Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


What Outfield?

batmagadanleadoff
Jul 14 2013 03:42 PM



Collins Credits His Outfielders for the Mets’ Revival


Left fielder Eric Young Jr., left, and right fielder Marlon Byrd have given the Mets a boost offensively
and defensively.



By ANDREW KEH
Published: July 13, 2013

PITTSBURGH — The Mets have recovered some since their disastrous start to the season, going 16-10 since June 16, baseball’s third-best record during that time. They began Saturday 40-49 over all, but they were considerably worse off a month ago.

From Manager Terry Collins’s perspective, improved play from his outfielders has been a major reason for the resurgence. Asked about the outfield over the winter, General Manager Sandy Alderson aptly characterized the team’s situation when he said jokingly, “What outfield?” But the group seems to be constructing a positive identity now.

Catching the ball has been a start.

“I truly believe one of the reasons we have played better is our defense has been very good out there,” Collins said.

Earlier this year, the Mets did not have much stability and were employing a carousel through the various outfield positions. They used players like Rick Ankiel, Collin Cowgill and Jordany Valdespin as center fielders. Only Valdespin has remained on the team, and his role has been minimized. Lucas Duda, a natural first baseman who has been a project as the team’s starting left fielder, has been on the disabled list since mid-June.

Now, Marlon Byrd has settled into right field. Collins lauded his defense, pointing out his team-leading six outfield assists through Friday.

Juan Lagares and Kirk Nieuwenhuis have split time as center fielders. Collins acknowledged the two were not producing big numbers at the plate, but he said their combined defense had made the team better.

And Eric Young Jr., who arrived via trade June 18, has added speed and aggressiveness to left field. Collins singled out a catch he made at AT&T Park during their series against the San Francisco Giants, when he hurtled into foul territory and scampered over the bullpen mounds to catch a pop fly.

“There’s not a lot of guys getting to that ball, let alone catch it in those conditions,” Collins said.

All that has given Collins some peace of mind.

“When they’ve hit the ball in the air to the outfield, we’ve caught it,” Collins said, “and all of a sudden, that’s one less out we’ve got to worry about. Earlier in the year, there were balls we weren’t getting to, balls that were dropping in, and now they’re not.”

Even more surprising has been the group’s contributions at the plate.

Young had 180 plate appearances for the Colorado Rockies before he was traded, and he produced a .242 average and .290 on-base percentage, scoring 22 runs and stealing 8 bases. For the Mets, he had had 111 plate appearances over 22 games through Friday, compiling a .296 batting average and .369 on-base percentage. He had scored 15 runs and stolen 7 bases. His speed has added a new dimension to the Mets’ lineup, which had lacked a traditional leadoff man.

Byrd has had a career revival, batting .263 with 15 home runs and 49 runs batted in through Friday. Collins said he did not know what to expect when the Mets signed him to a minor league deal this winter, but as he said Saturday, “Marlon’s been special.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/sport ... vival.html

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jul 14 2013 03:53 PM
Re: What Outfield?

Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jul 14 2013 03:59 PM

One whacky thing about how good Young's been is that it seems for a guy who's getting on as often as he is, he's been left on base way too much. Hoping that the inevitable correction in his BA/OBA is accompanied by rebound in RBI-ing by guys like Wright, Muffy and whoever we replace Ike Davis with.

Kirk and Lagares are about at the bottom range of what I'd consider the least acceptable offense for a center fielder, but they can go get it, and that's been a huge upgrade from the time when Valdy was our best defensive CF. Cowlick was terrible with the leather according to my exclusive Eyewitness Defense stats.

Mex17
Jul 14 2013 03:53 PM
Re: What Outfield?

I think Young is a keeper, and I am willing to see if Lagares and/or Nieuwenhuis can develop at the plate (while batting them lower in the order so as to not rely on them that much) while covering ground in CF. That just leaves one spot left to fill.

Edgy MD
Jul 14 2013 04:04 PM
Re: What Outfield?

We could be looking at Puello in the second half of the season. Maybe den Dekker too.

Mex17
Jul 14 2013 04:41 PM
Re: What Outfield?

Edgy MD wrote:
We could be looking at Puello in the second half of the season. Maybe den Dekker too.


Puello isn't drawing many walks despite his high OBP (I think that some HBPs are padding that), so that is a bit of a concern of mine about him. Then there is the whole Biogenesis cloud hanging over him.

Has den Dekker even played yet?

Ashie62
Jul 14 2013 04:52 PM
Re: What Outfield?

Young is doing well at being Mr. Slappy from the left side. That has been has problem...Is this correction for real? hope so

Mex17
Jul 14 2013 04:57 PM
Re: What Outfield?

Ashie62 wrote:
Young is doing well at being Mr. Slappy from the left side. That has been has problem...Is this correction for real? hope so


He is getting consistent ABs for the first time in his career. That matters.

Edgy MD
Jul 14 2013 05:16 PM
Re: What Outfield?

Mex17 wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
We could be looking at Puello in the second half of the season. Maybe den Dekker too.


Puello isn't drawing many walks despite his high OBP (I think that some HBPs are padding that), so that is a bit of a concern of mine about him. Then there is the whole Biogenesis cloud hanging over him.

Has den Dekker even played yet?

I'm certainly not arguing that Puello is a complete and obvious answer (or arguing for him at all). But among a field of imperfect solutions, he's one that the team (reportedly) might take a look at in the second half.

Den Dekker has been in action a month --- two weeks in St. Lucie and two in Las Vegas. He hit for average and no power in the former, and power but no average in the latter.