Master Index of Archived Threads
Gold Gloves - 2012
Frayed Knot Oct 30 2012 07:38 AM |
Did you know that the candidates for GGs were narrowed down to a list of finalists prior to the winner being announced? Yeah, neither did I.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Oct 30 2012 08:03 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
Funny. That link includes a comment that Brandon Phillips has already tweeted that he didn't win a Gold Glove, indicating this whole "list of finalists" thing is a stunt.
|
Edgy MD Oct 30 2012 09:44 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
I'm kind of working on an idea of all MLB post-season awards being presented in an autumn star-studded TV award show at Radio City, with speculation about the five finalists for each award, heavy wagering, musical interludes, baseball-loving comic hosts, awkward canned jokes by un-funny celebrity and ballplayer presenters, more musical interludes, VIPs (US presidents?) pontificating about the importance of baseball to the American fabric, morning-after comments on gowns worn by starlets and baseball wives/dates, all culminating in the presentation of the championship trophy by last year's champion.
|
Frayed Knot Oct 30 2012 11:19 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
I remember, as part of the media's ongoing attempt to "fix" baseball, someone proposing just that a bunch of years ago. They (it was probably S.I.) had the lavish ceremony taking place in Las Vegas rather than Radio City but the concept was the same.
|
Frayed Knot Oct 31 2012 06:41 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
C -- Molina (StL) & Weiters (Bal)
|
Edgy MD Oct 31 2012 07:42 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
Great year with the glove for Wright, but Keith will be very happy to see Headley get his.
|
Vic Sage Oct 31 2012 10:27 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Oct 31 2012 10:42 AM |
|
blowjobs from starlets? get that going and i think they'd make time.
|
Vic Sage Oct 31 2012 10:42 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
|
i know nothing about defensive metrics, and what i do know i don't like, so i rely primarily on anecdotal information and aesthetic impressions to make GG assessments. 1B -- LaRoche (Wash) & Teixeira (NYY): both are legit gloves who didn't win it with their bats this year, as both get it over some superior hitters. 2B -- Barney (CHC) & Cano (NYY): i know nothing about Barney, but Brandon Phillips appears to have lost some range and i'm not sure Hill ever had any, so good for Barney. Cano? a joke, i think. won it with his bat. SS -- Rollins (Phi) & Hardy (Bal): I've long thought Hardy a great glove, but Rollins? He lost it years ago. That's a total joke. 3B -- Headley (SD) & Beltre (Tex): These seem legit to me, even if it was Mr. Wright's best year in a while. LF -- Gonzalez (Col) & Gordon (KC): I would've gone with Braun and Jennings, but i can't argue. CF -- McCutcheon (Pitt) & Jones (Bal): Is this the beginning of the anti-SABR backlash against Trout? McCutcheon is great. RF -- Heyward (Atl) & Reddick (Oak): Is Heyward all that and a bag of chips? Not with his glove he ain't. I'd take Bruce's cannon-shot arm. Reddick? I don't know. He seems like a solid all-around play P -- Buehrle (Fla) & Hellickson (TB)/Peavey(CWS): It seems to me this award would favor the junkballers who pitch to contact, so i don't take it all that seriously.
|
Edgy MD Oct 31 2012 10:46 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
If defensive metrics aren't winning your confidence regarding which guys are getting to balls that might elude other guys, they should be able to tell by now, with some accuracy, how effective an outfielder's arm is --- not only regarding the guys you nail but the guys you freeze because they'd never run on you.
|
Edgy MD Oct 31 2012 10:57 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
The engagement and perspective that only Twitter can give you.
|
seawolf17 Oct 31 2012 11:30 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
Well, Headley DID have a whole mess of RBI this year.
|
Frayed Knot Oct 31 2012 11:42 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
|
LaRoche had a great offensive year to go with his usual steady defense, and with Votto missing large chunks of time and Pujols & Fielder moved to the AL he probably was among the best hitting 1st sackers this year also. I was reading something this summer about Barney which was arguing for his season to be included among the best defensively by a 2B evah!! I haven't seen him enough to argue for or against but the author was pretty certain. Cano is good, but his lackadaisical style annoys folks and looks that much worse when he does make mistakes as in the playoffs this year. Suddenly his 'coolest guy in the room' act wasn't as attractive to MFY fans as before. Anti-SABR/Trout? I dunno, this is managers & coaches voting remember, not media. Plus Jones is real good. Under the old 'three OFers' method they'd both win but I think we all prefer this version better even if one of those guys has to lose. Heyward seems more the type to me who can simply out-run any mistakes. Bruce has the better arm but is slower and might be more erratic. Based on small eye-samples plus word-of-mouth rep, Reddick was most deserving.
|
Ceetar Oct 31 2012 11:46 AM Re: Gold Gloves - 2012 |
||
Problems of sample size abound of course. How many legitimate first to third decisions are there in which the ball is hit to RF? How much of it's because of third base coach? (A real aggressively bad coach could cause a lot of his runners thrown out, bonus to outfielders in his division) You have to break it down by outs too, since a runner is less likely to go (and more likely to have a head start and make it easily) with two outs. But surely you should look at defensive numbers, including the arm stuff. It's better than randomly guessing based on a handful of games you've seen, or errors, or genie, or however they do this.
Bruce had a -1.7 ARM last year, and has a total of 5.2 over his career. Duda, had a -5.7 last year and -9.2 overall. I'm not sure exactly how the stat is calculated but it seems Bruce is fairly average. There were 250 balls in his zone last year (120 for Duda) so 1.7 might be a percentage? perhaps he allowed an extra base or missed an out compared to the mean on ~5 balls over the course of the year. (edit, clearly it says it's the amount of runs. so -1.7 is particually nothing. )
|