Master Index of Archived Threads
High Futily, High Utility
Edgy MD May 14 2013 06:20 PM |
Modestly skilled white utility guys whose suddenly daily presence in the lineup at any number of positions and batting order slots indicated just how desperate the offensive times had become for the team.
|
Swan Swan H May 14 2013 06:25 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
Tim Bogar, 1993
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 14 2013 06:27 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
|
Swan Swan H May 14 2013 06:31 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
Miguel Cairo, 2005
|
G-Fafif May 14 2013 06:42 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
|
I'm glad McEwing finished his tour of Met duty before his limited effectiveness became minute-to-minute fodder for those who would notice and slice it to bits because, gosh darn it, he's such a mensch.
|
Edgy MD May 14 2013 07:03 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
Alternative title: "White Guy, White Flag."
|
Edgy MD May 14 2013 07:06 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
Turning Bailor and his all-around intangible baseballiness playthegamerightiness, along with usefulmiddlereliveriness of Carlos Diaz into Sid Fernandez had to be one of the more underappreciated pieces of alchemy in Frank Cashen history.
|
G-Fafif May 14 2013 07:12 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
I contend Bailor-for-Fernandez trade could never happen today. Too much sophistication in scouting, too much scrutiny within industry. Less quality control in those days, so a Lasorda who could just decide young El Sid was too large or whatever would be overruled.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 14 2013 07:36 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
Stunning heist. It was strange that for that one period you had no fear the Mets were going to make a good or great deal whenever they made one.
|
smg58 May 14 2013 08:14 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
I liked Bailor until I took a look at his actual statline. Getting Sid for him really was criminal.
|
Edgy MD May 14 2013 08:26 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
I had even heard of Fernandez and understood him to be the next Valenzuela in the Dodger talent pike.
|
G-Fafif May 14 2013 08:42 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
Kazmir trade practically prehistoric times by now. Not that a hasty prospect trade can't be made now but that one felt like a tipping point not just for Mets but for how top draft picks are valued. Or maybe Mets were just super drunk that day.
|
Edgy MD May 14 2013 08:52 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
Interestingly, six months later, the Mets traded a top draft choice of their own --- 1983's #4 overall Eddie Williams --- for Bruce Berenyi, and nary a peep of protest was sounded if I remember right. Jay Tibbs wnet in that deal too.
|
G-Fafif May 14 2013 09:07 PM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
|
Heep for Scott was golden until it wasn't.
|
MFS62 May 15 2013 07:51 AM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
Rod Kanehl:
|
Edgy MD May 15 2013 08:02 AM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
Rod's a good precedent --- a utiltiy player overused by a team that isn't hitting enough --- except he differs from those guys in that what he brought to the table
|
seawolf17 May 15 2013 08:10 AM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
I thought "come on, McEwing wasn't that useless offensively" until I looked at his stats. He OPS+ed 107 in 2001, but otherwise? 55 in 2000, 44 in 2002, 61 in 2003, 60 in 2004. Holy hell.
|
Vic Sage May 15 2013 08:28 AM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
names that come to mind (some played more than others):
|
Edgy MD May 15 2013 08:29 AM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
|
Sure, but the key is that, in the midst of an offensive drought, he suddenly becomes an everyday player. In midsummer 2001, he was playing a different position every day, but he was playing, because we were getting fallback years from virtually everybody in the lineup. He got a lot of PT in 2003 also, but that was more about injuries --- and eventually unloading other veterans --- than ineptitude. I was trying to distinguish utility guys who fell into an everyday role from utility guys full-stop.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 15 2013 08:35 AM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
76 I think Mike Phillips played an awful lot more than penciled in for. Without looking it up, he might have hit better than Harrelson though.
|
Vic Sage May 15 2013 08:39 AM Re: High Futily, High Utility |
well, from my list, i think Phillips, Miller, and Bogar fit that definition, more or less. And did anybody think Eric Valent was going to get all the playing time he got? But i guess he's not utility-ish enough.
|