Master Index of Archived Threads


Rudolph v. Santa

Edgy DC Dec 23 2005 08:12 AM

Direct from the old CPF Litigation Sub-Forum.

Johnny Dickshot Dec 23 2005 08:23 AM

That's pretty goshdarn funny

ScarletKnight41 Dec 23 2005 08:26 AM

Thank you Edgy - I had feared we had lost that one in the cyber tsunami. I hat Santa and those smug reindeer....

Rockin' Doc Dec 23 2005 08:35 AM

The classics never grow old. Great thread. Ultimately, Rudolph was no more successful at stopping Christmas than was the Grinch. I guess you just can't mess with the jolly old fat man. Rudolph was fortunate to have such strong legal representation, otherwise Santa might have had stewed venison for his pre-flight meal. It's too bad they were never able to work out a peaceable resolution to their labor dispute.

cooby Dec 23 2005 09:30 AM

Who the heck has Pacific down comforters as an avatar?

Elster88 Dec 23 2005 07:35 PM

]To assist him in his efforts, Prancer has agreed to lead the team, and will insert a high-powered flashlight in his rectum and fly backwards. I'm dying here.

Centerfield Dec 28 2005 02:05 PM

Wow...that thread was fun.

MFS62 Dec 28 2005 02:27 PM

I guess you can consider Rudolph's nose a "deformity". If so, then his agent Scott Boras will make sure he gets special parking priveleges. And if anyone is discriminating agsinst him at work, he has grounds to appeal to the EEOC in Washington and sue for compensatory damages. Stay tuned. This will be prime programming on Court TV for quite a while. Later

Vic Sage Feb 02 2006 04:59 PM

ah... misty, water-colored memories of the way we were...

MFS62 Feb 02 2006 07:43 PM

"standard sleigh insurance policies specifically deny coverage for rides utilizing rectally-enhanced, backward flying reindeer." That is one of the best lines I've read since I've been here. Might be the best. Thank you, CF, for that line. And thank you, Edgy, for bringing this classic thread back to us. Later