Master Index of Archived Threads
spring training opponents
Farmer Ted Mar 28 2012 03:39 PM |
There are 14 other teams in FLA during spring training but the Mets only play six of them (Cards, Marlins, Braves, Astros, Tigers, Nationals). Phillies, NO. Yankees, NO. Boston, NO. Tampa Bay, NO. Minnesota, NO. Toronto, NO. Pittsburgh, NO. Baltimore, NO.
|
TransMonk Mar 28 2012 03:45 PM Re: spring training opponents |
Best guess: Millionaires don't like to ride on buses for more than an hour or two if they don't have to.
|
Farmer Ted Mar 28 2012 04:08 PM Re: spring training opponents |
The Mets threw Harvey the other day so they wouldn't expose Dickey to a common opponent (he subsequently pitched in a minor league game that day).
|
Ceetar Mar 28 2012 04:32 PM Re: spring training opponents |
it's a long trip for practice. The Mets occasionally play some of those teams..they played the Red Sox last year. I was there, and I made the trip to PSL afterwards too. It's long. Even the Astros/Braves isn't exactly down the road. This is even written into the Mets lease. If other teams leave, the Mets have an out.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 28 2012 08:51 PM Re: spring training opponents |
Not to pile on another easy target, but ultimately St. Lucie looks like a poor real estate decision by the Wilpons.
|
Ceetar Mar 28 2012 08:55 PM Re: spring training opponents |
What was the impetus for leaving Tampa anyway? Or was Tampa not real nice back then? it's kinda nice that you can run into and interact with the players all around the PSL 'nightlife' but they'd do better attendance-wise too in a real place.
|
G-Fafif Mar 28 2012 09:14 PM Re: spring training opponents |
I don't precisely recall if St. Pete was ditched on merit, save maybe for having to share with the Cardinals. I loved it over there, both as an attendee in my college days and just absorbing it via TV and the papers.
|
Ceetar Mar 28 2012 09:15 PM Re: spring training opponents |
|
My vote is for the Twins! Port Charlotte sucks and its' Red Sox nation down there!
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 28 2012 09:23 PM Re: spring training opponents |
The St Petersburg field was right downtown, right on the water but old and cramped, I don't think one team much less two could successfully have an appropriate modern facility there. I l-o-v-e-d going to games there anyhow.
|
Edgy MD Mar 28 2012 09:39 PM Re: spring training opponents |
St. Lue was an enticing business deal with the community rolling over for them. The number of crimes great and small committed against St. Lucians by bored stupid Mets personnel over the years has got to have become a constant source of embarrassment to any civic leaders still living.
|
MFS62 Mar 28 2012 10:00 PM Re: spring training opponents |
Edgy, as one of my bosses used to say, "Please don't try to dazzle us with logic".
|
Ceetar Mar 29 2012 05:32 AM Re: spring training opponents |
yeah, I imagine something could be worked out if they really tried. Especially near the end once minor leagues games have started. Hell, the minor leaguers ONLY play the Nats and the Fish I think. Bring some of them along (second bus) and play some minor leaguers against the Red Sox too.
|
bmfc1 Mar 29 2012 05:46 AM Re: spring training opponents |
The Nationals maybe moving to the old Red Sox camp in Ft. Meyers. That would be another team leaving the east coast of Florida. The Wilpons went "all in" for PSL but nobody followed, the Orioles and Dodgers left, and now they are part of a lonely group of teams (Astros, Marlins, Cardinals). "Guys!" said that the Mets are trying to get an AL team to share their facility but with so few teams in the area, I wonder if this will happen.
|
metirish Mar 29 2012 06:34 AM Re: spring training opponents |
Cliff Floyd called PSL the "black hole" and apparently a whole lot of people agree. I remember at the time it was cause for some embarrassment to the Mets/Wilpons that he said that, it may have been around the time they were changing names down there to sill things like The Town of Tradition.
|
Ceetar Mar 29 2012 06:48 AM Re: spring training opponents |
|
The Mets have an out if the Nats leave I think, so I'm torn. Maybe that starts an exodus to the gulf side. The Mets did just redo Digital Domain Field, but it wasn't a huge job really. The Jupiter places is nice enough, but it's nothing real special. And That's it. Astros/Braves are in Orlando/Kissimmee, closer to Tampa anyway.
|
Ceetar Mar 29 2012 06:49 AM Re: spring training opponents |
And for all the black hole comments and the digs at PSL...take your typical LI or NJ or upstate suburb and its' really not that much different. Strip malls all over the place, and a few 'popular' places. Yeah, it's not NY..but..
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 29 2012 07:13 AM Re: spring training opponents |
I rarely do the spring training thing (2008 was my first and so far only visit to Port St. Lucie) so I really don't care where the Mets play. In fact, I wouldn't mind if they moved to Arizona, because if I was to go to spring training, I'd rather be in Arizona than Florida.
|
Ceetar Mar 29 2012 07:26 AM Re: spring training opponents |
There are no teams in Miami for Spring Training.
|
bmfc1 Mar 29 2012 07:28 AM Re: spring training opponents |
I could care less about the night life at PSL. Good line Ceetar: "PSL might as well be NYC compared to those places in terms of stuff to do." It's not supposed to be Vegas. They need to have a greater variety of opponents, especially more non-NL East opponents, and shorter travel times.
|
Ceetar Mar 29 2012 07:34 AM Re: spring training opponents |
|
I guess part of the question (and this applies to the Arizona thought as well) is how much do you factor in ticket sales and your customers? How much of Spring Training is getting ready, and how much is providing for fans? Part of the reason the Yankees do so much better than the Mets in terms of attendance down there is because of the relative populations of the area. PSL has beaches and restaurants and bars and bowling alleys. who's vacationing in Bradenton florida? Even if you go down for Spring Training, the games over by 4 and then you have all evening. It's probably just because it's so much NL-east though. Wouldn't really care if they played 10 games against the Twins. or the Blue Jays.
|
Edgy MD Mar 29 2012 07:45 AM Re: spring training opponents |
|
I think better yet would be the high school sports model --- where the JV travels to the same school the varsity is hosting, and when the varsity travels, the JV hosts the team coming from that school. If the Mets minor leaguers are in Jupiter or Dunedin for a few days, it means a few fields and dormitories are available for big league visitors to futz around on or in. Vice versa.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 29 2012 07:46 AM Re: spring training opponents |
A lot of that "black hole" stuff that Cliff and others talked about was a lot more true some 10-15 years ago when the town of PSL barely existed, especially for those athletes used to a late-night life-style. By moving there two decades or so ago what the Wilpons did was bet on the area growing and on that point they were correct. The problem now is no longer the town of PSL itself but that the larger area shrank baseball-wise due at first to the Dodgers abandoning Vero and then to the general exodus to Arizona. With fewer - I believe it's just 15 now - teams in the whole state of Florida even if teams were to get together and construct some kind of equitable east-coast/west-coast split you're still only going to have a half-dozen or so opponents in your general area.
|
bmfc1 Mar 29 2012 07:48 AM Re: spring training opponents |
Ceetar correctly said: "Supposedly you can hit a day and a night game in the same day if you want. constant baseball" Yes, that's true on the "other side" of Florida and in AZ, not so where the Mets are unless the Marlins or Cardinals have a night game while the Mets have a day game (and there are very few night games). Some office friends who are Yankee fans (sigh) went to see their team play a day game and then went to see the Jays that same night. I would think that if the Mets were in an area with more teams, their attendance would rise because of fans from other teams doing that same thing.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 29 2012 07:48 AM Re: spring training opponents |
Or really go back to the old way. Pick a spring training site wherever you please: Tulsa, Oklahoma; Mobile, Alabama, or wherever. Play college teams and intrasquad games and then when spring training is over, barnstorm your way back north.
|
Ceetar Mar 29 2012 08:02 AM Re: spring training opponents |
|
I don't think that's work, just due to level of competition issues with trying to get guys used to hitting major league quality pitching. Although.. I guess if you make barnstorming long enough with another ML team. (pick an interleague opponent you don't play that year. Mets and the Orioles, etc. ) It doesn't even have to be a straight trip anymore, which they were doing to break up what was probably a reallllly long train ride back to NY. You could probably zig-zag your way north stopping at minor league stadiums and playing the Orioles every time. Would be nice for the minor league fans too.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 29 2012 08:13 AM Re: spring training opponents |
Mainly as a result of the rapid growth the Wilpons saw there, St Lucie got badly beaten up in the housing debacle and the economy there is still pretty rotten, so I'm not sure who'd wanna move there now.
|
metsguyinmichigan Mar 29 2012 08:30 AM Re: spring training opponents |
My parents moved to Jupiter in the early 1990s,and I used to love visiting in March and hitting a whole bunch of games. The Mets were in SPL of course, but the Braves and Expos shared a charming old stadium in West Palm Beach, less than a half-hour south. The MFYs were in Lauderdale, which was not that nice of a park, about an hour south, Dodgertown was about an hour north and the Marlins were in Melbourne about two hours north.
|