yard. I do have strong opinions about the idiots that criticize them and make it a talking point on the radio/newspaper/blogs. But Carlos Beltran doesn't really need me to defend him and I lose interest in it pretty fast.
|
Edgy MD Feb 08 2012 09:05 AM Re: SB XLVI |
"Who am I to judge?" is a backhanded way of saying "Who are you to judge?"
|
Ceetar Feb 08 2012 09:10 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
correct. I judge those that judge athletes for how they live their lives.
|
Edgy MD Feb 08 2012 09:17 AM Re: SB XLVI |
OK, now I get it. "I don't get worked up about this stuff. People celebrate in different ways, people grieve in different ways. Who am I to judge?" spoke about your unwillingness to judge the athletes. Not about your unwillingness to judge the fans.
|
Ceetar Feb 08 2012 10:17 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
yeah. I mean I try not to judge the fans either, there is no right way to follow sports and all that, but there is just SO MUCH stupid out there. (aside, my brain is absolutely frazzled this week. I typed that last sentence three times and each time it was rife with spelling and grammatical errors well beyond the usual ones I make)
|
Frayed Knot Feb 08 2012 10:18 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Part of this type of criticism is a way for pissed-off fans to convince themselves that a portion of the reason their team lost can be explained by athletes who simply don't care as deeply as they the fans do. Dancing, not crying enough, taking post-season vacations or otherwise continuing with their lives despite the last loss serve as 'proof' to those already given to that view. Add in the transient nature of players in a city -- "I've been a ______ fan for forty years and he's only been here for three!" -- and it becomes an easy way to transfer the pain.
|
Ceetar Feb 08 2012 10:27 AM Re: SB XLVI |
|
the mediots are who I have the biggest problem with. In my opinion (and what I am looking for when I read/listen) is talk about the game/sports/abilities. And while I enjoy hearing about things like Butterfingers, it should be a "hahah, did you hear that?" not a jumping off point for a three hour back and forth with callers about a players attitude or how much he cares.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Feb 08 2012 10:37 AM Re: SB XLVI |
Hell, I'd feel more of a need to go out drinking and/or dancing after the excruciating loss than I would after a win.
|
Mets – Willets Point Feb 08 2012 05:42 PM Re: SB XLVI |
mm beat me to it with his long and excellent scenario, but I was going to point out that most people in whatever line of work will in fact actually be more likely to want to go out for drinks and social activity after a bad day at work. Football players should not be exempt.
|
metirish Feb 08 2012 05:48 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Trust Ian O'Connor to be a total wanker on this
|
Mets – Willets Point Feb 08 2012 05:54 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Yes, but Steinbrenner was a narcissistic douchebag.
|
Edgy MD Feb 08 2012 06:11 PM Re: SB XLVI |
Your move, Ian O'Connor.
|
G-Fafif Feb 10 2012 02:14 PM Re: SB XLVI |
What a "Finish": audio and video masterpiece from NFL Films.
|