Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Television Baseball

batmagadanleadoff
Mar 19 2013 11:22 AM

This afternoon on ESPN Classics, relive Game Four of the 1988 NL Playoffs. (That's right. Playoffs. Not this newfangled NLCS bullshit, which implies extra rounds and lame wild cards). Watch Mike Scioscia effectively put to bed the Davey Johnson era Mets. Or as Tom Verducci would write five years later in an end of the year Sports Illustrated piece, "the end to the dynasty that never was".





The Amazin' Collapse Of The Mets
The team's fall from perennial contender to laughingstock is a testament to the destructive power of mismanagement
Ddecember 20, 1993

excerpt:
It was 1988, one of those years of imperfect glory for the New York Mets, before the upper deck of Shea Stadium was closed for lack of interest and before any of the team's players were slapped with felony charges. Deep into the chilly night of Oct. 9, Dwight Gooden stood on the mound with the baseball in his hands and a two-run ninth-inning lead over the Los Angeles Dodgers. Three outs and the Mets would lead the National League Championship Series three games to one.

"It's in the bag," thought Met senior vice-president Al Harazin. Gooden had permitted the Dodgers only three hits—all singles, none of them after the fourth inning. "Doc's going to win his first post-season game."

Gooden quickly had an 0-and-2 count on John Shelby, the easiest hitter in the league to strike out. Yes, the Mets were nearly a lock to play the Oakland Athletics in a titanic World Series, the first matchup of 100-win teams in 18 years. Except something began to go wrong. Gooden walked Shelby in what turned into an eight-pitch at bat. He seemed to labor on the last two deliveries, fastballs high and away. He had thrown 125 pitches.

Reserve in fielder Dave Magadan squirmed in the Met dugout and thought, "Scioscia's up, Myers is in the bullpen.... Please put him in the game." But the lefthanded Randy Myers was not ready to face the lefthanded Mike Scioscia. Myers wasn't even warming. No one was.

"He's still in control," manager Davey Johnson thought about Gooden. "If I bring in Myers, they'll pinch-hit Rick Dempsey anyway. He's more of a home run threat than Scioscia."

Scioscia had hit three home runs all year, only one since June. Met catcher Gary Carter, knowing Scioscia liked to take a pitch or two with a runner on first, flashed his index linger to Gooden. After walking Shelby, the pitcher knew exactly what was needed: just a good get-ahead fastball squarely over the plate. It was 11:02 p.m. when Gooden threw the pitch. It arrived slightly above belt high. It would have been strike one, absolutely.

But then Scioscia swung.

There is a line of demarcation that runs roughly along the crest of the Rocky Mountains through North America. Water on one side of the line flows toward the Pacific. On the other it flows in the opposite direction. The moment Scioscia hit that two-run home run, the Mets had reached their Continental Divide. "If we had won that game, we would have won that series," says Joe McIlvaine, then the Met vice-president of baseball operations and now an executive vice-president with the team. "There's no doubt in my mind. It was a flash point."

The Mets lost that night in 12 innings and again the next afternoon. They lost the series in seven games, and they have not played another postseason game since. The course of the franchise's fortunes began flowing the wrong way, first in a trickle and then in a rush.

Two second-place finishes followed, though those turbulent years were more corrosive than anyone knew. It was the end to the dynasty that never was. The Mets were one of eight teams ever to finish first or second for seven consecutive seasons, but the only one of that group to not emerge from such a run with more than one pennant. Then came three losing seasons, each worse than the last. No team in baseball has been worse over those past three years, especially the most recent, a 103-loss horror in which the Mets, with conduct even more odious than their play, were reduced to being pathetic objects of late-night television humor. Baseball's Buttafuoco.

[***]

In the past three years three teams have gone from worst to first in successive seasons. Another, Oakland, took the reverse route last year. "A lot has changed since 1988," Wilpon says. "It's a much more volatile business now." The crash of the Mets, though, took on historic proportions. They became only the fourth team in history to lose 100 games within five seasons of winning 100. But unlike Oakland last season, the Mets collapsed without the excuse of fiscal restraint. They are a monument not so much to the vagaries of modern baseball but more to the destructive forces of mismanagement.

The most ruinous of their mistakes took three basic forms: miscalculation or outright ignorance of the intangibles winning players need, particularly in New York; quick-fix trades that recklessly disregarded long-term effects; and the disastrous breakup of what was supposed to be a seamless passing of the front-office command from chief operating officer and general manager Frank Cashen to his lieutenants, McIlvaine and Harazin. Wilpon is positively penitential in acknowledging all three elements. "Not enough emphasis was placed on the mix of people and the chemistry that are essential to winning," Wilpon says. "It was almost like Rotisserie baseball."


Whole article here
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/ ... /index.htm

Benjamin Grimm
Mar 19 2013 11:26 AM
Re: Television Baseball

I was at that game. No need to relive it!

batmagadanleadoff
Mar 19 2013 11:30 AM
Re: Television Baseball

Tom Verducci wrote:

The team's fall from perennial contender to laughingstock is a testament to the destructive power of mismanagement
December 20, 1993



Verducci probably had no idea just how prescient he was when, 20 years ago, he described the Mets as a "laughingstock".

Edgy MD
Mar 19 2013 11:32 AM
Re: Television Baseball

If he was prescient, he would have worked Jeter in there.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Mar 19 2013 11:34 AM
Re: Television Baseball

Thanks, BML!

By the way, I'm also in the market for both a sharp oral-nerve probe and an extraneous, discomfiting nonmedical rectal insert. Any recs?

Benjamin Grimm
Mar 19 2013 11:38 AM
Re: Television Baseball

Ask Governor Phillip.

batmagadanleadoff
Mar 19 2013 11:39 AM
Re: Television Baseball

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Thanks, BML!

By the way, I'm also in the market for both a sharp oral-nerve probe and an extraneous, discomfiting nonmedical rectal insert. Any recs?


With or without anesthesia?

Lefty Specialist
Mar 19 2013 12:54 PM
Re: Television Baseball

Baseball's Buttafuoco.

Ouch.