Master Index of Archived Threads
RA Deserves His Own Thread
batmagadanleadoff Jun 13 2012 09:17 PM |
|
...and I'll kick it off with this bit of news.
http://scores.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=320613130
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 13 2012 09:21 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
I didn't know that a hit/error call was appealable.
|
Nymr83 Jun 13 2012 09:22 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I still haven't SEEN the play, but Howie said the scoring was kosher, I wouldn't want it changed after the fact- if its even debateable then the official scorer's initial call should stand.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 13 2012 09:22 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?secti ... id=8049989
|
MFS62 Jun 13 2012 09:24 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
There is precedent for an official scorer changing a ruling after the game. Used to happen all the time. But I'm not sure if it has been done for a no-hitter.
|
Ceetar Jun 13 2012 09:35 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
That'd be really weird. It doesn't matter now anyway though. I didn't think you could get a no-hitter when you let a run score? (I always figured that's how the Mets would get theirs..and maybe lose to boot)
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 13 2012 09:40 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I don;t want it that way. This just illustrates further how random and freaky one is. We all know what happened out there. He threw a poifict game.
|
themetfairy Jun 13 2012 09:47 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
TransMonk Jun 14 2012 05:36 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I think last night put RA officially in the bidding for NL starter at the All-Star Game...although, Matt Cain helped himself a lot as well.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 14 2012 06:18 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Of course you can. It wouldn't be a shutout, but it would certainly be a no-hitter.
|
Edgy MD Jun 14 2012 06:35 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
They've changed some of the rules over the years, even going so far as to strike some no-hitters from the record book, so I wouldn't necessarily be surprised if they decided to discount no-hitters that weren't shutouts. I think they ruled --- 20 years or so ago --- that it had go at least nine innings and your team had to win. Poor David Palmer had a perfect game stricken from the records, because it had only gone five innings, before being shortened by rain. The rational defense of Palmer would be that he didn't ask it to rain; he just went out and did his job. Perfectly. He even made a point of going out and throwing the first four innings perfectly in his next start. Against the Mets, I think.
|
Ceetar Jun 14 2012 06:40 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
yeah, did some reading this morning. I've heard the 'not if a run scores' thing before but it doesn't appear to be accurate. It does have to be 9 innings, and that rule was changed in 1991. It may be related, the idea being that if you pitch a complete game no-hit 8IP loss and give up a run you don't get the no-hitter.
|
metirish Jun 14 2012 06:48 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
yeah, wouldn't want it after the fact......
|
Edgy MD Jun 14 2012 06:57 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
There's the ongoing issue that there really aren't professional standards among official scorers. It's not as bad as it used to be, but it's still a safe bet that tough calls are more likely to fall on the side of giving a hit to the home player. And the league office is the objective arbiter.
|
Ceetar Jun 14 2012 07:01 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
yeah, like the Jeter hit the other day. stupid. I saw the play, but never saw a side by side to see where Upton was. They do change things very frequently, I doubt all of those are initiated by protest.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 07:06 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Frayed Knot Jun 14 2012 07:10 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
There were a whole bunch of stricken no-nos from the record books when they more narrowly defined the criteria, but giving up runs wasn't one of them. Unless you're Ralph Kiner that is who always uses the phrase "No-Run, No-Hit games" as if his standards are higher than just a plain "No-hit" games.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 07:14 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I'm surprised that this game was ever counted as a no-hitter. I thought that one of the elements of a no-no is that the pitcher throw a complete game.
|
Ceetar Jun 14 2012 07:16 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
that goes into the 'combined' no-hitter category now. I love that one as a caricature of Babe Ruth. makes me laugh every time.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 14 2012 07:22 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Well, viewed from one angle you could call it complete in that he got all 27 outs - he just did it without being the starter and without facing 27 batters. And that's what the "clean-up" campaign was designed to do, more clearly define what was and what wasn't a No-hitter by getting rid of all those grey-area deals. Call it the anti-asterisk crusade.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 07:23 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Obviously. But my issue was that the reliever, as opposed to the team, was once credited with a no-hitter.
|
Edgy MD Jun 14 2012 07:23 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Yeah, it's still a no-hitter, just not a complete game affair. Neil Allen had one of those once also. Not a no-hitter, but a game he entered in relief with no outs in the first, and he went on to complete it. Under the old rules, he got credited with a complete came, but no more.
|
Ceetar Jun 14 2012 07:25 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
well, he got all 27 outs right? *looks up the reliever* Ernie Shore. Actually, that was the first combined no-hitter.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 07:27 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||
But he didn't pitch a complete game.
|
HahnSolo Jun 14 2012 07:28 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Andy Hawkins, anybody? No hits but 4 runs thanks to a crappy MFY defense (3 errors in the 8th). [url]http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/1990/B07010CHA1990.htm Also, in looking at the Wright replay, that's a hit. If they called that an error Keith and Gary would have been all over the official scorer.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 07:32 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
I doubt that the Rays lone hit will be reversed. But just to play Devil's Advocate: how can you be so sure that it was a hit without seeing video of the batter running down the basepath? Are you basing your opinion on what you believe was the level of difficulty in fielding that grounder cleanly, or that the batter is not as slow as, say, Ike Davis? Just askin'.
|
TransMonk Jun 14 2012 07:36 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
I attended that game as a 15 year old. Bizarre.
|
HahnSolo Jun 14 2012 07:39 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||
Upton being the baserunner versus, say, Jose Molina, does make a difference in my opinion, yes. I'll also assume--and you are right, I have no idea how quickly Upton was getting down the line--that DAvid is going for the barehand because he thinks if he gloves it he has no chance to get him. A slower runner, Wright probably gloves it and can make the play. From years of watching baseball, plays like that seem to be ruled hits way more often than errors.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 14 2012 07:42 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
It was obvious to me that Wright flubbed the play because he was aware Upton had wheels and rushed as a result but I want to call it an error because he failed to pick it cleanly, whether or not he had a shot with a strong throw we'll never know.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 07:46 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Shades of Ray Knight.
|
Edgy MD Jun 14 2012 07:51 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Man, if anybody should have a scouting report on a member of the Norfolk Mafia, Wright should.
|
Edgy MD Jun 14 2012 07:55 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 07:55 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 08:06 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dickey on pace for a 7.2 season WAR, 8th best in franchise history.
|
RealityChuck Jun 14 2012 08:11 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||||
Actually, it was always credited as a no-hitter because that's what it was -- a game with no hits. Until Steve Barber and Stu Miller did the same thing (and lost the game), it was sui generis, and there was no consistent way to credit Shore. By the 60s, lists of no-hitters had supplementary lists for multi-pitcher no hitters, no hitters of less than nine innings, and games which were no-hit for nine innings, but with a hit in extra innings. The last was a much more fair way to designate them; why should Harvey Haddix be denied a no-hitter just because of the hobgoblins of small minds?
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 08:16 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||||
But my issue was that the reliever, as opposed to the team, was once credited with a no-hitter.
|
RealityChuck Jun 14 2012 08:48 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
But my issue was that the reliever, as opposed to the team, was once credited with a no-hitter. |
Gwreck Jun 14 2012 09:41 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Neither did any of those people in Seattle last week. That's why it's a combined no-hitter.
|
Edgy MD Jun 14 2012 10:00 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Joe Torre, to rule on the appeal. He also has the option of referring the ruling to a five-member committee.
|
Ceetar Jun 14 2012 10:11 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Last hit I see being overruled to an error was an Endy Chavez hit to second on Saturday.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 14 2012 11:04 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Jesus H F Nixon Christ Already. I know what a combined no-hitter is. I thought that Shore, and Shore alone, was credited with the same kind of no-hitter that Santana pitched, or that Ryan and Koufax threw all those times, because Shore was on the mound for all 27 outs.
|
Chad Ochoseis Jun 14 2012 11:12 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Who is "crediting" all these no-hitters? I've never seen no-hitter listed as an official pitchers' stat, like walks, strikeouts, or wins.
|
Zvon Jun 14 2012 11:51 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Well, I'm glad it's an issue.
|
TransMonk Jun 14 2012 12:01 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Wright said himself post-game that he wouldn't have gotten the runner had he used his glove.
|
HahnSolo Jun 14 2012 12:05 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
@RaysJoeMaddon RA Dickey is good and he is really hot right now. Did you notice he was tipping his pitches?
|
TransMonk Jun 14 2012 12:31 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I have to imagine out of the 106 pitches he threw last night, at least 90 of them were knuckleballs. RA doesn't need to tip his pitches for the batter to know what's coming. He's just throwing that one pitch really, really well.
|
Ceetar Jun 14 2012 12:33 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
he was joking.
|
TransMonk Jun 14 2012 12:47 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Thanks...it's sometimes difficult for me to understand the sarcasm of tweets.
|
Ceetar Jun 14 2012 12:49 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I think Josh said he said it in the post-game press conference as well.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 15 2012 01:34 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
How impressive was R.A. Dickey's 1-hitter?
http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/ ... s-1-hitter ***************** R.A. Dickey's last five starts: W-L 5-0 (2 CG Shutouts) ERA 0.23 IP 39.2 IP/Start 7.9 H 20 BB 3 K 50 ER 1 WHIP 0.58 K/9 11.34 H/9 4.54 BB/9 0.68 K/BB 16.67
|
Lefty Specialist Jun 15 2012 07:17 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Those are cartoonish numbers. 4.54 hits per 9 innings? One earned run in his last 5 starts? Yowza.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 15 2012 08:37 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
OE --->BAA .149
|
Lefty Specialist Jun 15 2012 12:58 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
It's like turning everyone on the opposition into Mike Nickeas.
|
Edgy MD Jun 15 2012 01:28 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Hey, that's fun!
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 15 2012 01:51 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Cy Young Award? Between R.A's incredible pitching, mountain climbing exploits and the release of his book, Dickey's on pace for one of these:
|
Lefty Specialist Jun 15 2012 02:35 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Be thankful he didn't break a leg climbing Kilimanjaro.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 15 2012 03:40 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Appeal denied. It remains a one-hitter.
|
TransMonk Jun 15 2012 03:41 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Yea!!!
|
Frayed Knot Jun 15 2012 04:41 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Not even slightly surprising. Unless Torre et al found that the scorer made some kind of ruling that went against whatever guidelines scorers are supposed to use there was no way this was happening. That call of H-or-E was never anything more than a subjective matter of opinion.
|
Zvon Jun 15 2012 06:19 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Agreed. What was surprising to me was that article I read that said the Mets were assholes for putting in the protest. Wha? Of course they should go through the motions? Why not? SuckMahBawls Heyman!
|
Frayed Knot Jun 15 2012 06:26 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Well, the 'Why Not' is because, even if successful, it serves to boost the interests of one player but at the expense of another. And all of it for the purpose of creating a somewhat artificially contrived 'moment' that the team can celebrate. Or, to put it another was, it's like on 'Scrubs' when Dr. Cox said to Elliot right after losing a patient just before his shift ended and she wanted to delay recording it until just after midnight: "There's nothing wrong with a one-hitter, there, Barbie. In fact, it's miraculous. And I won't have you of all people cheapen what should be an endless pursuit of perfection just because you want the world to laugh with you tonight."
|
Ceetar Jun 15 2012 09:17 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Actually, Collins put it this way: "We think it might've been an error because David usually makes that play. Since he's so good, when he doesn't make that play it's natural to assume it might be an error." Phyllis Merhige
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 16 2012 04:32 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/17/sport ... wanted=all
|
Zvon Jun 16 2012 07:08 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
^Great article.
|
Edgy MD Jun 18 2012 07:29 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I'm perfectly OK with Collins acting as an advocate for Dickey there. That's part of his job. I heard an interview with him and he was asked whether he thought the appeal had a chance and frankly said, "No, I really don't."
|
TransMonk Jun 18 2012 07:00 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I might be wrong, but it looks to me like Dickey will line up to pitch Sunday night in front of the whole Yankee felatiating world. I'm hoping it is a nice national spotlight for his All-Star starting hopes.
|
seawolf17 Jun 18 2012 07:19 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I'll openly admit that I was wrong. I didn't think Dickey was worth the money; I thought he was just waiting to fall off the table. But holy hell, this guy has been unreal. I apologize, RA, for doubting you.
|
Edgy MD Jun 18 2012 07:19 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
And lots of it.
|
TransMonk Jun 18 2012 07:22 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Sign RA Now!
|
Frayed Knot Jun 18 2012 07:28 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
So what you guys are saying is that we should ... wait for it ... Sew him up!
|
G-Fafif Jun 19 2012 06:16 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
R.A. on beating Buck Showalter's team, since Showalter urged him to become a full-time knuckleballer and then, essentially, told him to take a hike as Texas manager six years ago after R.A. had a historically bad start against Detroit.
|
metirish Jun 19 2012 06:18 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Buck was pissed in his post game when asked about Dickey , not at R.A. but that his team got shutout.
|
metsmarathon Jun 19 2012 06:20 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
said minimm after watching the end of last night's game, "i like r.a. dickey"
|
G-Fafif Jun 19 2012 06:25 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
|
Ceetar Jun 19 2012 06:26 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
That was probably in response to the "R. A. Dickey!" chants.
|
Nymr83 Jun 19 2012 06:45 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
From Adam Rubin:
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 19 2012 06:47 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Three of those names are very impressive. I'm afraid that I'm drawing a blank on Francisco Liriano. Was he, is he, any good?
|
Frayed Knot Jun 19 2012 06:49 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Briefly
|
Ceetar Jun 19 2012 07:00 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
One of those young phenoms that took baseball by storm and then faded quickly. Edison Volquez. Dontrelle Willis. those types of guys. Or maybe he just can't pitch without Johan. flyer?
|
Lefty Specialist Jun 19 2012 07:17 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Updated- last 6 starts
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 19 2012 07:21 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I just posted this on the UMDB Facebook page:
|
Edgy MD Jun 19 2012 07:23 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Yeah, I was actually disappointed that R.A. walked a few. WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH ME?!
|
Ceetar Jun 19 2012 07:25 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
[url]http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120618&content_id=33530502&vkey=news_nym&c_id=nym&partnerId=rss_nym
|
Edgy MD Jun 19 2012 07:25 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
What must it be like to be a 12-year-old Met fan witnessing this sort of run?
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 19 2012 07:29 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Posting on the road from my smartphome ... what a pain in the ass.
|
metirish Jun 19 2012 07:39 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I imagine a lot of pride for a young Mets fan right now.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 19 2012 07:53 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
But less perspective. The older you are, the more you appreciate how rare something like this is.
|
G-Fafif Jun 19 2012 08:01 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
At 12, with Seaver, Koosman and Matlack, I assumed such Mets pitching was the norm. It was the rare Randy Tate great start that got me extra excited.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 19 2012 08:05 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
In addition to now leading the league among qualifying pitchers in ERA, Winning Pct, CGs, Shutouts (tied), Quality Start Pct (13 of 14), Strike-outs and WHiP, last night's win also makes RA 52-51 for his career and puts him above .500 for the first time since May of '04 when he was 13-12
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 19 2012 08:17 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Most books sold too.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 19 2012 08:22 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
[table:3up2u59i][tr:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]Year[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]Strike%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]Contact%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]GB%[/td:3up2u59i][/tr:3up2u59i][tr:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]2008[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]57%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]82%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]47%[/td:3up2u59i][/tr:3up2u59i][tr:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]2009[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]57%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]80%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]49%[/td:3up2u59i][/tr:3up2u59i][tr:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]2010[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]65%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]79%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]55%[/td:3up2u59i][/tr:3up2u59i][tr:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]2011[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]66%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]80%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]53%[/td:3up2u59i][/tr:3up2u59i][tr:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]2012[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]69%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]71%[/td:3up2u59i][td:3up2u59i]54%[/td:3up2u59i][/tr:3up2u59i][/table:3up2u59i]
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 19 2012 08:24 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
If they pitch Dickey every fifth day, and he keeps winning every start, we'll be getting into Denny McLain territory.
|
Edgy MD Jun 19 2012 08:29 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Those would be the books he is continually putting IT in.
|
TransMonk Jun 19 2012 08:33 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Dickey's ESPN game score from last night was tied with Humber's prefecto as the the second best of the year. #1 was Cain's perfect game.
|
Chad Ochoseis Jun 19 2012 08:43 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I think that ties him with Capuano's two-hitter last year and the Seaver-Qualls game for the highest Met game score ever.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 19 2012 08:54 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
The perfecto he's gonna throw against the MFYs this Sunday is gonna be awesome, you guys.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jun 19 2012 09:09 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
No, you stay negative. Can't go messing with karma.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jun 19 2012 11:38 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
themetfairy Jun 19 2012 11:48 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I am so stealing this
|
Edgy MD Jun 19 2012 01:39 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
On live with Francesa.
|
Ceetar Jun 19 2012 01:48 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
cruel punishment for giving up that one hit.
|
metirish Jun 19 2012 01:55 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Is Francesa taking credit for turning Dickey into a knuckleballer?
|
Ceetar Jun 19 2012 01:58 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||
Probably. But I don't know, I didn't give up a hit so I don't need to be punished by listening. Francesa's been using the Clemens trial to assert that there have always been rumors about Piazza and steroids so he's already in my doghouse this week.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 19 2012 04:03 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Consecutive One-hitters = Johnny Vander Near
|
bmfc1 Jun 19 2012 06:41 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 19 2012 08:04 PM |
|
RA on RA (Angell on Dickey):
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/s ... z1yI0oxA8O
|
Frayed Knot Jun 19 2012 07:02 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
That sentence perfectly illustrates why some folks love, while others hate, the writing of Roger Angell.
|
TransMonk Jun 19 2012 07:10 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Lance Lynn failed in his attempt to stay close to Dickey's greatness allowing 5 earned in 5 innings pitched to the Tigers tonight. His ERA fell to 2.80.
|
Edgy MD Jun 19 2012 07:40 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Starting as it did with a lower-case letter, I'm getting that there's more to it we have to click to see.
|
bmfc1 Jun 19 2012 08:05 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
It didn't. I made a change. My apologies to Mr. Angell.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 19 2012 08:10 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
My point wasn't to pick apart his punctuation or syntax, but it's that flowery language of his when describing baseball fields and games which entrances some while it absolutely infuriates non-baseball fans.
|
Edgy MD Jun 19 2012 08:37 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
And my point wasn't to pick apart his punctuation or syntax, but to suggest that maybe there were more flowers in that sentence.
|
G-Fafif Jun 20 2012 05:41 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Which is EXACTLY what the Orioles looked like Monday night. Never mind what a writer Roger Angell is. What a reporter Roger Angell is.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 20 2012 05:59 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 20 2012 06:16 AM |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dickey on pace for a [crossout]7.2[/crossout] 8.2 season WAR, [crossout]8th[/crossout] 5th best in franchise history.
Listened to yesterday's Mets/O's game on Baltimore radio. Pre-game Baltimore crew, recounting Dickey's 2nd 1-hitter, described RA's stuff as being absolutely filthy. OE - Dickey the knuckleballer hasn't thrown a wild pitch all season.
|
Ceetar Jun 20 2012 06:11 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I heard Gary mention the no wild pitch thing last night, but isn't that just a scoring decision? Josh Thole has 5 PB and Nickeas has 6. Not all of those were Dickey starts, but I don't think Dickey is completely innocent of it.
|
metirish Jun 20 2012 06:27 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
The article is worth reading btw.
|
MFS62 Jun 20 2012 06:58 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I wonder what the percentage of each is who read The New Yorker. It wasn't as if he was writing for the NY Post. I was going to say The Sporting News except: 1) The don't cover baseball 2) When they did, they had some very good writers. Later
|
G-Fafif Jun 20 2012 07:06 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
So, what happens to ruin everything Sunday night? These have crossed my mind:
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 20 2012 07:10 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
The Daily News reporting that the Mets have considered having Dickey pitch continuously on three days rest. Sounds like it was discussed in May and the idea was put aside.
|
Ceetar Jun 20 2012 07:43 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
No. The wind currents at Yankee Stadium that normally allow pop-flies to float over the fence instead make the knuckleball flutter like crazy. Jeter strikes out 3 times. He nearly reaches on the first because the ball gets by Thole but he doesn't run out of the box because he was bitching about the called strike the pitch before to the ump. Terry Francona declares Dickey is amazing and regales us with tales of Tim Wakefield similiarly baffling the Yankees. He talks about their long swings being unsuited to hit the pitch. C.C.'s heavy frame is worn out from it being a night game during a heat wave, he's strong early but waivers in the 5th to give up 3 home runs to the Mets. Wright, Davis, Murphy back to back to back. Mets feast on the bullpen for the blow-out. Wallace Matthews probably hasn't noticed since he covers the Yankees exclusively now, but back in the day he had some rather unprofessional and ignorant things to say about knuckleballs. I wonder if we'll get a sequel this weekend. [url]http://www.firejoemorgan.com/2007/05/what-eff.html
|
soupcan Jun 20 2012 07:50 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
That. Always that.
Except the game is at Citi
|
Ceetar Jun 20 2012 07:55 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
duh. *bonks self* The gentle breeze from the flushing bay then. 1.20 ERA at home for Dickey. .783 WHIP. After that night, Jeter's going to use Dickey as the excuse why he skips the All-Star Game this year.
|
Chad Ochoseis Jun 21 2012 06:23 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 21 2012 07:19 AM |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All pitchers. I don't know whether this shows that (a) pitchers are more valuable than position players, (b) WAR is biased towards pitchers, or (c) the Mets have historically pitched, caught, and thrown better than they've hit. OE - "Catched"? Did I really type "catched"???
Yay, catchers!
|
Ceetar Jun 21 2012 06:31 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I blame defense WAR a bit for that.
|
Edgy MD Jun 21 2012 06:59 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Pitchers are not more valuable, so much as (a) historic seasons by pitchers are more valueable than those for batters and/or (b) we've hosted historic seasons by pitchers, but not by batters.
|
metsmarathon Jun 21 2012 07:52 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
what's your data source? bb-ref has gooden at 11.9, and fangraphs has him at 9 WAR for pitching. each has him at an additional 1.1 WAR for offense. (isn't it at all frustrating that nobody sums these together in a conveniently located website?) i assume this list to be only pitchers' WAR, a bb-ref has dwright's 2007 was an 8.1 WAR and beltran's '06 was an 8.0 WAR. omitting hte hitting component of pitcher's value, bb-ref would tell you that hte top four seasons in mets history would be delivered by pitchers. the next three by hitters, and than alternating to round out the top ten.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 21 2012 09:02 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I made those WAR charts two years ago for some CPF posts on the topic of best Mets pitcher WAR seasons. (source -- bbref) Maybe, bbref modified its formula since then, thus accounting for the discrepancies you discovered.
|
MFS62 Jun 21 2012 11:53 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Just heard Goose Gossage being interviewed by Michael Kay (yeah, I know).
|
metsmarathon Jun 21 2012 11:57 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
fair enough. now go back and fix them. i kid.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 21 2012 02:19 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
No, but, as mentioned, probably half the pitchers in the majors (and more than a few of the position players) have a knuckleball that they screw around with on the sidelines throwing one to each other or to unsuspecting teammates. Gil Hodges was said to own a real good one, and it was Jose Canseco's faith in his that got him to talk his manager into letting him pitch in relief one day. The result was that he blew his arm out and spent a lengthy stay on the DL (back when going without his presence was still a bad thing). The problem isn't in being able to throw one, it's locating it and being consistent enough to make a living with one, and that's why the staffs of the 30 teams features about one or so legit k-ballers per decade.
|
Ashie62 Jun 21 2012 03:35 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
This is the unofficial list of knucklers with Eddie Fisher 1959-1973
|
G-Fafif Jun 21 2012 10:10 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
MFYs suddenly admit to passing on Dickey, according to professional idiot Wally Matthews.
Y'know that heartwarming story of the career Quadruple-A pitcher who couldn't get a break so he had to make his own and look at him now? Man, would we hate hearing about it if the tire-kicking had gone anywhere.
|
Ceetar Jun 22 2012 06:14 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
I propose full excerpts of professional idiots, so I don't have to give them page hits. Matthews is on record as basically calling the knuckleball worse than steroids. I'm really really hoping he pipes up with more of that.
|
metsguyinmichigan Jun 22 2012 07:48 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
CBS New York has a neat photo gallery showing R.A. through the years. Seems funny to see him unbearded. I didn't know he was on an Olympic team.
|
Nymr83 Jun 22 2012 07:51 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I propose not polluting the forum with their articles, just paste the dumbest line (no, not "written by Matthews") and assume we don't really want to read it anyway.
|
Ceetar Jun 22 2012 07:51 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
yup, he rather lamenting being cut to the minors in 2010 and having to shave his beard.
|
Ceetar Jun 22 2012 07:52 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
That works too.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 22 2012 11:19 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
June, 2012 NL Pitcher of the Month candidates (min. 20 IP)
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 22 2012 11:38 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
RA's league leading categories:
|
seawolf17 Jun 22 2012 06:52 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Dempster and Cain also leading my suddenly revitalized fantasy team as well; although Dempster is now on the DL, so it's Dickey's to lose.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 24 2012 08:20 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/obs ... uckleball/ About the Author: Evelyn is an AAAS mass media fellow with Scientific American for the summer of
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 24 2012 08:31 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
RA's succeeding because of, among other reasons, his uncanny ability to throw strikes when behind 1-0 or 2-0. When he's behind, which is almost never, RA relies on his faster knuckler, which has less movement, and is thus easier to control, but just as hard to hit.
http://blogs.thescore.com/mlb/2012/06/1 ... gle+Reader
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 24 2012 08:42 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.ph ... -velocity/
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 24 2012 08:45 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
The most dominant pitches of all time
|
MFS62 Jun 24 2012 09:11 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Fuck that shit. If we were ESPN insiders we'd be more concerned with the upcoming NBA draft and NFL season rather than baseball. What did it say? (summarize or paraphrase if you must) Later
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 26 2012 10:55 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
New York Mets Enjoying Sizable 'Dickey Effect' of $116,000 Per Start During Pitcher's Hot Stretch
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 26 2012 10:58 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
About half the spam I get is aimed at people who want a sizable Dickey effect.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 29 2012 11:30 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
RA is back on track for June 2012 NL pitcher of the month.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jun 30 2012 09:48 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Next up .... RA. Because he deserves, not only his own thread, but his own cover, too.
|
Ashie62 Jun 30 2012 10:26 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Now that Hoops is over he may very well get it...soon...
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 01 2012 08:55 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
The final June #'s. It's got to be RA.
|
Edgy MD Jul 01 2012 12:48 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Crazy about this cover. One of my favorite ever sports photos.
|
MFS62 Jul 01 2012 01:08 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
If he keeps pitching like he has, he'll deserve his own edition.
|
G-Fafif Jul 01 2012 02:01 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Congratulations to the National League for naming R.A. Dickey to its All-Star team. That was quite wise of it.
|
Ashie62 Jul 01 2012 03:04 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
He may be assured of the start with Wright and all....
|
TransMonk Jul 02 2012 02:56 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
R.A. Dickey is the National League’s Pitcher of the Month
|
Edgy MD Jul 02 2012 03:01 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
More important is going to be the big Schaefer announcement.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 05 2012 11:30 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
La Russa said to be "pondering" giving RA the ASG start. It seems to me, though, that La Russa isn't pondering enough.
|
TransMonk Jul 05 2012 11:35 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Yeah, it seems to me like LaRussa is going to dick Dickey out of the start by claiming that Posey can't catch him or that they wanted to use him in a certain situation.
|
Edgy MD Jul 05 2012 11:36 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Fans are voting with hashtags. Hashtags!
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 05 2012 11:40 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
If I ain't startin', I ain't departin'!
|
bmfc1 Jul 05 2012 11:45 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
If his guy isn't starting at catcher, then he'll take the guy that should be the starting pitcher and pair that guy with his guy to make a point in the 3d inning. LaRussa's a friggin' genius... or he's drunk.
|
bmfc1 Jul 05 2012 12:39 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Dickey on Letterman, July 11:
|
themetfairy Jul 05 2012 12:54 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Great idea interviewing a guy right in front of the showers....
|
Frayed Knot Jul 05 2012 01:54 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Not that I think it's a huge firggin deal whether Dickey pitches first next Tuesday, or third, or wherever ... but I'm not totally sure where LaRussa is getting the idea that Molina & Ruiz ARE good knuckleball catchers while Posey is not - especially seeing as how none of them have ever caught any K-ballers.
|
G-Fafif Jul 05 2012 02:04 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Knuckleballers get a whole different kind of interview room for their press availabilities.
|
Swan Swan H Jul 05 2012 02:04 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
He's Tony LaRussa, Boy Genius. He knows every fucking thing.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 07 2012 10:25 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Jay Jaffe sez RA oughtta get the AS start.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 07 2012 10:37 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Is it truly a National story without National magazine cover action?
|
G-Fafif Jul 07 2012 11:14 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
In this media age, would you settle for network news?
|
G-Fafif Jul 07 2012 11:16 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Advantage to giving it to Strasburg: Two fewer inning for his regular-season limit. But that's the only one.
|
Fman99 Jul 08 2012 01:56 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Tony LaRussa is a cunt. How about you screw the Mets one more time, from beyond the grave? Thanks Tone.
|
Ceetar Jul 08 2012 07:11 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Strasburg and Cain can start next year, or 10 years from now. Their stories will be the same (likely). This could be R.A. Dickey's only shot at being the starter, even if he's great the next couple of years. It's all (imo) about baseball stories and Dickey's is just more fun.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 08 2012 04:49 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Mets' Dickey wants ball to start All-Star Game
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?secti ... id=8141617
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 08 2012 08:47 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Hey, Tony La Russa, don’t be a knucklehead, just start R.A. Dickey
|
G-Fafif Jul 09 2012 07:44 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Word on the Tweet is it won't be R.A. tom-R.A., but rather that Cain in the ass.
|
bmfc1 Jul 09 2012 07:47 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Even in retirement, LaRussa is a jerk.
|
Edgy MD Jul 09 2012 07:52 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I tell you though. By lobbying for this, we're almost kinda setting ourselves and Dickey up for egg on the face if he comes up poorly. He's gonna get to pitch one way or another, so we should probably root for success in whatever role he gets rather than demand greater honors up front.
|
TransMonk Jul 09 2012 07:57 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Now that YFMolina isn't going to be there, I wouldn't be surprised if LaRussa uses it as an excuse not to get Dickey into the game at all. I've never really disliked the SF Giants all that much until this season.
|
bmfc1 Jul 09 2012 08:02 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Jul 09 2012 08:07 AM |
CPF note: since the NL won last year, shouldn't this year's IGT be started by the same person?
|
G-Fafif Jul 09 2012 08:04 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
And that was...you!
|
Ceetar Jul 09 2012 08:04 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Cain's not going to have egg on his face if he gives up 2 runs in the first. By anyone but us anyway. But it's that unfairness/bias that is the reason they should've chosen Dickey in the first place. You'll always be able to start a fireballing starter having a good first half, Dickeyesque stories are quite rare, and rarer still that they're arguably the best pitcher in baseball. And I know MLB and half the sarcastic world trumpets "this time it counts" but what it's really about is celebrating baseball.
|
G-Fafif Jul 09 2012 08:06 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I've been lobbying for the Mets to win a World Series every year. That would explain those 25 consecutive eggs on my face.
|
Edgy MD Jul 09 2012 08:07 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
He might if he was given the honor in response to a populist campaign centered around the partisans of his team.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jul 09 2012 08:09 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I'd rather see Dickey starting the first game of the World Series.
|
Lefty Specialist Jul 09 2012 08:40 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
And the third, fifth and seventh (if necessary).
|
Frayed Knot Jul 09 2012 08:46 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
That kind of jerkery is usually only reserved for the likes of (Yanqui icon) Billy Martin. In 1982 Cleveland 3Bman Toby Harrah was leading the league in hitting and was having the season of his career [.332/.438/.548 w/17 HRs at the break] when he was naturally picked for the ASG. Martin went on to use every player on his bench that game except Harrah. Martin and Harrah had crossed paths briefly when both were with Texas several years earlier and the thought was that Billy didn't like Harrah for some reason (real or imagined) so used the chance to embarrass him by letting the league's leading hitter at that point sit on the bench.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jul 09 2012 08:53 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I've made this into an all-purpose boilerplate.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 09 2012 09:25 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
You're right. It's a good thing for Mets fans that Dickey won't start. Even though Dickey could get bombed pitching the fifth inning, just the same. I'm so confused.
|
Edgy MD Jul 09 2012 09:29 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
That's OK.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 09 2012 09:32 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I guess it's also good that Sandoval overtook Wright in the 3B voting. Now I don't have to worry about Wright tripping over the foul line while trotting out for the starters' intros. That's Sandoval's problem.
|
Edgy MD Jul 09 2012 09:45 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
That's OK.
|
Fman99 Jul 09 2012 10:18 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
What bullshit. Tony LaRussa should die in a grease fire.
|
bmfc1 Jul 09 2012 10:21 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Fman99--you're being too kind... why limit it to a grease fire? Any kind of fire would do.
|
metsguyinmichigan Jul 09 2012 10:52 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Oh yeah, because we needed one more Giant starting. I thought for sure Dickey would get it in part as a make-up call for the David Wright/Panda debacle.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jul 09 2012 01:18 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
A flaming automobile, or one of those gimmicky tropical drinks they set aflame, seems much more likely.
|
metsguyinmichigan Jul 09 2012 01:19 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Geeze, I thought Wright might start as DH, and he doesn't even get that. BOOOOOOOOOOO
|
Frayed Knot Jul 09 2012 01:26 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Back to actual Dickey news: Letterman on Wednesday.
|
Met Hunter Jul 09 2012 02:00 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
No matter how you slice it, Dickey, Wright and the Mets in general get hosed again. At least Collins got some love.
|
G-Fafif Jul 09 2012 02:20 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
One of TLR's reasons for starting Cain was he lives in SF area, gets to see him pitch, thinks he's good.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 09 2012 05:31 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
From Jayson Stark's mid-season awards:
|
G-Fafif Jul 09 2012 09:21 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
All-Star starter in life, I tell you what. I'd heard this story off-the-record a few months ago and am glad it's now coming to light.
|
G-Fafif Jul 10 2012 11:39 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Alex Belth with more on the guy who R.A. befriended in his last months -- a study in menschdom.
|
G-Fafif Jul 10 2012 11:46 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
And, oh yeah, Dickey's been something close to Terrific in the first half, per Mark Simon.
|
metirish Jul 10 2012 11:59 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
that's really cool.....lumps I tell ya
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jul 11 2012 03:28 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
All this needs is a beckoning Scarlett Johannson and a rare, dry-aged porterhouse to be the best great-things photograph ever.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jul 11 2012 03:39 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Good to see Roaring-for Attention Dickey is taking it easy during the break so as to gear up for the second half and not Hollywooding it too much.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jul 11 2012 05:34 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
With the Gee business, we'll need you cracking the whip now more than ever, brother.
|
Farmer Ted Jul 11 2012 07:07 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Did Mr. Dickey sign off on this?
|
Ceetar Jul 11 2012 07:13 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Probably not. That's why I bought this one
|
Edgy MD Jul 11 2012 08:45 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Couldn't there have been a little more wordplay in an R.A. Star Wars shirt?
|
metsmarathon Jul 12 2012 06:16 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
his lips are superimposed over the beard. it's just creepy as all get out. make it stop.
|
Edgy MD Jul 12 2012 06:26 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Yeah, I salute the initiative, but not the execution.
|
Edgy MD Jul 12 2012 10:01 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
The man himself and our new catching candidate:
|
Frayed Knot Jul 12 2012 11:23 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
There's usually some sort of connection to whatever intro music Paul's band plays during the guest's walk-on although I didn't recognize their selection for Dickey.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jul 14 2012 08:27 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Vic Sage Jul 14 2012 08:51 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
he's gotten pounded for 5 runs in 3 of his last 4 games.
|
Mets – Willets Point Jul 14 2012 09:28 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I hate to bring this up, but with the bloom starting to fall off of Dickey's rose and the Mets falling out of contention for a playoff spot, maybe it's time to start thinking about the Mets being sellers at the trade deadline. Odds are that at 37, Dickey isn't going to have many more seasons like this one (if any) and some playoff-bound team might give up some young talent in return. I know it's ruthless but Sandy's supposed to be all about "buy low, sell high", right?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jul 14 2012 09:53 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Even if you leave aside the off-field/marketing benefits he brings to the table-- which are, of course, considerable-- he's having a GREAT year this year, but he's posting his third good year in a row. And 37 is like 28 for a knuckleballer. AND he's under contract for $5M next year. Even if he never has another year that sniffs his results this first half-- and that's not nearly as unlikely for him as for, say, Chris Capuano-- he's worth a LOT. Unless some team's willing to give up Mike Trout, Jr., they're likely best served holding on Ripe Asset.
|
TransMonk Jul 15 2012 09:29 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
This. And I can think of worse veteran back-ends to mop up every fifth day while Harvey, Wheeler, Niese and whoever go through their growing pains on their way to being the most dominant staff in the NL over the next couple of years.
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 15 2012 10:01 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I don't know that this is as true for Dickey as it was for other MLB knuckleballers. If it ever was true. Dickey's knuckler comes in 15-20 MPH faster than, say, Wakefield's. And Dickey was throwing his all out fast ball in the majors for longer than most of the well-known knucklers of the past.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jul 15 2012 10:28 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Would you stipulate that 37, in this case, is something like 30-32?
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 15 2012 10:40 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||
For you? Sure. Why not. But it's not as if me and you can do anything about the Dickey and his age in knuckleball years other than to enjoy the show he's puttin' on until it's no longer enjoyable.
|
Ashie62 Jul 15 2012 11:27 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
37 is 37 in that you can pull a hammy fielding your position, running, hitting etc.
|
TransMonk Jul 15 2012 01:53 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I would have no problem locking him up through age 40.
|
Ashie62 Jul 15 2012 01:56 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Thats the guy from "The Deadliest Catch"
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jul 15 2012 05:11 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||||
So, what you're saying is, 33 1/2, and we should trade Dickey and Murphy for Huston Street?
|
batmagadanleadoff Jul 15 2012 09:13 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||||
I didn't say any of that. But I'd trade Jason Bay for Huston Street.
|
batmagadanleadoff Aug 10 2012 10:46 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
This thread sure died down in the past month or so. Still, it's R.A. by a wide margin, according to ESPN's Cy Young Predictor.
|
batmagadanleadoff Aug 11 2012 07:50 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Here's another category Dickey leads the league in:
|
batmagadanleadoff Aug 13 2012 07:57 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Dickey Nearing Gooden and Seaver Territory
Strikeout Mavens Mets pitchers with the most 10-strikeout games: Pitcher Year 10-K Games Dwight Gooden 1984 15 Tom Seaver 1971 13 Tom Seaver 1970 12 Dwight Gooden 1985 11 David Cone 1990 9 David Cone 1991 8 David Cone 1988 7 R.A. Dickey 2012 6 Dwight Gooden 1990 6 Sid Fernandez 1988 6 Tom Seaver 1973 6 Tom Seaver 1972 6 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000087 ... 55624.html
|
batmagadanleadoff Aug 14 2012 09:20 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/14/sport ... -mets.html *The writer could've quoted me verbatim for this sentence.
|
Mets – Willets Point Aug 15 2012 12:06 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
The Atlantic sez he's something to root for.
|
G-Fafif Sep 01 2012 01:57 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
R.A. joins a club that now includes 10 Met pitchers and encompasses 21 individual Met seasons.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 01 2012 05:00 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
And it looks like, what, he'll get another five or six starts?
|
Swan Swan H Sep 01 2012 06:32 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Newsday said it would be six.
|
Frayed Knot Sep 01 2012 06:41 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
MUST BE 17 OR OVER TO BE ADMITTED -- aka: RATED RA
|
Ceetar Sep 01 2012 06:49 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Grain of salt because it was a Francesa question, but Collins said he'd consider using him in relief in a key spot the last week if he could get him a relief win somehow.
|
Frayed Knot Sep 01 2012 06:50 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
If the right situation comes up, why not.
|
metsguyinmichigan Sep 01 2012 08:29 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Nice!!!
|
Mets – Willets Point Sep 01 2012 10:32 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Oh wow, now I want to see him get at least 22 wins and join the Seaver-Gooden-Dickey club. My mind is also blown that Gooden achieved a 20+ win season only once. In my sepia-toned memories he had several consecutive 20-win seasons.
|
G-Fafif Sep 01 2012 10:38 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Fuckin' A, yes. Or Fuckin' RA.
|
G-Fafif Sep 05 2012 02:46 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
R.A. joins a club that now includes 7 Met pitchers and encompasses 15 individual Met seasons.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 05 2012 02:53 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Now that we have a no-hitter we can shoot for that elusive 23-win season.
|
Ceetar Sep 05 2012 02:58 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Koosman would be pissed, first the consecutive scoreless innings streak and then bumped from the top-3 in wins in a season?
|
themetfairy Sep 05 2012 03:04 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
G-Fafif Sep 05 2012 05:47 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Sep 06 2012 07:50 AM |
|
I'm just happy R.A.'s joined such a notorious gang.
|
Ceetar Sep 05 2012 05:52 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
This is genius. Lets get the NYY logo going among gangs so it's banned amongst New Yorks young! This way they'll all grow up Mets fans.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 05 2012 06:35 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
If the Mets continue to pitch Dickey every 5th game throughout the rest of this season, then Dickey will have five remaining starts:
|
Ceetar Sep 05 2012 08:33 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
if he pitches every 5th day, he'll possibly be able to toss a relief inning in a key spot in the last two games maybe right?
|
Ceetar Sep 06 2012 09:39 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
another book deal(well, 3)
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 06 2012 09:43 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Esther Newberg... I seem to remember that name from when I used to listen to Imus.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 06 2012 09:49 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
I for one am happy to see Really Ambitious Dickey stick to what he does best.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 06 2012 10:09 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
He has a real chance of winning the Triple Crown of Pitching:
|
Vic Sage Sep 06 2012 10:25 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Amazin'...
|
Edgy MD Sep 06 2012 10:32 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Gooden's 1985 was a runaway triple crown for him.
|
Vic Sage Sep 06 2012 10:37 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
to answer my own question:
|
Frayed Knot Sep 06 2012 11:25 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
And just imagine how good he'd be if he didn't take time off to write books and climb mountains.
He nicknamed her 'Lobster'.
|
The Second Spitter Sep 09 2012 06:29 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Cueto jobs to the Astros. Dickey has a legit shot to be first to 20 wins.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 11 2012 12:03 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Latest on Dickey's Triple Crown bid:
|
Edgy MD Sep 11 2012 12:24 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Bryce Bryce Baby expected to be sitting.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 11 2012 02:11 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Makes sense. Harper's looked clueless against R.A all season long, in practically every at bat.
|
Edgy MD Sep 11 2012 02:29 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I read about Dickey-Gonzalez battling for the Cy Young and my synapses started shorting out.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 12 2012 08:43 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
The NL Cy Young Award contenders:
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 12 2012 08:54 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Cueto's claim to the CYA is strengthened considerably based on sabrmetric statistics.
|
bmfc1 Sep 12 2012 09:13 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Thank you batmagadanleadoff. Apart from the stats, I fear that an anti-NY bias and an anti-knuckleball bias will cost R.A. the Award.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Sep 12 2012 09:15 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
EVERY ANALYST/WRITER IN BASEBALL, IN TWO MONTHS: "I tell you what, Joe-- he may not be the Cy Young winner, but he sure is the best story of the year."
|
HahnSolo Sep 12 2012 09:27 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
How many of the voters, do you suppose, base their vote more on the 'traditional' stats as opposed to the "sabermetric" stats as posted by BML?
|
Mets – Willets Point Sep 12 2012 10:11 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I think they're going to look at pitchers who are on teams that are going to the postseason and that will eliminate Dickey before any other considerations.
|
Edgy MD Sep 12 2012 10:26 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Well, last year they honored a pitcher from an 82-79 team, the year before a pitcher from a dreadful 61-101 team, so to the extent that this was once true, it's less so.
|
Frayed Knot Sep 12 2012 10:35 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
I actually think many of the baseball writers have altered their views enough to where they're no longer hanging onto narrow views of just W/L/ERA -- and that it's two active (and revolving) writers per city then fresh views are constantly introduced as opposed to the everyone who's ever written gets to hang onto their vote like the HoF. The non-baseball pundits plus a handful of old baseball fogies are still likely to scream and yell if the "wrong" guy gets it like they did when Felix Hernandez won with, what was it, 13 wins a couple years back? ... but those guys don't vote and fuck them anyway.
I do think this will be a factor with some voters. Not that they'll eliminate him from the get-go kind of thing but that enough will use the non-competing team as a kind of tie-breaker to make this a tough get for Dickey. Cueto, Gio Gonzalez, Kershaw, plus relievers Chapman & Kimbrel are all going to have the team-in-contention thing on their side and RA clearly will not.
|
Ceetar Sep 12 2012 11:23 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
as it stands right now, I'd find it hard to be pissed,or even mildly annoyed, if Kershaw won it, and i suspect that doesn't bode well.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 13 2012 08:41 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
|
TransMonk Sep 13 2012 09:59 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Dickey wins Rickey!
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 16 2012 09:08 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Four bad innings and suddenly, Cueto's edge in sabrmetric stats isn't as imposing as it appeared. Also, between Operation Strasburg Shutdown and Kershaw' hip injury, Dickey might take the NL Strikeout crown by default.
|
metsmarathon Sep 16 2012 07:02 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
dark horse: medlen.
|
Edgy MD Sep 16 2012 08:45 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Nats down 3-1 in the seventh as Gio goes for his 20th.
|
Frayed Knot Sep 16 2012 09:25 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
That was 5 innings, 2 runs on 4 hits & 4 BBs for Gio tonight -- and no 20th win as the Nats get swept by the Braves.
|
The Second Spitter Sep 17 2012 06:22 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
can't remember the last time I cheered so loudly for a Braves win.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 18 2012 04:58 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Wins: G. Gonzalez, 19. R. Dickey, 18. J. Cueto 17.
|
G-Fafif Sep 18 2012 05:57 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
That clever Terry Collins could figure out a way to get him an extra start with a little of that three days' rest action they talked up constantly (he's gotta be reasonably well rested considering this stupid six-man rotation) -- and they can get him an extra home start (against the Pirates, against whom he's excelled).
|
Edgy MD Sep 18 2012 06:00 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
As far as I can see, the six-man thingie appears to be working, except maybe we should trade one of those six men for a leftfielder who can hit .200 or so.
|
Mets – Willets Point Sep 18 2012 09:06 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Today is Knuckleball Day in Boston, to be celebrated Sept. 20th in New York.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 18 2012 10:56 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
TransMonk Sep 19 2012 01:15 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
He will be on NPR's Talk of the Nation later this hour.
|
HahnSolo Sep 19 2012 02:08 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Oh, boy. Where's JCL?
|
TransMonk Sep 19 2012 02:23 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
It was a decent interview conducted live from Citi. They even got in a couple of phone calls from listeners.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 19 2012 02:36 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Any promotion is good promotion for Ready Anytime Dickey.
|
G-Fafif Sep 20 2012 01:04 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
They're not getting him an extra start but they are giving him two at home -- Saturday 9/22 (a day earlier than planned) and Thursday 9/27 (home closer) before his last start at Miami. Will not pitch at Atlanta.
|
themetfairy Sep 20 2012 01:34 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
What's the rest of the rotation for the homestand?
|
G-Fafif Sep 20 2012 02:22 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
From Newsday, R.A. thinking through beat writers' jobs better than most of them do.
|
G-Fafif Sep 23 2012 03:49 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
R.A. joins a club that now includes 6 Met pitchers and encompasses 12 individual Met seasons.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 23 2012 05:15 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Another update on R.A.'s quest for the pitching Triple Crown:
|
bmfc1 Sep 23 2012 09:43 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
http://espn.go.com/mlb/features/cyyoung
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Sep 24 2012 02:19 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
It's a vote predictor, not a this-is-who-really-deserves-it meter.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 26 2012 03:01 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/s ... z27bzcpFCj
|
dinosaur jesus Sep 26 2012 03:51 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
The kid with the backpack? That was me! I had a blast tossing ideas around with Lucia and RA. Spitballing, ha ha. RA's a great guy. We came up with a whole bunch of characters to be Knuckleball Ned's friends. Like Gyro, his buddy from Japan. His country cousin Eephus who everyone thinks is dumb but isn't. Screwball, who likes to party. And when Ned's in trouble his Uncle Charlie is always there to help him out. And there are some others I'm forgetting. You'll just have to wait for the book to come out!
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 27 2012 08:16 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
RA deserves his own thread. And his own contract, too.
|
The Second Spitter Sep 27 2012 08:22 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I can hear it now:
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 27 2012 08:24 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
I can hear that four months ago.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 27 2012 08:36 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Eff Wilpon on RA Dickey in The New Yorker:
|
seawolf17 Sep 27 2012 08:51 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I know I'm in the minority here, but I definitely, unquestionably find a trade for RA over the winter. There's nobody on this roster who has more value right now.
|
Frayed Knot Sep 27 2012 08:53 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Keith was making the case for that a few weeks ago. Not trying to say that it was a 'Had To' move, just one that was likely to fill the most holes elsewhere while not touching the good young players you'd want to keep (Niese, Harvey, etc.)
|
Edgy MD Sep 27 2012 08:58 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
While very much disagreeing, is it necessarily true that there's nobody who has more value? Dickey on a cheap one-year deal vs., say, control of Matt Harvey or Zach Wheeler for six?
|
metirish Sep 27 2012 08:59 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I just don't see how you can expect to get prime prospects or ML ready players for a guy his age no matter how good he has been. I think he is more valuable as a Met player than as trade bait, if you are looking to fill holes like in the OF with trades then you would look to trade Harvey or those kids with real value?
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 27 2012 09:15 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Dickey's 2013 will be more valuable to another team (a team more likely to contend than the Mets are) than it will be to the Mets. If you trade him, you're selling high.
|
seawolf17 Sep 27 2012 09:39 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
This.
|
Edgy MD Sep 27 2012 10:12 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I don't know. If the statement is that there's nobody on the team that has more value right now, it seems ambiguous with regard to future and present value. I'm terribly excited by this coming offseason, and I hope Dickey is a part of it, and I hope the Mets younger pitchers assert themselves to the point where Dickey could continue to be a big part of this team even as he becomes the third or fourth best pitcher in the rotation.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 27 2012 10:16 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I hope he stays too. My point was only that it would be better to trade Dickey than Harvey, even if Dickey brings back less.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 27 2012 10:18 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
If they can finish 20 games out with him, they can finish 20 games out without him.
|
metirish Sep 27 2012 10:28 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
So, if we go with the idea that there is no more valuable player on the team right now what or who are you wanting when you trade him in a few months?
|
Edgy MD Sep 27 2012 10:33 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
With respect to the Branch Rickey paraphrase, I have greater aspirations than finishing 20 games out, and even that modest goal is harder without Dickey. We'll see.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 27 2012 10:37 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
A team with better hopes for 2013 would have a different bird-in-hand/bird-in-bush perspective than a team further away from contention.
|
Edgy MD Sep 27 2012 10:44 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
In theory, sure. We'll see. They will still drive for the best bargain they can.
|
Ashie62 Sep 27 2012 02:02 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
How long before R.A. is approached to do a reality show?
|
Edgy MD Sep 27 2012 02:05 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Baseball is a reality show.
|
Mets – Willets Point Sep 27 2012 02:06 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I was going to say the same thing.
|
Edgy MD Sep 27 2012 02:09 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
And I hope the Mets approach with an offer to shoot three more seasons.
|
Ashie62 Sep 27 2012 04:41 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I fear R.A. has become a financial luxury to these owners at this point and will be dispatched somewhere. Upside? You get Wright for 8 years or so. Its' really kind of sad...
|
G-Fafif Sep 27 2012 05:54 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
MUST BE 20 OR OVER TO BE ADMITTED
|
Edgy MD Sep 27 2012 09:51 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Prediction archives.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 28 2012 09:11 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 28 2012 09:25 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
ERA: Kershaw 2.68, Dickey 2.69, Cain 2.77, Lohse 2.77, Cueto 2.83.
|
batmagadanleadoff Sep 28 2012 09:35 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Kershaw is slated to start tonight. The Dodgers have six games remaining, so Kershaw can also pitch the Dodgers last game of the season on normal rest. According to some reports though, Kershaw, because of his hip, will be shut down if the Dodgers are mathematically eliminated from playoff contention. The Dodgers cannot win their division, but are three games behind the Cards for the last Wild Card play-in slot.
|
themetfairy Sep 28 2012 09:47 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
While they were Takin' Care of Business yesterday, Mike Baxter made sure that R.A. got the game ball -
|
HahnSolo Sep 28 2012 11:44 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Damn you Robert Johnson, stealing R.A.'s press and what not.
|
Edgy MD Sep 28 2012 09:15 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Back with the two dollar words.
|
smg58 Oct 10 2012 11:25 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
[url]http://deadspin.com/5947192?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_facebook&utm_source=deadspin_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Oct 29 2012 12:00 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Mets – Willets Point Oct 29 2012 12:26 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
So when do they announce the Cy Young awards?
|
Frayed Knot Oct 29 2012 12:35 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
November 14
|
Benjamin Grimm Nov 05 2012 11:38 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
I don't think that will be a major stumbling block.
|
HahnSolo Nov 05 2012 11:57 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
To the other team it might be.
|
Frayed Knot Nov 05 2012 01:50 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I get a kick out of the sub-headline: It is far from certain that the Mets will trade their Cy Young candidate, R.A. Dickey -- something that's repeated later on within the body of the story.
|
smg58 Nov 05 2012 07:31 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||
As if Thole catches the knuckleball particularly well. I'd have thought that even an AL scout would know more about Thole than that.
|
Frayed Knot Nov 05 2012 07:38 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Well, the thing is that he's the only one in the major leagues these days who catches it at all.
|
G-Fafif Nov 06 2012 05:08 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
PL Robert A, which is to say Players Love Robert Allen Dickey.
|
Vic Sage Nov 06 2012 10:07 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
there's no trick to catching the knuckleball. you wait till it stops rolling and pick it up. - Bob Uecker
|
MFS62 Nov 11 2012 10:36 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I know, this falls into the blatantly obvious category, but methinks the Mets are waiting to see if he wins the CY, so they can judge his value for an extension/ trade. Reasonable extension if he doesn't and high return trade if he does.
|
Frayed Knot Nov 11 2012 11:35 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I don't think any GM - on either the giving or receiving end of a trade - is going set his giving/asking price on a player based on whether said player finishes 1st or 2nd or 3rd in a CY vote. Dickey's season, his assets, his age, etc., are what they are regardless of how a small and almost random sample from the BBWAA cast their votes.
|
MFS62 Nov 11 2012 12:01 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I realize that, but was thinking that a team acquiring a Cy Young winner would be looking to not only improve their team but sell more tickets too. So they might be willing to pay more for that.
|
Ashie62 Nov 11 2012 07:19 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Dickey and Flores for Justin Upton...just do it.
|
Frayed Knot Nov 11 2012 07:27 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
If we trade those two for Kate Upton will we get Verlander thrown in too?
|
Edgy MD Nov 12 2012 07:22 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Upton is everybody's favorite flavor of ice cream these days, isn't it?
|
Frayed Knot Nov 12 2012 08:12 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
And why not? Comes in three varieties these days: - one is a 28 y/o FA/CF - one is a 25 y/o under team control for the next three years and reportedly on the trading block - and the other is ridiculously hot
|
Edgy MD Nov 12 2012 08:26 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
And one a muckraking novelist who blew the lid off the meat packing industry.
|
Frayed Knot Nov 12 2012 09:04 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Yeah, but he's not available this off-season.
|
smg58 Nov 12 2012 01:40 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Dickey "and" implies that Upton is the better player. He's not.
|
Edgy MD Nov 12 2012 02:35 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
It's easy enough to imagine Upton garnering his team more wins going forward.
|
Edgy MD Nov 20 2012 08:05 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Dickey gets sorely needed pub from the Huffington Post.
|
smg58 Nov 27 2012 06:55 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
The Royals are shopping OF Wil Myers (.314/.387/.600 with 37 HR and 109 RBI in AA and AAA last year, turns 22 on Dec. 10) for a front line starter. They've apparently inquired about Jon Lester and James Shields, neither of whom won a Cy Young last year. I'm not saying the Mets should necessarily trade Dickey for Myers, but it's imperative that they either re-sign Dickey or get at least as much value in return for him as Myers would provide.
|
Ceetar Nov 27 2012 07:01 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I'd want more than Myers.
|
G-Fafif Nov 27 2012 07:04 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
R.A. was just on CBS This Morning charming the hell out of Charlie Rose. Came out in favor of reading, persevering, staying with the Mets.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Nov 27 2012 09:03 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
I don't think there's a chance you get more than Myers. Hell, I'm not sure you get Myers.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Nov 27 2012 09:06 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
OK, we'll throw in Josh Thole.
|
Ceetar Nov 27 2012 09:16 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||
Then no chance I'd make the deal. Unless Myers is bordering on Trout, and no one is, I'd wager on Dickey being more valuable the next couple of years.
|
Swan Swan H Nov 27 2012 09:17 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
"Bordering on Trout" sounds like an Irish insult.
|
Edgy MD Nov 27 2012 09:21 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Lester's tied up for two years, as is Shields.
Depends on what the "next couple of years" means. But on a per-dollar basis, I wouldn't guess this comes to pass.
|
Ceetar Nov 27 2012 09:29 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I meant closer to a WAR basis. I don't really care about the dollars as much as the total production.
|
Edgy MD Nov 27 2012 09:36 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
But dollars count --- and we've been down this road --- as they can be turned into production elsewhere.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Nov 27 2012 09:38 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Put another way: 3 years x (Dickey + in-house/"value" OF) < 3 years x (Myers + assorted FA pitching)
|
Ceetar Nov 27 2012 09:44 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
so why bring it up? I disagree obviously. production is finite, money isn't. Losing Dickey lowers the ceiling of production by slotting in a almost definitely lesser product there. You have to try to maximize at a couple of positions or the aggregate will never be good enough. Especially given that Dickey is a good candidate to out-produce the money he's making the next couple of years which BOOSTS his trade value.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Nov 27 2012 09:51 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Dickey has one year left on his contract. How do you know what he'll be outproducing in 2014?
|
metirish Nov 27 2012 09:53 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
??
|
Edgy MD Nov 27 2012 09:56 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||||||||
Why bring what up?
Money doesn't count and it can't be turned into production elsewhere?
I'm not sure what this means. I've never understood that the Mets' access to money is infinite.
Dickey won't be a Cy Young winner forever. In fact, it's overwhelmingly likely that he'll never be that again.
Eggs in multiple baskets is often a more secure position. A diversified portfolio.
Well, next year, anyway.
|
Ceetar Nov 27 2012 10:02 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
An example of such is trading Angel Pagan for pieces to fill two holes. Alternatively, they could've kept Pagan and picked from the very large pool of guys to fill the spot Ramirez did. Same with Dickey. You're likely talking about something like Chris Young/Mike Pelfrey to complement Myers. That's not better in 2013, Maybe Myers and Wheeler step up and are better than Dickey/signed OFer in 2014, but I wouldn't necessarily bet on that either.
|
Edgy MD Nov 27 2012 10:07 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
OK, Angel Pagan.
|
Benjamin Grimm Nov 27 2012 10:13 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Where can I get me some of that infinite money?
|
seawolf17 Nov 27 2012 10:15 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Let me connect you with my colleague, Mr. Madoff.
|
Ceetar Nov 27 2012 10:23 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
there is no salary cap, hence infinite. there is a maximum amount of production. it's the sum of the 25 players on the roster, and the playing time they'll get over the course of a season. Let's say, just for math's sake, that if each player is worth 4, they can all add up to a total of 100 wins. Dickey is a 4. If you trade him, almost definitely replacing him with a 2, the max total is now 98. You do that a couple of times and suddenly it's almost impossible to make the playoffs, no matter how secure you are. The Mets don't have a ton of 4s, and if you don't have any your max is 75. Even if Myers is a 2, and that 2+2 gives you just as much production as the Dickey+0 outfielder we have now or the scrub we end up with if Alderson doesn't do anything (which is unlikely), you have a bunch more money saved but NOWHERE to spend that money. Especially given that Dickey doesn't cost much, and if they can work out a reasonable extension won't, it makes a hell of a lot more sense to spend the MONEY on the 0 because it provides the maximum value for production. Trading Dickey is taking a step or two backwards in hopes of finding a better way forward, but there's only so much time you can spend looking for the best path when it's possible you're already on a good one. Total wins is what you're after, and total wins is what begets more money. best economy of wins just saves the Wilpons some cash in the short term.
|
Benjamin Grimm Nov 27 2012 10:35 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Do you have infinite money to spend?
|
Ceetar Nov 27 2012 10:38 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Sure. I could go to the bank. I could take out a loan. I could sell my car. I could get a second job. I'll get a paycheck on Friday with more money. two weeks from then I'll get another one.
|
metsmarathon Nov 27 2012 10:41 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
trading dickey (not something i want to do at all) is something you do to not help you in the coming year, but to maximize the potential productivity in teh coming years.
|
Edgy MD Nov 27 2012 10:49 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||||||||||
Yes, there is a salary cap, limited by the amount of money the organization has to spend.
I disagree. Those figures don't add up to production. They can achieve zero production (strike out all year long) or an amazing amount of production (hit homers almost into perpetuity, extended opening day by weeks as they score thousands of runs, until the players collapse, only to have their replacements continue by scoring thousands of runs in game two, which has been rescheduled by weeks).
Four what?
Every player on the team is as good as Dickey?
Sure. Completely made up numbers? Why not?
No, you have saved $15 million dollars. Can be parlayed into improving yourself at another position. Of course, in your fantastical scenario, every player on the Mets is as good as Dickey --- and every player in AAA too, in case somebody gets hurt. So, maybe they can trade, two of those four for a six, and then go out and buy a five! YEAH!! BAM!! One hundred and six wins, Baby!
They will have more with more money to spend.
Anybody? Can anybody parse this? As for NOWHERE to spend that money, how about the free agent market.
Spending money on the 0. My brain is rending.
Unless you trade him for a really good player that makes a lot less, then it's taking two steps forward, twirling, dropping your pants, laughing, pulling up your pants, taking another step forward, and accepting a congratulatory call from the president.
No, money saved can be spent --- and often is spent --- in the pursuit of wins. I don't understand how this can be elusive. http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/inc-wel ... 47035.html http://www.biztechmagazine.com/article/ ... ther-areas http://www.creditsesame.com/blog/infogr ... -reinvest/
|
Edgy MD Nov 27 2012 10:50 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|||
Infinite amounts of cars? Infinite amounts of houses to mortgage? Infinite amounts of paychecks to borrow against? I've decided I don't want to marry you.
|
batmagadanleadoff Nov 27 2012 10:53 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I bid $20 million a year for the knuckleballer.
|
batmagadanleadoff Nov 27 2012 10:54 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
No. Atsa not enough. $Thirty million a year.
|
Ceetar Nov 27 2012 10:59 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
The pursuit of wins. That's it, but that's not what we're after. We're after actual wins, and the probability (which is all we have to work with really) is higher that Dickey gives them to you. No matter what you think about Myers potential. Trading a guy Dickey's age for a guy Myers age which his potential and financial commitment is easy if 2013 and 2014 don't exist. but they do. And what happens in those years greatly influences what happens in 2015. I'm sure I can dig up a lot of business jargon articles too. Gotta spend money to make money, respect the customers you have NOW, etc. If you're just going to make fun of my attempt to simplify a numerical representation of my point, I'll just stop here.
|
batmagadanleadoff Nov 27 2012 11:01 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
I bid $40 million
|
Swan Swan H Nov 27 2012 11:06 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Every seat is a stone's throw from the stadium. And as soon as we throw enough stones, we're gonna build a stadium.
|
metsmarathon Nov 27 2012 11:19 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
jeez, c'mon edgy. you know better. we want actual wins, not just to go after them. if you chase the wins down they'll just run away.
see. now the wins are all getting away and we're left behind. way to go.
|
metirish Nov 27 2012 11:28 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
"he who chases wins, wins no chase"
|
Edgy MD Nov 27 2012 11:39 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||||||
Sheesh. You're talking to me like I'm a moron and not reading what your write yourself. Being in pursuit of something and being after something are the same thing.
This, of course, depends on who you get, what he costs, and how well your scout him.
What if he's the most phenomenal athlete ever?
You really seem to know what happens in 2013 and 2014. I could say Myers hits 300 homers between the next two seasons, and the money saved is spent on another guy who hits 301 homers, just to be difficult, and Dickey quits baseball to become an astronaut. I have no clue. But there is room for professional speculation based on historical data.
I didn't say you gotta do anything.
I didn't just do that. I genuinely take issue with your model. I outline my concerns above. Please don't play the martyr card again.
|
Vic Sage Nov 27 2012 11:43 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Nov 27 2012 11:59 AM |
|
This may be the most Ceetarded thing he's ever posted. As the former president of the Trade In Tomorrow for Today Society (TiTTS, you say!), i'm all about not counting on prospects (ours or others) to become superstars, and winning now, for tomorrow we may all be dead. that being said... The Mets are not one SP away from contention, or even .500 level mediocrity. We have holes everywhere and, as reported, not so much of that infinite money to fill them with. Right now, we have a 38-year old pitcher coming off a CY season, with a $5m contract for next season. So we can either (1) let him play out the year and compete with every other team to re-sign him; (2) re-sign him now to an extension, or (3) trade him while he's at the peak of his value. I think we can all agree that (1) is not a very good option. Lets call it the Reyes Option, in which we are likely to turn an asset into nothing whatsoever. That leaves signing him to an extension or trading him. an extension would likely require a 3-4 year commitment at $12-$15m/yr, or something in that range. So, even if the Wilpons could afford it (and i don't know that they can), we will be paying fair market value for a guy coming off a career year after his 38th birthday. I know he's a knuckler, and therefore we assume he's got many years left, but 40 is 40, and after the steroid era, bodies break down even when the arm doesn't. also, Dickey throws an unusually HARD knuckler, and he came to it late in his career after throwing a lot of fastballs and breaking balls in the majors, so its a crapshoot how much he's really got left. While i'm all for them re-signing Dickey, the Mets could be facing the reality of having to guarantee a broken down 42-year old $15m in a few years. Lets call this the Jason Bay Option... or Santana Lite. Or the Mets can make a move, turning an aging pitcher coming off a career year into a few studly prospects, or an uber-prospect. We would be dealing from our 1 and only position of depth (SP) to fill some of our multitude of holes; we would be capitalizing on a career year from an old pitcher (a high risk position to begin with) into young everyday players (OFs and/or Cs) with futures. Wouldn't it be nice to be on the GOOD side of such a deal for a change? you want to talk economics? Buy low and sell high. Rinse. Repeat.
|
Edgy MD Nov 27 2012 11:50 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
If there's any lesson of the last few years, it's that money isn't infinite.
|
Edgy MD Nov 27 2012 01:04 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Well, they got Kevin Plawecki and Matt Reynolds. It's something, but the compensation rules are changing monthly these days.
|
Benjamin Grimm Dec 01 2012 05:59 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
|
Frayed Knot Dec 01 2012 07:53 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
No harm is finding out what's available.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Dec 01 2012 08:10 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Here's my dream scenario: When they tell us Dickey is too old we offer up Matt Harvey instead and they accept.
|
G-Fafif Dec 03 2012 01:11 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Ex-Met Orel Hershiser and not yet ex-Met R.A. Dickey talk knuckleball in ESPN: The Magazine.
|
G-Fafif Dec 04 2012 03:21 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
R.A. on The Daily Show tonight, Tuesday.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Dec 04 2012 10:12 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I'm sure Stewart will be the picture of stoic composure.
|
Mets – Willets Point Dec 04 2012 10:43 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
||
Do you think he'll bow down all the way until his forehead touches the floor?
|
G-Fafif Dec 04 2012 09:30 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
R.A. worked "circuitous," "poetic" and "trajectory" into one answer on TDS. So he doesn't do that just to impress Guys!
|
Zvon Dec 04 2012 11:51 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Interesting how when talking about the hassles of re-locating he mentioned Toronto and Los Angeles.
|
Edgy MD Dec 05 2012 07:34 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Yeah, that was an interesting answer.
|
Ceetar Dec 05 2012 07:35 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
also "Jedi Council"
|
G-Fafif Dec 05 2012 04:59 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Part II, online, features Jon asking R.A. how he comes to use words like "circuitous". R.A. responds with "voracious".
|
Ashie62 Dec 05 2012 08:30 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Watch them trade R.A and Niese.
|
G-Fafif Dec 12 2012 01:48 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Edgy MD Dec 12 2012 02:24 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
That's great.
|
Ashie62 Dec 12 2012 03:48 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Has Thurston Howell bid yet?
|
Benjamin Grimm Dec 13 2012 04:02 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Mike Puma, in the Post, says that Sandy says that this should all be resolved by the end of the week.
|
Ashie62 Dec 13 2012 04:57 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Dec 13 2012 08:54 PM |
This forum will have it first...2 for 26 if RA shaves and donates 1 million to the world fund.
|
G-Fafif Dec 13 2012 05:29 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Gary Smith is a Cy Young writer every year.
|
Ashie62 Dec 13 2012 08:54 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Can Gary Smith play the OF?
|
G-Fafif Apr 30 2013 12:50 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
Former New Yorker profiled in The New Yorker. Lot of good stuff, particularly regarding the breakup.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 30 2013 02:44 PM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
I didn't know JCL wrote for the Post
|
batmagadanleadoff May 18 2013 10:44 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/875 ... years-come
|
Ashie62 May 19 2013 09:31 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Toronto bought high...
|
Frayed Knot May 19 2013 11:53 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Scheduled against Sabathia today ... except that the game is washed out.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 19 2013 11:54 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
|
That was the idea.
|
Mets – Willets Point May 20 2013 07:54 AM Re: RA Deserves His Own Thread |
Has he been trade back to the Mets?
|