Master Index of Archived Threads
Yeah, So the Reds
Edgy MD May 19 2013 10:05 PM |
The Reds have had perhaps the most frightening frontline lineup in the National League for a few years now --- young, home-grown, athletic, and refined. The only thing keeping them from having made a few World Series appearances from now seems to be depth. Some big shot goes down, as somebody inevitably will, and the Reds plug some bottle of joke-a-cola like Miguel Cairo in there. Thusly, the likes of San Francisco and St. Louis have become the recent class of the league, with less megatonnage up front, perhaps, but with deeper arsenals.
|
Edgy MD May 20 2013 07:47 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
You know, you figure shortstop might be a rare position that isn't a strength for the Reds. Since the end of the Larkin era, they've gone with the average (Felipe Lopez) and the wish-I-were-average (Paul Janish), hitters who can't field stopgaps (Jeff Keppinger) and once-good-guys-past-their-sell-by-date (Alex Gonzalez, Orlando Cabrera). So yeah, at least the Reds aren't hurting you at shortstop, right? Then last year, they get all Reese Havens and come up with a 26-year-old rookie in Zack Cosart. Solid hitter, solid fielder. Good athlete. Bunts like he was born to do it.
|
Edgy MD May 20 2013 09:18 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
So, Ryan Ludwick is a decent player. Gives a good effort and such. But last year, he puts together one of his best years ever at 33. Good for him. The Reds, perhaps ill-advisedly, considering their limited resources, reward the Luddite with a two-year, $17.5 million contract and a third option year with a not-too-modest $4.5 million buyout guaranteed. He starts that contract off with an opening day slide that dislocates his shouder. He's possibly out for the season and likely compromised for the duration of his contract. That's what you get for being generous.
|
MFS62 May 20 2013 09:31 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
So, ...
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 20 2013 09:36 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
The Reds really are an interesting group. They're the team that really proved that the 2012 Mets were a fraud, or you know, not as good as they looked. Two series at CitiField where they took us apart, and that was that for 2012.
|
Edgy MD May 20 2013 09:41 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
Well, the Reds aren't particuarly lefty, for all their graces, but the ones that are --- Votto, Choo, and Bruce --- are dangerous eggs. But I imagine, you know, pretty damn near as dangerous against lefties as righties.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 20 2013 09:46 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
I don't trust Carson or Hawkins to keep the ball in the yard.
|
Frayed Knot May 20 2013 10:13 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
One interesting bench player for the Reds is Donald Lutz
|
Edgy MD May 20 2013 12:23 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
Yeah, I was getting to him. Lutz did his schoolboy days in Germany, and being the only American-born kid in his class had to have been die größte saugen.
|
Edgy MD May 20 2013 12:38 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
Mike Leake, played by William Devane in The Bad News Bears in Breaking Training, goes in game two against Jon Niese. Leake joined the rotation after Cueto's injury but is sticking around after three good starts (and one three inning boner before that). He's no fill-in though. An alum of the prestigious ASU baseball program, he became the first guy since Xavier Nady to go straight from amateur ball to the majors, if'n' you don't count a sting in the Arizona Fall League.
|
Edgy MD May 20 2013 12:47 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
Solid youngish vet Mat (one T) Latos (also one T) is who the Mets draw in game number three, and he's been solid-plus since Cueto went down, going 4-0 with a 2.91 ERA (which is good enough to get you to 4-0 with this lineup).
|
Edgy MD May 20 2013 01:19 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
|
Closer Aroldis Chapman is just a spectacle out there. In four big-league seasons, he's whiffed 12.8, 12.8, 15.4, and 14.2 batters per nine. So yeah, it's an achievement just putting the ball in play against him. He's a lean and wicked lefty, who brings the old four seamer at 96-101. Goodness gracious, you may say, but back in 2010, big league scouts claimed to have clocked him at 105. Which is GETHEFUCKOUTAHERE, you know?
|
Zvon May 20 2013 03:14 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
|
I wish it was a simple matter of trust. Great job Edge!
|
Chad Ochoseis May 20 2013 06:38 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
||
Not only does he pitch and steal, he also hits - career .272/.302/.348.
Howie in the bottom of the second: "Mesoraco might get into the game if he sees his shadow".
|
Edgy MD May 20 2013 08:22 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
Oh, poor Howie. Don't try standup.
|
MFS62 May 20 2013 09:31 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
Worth the wait.
|
Edgy MD May 22 2013 02:23 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
Well, I didn't deliver victory here.
|
HahnSolo May 22 2013 02:26 PM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
|
They do like playing in this Queens ballpark, don't they?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 23 2013 10:44 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
Belatedly: this was so much more and better and morebetter than this lifesucking series deserved.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 23 2013 10:47 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
||
Really. It's like the Mets are Jason Bay, and the Reds are the wall his head smashes into that turns into a humiliating inside-the-park home run. Or something.
|
Edgy MD May 23 2013 11:10 AM Re: Yeah, So the Reds |
So, who's got the Braves series?
|