Master Index of Archived Threads
Split from June 21 Schaefer thread
vtmet Jun 21 2013 10:19 PM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jun 21 2013 10:38 PM |
|
so...if Lagares didn't make that catch in CF in the 5th with the bases loaded; how different would the night have played out for Hefner? I didn't see the game, just the running box score, but...even with that play by Lagares, 2 doubles, 10 hits and a walk in 6 innings...maybe I'm missing why Hefner gets the most Schaefer POTG...would some of the other 2013 CFers have kept the score tied at 3-3? Dom Brown, who has decent speed was on 2nd; Ben Revere, who has excellent speed was on 1st (even with Howard on 3rd, that could have been a 3 RBI play for Ruiz)...
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/mets/p ... -in-center On edit...finally saw the replay of the play, it wasn't quite so spectacular...at least not as big of a deal as the online articles are making it out to be...
|
vtmet Jun 21 2013 10:20 PM Re: Schaefer POTG 6/21/13 - Mets 4, Phillies 3 |
I don't know the rules of the POTG...was commentary & quotes allowed? or is it just supposed to be a score card?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jun 21 2013 10:48 PM Re: Schaefer POTG 6/21/13 - Mets 4, Phillies 3 |
It was a great play, in which he had to run a LONG way to catch a very hard-hit liner; he just-- a la Beltran-- made it look very easy.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 22 2013 05:40 AM Re: Schaefer POTG 6/21/13 - Mets 4, Phillies 3 |
|
Yes, the POTG threads are just for votes; I paste the entire thread into a spreadsheet that tallies the votes, and non-voting posts make the whole process fall apart. You can make some comments in the same post with your votes, but if you do, please refrain from using numeric characters. (I've noticed that metsmarathon is aware of this rule, for which I'm grateful.) BAD: "I gave Wright 1 extra point for his catch in the 8th inning." GOOD: "I gave Wright one extra point for his catch in the eighth inning."
|
vtmet Jun 22 2013 05:45 AM Re: Split from June 21 Schaefer thread |
thanks for the explain...I don't usually participate in the POTG thread, so I didn't know about the rules...but after I posted, I kind of figured that there must have been one of those baseball unwritten rules (since there was no commentary at all in the other posts)...
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 22 2013 05:53 AM Re: Split from June 21 Schaefer thread |
No problem! The rules actually are written somewhere and posted on this forum, but it's been years and I'm not sure where to find them!
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 22 2013 05:54 AM Re: Split from June 21 Schaefer thread |
And I need to find them, I suppose, so I can update the link on this page.
|
vtmet Jun 22 2013 08:12 AM Re: Split from June 21 Schaefer thread |
|
thanks...didn't know that Pabst owns/owned Schaefer...by the way, that link to the Pabst page no longer works...and if you go to pabst.com, it requires you to type in your date of birth...is the site going to get you drunk just by viewing it? this link will get you to the Schaefer history page: http://www.schaefer-beer.com/history/default.aspx
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 22 2013 01:02 PM Re: Split from June 21 Schaefer thread |
Thanks for pointing that out.
|