Master Index of Archived Threads
Tim Wakefield to retire
Frayed Knot Feb 17 2012 10:29 AM Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Feb 17 2012 10:56 AM |
The knuckle-baller to make his announcement today at Boston's ST complex in Florida
|
TransMonk Feb 17 2012 10:40 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
|
Definitely. Wakefield was always a favorite of my old man (who roots for the Sox of the other color), so I always kept an eye on how he was doing.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Feb 17 2012 10:50 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
Drafted as an outfielder or first baseman if I recall correctly.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 17 2012 10:53 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
|
Yup! Played all of '88 and most of '89 as a 1B, 3B & 2B Was full-time pitcher by 1990
|
metirish Feb 17 2012 11:18 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
Nice career, wanted to look up his numbers versus the MFY's but Baseball Reference is a real pain in the arse these days, used to be you could click on career and go from there......
|
SteveJRogers Feb 17 2012 11:24 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
|
Hate to bring up Uber-douche Wally Matthews, but this does bear mentioning as it is a clear example of his douchebaggery. Heading into that 2004 ALCS, Matthews had declared that, thanks to the Aaron Boone homer, the Yankees had "solved" Wakefield, and that Wakefield was DONE when it came to pitching against the MFYs. Yeeeeeaaaaaaahhhhhhh, about that...
|
G-Fafif Feb 17 2012 11:25 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
Starting lineup Wakefield faced in his first Shea Stadium start, August 10, 1992.
|
Edgy MD Feb 17 2012 11:27 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
My shorts are still stained from his pitching in game five of the comeback against the Yankees, when for three innings Varitek was desperately trying to keep the pitches in front of him --- with the Yankees on at least one occasion a single wild pitch or passed ball from going ahead.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 17 2012 01:55 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
|
58 Games 36 starts including 2 CGs 10 games finished incl 1 Save 255 IP -- 231 Hits -- 167 K, 130 BB -- 5.01 ERA; 1.414 WHiP [vs 4.41, 1.350 career averages] -- 12 Wins 18 Losses Not surprisingly, the Yanx, along with the other ALEast teams, are among the teams he pitched against the most. Toronto was way out in front as his most faced team while Baltimore was slightly higher than NYY.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 17 2012 01:57 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
||
Yeah, like anyone ever solves a knuckleball pitcher. Or that one pitch to one batter (especially one who was only on the team for about an hour) proves anything about anything. That theory is stupid even by Wally standards.
|
Ashie62 Feb 17 2012 10:58 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
Class act whose number may very well be retired.
|
Nymr83 Feb 19 2012 10:49 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
Actually saw this on twitter as Dickey posted about it the other day, said he already felt lonely as the only active knuckleballer (is that true?)
|
Frayed Knot Feb 20 2012 07:33 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
|
Probably is, at least for pitchers who use it as their majority pitch. Another side-note about Wakefield's retirement is that it leaves MLB without an active 200+ win pitcher for the first time since ... since 1879!! when Tommy Bond (you all remember ol' Tommy, right?) passed Bobby Mathews to take over the lead in the post-Al Spalding era with 195. The Ireland-born T.B. (as we who were close to him called him) went on to win 26 that year (after four straight seasons of 40+) to push him over the 200 mark. Of course, seeing how Wakefield didn't get #200 until September it would seem that last season didn't have a >200 guy either but Jamie Moyer (267) was considered active even though he didn't pitch due to injury. Moyer hooking on with a team (I think the Rox invited him to camp) would give him back the lead and continue the streak. If not it'll still only last this year as current leader Roy Halladay (188) is poised to break the barrier unless (heh, heh) something bad happens. There were a few close calls over the years such as Don Drysdale with 204 taking over the lead upon the retirement of Whitey Ford. But there were also decade-long streaks where the mark stayed at 300+
|
Edgy MD Feb 20 2012 08:28 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
For those of us who think they've really bolluxed up the system with the limitations they're placing on starting pitchers --- and the demands they're placing on relievers --- that's a sorry turn of events.
|
Nymr83 Feb 21 2012 04:57 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
|
It almost seems unthinkable that there wouldn't be a single active pitcher with 200, but yeah its a sign of the times and the strategy of having your best players pitch a lower percentage of your club's innings. Its arguably a stupid strategy, but its become universal.
|
Frayed Knot Feb 27 2012 04:35 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
Will the last aging Red Sox please shut the lights on your way out as Jason Varitek gets set to announce his retirement.
|
Edgy MD Mar 24 2012 10:41 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
||
Hold the phone. Jamie Moyer just threw four perfect innings against the Giants.
|
MFS62 Mar 25 2012 11:24 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
No. Just a tad too young to remember Bobby Bond.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 31 2012 02:06 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
Jamie Moyer not only makes the Rox roster but is slated to start their 2nd game.
|
Edgy MD Mar 31 2012 03:19 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
Pettitte's going to be activated soon also, right? I guess we still need for him and Moyer to hang in there until Halladay wins 12 more games.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 31 2012 06:26 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
The first game Moyer wins (assuming there is one) will make him the oldest ML pitcher ever to win a game.
|
Mets – Willets Point Mar 31 2012 08:33 PM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
|
Military service, perhaps?
|
Frayed Knot Apr 01 2012 09:10 AM Re: Tim Wakefield to retire |
||
That was my first guess although I don't believe there was a military draft at that point and, of course, that time-frame was prior to our entry into WWI. A significant number of MLers went on to miss the '18 season for that reason but missing '16 & '17 in the military and then being available for '18 seems odd ... unless he was somehow dragged into the fighting via the empire of his birth.
|