Master Index of Archived Threads
2013 IPP: Frank Francisco
Benjamin Grimm Mar 03 2013 08:31 AM |
|
vtmet Mar 03 2013 11:25 AM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
Frank Frank is one of those guys like Armondo Benitez or Branden Looper that are better suited as a "setup man" with an occasional save opportunity than actually being the every day closer...the guy on his career only has 72 saves vs 67 "holds" and 24 "blown saves"...
|
dinosaur jesus Mar 03 2013 11:50 AM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
|
That's 139 saves or holds in 163 opportunities, or 85%. Which really isn't that bad--it's pretty much what Jason Motte, for example, did last year, when he saved 42 and blew 7. And all that proves is that in most save or hold opportunities you can stick just about anyone in there and get away with it. But I'd rather have an actual competent major league pitcher. I'll go with my heart on this one: Parnell wins the job, and Francisco never throws another pitch for the Mets.
|
vtmet Mar 03 2013 12:15 PM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
|
pretty much why I never understand wasting a lot of money on a veteran closer that isn't elite (which pretty much is anyone not named Mariano Rivera)...Somebody like Frank Frank, or Looper, or Wagner, or Lidge, blows just as many saves as a young guy that throws gas and costs relatively little...and tell me that KRod didn't give you more panic attacks than Parnell does...
|
Ceetar Mar 03 2013 12:26 PM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
||
Well most years you can find someone better than Rivera, if it's just one year, and certainly now. It's not so much about 'veteran closer' as it is about giving money to a reliever that you have any confidence can simply be good and won't have a 2012 Ramon Ramirez year.
|
vtmet Mar 03 2013 12:47 PM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
|||
IMO, the difference between Rivera and others, is that Rivera is pretty consistent from month-to-month and year-to-year; whereas most closers are a crapshoot: sometimes dominant, sometimes awful...and I think that the 'unbalanced schedule' where a team faces their own division's teams 18 times a season each; makes it really rough for a veteran reliever to not lose their effectiveness; at least with "young guns" in the bullpen, they have a chance of surprising the hitters a little bit...
|
Edgy MD Mar 03 2013 01:44 PM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
Neither Francisco nor Looper really represented a lot of money, relatively.
|
Lefty Specialist Mar 03 2013 02:25 PM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
Gets blind drunk and does drugs with a stewardess, but manages to get himself together and take off from Orlando but encounters turbulence and mechanical failure which he combats by flipping the plane over and flying it upside down. Saves most of the passengers but is charged with flying while intoxicated. Suspended without pay by the Wilpons and never pitches for them again.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Mar 03 2013 08:23 PM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
5 IP, a whole lot of elbow-related sturm-und-drang, 0 friendly karaoke nights/happy hours with NY media, 1 dented chin
|
TheOldMole Mar 04 2013 02:36 AM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
Setup man all year long. 3 save opps, converts 2.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 04 2013 05:07 AM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
I'm gonna go against the grain here and say that once he's back up and healthy in late April, Double F pitches well enough in a setup role to get traded to Cincinnati in July.
|
Vic Sage Mar 05 2013 10:39 AM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
|
i like that scenario.
|
MFS62 Mar 05 2013 09:40 PM Re: 2013 IPP: Frank Francisco |
It looks like Parnell has been grabbing at the closer spot this Spring, and I think he'll get it.
|