Master Index of Archived Threads
Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One!
Benjamin Grimm Mar 28 2013 01:08 PM |
|
|
Edgy MD Mar 28 2013 01:22 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Greatness.
|
themetfairy Mar 28 2013 01:39 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Looking forward to it - Thanks BG!
|
metsmarathon Mar 29 2013 08:51 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
time to dust off the cumbersome spreasheet!
|
Ashie62 Mar 29 2013 12:41 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Vote early and often...
|
Edgy MD Mar 29 2013 02:57 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Looking forward to the return of m.e.t.b.o.t.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 29 2013 03:18 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I agree. He's not going to Cooperstown.
|
Edgy MD Mar 29 2013 03:53 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I dunno. m.e.t.b.o.t. has a lot of good years ahead of him.
|
Benjamin Grimm Mar 29 2013 04:08 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Yikes! I somehow replied to the wrong thread!
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 03 2013 07:20 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Fifteen voters so far for the Opening Day game! It would be great if we can maintain this level of participation deep into the season!
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2013 07:11 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Schaefer voting for the second game of the season will close on Monday morning.
|
Centerfield Apr 05 2013 07:38 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I see votes as low as 2 points for Gee yesterday. 6 1/3 of one run ball doesn't buy you as much as it used to.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 05 2013 07:45 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Gave up 3 leadoff walks and hit a guy, a good opponent would have knocked him out of the box in 4. Didn't help himself with the bat when a single run was all we needed to get him off the hook.
|
Edgy MD Apr 05 2013 08:20 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Welcome aboard!
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Apr 05 2013 08:22 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
metropolitan starting pitcher dillon gee earned +151 WPA as a pitcher, but cost -67 WPA as a batter. furthermore, because m.e.t.b.o.t. apportions WPA for stolen bases against and caught stealings against between the pitcher of record and the catcher of record, metropolitan pitcher received +6 WPA for the stolen base by san diego father shortstop everth cabrera but lost -21 WPA for the caught stealing by san diego father left fielder mark kotsay. accordingly, metropolitan catcher john buck recieved -6 WPA for the stolen base by san diego father shortstop everth cabrera but gained +21 WPA for the caught stealing by san diego father left fielder mark kotsay.
|
Edgy MD Apr 05 2013 08:29 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I'm with Springy.
|
metsmarathon Apr 05 2013 08:33 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
i lack the sophistication to look beyond 6 innings, one run? good! nobody else did anything much of good? even better!
|
Vic Sage Apr 05 2013 08:41 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
...or you could simply give a pitcher's offense less value in your computations, right? Given that (1) a pitcher good enough to be a hitter is often made one at some point early in his career, (2) the others do not have the time to improve their already lesser offensive skills as they are too busy trying to perfect the skill that they are on the team for (ie., pitching), and (3) half of baseball thinks pitcher's offense is so superfluous to the game that they changed the rules just to replace them at the plate with actual hitters. But somehow you, in your robotic wisdom, choose to give their hitting "prowess" equal weight to their pitching, in your formulation. Yes, a weak-hitting short stop still has to hit. But first of all, that's part of what he's expected to do as a player, and is expected to be proficient enough at it to be a major leaguer (except for Rey Ordonez). And defense, while important in the aggregate, is primarily impacted by pitching, not by fielding. And the extent fielding has an impact, it is a job shared by all 9 players. So a shortstop generally cannot impact the defense enough to make up for his bad hitting. There is, of course, a certain amount of era-context in determining this. Mark Belanger and Buddy Harrelson were very good SSs in a small-ball era; whether a team could afford to carry them in the steroids era, where SSs were hitting 30 HRs a year (except for ours, of course), is at least an open question. But when games are determined by small margins because of run scarcity, a SS that can prevent a run is more valuable than one that can prevent a run when runs are more plentiful (and therefore worth less). On the whole, every fielder has to carry their glove with their bat. A pitcher does not, and shouldn't be penalized for not doing so, in my view. You could simply give those handful of pitchers who are actually good hitters, too, a bonus for their extra value. Don't blow a fuse now; i'm just sayin'.
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 05 2013 09:02 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
I think you guys way over-score the pitchers, in general. I gave Johan less than 5 points for his no-hitter. What's the max? Six? If so, everyone else gave Johan six pts. for his no-hitter, if I remember. Johan woulda had to strike everybody out, and then run behind home plate to catch his own third strikes to get five points from me. If he wanted six, he woulda had to hit a home run, as well.
|
Mets – Willets Point Apr 05 2013 09:05 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
||
I remember when I used to participate in Schaeffer points, everyone would give 5 to 6 points to Tom Glavine every outing and would tear me several new assholes when I would give him fewer points. That's why I don't participate anymore, it's not the worth the headaches.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2013 09:05 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
The idea is that a player can get a maximum of 6 points, but 10 points are awarded. When a pitcher throws a complete game shutout, he's done everything expected of him (hence the 6), and those other 4 points are for the guys who hit the ball and catch the ball.
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 05 2013 09:09 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
That's one way of looking at it. I suppose that a bottom of the 9th inning pinch hitter in a tie game who singles in the winning run has also done all that was expected of him. But six points worth?
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2013 09:11 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
You're just trying to be argumentative. There's a difference between a nine-inning effort and a single at bat.
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 05 2013 09:14 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
I know. What I ought to have written was that offense (run scoring) is half the game and pitching/defense (run prevention) comprises the other half. And from that view, a pitching performance alone, no matter how dominant, can't be worth five out of the 10 points.
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Apr 05 2013 09:20 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
were m.e.t.b.o.t. to begin to attempt to calculate positional adjustments for hte offensive contributions of pitchers it would perhaps send m.e.t.b.o.t. down a slick gradient of attempting to then positionally adjust the offensive contributions of, for instance, catchers, relative to first basemen and left fielders. because, therefore, are not the first basemen and left fielders generally assumed to be better offensive performers than catchers?
|
metsmarathon Apr 05 2013 09:28 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
||
i don't believe that's particulatly true. unless you also establish that you cannot give out more than 5 points for offense (of course allowing for some points to be awarded for noteworthy defensive performances) a pitcher who throws 9 innings of shutout ball is almost certainly doing more than half the share of the winning, especially if the offense isn't doing much on it's own end. if the offense is also scoring 8 or 10 runs, then maybe you've found a balance, i guess. but i don't believe that it's appropriate to slice it right down the middle as such. as i recall, the 'bot also didn't give out a full 6 points either. damned robots.
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 05 2013 10:12 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
A pitcher doesn't throw a shutout, or a no-hitter, all by himself. Fielders must make the plays behind him. And the catcher has to hold on to the third strike. I don't believe that Schaefer correlates perfectly with what we'd consider dominant performances. For example, the most dominant thing that a pitcher could do is strike out all 27 batters in a perfect game. But for Schaefer purposes I'd award a pitcher more points if he pitched a perfect game where every batter popped out to that pitcher.
|
Gwreck Apr 05 2013 11:33 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
I have never understood this complaint (and I don't mean to pick on you, WP, personally, as you are not the only person who as voiced it). This is a discussion board, your Schaefer vote isn't sacred, and someone questioning it is not personally offending you. I can recollect several interesting discussions regarding Schaefer voting but nothing uncivil, although perhaps my memory is faulty.
|
Edgy MD Apr 05 2013 11:34 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Oh, well, it was tough there for a while.
|
metsmarathon Apr 05 2013 11:41 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
oh come now.
|
Edgy MD Apr 05 2013 11:48 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
||
I try and do this.
I agree with that. I wonder sometimes if we fall out of that frame of reference, particularly with starting pitchers. A six-inning, two-run, four-strikeout, two-walk performance is not the same thing, I think, in an 9-2 win that it is in a 3-2 win, or a 2-1 loss.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2013 01:37 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Here's the first Schaefer discussion thread, from 2005 and 2006. I think this may include the "several new assholes" conversation that Willets referred to. Either way, it shows how much more lively the Schaefer process was eight years ago when this was all fresh and new.
|
Mets – Willets Point Apr 05 2013 02:42 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I don't think I want to reread that. It's not been so long that I could sit down again.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2013 02:45 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I don't think it's as bad as you recall. That is, if I dug up the correct thread.
|
Edgy MD Apr 05 2013 02:59 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
There were others. Unpleasant others.
|
Vic Sage Apr 05 2013 03:20 PM Schaefer POTG 4/3/13 - Mets 8, Padres 4 |
|
hey, Bot, you forgot Ike Davis' HR.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 05 2013 05:07 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Please don't quote anybody else's votes in a voting thread; it will lead to that person's votes getting counted twice.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 08 2013 06:49 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Thursday's afternoon loss to the Padres will close on Tuesday morning.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 08 2013 07:31 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
Well, seeing as it's been what, 7 years since someone's feelings got hurt, how about we all forgive one another and start fighting over this stuff again? Like today, Byrd is getting tons more beer than Nieuwenhuis who to me was the Real American Hero of the 9th inning. A pinch-hit single off the closer than a daring dash to set up the winning run. Not saying the Byrd is overrewarded so much as Kirk is being under-rewarded.
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Apr 09 2013 07:41 AM Re: Schaefer POTG 4/3/13 - Mets 8, Padres 4 |
||
m.e.t.b.o.t. lacks any physical data storage device, and therefore is incapable of forgetting. it is always possible that an algorithmic error has occurred, but in this case, no. metropolitan first baseman ike davis had four at bats. in the first at bat, with a score of 0-0 with a runner on first base and 2 outs, metropolitan first baseman ike davis grounded out to second base, decreasing the probability of a metropolitan win by 2.2%, to 50%. in the second at bat, in the third inning with a score of 2-0, and 2 outs, metropolitan first baseman ike davis again grounded out to second base, decreasing the probability of a metropolitan win this time by 0.7%, to 75%. in the third at bat, in the fifth inning with a score of 5-0 with a runner on third base and 1 out, metropolitan first baseman ike davis hit a home run. because of the score of hte game, and with the metropolitans already having a 97.6% probability of winning the game, this at bat resulted in an increase in the probability of the metropolitans winning the game of only 1.5%, to 99.1%. in the fourth and final at bat, leading off the seventh inning with a score of 8-0, metropolitan first baseman ike davis flied out to left field. the metropolitans already had a 99.9% probability of winning the game, and this outcome affected the probability of winning the game by less than one tenth of one percent, and is scored as 0%. the sum total contribution by metropolitan first baseman ike davis was negative. the positive contribution came late in a lopsided game, and therefore affected the outcome less than his earlier failures, notably the first at bat.
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Apr 09 2013 08:05 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
metropolitan pitcher matt harvey received a relatively low score in the april 8th game because of the early offense generated in particular by metropolitan catcher john buck. following the home run by metropolitan catcher john buck, the metropolitans had a 78% probability of winning the game. as the offense continued to generate runs, there was less and less positive impact available to metropolitan pitcher matt harvey.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 09 2013 08:40 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games played against the Marlins last weekend will close on Wednesday afternoon.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 10 2013 02:33 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Edgy MD Apr 10 2013 02:38 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I may have to beg you to give me until this eve on one or two of those Fishgames.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 10 2013 02:39 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Sorry, they were closed a couple of hours ago.
|
Zvon Apr 10 2013 02:45 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
He runs a tight ship. Yea, Buck! gratz!
|
Zvon Apr 10 2013 02:46 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I think the winner for the season should get a real classy expensive matchbox car.
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 10 2013 02:59 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|||
I wouldn't award those defensive points in Schaefer voting only because it's not worth the trouble. But routine plays count and they should, ideally, be accounted for. Schaefer is supposed to be mainly a fun exercise, and like a risk/reward analysis, the effort needed to score every defensive play would eliminate whatever joy there is in participating in the first place. Not that I participate very much, anyways.
But your logic doesn't explain why the game's best player should get six points. Though I didn't give Johan six points for his no-hitter, I did award him more points than any other Met for that game.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 11 2013 07:29 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Monday night's win in Philadelphia will close on Friday morning.
|
metsmarathon Apr 11 2013 01:19 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
||
i'm not saying that hte game's best player should get 6 points. i'm saying there's no reason why a player who does more than the rest of his team combined shouldn't be eligible for 6 points. the game's best player could get zero points, for all i care, if he just only didin't suck nearly as bad as everybody else sucked in a 23-0 blowout. it's certainly possible. in fact, the 'bot has run across such an occurrence where nobody had a positive WPA in a game. my formulatings are a bit more generous, but if every pitcher gave up hits and runs, nobody hit a lick, and nobody fielded particularly well, then i'd give out a zero too. also, it is certianly true that a valid voting scheme could be devised where a voter decided to rank the most schaferly players of a game, and give out points based solely on that ranking, for inscance, a strict 6.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 would have some merit, or a 6 | 3 | 1 if you wanted less granularity. who says the points have to be given out linearly. (in my massive overly complex spreadsheet, i'm actually tallying such a thing. right now, buck leads with 14 points).
|
Ashie62 Apr 11 2013 04:27 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Two players only..I dont see the point of 0.37 for some players.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 12 2013 06:52 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday and Wednesday's losses in Philadelphia will close on Monday morning. Please try to get any remaining votes posted today or over the weekend.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 15 2013 02:50 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
6.2 honorary Schaefer points to metsmarathon for remembering to not to use numeric characters in his comments in the voting thread! Well done!
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 16 2013 09:42 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for both games played in Minneapolis against the Twins over the weekend will close on Wednesday afternoon, not before 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 19 2013 07:32 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for both ends of the doubleheader loss to the Rockies on Tuesday will close on Monday morning, April 22.
|
metsmarathon Apr 22 2013 06:49 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
good heavens, when you say morning, you ain't kidding.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 22 2013 07:13 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Sorry!
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 23 2013 07:43 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the three games played last weekend against the Nationals will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
metsmarathon Apr 24 2013 11:28 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
it might seem as if i've overindulged on familia in the 4/23 game, but really, with 3 strikeouts in 1 2/3 innings of relief, stranding two inherited runners, and with nobody else doing much of anything, his was hte performance of the game.
|
themetfairy Apr 24 2013 12:16 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Stranding inherited runners deserves beer.
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Apr 25 2013 07:21 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
m.e.t.b.o.t. has been determining the appropriate level of schaefer points to distribute to a metropolitan baseball player for long enough that m.e.t.b.o.t. is able to anticipate a potential criticism from a human crane pool forum poster regarding hte voting for the april 24 game, specifically the relatively little schaefer points awarded to metropolitan centerfielder jordanny valdespin.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 25 2013 08:14 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
That sounds right.
|
Zvon Apr 25 2013 11:35 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
M.e.t.b.o.t., on reviewing last nights game I'm thinking that David Wright contributed more than I gave him credit for (.5). If he doesn't get that two out hit in the 9th to tie the game Valdespin does not get the chance to go deep into his cups (of beer). So I'm thinking of trying to throw him more sips. How important a contribution is that hit in your thinking?
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Apr 25 2013 12:18 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
within the context of the entire game, m.e.t.b.o.t. has assessed metropolitan third baseman with a total of 0.266 WPA, 25.5% of the total net-positive WPA contributions in the game, as reflected in the shaefer vote of 2.55.
|
Zvon Apr 25 2013 12:58 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Thank you very much for your prompt reply m.e.t.b.o.t.. I will factor things and make an adjustment. Now who do I steal sips from...
|
Frayed Knot Apr 25 2013 03:15 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
The main point on this type of discussion is how highly to reward/award Valdespin for the GS over and above what you would have if he won the game with "only" a 1B, or SacFly or GR 2B (not possible in that case for him to get a regular 2B or 3B) or even simply beating out a GiDP?
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 25 2013 03:33 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
Is it about contributing to a team win, or about individual accomplishments irrespective of team outcome? And how do you even begin to separate the two? Why did Santana practically* max out the scoring for his no-hitter? By your logic, because the Mets won by eight, Johan could've given up seven runs on 12 hits without jeopardizing the team win. Why then, was he credited fully for a brilliant, but according to your rationale here, superfluous performance? And then why does any Met, for that matter, ever get any Schaefer points in a team loss? * But see my ballot.
|
Chad Ochoseis Apr 25 2013 04:41 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
||
The difference is that there was no point where Santana could have clinched the win by doing less than what he actually did - every out he got increased the Mets' win probability, however infinitesimally. So his performance wasn't really superfluous. Valdespin's home run increased the Mets win probability to 1. A simple poke into short center would have done the same. What if he'd lined the ball off the RF wall - an easy double and possibly a triple under ordinary circumstances, but a single in a walk-off situation? Would he then get Schaefer credit for a single, or for an XBH? I'd guess a single. Why treat a GS differently? I very rarely Schaefer, but if I were Schaefering on June 1, 2012, I probably wouldn't have given Santana the full six points. Sentimentality aside, it was an 8-0 shutout, and there was plenty of offensive and defensive credit (Baxter!) to go around.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 25 2013 06:53 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Apr 26 2013 09:15 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
||
m.e.t.b.o.t. does not fully understand the question. m.e.t.b.o.t. has one primary purpose - to process per-game win probability values into schaefer votes. a need was determined, and m.e.t.b.o.t. was shoddily cobbled together from readily available scrap material. it was a very low budget affair. win probability values place the players' individual accomplishments into the overall context of a team win. not all home runs are equal. some are completely meaningless in the context of a single game. others can swing a sure loss into a total victory. similarly, not all shutouts are equal. in many cases, the contributions of the offense make less meaningful the efforts of the pitcher. although it could be argued that in throwing a shutout, the pitcher has made less meaningful the contributions of the offense. if it is necessary to revisit the no-hitter thrown by metropolitan pitcher johan santana, then m.e.t.b.o.t. will revisit this game in the context of win probability. in the game in question, metropolitan pitcher johan santana is credited with a +0.348 WPA as a pitcher. as a batter, he is credited with a -0.028 WPA. his net unadjusted WPA is then +0.320 m.e.t.b.o.t. does not generate these WPA values. m.e.t.b.o.t. only attempts to utilize these values to generate schaefer votes. as has previously been discussed, m.e.t.b.o.t. long ago recognized that the WPA outcome from a fielder's error is counted against the pitcher. m.e.t.b.o.t. implemented an adjustment process which transfers the WPA lost by the error to the fielder who committed the error. similarly, m.e.t.b.o.t. recognized that the defender who makes an outstanding defensive play is similarly unrewarded, and so m.e.t.b.o.t. implemented an adjustment process which shares the WPA gained by the outstanding defensive effort between the pitcher and the fielder. m.e.t.b.o.t. believes that the vast majority of defensive plays are neutral. and those neutral plays need not be credited to a defensive player when, effectively, any defensive player could have achieved the same outcome. m.e.t.b.o.t. is limited to believing that the only non-neutral defensive plays are errors and those outstanding defensive plays which are recorded as highlights in the mlb.com video highlight reel. this is an acknowledged limitation, but m.e.t.bo.t. is forced to accept this limitation until and unless a better solution presents itself in such a fashion as to be easy and rational to implement. this all strays from the analysis of the game, but lays the foundation for the following. in the game in question, metropolitan left fielder mike baxter made an outstanding defensive effort in catching a deep fly ball and subsequently crashing into the wall and damaging his body. this was recorded in the mlb.com highlight reel and as such was designated an outstanding defensive play by m.e.t.b.o.t. however, the play was only worth 0.005 WPA, due to the score and the late inning. so, while a human schaefer voter might credit metropolitan left fielder mike baxter with a significant amount of schaefer votes, m.e.t.b.o.t. increased his WPA total by only 0.0025 WPA, increasing his total from -0.040 to -0.0375. the negative total would make metropolitan left fielder mike baxter ineligible for a schafer vote from m.e.t.b.o.t. looking specifically at the performance of metropolitan pitcher johan santana, while it is true that the offense scored many runs, they did not score those runs very early in the game, and by the time they game was as humans might consider a blowout, the majority of his contributions to winning the game had been made. in the first inning, he increased the probability of the metroplitans winning the game from 50.0% to 54.6% in the second inning, he increased the probability of the metroplitans winning the game from 50.0% to 54.9% in the third inning, he increased the probability of the metroplitans winning the game from 50.0% to 55.2% in the fourth inning, he increased the probability of the metroplitans winning the game from 50.0% to 55.7% in the fifth inning, he increased the probability of the metroplitans winning the game from 77.2% to 82.9% in the sixth inning, he increased the probability of the metroplitans winning the game from 80.1% to 86.1% in the seventh inning, he increased the probability of the metroplitans winning the game from 97.6% to 98.9% (although here he did have the 0.25% assist from metropolitan left fielder mike baxter) in the eight inning, he increased the probability of the metroplitans winning the game from 99.9% to 100.0% (unsure if rounded) and finally, in the ninth inning, he increased (or maintained) the probability of the metroplitans winning the game from 100.0% (unsure if rounded) to 100.0% as is apparent, metropolitan pitcher johan santana contributed to the probability of winning the game throughout the game, and only after the score became significantly lopsided late in the game did the scale of his contributions begin to slow. the 0.318 WPA accrued by metropolitan pitcher johan santana accounted for 48.4% of the contributions by net-positive players, and therefore would have been worth 4.84 schaefer votes. m.e.t.b.o.t. is most typically accused of not awarding enough schaefer votes to pitcher in the wake of well-pitched games. it is curious that m.e.t.b.o.t. is being questioned on the mindset behind awarding a full complement of 6 schaefer votes to a metropolitan pitcher in a game in which m.e.t.b.o.t. did not award 6 schaefer votes. m.e.t.b.o.t. has no influence over the schaefer voting of other humans, except in those instances where m.e.t.b.o.t. is asked specific questions, or in those instances where m.e.t.b.o.t. expounds on the machinations behind a specific schaefer vote. m.e.t.b.o.t. cannot account for why any metropolitan player should ever be awarded schaefer votes in a loss except to comment that it is indeed a team game made up of the sum aggregate of the contributions of a collections of individuals. one single player alone can very rarely win a game all of his own accord, and one single player can very rarely lose a game all of his own accord. in the context of a single losing effort, one or many players may make contributions big or small which increased the likelihood of winning a given game, even if the ultimate outcome was a loss. the ultimate outcome does not undo or unmake those earlier contributions. m.e.t.b.o.t. is programed to view each players performance within the context of a single game. it is theoretically possible for m.e.t.b.o.t. to tabulate the outcomes for each individual at bat within a game, and only credit for those at bats which had a positive outcome, and ignore those at bats which had a negative outcome, for the purposes of schaefer voting, but this approach would be more complicated, and perhaps less meaningful. the end product is the player of the game vote, and m.e.t.b.o.t. strives to identify which players contributed to winning a game, and the relative valuation of those contributions against each other. some voters may view an outstanding statistical achievement or outstanding physical performance as noteworthy and therefore meaningful within the context of determining how to vote for a player of the game. m.e.t.b.o.t. does not and cannot do this. m.e.t.b.o.t. focuses solely on WPA, and the appropriate apportionment thereof within the best and most reasonable limits of time, freely available data, and clockwork mechanical contraptions.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 26 2013 09:40 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday and Wednesday's games against the Dodgers will close on Monday morning. Please try to get any remaining votes posted today or over the weekend.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 29 2013 06:09 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Thursday's loss to the Dodgers will close on Tuesday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Zvon Apr 29 2013 05:26 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Hey m.e.t.b.o.t., how are you doing?
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 30 2013 08:42 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games played against the Phillies over the weekend will close on Wednesday afternoon, after 2 p.m.
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Apr 30 2013 09:37 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
metropolitan left fielder lucas duda generated a total of 0.089 WPA in the game, more than any other metropolitan. while metropolitan left fielder lucas duda had two negative WPA at bats, first flying out to right with the score tied 0-0 and no outs in the second inning (-0.023 WPA) and later flying out to left with the metropolitans trailing 3-8 with a runner on second and two outs in the fifth (-0.012 WPA), the at bat in the fourth inning generated a significant amount of WPA. with the metropolitans trailing 1-3 in the fourth inning, with a runner on first and no outs, metropolitan left fielder lucas duda singled to right field, advancing the baserunner from first to third. (note, the baserunner gets no credit for advancing the extra base as m.e.t.b.o.t. is unable to reliably ascertain whether the advancement was a neutral act or not). prior to the at bat, the metropolitans had a 33.3% probability of winning hte game. following hte at bat, teh metropolitans had a 45.7% probability of winning the game. metroplitan left fielder generated +0.124 WPA in this at bat. 0.089 WPA constituted 28.6% of the total 0.311 net-positive WPA generated by metropolitan players, and therefore metropolitan left fielder lucas duda is awarded 2.86 schaefer votes.
|
metsmarathon Apr 30 2013 01:10 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
john buck is getting a lot of love in the 15 inning loss to the fish.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 30 2013 01:19 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Yeah, but without that homer, they would have lost in nine innings.
|
metsmarathon Apr 30 2013 01:31 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
i suppose it's true, but in a general sense, we're typically much more likely to view players' at bats and defensive contributions as discrete units that don't weigh against each other good vs bad, whereas we typically tend to view pitchers performances as a whole.
|
Zvon Apr 30 2013 03:37 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
||
Bleep-blaap-bloop. Translation=ty for the explanation. So Duda gets credit for 'might have beens'? Interesting.
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. May 01 2013 07:14 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
m.e.t.b.o.t. is all about what might have been. future events do not affect WPA. in the specific example, metropolitan left fielder lucas duda generated +0.124 WPA irrespective of whether or not the subsequent batters drove in any subsequent runs, or whether or not any subsequent metropolitan pitchers would surrender additional runs.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 01 2013 09:27 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Monday's loss in Miami will close on Thursday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 01 2013 02:46 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Benjamin Grimm May 02 2013 07:31 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday's loss in Miami will close on Friday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 03 2013 12:05 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Wednesday's win over the Marlins will close on Monday morning.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 07 2013 11:41 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
As the losses grow more frequent, the Schaefer participants grow less participatory.
|
metsmarathon May 08 2013 06:58 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
lets not leave parnell hanging for preserving the shutout in the tenth last night. a reliever can't do much more than come into a tie game in extra innings, surrender nothing and record two k's.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 09 2013 07:20 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday night's win over the White Sox at Citi Field will close on Friday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 10 2013 07:38 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Wednesday night's loss to the White Sox will close on Monday morning.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 14 2013 06:52 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all four games played against the Pirates will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m. The May 12 game is particularly low on votes.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 15 2013 08:43 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Monday's loss in St. Louis will close on Thursday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 16 2013 07:23 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday's loss in St. Louis will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 20 2013 11:37 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Wednesday's loss in St. Louis will close on Tuesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 21 2013 06:43 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games played over the weekend in Wrigley Field will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 21 2013 12:09 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I keep forgetting to update this...
|
Benjamin Grimm May 22 2013 01:08 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Benjamin Grimm May 23 2013 07:12 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the games played against the Reds on Monday and Tuesday of this week will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 28 2013 06:54 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the game played last Wednesday against the Reds will close tomorrow (Wednesday) afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Frayed Knot May 29 2013 07:08 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
When voting, be careful not to mix up the twin 2-1 wins over the Yanx. Would make for some strange results if you did.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 29 2013 07:09 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all four games played over the Memorial Day weekend (three against the Braves, one against the Yankees) will close on Thursday afternoon some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 30 2013 07:40 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday night's win against the Yankees at Citi Field will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 30 2013 12:46 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Zvon May 30 2013 01:12 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
Benjamin Grimm May 30 2013 01:17 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I really like that one!
|
Ceetar May 30 2013 01:19 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
metsmarathon May 31 2013 09:17 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
i'm really surprised no other sixes are showing up for gee. i mean, the dude k'd twelve mfy's, with four hits, no walks and only one run scored. plus, who the hell expected that out of him at this point? he didn't even have to pick up a bat to degrade his overall contribution! his game score (for whaterver weight you give such a thing) of 79 marks it as the best met start to date by someone other than matt harvey, and harvey's only had two better by that metric.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 31 2013 09:25 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
The only reason I gave him less than six points was because he only went 7.1 innings.
|
Frayed Knot May 31 2013 09:27 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
" plus, who the hell expected that out of him at this point?"
|
metsmarathon May 31 2013 09:47 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
well, i certainly don't use that as an argument, i just figured, well, its certainly possible that some of us do use level of expectation (either for position, usage or player) as a baseline against which to consider their performance, so i thought i'd throw it out there.
|
Zvon May 31 2013 03:58 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
This, pretty much. If Rice got a rest Gee would have gotten more from me. To me that would have been significant . I realize that it's not his fault he was pulled earlier than he had to be, but that's the way it goes.
|
Frayed Knot May 31 2013 04:03 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
I do start by awarding points to the starter and then base things off of that, but by no means do I stick to that original score if I see that the night's offense deserves a little more or if the relievers do, etc. I just use it as a starting point. In this case I didn't start off with 6 points and then subtract based on the idea that if I start awarding 6 for 7-inning/1-run outings there's no place to go for those 9-inning shutouts.
|
themetfairy May 31 2013 04:57 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
It's rare for me to award six point to a starter. I did so for Johan's no hitter and one of Harvey's recent starts, but generally I save the 6s for truly superlative performances (and for the most part starts in games without a lot of offense that deserves suds).
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 03 2013 08:51 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the two games the Mets won in the Bronx last week, which seems like a much longer time ago, will close on Tuesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 04 2013 07:17 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three sorry games played over the weekend in Miami will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m. This will also finish out the month of May, so look for the Players of the Month announcement as well.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 05 2013 12:23 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 06 2013 07:22 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday night's loss in Washington will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 07 2013 07:10 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Wednesday's win over the Nationals will close on Monday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 11 2013 08:22 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the two losses to Miami at Citi Field this past weekend will close on Wednesday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 12 2013 12:40 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 13 2013 07:05 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Despite the fact that only three people have voted for Tuesday's loss to the Cardinals, the votes will be tallied on Friday, some time after 2 p.m. Schaefer must march on...
|
G-Fafif Jun 15 2013 12:58 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Special Postgame Concert Edition, 6/14/2013
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 17 2013 09:12 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the games played against the Cardinals on Wednesday and Thursday of last week will close on Tuesday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 18 2013 08:40 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games from the past weekend's series against the Cubs at Citi Field will close on Wednesday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 19 2013 07:34 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Monday's late night loss in Atlanta will close on Thursday afternoon some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 20 2013 09:37 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for both games of Tuesday's Harvey-Wheeler doubleheader sweep of the Braves in Atlanta will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
metsmarathon Jun 20 2013 11:40 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
damn work getting in the way of my schaefering. i should get my votes in by tomorrow's deadline...
|
metsmarathon Jun 20 2013 02:02 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
wow. m.e.t.b.o.t. is a harsh grader.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 24 2013 07:21 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the final two games of last week's series in Atlanta will close on Tuesday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 25 2013 10:42 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Not a lotta votes yet for the series against the Phillies, but nevertheless, all three games will close on Wednesday, some time after 2 p.m.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jun 27 2013 08:46 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
For the Beckham buttfumble:
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Jun 27 2013 10:04 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
correct. metropolitan pinch hitter daniel murphy generated +0.305 WPA by reaching base via error, and also by hitting a ball that resulted in a run scoring via error.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 27 2013 11:09 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday night's loss to the White Sox will close on Friday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 28 2013 07:04 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Wednesday night's win in Chicago will close on Monday morning, some time after 10 a.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 01 2013 07:54 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the Mets win in Denver on Thursday will close Tuesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 02 2013 01:15 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Because of the Fourth of July holiday, we'll give these games a little extra time. All three games from the Mets weekend series against Washington will close on Friday morning, some time after 10 a.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 05 2013 08:21 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 08 2013 08:55 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all four games played last week against Arizona will close on Tuesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m. The July 4 game is still a little light on votes.
|
metsmarathon Jul 09 2013 11:21 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
crap, after a five day weekend, i've got me some catching up to do!
|
Frayed Knot Jul 11 2013 06:19 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I am (as usual) behind on my PotG voting - like two series worth. But with the off day today and the ASB just around the corner the next few days should be a good time to catch up.
|
metsmarathon Jul 24 2013 06:26 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
oh crap, i have so much catching up to do!
|
Frayed Knot Jul 24 2013 06:50 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
||
How appropriate, y'know, seeing as how you're all orange.
Oh sure, ignore it when I warn you but then get all urgent when Grimm says so.
|
metsmarathon Jul 26 2013 01:45 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
i'm exhausted. i hope those all went to the right places...
|
Frayed Knot Jul 26 2013 01:48 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
If we find any votes for Art Shamsky we'll know that your spreadsheet has a bug in it.
|
Zvon Jul 26 2013 02:00 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
Hey Grimm! Greetings from us! [youtube]ePrQFaB50w0[/youtube]
|
Zvon Jul 26 2013 02:08 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Hey m.e.t.b.o.t., wanna go to a Citi Field sleep-over with me? I'll roll you up in my sleeping bag and sneak you in.
|
themetfairy Jul 27 2013 06:48 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Welcome back BG!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 27 2013 07:53 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Thank you!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 29 2013 08:43 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the games from Wednesday and Thursday of last week will close on Tuesday afternoon after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 30 2013 06:47 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all four games played over the weekend in Washington will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m. The games from July 27 and 28 are still particularly low on votes.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 31 2013 06:43 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Monday night's win in Miami will close on Thursday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m. This game, too, is light on votes.
|
metsmarathon Jul 31 2013 12:15 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
votes will be in in, like 5 minutes!
|
metsmarathon Jul 31 2013 12:23 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
on the 7/26 game, i had harvey down for 7.4 schaefers, but, of course, had to tamp him down to fit under hte limit.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 31 2013 12:26 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
Okay, I'll hold off for a little while longer. While you and m.e.t.b.o.t. are in Schaefer mode, you might as well do the two Florida games too.
|
m.e.t.b.o.t. Jul 31 2013 12:35 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
m.e.t.b.o.t. is in a quandary.
|
Zvon Jul 31 2013 02:37 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
The important question is how much beer does that translate into? A pinhead? They still get some beer, right? No matter. We accept your judgment. The last thing we need is you blowing a fuse.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 01 2013 08:49 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday's win over the Marlins in Miami will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Zvon Aug 01 2013 01:29 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Most interesting that Byrds received only one award so far.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 01 2013 01:29 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
And two for Quintanilla!
|
Zvon Aug 01 2013 01:44 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
For him sometimes the contrast between his ability and what he does will net him some nice points. Byrds only valley was around May and other than that, all peaks. Could consistency be working against him? Is what he is doing not contributing to wins? There is no doubt at this point that he's the teams offensive MVP. No slouch in the field either.
|
metsmarathon Aug 01 2013 01:50 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
david wright would porbably disagree with you, if he weren't busy being so gosh darned swell.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 01 2013 01:56 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Byrd has received plenty of Schaefer points this year. He's among the team leaders and has a real shot at winning the coveted Player of the Year award.
|
Zvon Aug 01 2013 02:05 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
Was just looking into that now. Very interesting.
|
metsmarathon Aug 01 2013 02:53 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
not that the 'bot and i are the definitive metric against all else should be judged, but i've got byrd as my #3 schaeferrific player, behind both wright and murphy.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 02 2013 07:19 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Wednesday night's loss in Miami will close on Monday morning, some time after 10 a.m. This will close out the month of July, so stay tuned for the Players of the Month announcement.
|
Frayed Knot Aug 02 2013 09:32 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Gee is getting less beer from me than an 7-inning shut-out would normally deserve on account of his shitty bunting.
|
Zvon Aug 02 2013 09:37 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
Now that you mention that I should have factored that in but I didn't. Once Ill let ya slide, but twice...?
|
themetfairy Aug 02 2013 09:44 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I normally would have given him more beer for 1 run (which was due to Rice allowing his inherited runner to score) over 7 innings.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 05 2013 07:06 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Thursday afternoon's loss to the Marlins will close on Tuesday, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 06 2013 07:04 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games played against the Royals at Citi Field this past weekend will close on Wednesday afternoon some time after 2 p.m. The middle game of the series has only three votes so far.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 07 2013 12:29 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 08 2013 09:03 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday's win over the Rockies will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 4 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 09 2013 07:41 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Wednesday night's win over the Rockies will close on Monday morning, some time after 10 a.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 12 2013 08:28 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Thursday afternoon's win over the Rockies will close on Tuesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 13 2013 06:57 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games played in Phoenix this past weekend will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m. Friday night's game is particularly low on votes, with only three at the time of this posting.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 14 2013 04:35 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Monday night's loss in L.A. will close on Thursday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 14 2013 01:52 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 15 2013 07:25 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
We've reached the time of year when, traditionally, participation drops and I wonder if I should bother continuing to do this. I will at least see it out through the end of the year. Voting for Tuesday's game will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 20 2013 08:51 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the five games listed below will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 21 2013 06:42 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Monday afternoon's game in Minnesota will close on Thursday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 21 2013 12:56 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
metsmarathon Aug 21 2013 02:12 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
sorry, i've fallen off hte wagon of late. getting slammed at work makes it hard to catch up. don't these people have priorities?!
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 21 2013 02:14 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
I'm sure things will be calmer next year once your quintuplets have been born.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 23 2013 06:33 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for both games played against the Braves this week will close on Monday morning, some time after 10 a.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 27 2013 07:06 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games played against the Tigers last weekend will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
G-Fafif Aug 27 2013 01:41 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Assuming Wright, Byrd and Harvey are/were (I'm guessing) the leading candidates for PotY, yet two are done getting votes and one may not come back except for token appearances. If Gee or Murphy has a huge September, perhaps they can swoop in. They, Hawkins and Rice are the only Mets to have lasted every day since Opening Day on the 25-man roster.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 27 2013 01:49 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Murphy is right in the thick of things:
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 28 2013 04:45 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Monday night's loss to the Phillies will close on Thursday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 29 2013 06:57 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
G-Fafif Aug 29 2013 07:09 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Byrd 3.0
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 30 2013 12:07 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
On Tuesday, Jon Niese became the first Mets player in recorded history* to earn a perfect 6.00 in CPF Schaefer voting.
|
Benjamin Grimm Aug 30 2013 12:09 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
And, in case you're wondering, these are the highest scores ever earned by position players in a single game:
|
Edgy MD Aug 30 2013 01:45 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Wow. Niesie.
|
themetfairy Aug 30 2013 01:55 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Being the best bat of the game in addition to throwing a shutout will up your beer intake!
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 02 2013 09:31 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the final two games of last week's series against the Phillies will close on Tuesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 04 2013 09:26 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all four of the games listed below will close on Thursday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 06 2013 07:45 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the games played in Atlanta on Tuesday and Wednesday will close on Monday morning, some time after 10 a.m.
|
Edgy MD Sep 06 2013 07:57 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Bad job by Marlon Byrd defending his title there.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 12 2013 10:17 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games played against the Indians last weekend will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m. The middle game of the series is very low on votes; only three people have posted in that thread.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 13 2013 12:25 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 16 2013 12:13 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the four games listed below will close on Tuesday, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 17 2013 06:51 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all four games played against the Marlins last week will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 18 2013 01:17 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Edgy MD Sep 18 2013 01:19 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
That didn't just happen.
|
themetfairy Sep 22 2013 07:00 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
d'Amn! I initially gave d'Arnaud's Schaefer to den Dekker.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 23 2013 09:37 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games played against the Giants last week will close on Tuesday some time after 2 p.m. All of the games are light on votes at the moment, especially the first two.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 24 2013 06:37 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for all three games played in Philadelphia this past weekend will close on Wednesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 25 2013 07:16 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Monday night's loss in Cincinnati will close on Thursday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 25 2013 02:15 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 26 2013 09:56 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for Tuesday night's win in Cincinnati will close on Friday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 30 2013 08:43 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the two games listed below will close on Tuesday afternoon, some time after 2 p.m.
|
Benjamin Grimm Oct 01 2013 07:20 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
Voting for the final three games of the season will close on Thursday morning, some time after 10 a.m.
|
metsmarathon Oct 01 2013 12:51 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
thank you for doing this again this year. i'm sorry to have fallen off the wagon in july, though i hope to still be able to update my massive spreadsheet eventually and play along at home, if retroactively.
|
Benjamin Grimm Oct 01 2013 01:25 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
You're welcome, and no problem. You stuck with it longer than many others did! Just be sure to have m.e.t.b.o.t.'s oil changed by Opening Day 2014. I expect I'll probably continue this tradition next year.
|
Zvon Oct 01 2013 06:13 PM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
|
Ditto the thanks and I think I didn't miss a one this year. I tried not to anyway. The best thing about this is not only is it a reflection of how this community rates the players, it's also like a bubble gum machine where I put my votes in and kool baseball cards come out.
|
Benjamin Grimm Oct 03 2013 09:50 AM Re: Schaefer 2013: Ninth Year of Having More Than One! |
SCHAEFER METS PLAYER OF THE WEEK, 2013
|