Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

batmagadanleadoff
Aug 30 2013 08:50 AM

Mets great Tom Seaver reacts to Matt Harvey's injury by saying today's pitchers are being babied
With that, the Mets’ greatest pitcher, with three Cy Young Awards and 311 victories, who averaged 265 innings his first 13 years in the big leagues, cited the examples of all his Hall of Fame pitching cohorts in the ’60s and ’70s as guys who got to Cooperstown, without incident, because they just pitched.


Mets legend Tom Seaver says pitchers of his generation just went out and pitched.

When word of Matt Harvey’s partially torn ulnar collateral ligament reached the mountaintop in the Calistoga, Calif., wine country the other day, the still one-and-only Mets “Franchise” shook his head and let out a sigh.

“That’s all I could do,” Tom Seaver said of the player touted to be the next “Franchise.”

“Naturally, I felt terrible for the kid. He’s got such a bright future. But at the same time, all I could think of was how it just goes to show how all this babying of pitchers — pitch counts and innings limits — is a bunch of nonsense. You can’t predict these things, and there’s really not a whole lot you can do to prevent them other than refining your mechanics as (’60s and ’70s Mets pitching coach) Rube (Walker) did with us. But one way I know doesn’t do anything to prevent them is babying these kids like they do.”

With that, the Mets’ greatest pitcher, with three Cy Young Awards and 311 victories, who averaged 265 innings his first 13 years in the big leagues, cited the examples of all his Hall of Fame pitching cohorts in the ’60s and ’70s — Juan Marichal, Steve Carlton, Ferguson Jenkins, Jim Palmer, even Warren Spahn, who was still logging nearly 260 innings in 1963 when he was 42 — as guys who got to Cooperstown, without incident, because they just pitched.

“Take a look at all of them, Marichal, Jenkins, Spahn, what do you think made them successful?” Seaver asked. “They conditioned their arms by pitching more, not less, starting from when they signed their first contract. Jenkins threw 300 or more innings half a dozen (actually five) times. Same with Palmer, Carlton and Marichal. I keep going back to that (July 2, 1963) Marichal-Spahn game when they both pitched 16 innings and threw almost 500 pitches between them.

“Neither one of them had any adverse aftereffects from it.”

RELATED: WRIGHT LOOKS TO RETURN THIS YEAR, SET COURSE FOR '14

By contrast, as Seaver noted, so many of today’s top young pitchers — Washington’s Stephen Strasburg and Jordan Zimmermann, the Blue Jays’ Kyle Drabek, the Orioles’ Dylan Bundy, the Twins’ Scott Baker, the Braves’ Brandon Beachy and the Yankees’ Joba Chamberlain and Manny Banuelos, to name just a few prime products of the modern pitch-count, innings-limit era — ended up blowing out their elbows anyway and getting Tommy John surgery.

The problem, said Seaver, is that pitchers today are treated like robots, with too much emphasis on how many pitches they might have in their arms instead of weighing the determination and competitive spirit they have in their minds and hearts.

“These kids today, they want to be men, they want to be foxhole guys, but they’re not being allowed to do that,” Seaver said. “Imagine if these computer geeks who are running baseball now were allowed to run a war? They’d be telling our soldiers: ‘That’s enough. You’ve fired too many bullets from your rifle this week!’ ”

he old “Franchise” was really getting worked up now as he spoke by phone from his vineyard atop Diamond Mountain in Calistoga. He acknowledged that in Harvey’s case, the Mets didn’t go overboard in the babying and did let him be “the man” this year, going deep into games. (“They did all the right things with him. It’s nobody’s fault this happened. It just did.”) But he hopes this will not scare the Mets into putting more stringent innings limits on their other top pitching prospects, Noah Syndergaard and Rafael Montero.

“There is no set numerical value you can put on a pitcher,” Seaver said. “They’re all different.

“What’s important is to get into the pitcher's head, to know what he’s made of.

“I guarantee most of these pitchers today would like to realize their full potential and pitch more.

Unfortunately, this is what the game has come to and sadly there’s no turning back.”

Another loud sigh could be heard at the other end of the phone.

So how, he was asked, does one explain how Harvey, who certainly has the competitive heart and bulldog approach Seaver and all the others had back in the ’60s and ’70s, not to mention the good mechanics Walker emphasized, still got hurt?

“It’s gotta be genetic,” Seaver said. “He’s a great competitor and the Mets let him pitch to his potential.

“Look, I don’t blame these organizations for what they’re doing with pitchers. There’s just too much damn money in the game now.

“But it’s the wrong approach. I can only speak from experience.”

Some 4,783 innings of it.


http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseb ... -1.1441192

Benjamin Grimm
Aug 30 2013 09:06 AM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

He sounds like a grumpy old man, but I agree with him.

seawolf17
Aug 30 2013 09:25 AM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
He sounds like a grumpy old man, but I agree with him.

Completely. The problem is that when managers/organizations try to do this, pitchers get hurt anyway, and then managers get blamed (See "Baker, Dusty"). We've gone too far and there's no "right" way to do it any more.

metsguyinmichigan
Aug 30 2013 09:27 AM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

Tom -- bowing my head reverently -- lists the great Hall of Fame pitchers from the 1960s and 1970s, but what we don't know are if there are other pitchers who would have joined that group had they been "babied" and not been injured in the pre-Tommy John era.

That said, Tom looks great. I think he looked heavy in the Shea Farewell photos. Working in the vineyard must be slimming. Also hoping that our hero is recovering from his health problems. Was nice seeing him at the All-Star Game!

Ceetar
Aug 30 2013 09:38 AM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

Those guys are Hall of Famers in part because they're lucky/exceptions to the rule. Not the other way around.

He's right that "THERE IS NO BOOK!" as Ron Darling said, and that innings limits aren't particularly effective at keeping guys healthy. He's also right that conditioning your muscles to throw a certain amount, whether that's 150 pitches or 75, is probably more important than the actual number. But to then single out guys that beat the odds as having some special quality of workout or commitment to excellence is the silly part.

When we figure out what genes make stronger capsules and ligaments, and 16 year old kids get preemptive Tommy John to implant the super-ligament, will that be considered a form of PEDs? What about when someone replaces their shoulder joints with hi-quality terminator-style cybernetics?

Zvon
Aug 30 2013 12:30 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

I think the problems of todays pitchers can also be attributed to the restrictions put on kids as they play the game growing up. Used to be you'd pitch until you couldn't and those that still could ended up with pretty strong arms. Now there are 12 yr old kids on pitch counts. Now I'm not saying thats a bad thing. But you could say they are being babied at every level. And it most certainly could be a factor in the conditioning of todays pitchers.

metsmarathon
Aug 30 2013 12:34 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

well, i htink one of hte things that's indirectly captured in citing hte hall of famers is that, if you do let your pitchers just pitch and throw 300 innings a year, you'll end up getting a hell of a lot more value out of hte healthy ones than you would if you limited them, and would get seemingly no benefit from limiting them. and, for those pitchers who would break down anyways, you'd still get no benefit from limiting them. and then there's the argument that limiting them is damaging them moreso than unlimiting them, and that by unlimiting your pitchers you would be encouraging them to have better mechanics and perhaps be better pitchers instead of just harder throwers, and you'd see benefit there as well.

metsmarathon
Aug 30 2013 12:41 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

i tend to think that you need to treat starting pitches like you would distance runners (and perhaps relievers/closers as sprinters).

the only way to run long is to train long.

Frayed Knot
Aug 30 2013 12:49 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Aug 30 2013 01:04 PM

[Seaver] cited the examples of all his Hall of Fame pitching cohorts in the ’60s and ’70s — Juan Marichal, Steve Carlton, Ferguson Jenkins, Jim Palmer, even Warren Spahn ...


I notice he leaves out Koufax, who threw his last pitch at age 30, and Drysdale who was 31, just to name a few who don't fit in that preconceived box. Also Marichal, cited in the 'tough guy' list above, was effectively finished as a top pitcher by age 33.

Doesn't mean Tom (and others) aren't right about certain things in this no-easy-answers topic. But the use of selective evidence to prove the point is maybe more prevalent here than in most other arguments.
Oh, and how did Gary Gentry's career pan out?

Ceetar
Aug 30 2013 01:04 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

metsmarathon wrote:
i tend to think that you need to treat starting pitches like you would distance runners (and perhaps relievers/closers as sprinters).

the only way to run long is to train long.


or weight lifting maybe. I agree. I don't know that they aren't doing this though, i'm no expert.

I know from my experiences with exercising that some days your muscles hurt more or strain more easily. One day is not the same as the next. Will a pitcher only throw 80 pitches on a day he can feel his body straining? or will he muscle through it to damaging results? And the days his muscles are loose and warm and he can throw 130 with ease...will he? They talk about watching a guy for changes in mechanics, but do they really? tight 6th inning one run game runner on second, 1 out, guys tiring and ends up altering his mechanics slightly for 10-15 pitches to get out of it..a pitching coach is really going to go out there and make him change? Or are they going out there to give him a breather, hoping that'll get his arm back where it belongs and going back to the dugout praying he doesn't twist his wrist a little toooo much while tired?

Frayed Knot
Aug 30 2013 01:06 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

The funniest statement from the whole article may be Seaver saying: "There’s just too much damn money in the game now."
I think he may have stolen that line from M. Donald Grant.

Edgy MD
Aug 30 2013 02:27 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

My dad just threw my brothers and me in the ocean to teach me to swim. He also never gave shit if I buckled my seatbelt. Secondhand smoke? He sucked long drags and then exhaled as he kissed us goodnight. Look at me. I'm fine.

Really, you want to argue that pitchers are better off today or pitchers were better off in the sixties, I'm all ears. But bring some data, because "It worked for me!" isn't too convincing.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Aug 30 2013 04:20 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

"Hell, it worked for me!"

-Survivors of the H.M.S. Titanic, on the ship's lifeboats

d'Kong76
Aug 30 2013 07:11 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

Seaver and Namath should go take a soak together.
Clyde's still the coolest, always will be.

RealityChuck
Aug 30 2013 08:09 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

The truth, as usual, is somewhere in between. There is something to the argument that the more you pitch, the stronger your arm gets, and pitchers are facing fewer batters. It's interesting that last year's leader in batters faced, Justin Verlander, wouldn't have made the top ten in 1969. (Seaver didn't even make the top ten that year and he still faced more batters than Verlander last year).

Of course, that was the era of four-man rotations, too. But most teams managed and I don't recall a lot of pitchers with abrupt ends to their careers. It was news when Koufax retired because it was so unusual (and Koufax's problem was arthritis, not any stress or muscle issue).

Do we have any comparison about the number of arm injuries that would have required Tommy John surgery prior to 1971? I'm seeing 30% of pitchers have had it nowadays. Did 30% of pitchers blow out their arms in the old days? I don't remember it happening that often (obviously, prior to 1971, what TJ surgery can easily fix today would have ended a career).

OTOH, pitching is different; you were expected to pace yourself as a pitcher and not throw every pitch as hard as you could. Now, you have to hit 90 on every fastball. and get a wicked break on every curve. That increases the strain.

My feeling is that the caution and innings limits may have little effect on a pitcher's career. But there's no way to see, since if a team tried it, the second guessers would be all over them even if they were successful and, of course, the shitstrom would be intense if a player were injured.

Frayed Knot
Aug 30 2013 08:34 PM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

RealityChuck wrote:
OTOH, pitching is different; you were expected to pace yourself as a pitcher and not throw every pitch as hard as you could. Now, you have to hit 90 on every fastball. and get a wicked break on every curve. That increases the strain.


That's a big factor which usually goes unmentioned much of the time this topic is brought up.

One of the things those pitchers didn't have to contend with was today's 6' 2"/215 lb middle infielders who can take a pitcher out of the park the other way. This isn't to say that yesterday's 5' 10"/170 guys could have been just anyone off the street, but they were often the size of the average guy off the street and the worst they could do to you most of the time was poke a single through a hole. I've heard Seaver himself talk about picking out the batters he could "rest" on while saving his best stuff for the two or three really dangerous hitters in the lineup. Today's pitcher doesn't have that advantage (or at least not as big a one) as very few lineups today are carrying hitters whose only job is to bunt, hit behind the runner, and play defense.

Ashie62
Aug 31 2013 09:14 AM
Re: The Franchise: "Baby, Baby, Stick Your Head in Gravy"

Sometimes it just comes down to luck. The human body was not designed for the torque involved in pitching.