Master Index of Archived Threads
Who's Next
Terry Collins | 18 votes |
Manny Acta | 0 votes |
Bobby Valentine | 1 votes |
Chip Hale | 0 votes |
Bob Geren | 0 votes |
Wally Backman | 1 votes |
Charlie Manuel | 0 votes |
Willie Randolph | 0 votes |
Ozzie Guillen | 0 votes |
Bob Melvin | 0 votes |
Ron Gardenhire | 2 votes |
Joe McEwing | 0 votes |
Dan Warthen | 0 votes |
Joe Torre | 0 votes |
Tim Bogar | 0 votes |
Pedro Lopez (B-Mets manager) | 0 votes |
Ryan Ellis (St Lucie manager) | 0 votes |
Tim Teufel | 0 votes |
Other current MLB manager (name) | 1 votes |
Other -- not a current MLB manager (name) | 2 votes |
John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 04 2013 08:35 AM |
I'm going to name all my threads after Who albums and songs from now on.
|
Edgy MD Sep 04 2013 08:44 AM Re: Who's Next |
Pedro Lopez is your Eastern League Manager of the Year.
|
Mets Guy in Michigan Sep 04 2013 08:44 AM Re: Who's Next Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Sep 04 2013 09:56 AM |
I do think Terry's coming back. He kept the team afloat for a long time, and now he's lost every one of his best players to injury or trade. I don't see how they can hold that against him. I don't think they give him a long-term deal. But a two-year extension? I can see that.
|
Ceetar Sep 04 2013 08:48 AM Re: Who's Next |
I went with Backman, I feel like it's the inertia choice. I don't like it though.
|
Edgy MD Sep 04 2013 08:57 AM Re: Who's Next |
I tell youse this: If Terra Cotta gets retained, then we could be in for a coupla dramatic offseason of personnel moves. If he gets replaced, it could be a way of representing a change of course for the team without otherwise doing high-impact offseason investing.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 04 2013 08:58 AM Re: Who's Next |
I'm really fascinated by this question if you couldn't tell.
|
TransMonk Sep 04 2013 09:37 AM Re: Who's Next |
|
I agree completely with this. However, I don't think the team is there yet and Terry will be re-signed.
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 04 2013 09:41 AM Re: Who's Next |
I think it will be Terry, probably a two-year deal, no option year.
|
HahnSolo Sep 04 2013 09:47 AM Re: Who's Next |
Listening to Sandy yesterday, I'm not so sure Terry is going to be back. Before yesterday I was thinking it was about 80/20 in Terry's favor. Now I think it is closer to 50/50.
|
Ceetar Sep 04 2013 09:50 AM Re: Who's Next |
the hint might be the rumor that Warthen will stick. (unless it's baseless anyway) It seems more like that Terry stays or someone/Backman is promoted from the system to manage, because a new guy would presumably at least be included in the retaining of the coaches discussion right?
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 04 2013 09:52 AM Re: Who's Next |
|
If they bring in a veteran manager, he'd more likely be allowed to have a say in who his coaches are. If it's a rookie manager, I think he takes the staff that he's given.
|
Zvon Sep 04 2013 10:09 AM Re: Who's Next |
Terry for two!
|
Ceetar Sep 04 2013 10:36 AM Re: Who's Next |
||
Perhaps. I don't know if that's how it should be though. If you're hiring a guy to be leader, you should let him choose who works under him, no matter if he's a veteran or a rookie. If you're going to micro-manage a little bit and direct 'how' you want your manager to manage (i.e. stick with this pitching/hitting coaches game plan, work with it) then maybe just stick with Collins.
|
themetfairy Sep 04 2013 10:54 AM Re: Who's Next |
I picked Bobby. Not because I really think he'll be the manager, but he's always high on my managerial wish list.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 04 2013 11:09 AM Re: Who's Next |
It's unfortunate but you have to think his stint in Boston was so damaging to the Bobby V brand it may not recover in time for him to be named a big-league manager again -- at least this soon.
|
Edgy MD Sep 04 2013 11:38 AM Re: Who's Next |
It's a shame (and less than American) that paying players and managers in stock is unallowed by MLB. It used to be a great model of upward mobility. Marquee player --> Manager --> Minority Owner --> Controlling Owner. Charlie Comiskey took that route. Clark Griffith, Cap Anson, and Connie Mack, too.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Sep 04 2013 05:58 PM Re: Who's Next |
"I've always been a big fan of I've-got-money-on-this as a job motivator."
|
Frayed Knot Sep 12 2013 07:48 AM Re: Who's Next |
Mike Puma sez: Collins "all but guaranteed" to return as NYM manager. Doesn't make any guesses as to how long a contract.
|
Centerfield Sep 12 2013 07:55 AM Re: Who's Next |
Terry Collins is my third favorite manager since I've been watching the Mets (behind Bobby, then Davey). So chances are whoever they bring in would likely not be as good. So I'm fine with bringing back Terry.
|
Centerfield Sep 12 2013 07:56 AM Re: Who's Next |
As far as predictions, I think TC will be back for the reasons stated above. Everyone thought Terry would be a transition guy until the team is competitive again. I think they realize the team is not there yet. So, back comes Terry.
|
Edgy MD Sep 12 2013 07:57 AM Re: Who's Next |
I briefly saw in passing that Pedro Lopez has joined the staff as a September coach. ("Run that ball out, September!" "¡Apoyarse en ella, Septiembre!" "I want to see some hustle, you lazy, good-for-nothing, autumnal lunar cycle!")
|
metirish Sep 12 2013 07:58 AM Re: Who's Next |
|
I tend to agree, but damn, that would be five years of Terry? I do want to see what he could do with a team expected to win.....problem is when the hell will that be?
|
MFS62 Sep 12 2013 08:03 AM Re: Who's Next |
Not only would I NOT bring TC back, but I'd find that book he carries around (that says you should remove relievers even after they've gotten a batter out) and burn it. (I think it was written by Tony LaRussa)
|
Ceetar Sep 12 2013 08:13 AM Re: Who's Next |
|
I think more that they've decided as transitional as he was intended to be, they like him as a manager and see no reason to replace him. I disagree, I'd always look for something better, but we could also do a lot worse.
|
Vic Sage Sep 12 2013 08:18 AM Re: Who's Next |
i think TC is an adequate steward for these transitional (i.e., sucky) years, but i have no confidence in him steering a good team to a post-season. If Harvey is going to be out all of next year, then there is no point in bringing in a hired gun, or even anointing an heir apparent. So i see him getting one more year, with an option that doesn't get picked up, before they go with someone else.
|
HahnSolo Sep 12 2013 08:19 AM Re: Who's Next |
|
Gary and Ron talked about this last night or the night before. Wally did not get the call this year. Ron implied that management was displeased with comments about Davis when he was first sent down, and that has a lot to do with him not being called up. [I don't specifically recall what Backman said; I think I read somewhere that he thought most of Ike's problems were in his head...I can't imagine that alone would aggravate the front office that much]
|
Edgy MD Sep 12 2013 08:22 AM Re: Who's Next |
I think, whatever he said, the fact that Davis hit like a superhero while in the PCL has got to be worth something. And coming back to the bigs, if nothing else, without his absolutely crippling penchant for chasing junk at his ankles, that was good too.
|
MFS62 Sep 12 2013 08:32 AM Re: Who's Next |
|
I heard one of those Baseball Tonight talking heads say that it is possible. Later
|
Ceetar Sep 12 2013 08:42 AM Re: Who's Next |
|
Yes but..perhaps that was Lopez's influence? I know managers generally get credit/blame for everything, but the organization would probably have a better idea on who/what was responsible. If I recall, a lot of it was to stop having 17 people telling Ike was he needed to do so there's every chance that they sent him to Vegas with the instruction to only talk hitting with one specific person (which could've been Wally) and he's the one getting the credit internally.
|
metirish Sep 12 2013 08:49 AM Re: Who's Next |
Most of us think Terry is coming back......
|
Edgy MD Sep 12 2013 09:04 AM Re: Who's Next |
||
I don't know who get's credit or blame --- ultimately the player himself gets the lion's share. But as Lopez is the manager of Binghamton, he'd be about 47th on my list of who to credit. Seriously.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Sep 12 2013 10:19 AM Re: Who's Next |
I think the fact that Ike hit like a maniac in the PCL may just mean that hitting in the PCL generally goes a lot easier than it does in the minors.
|
Mets – Willets Point Sep 12 2013 12:42 PM Re: Who's Next |
I want someone to venture out and name all their thread titles after songs by Zappa or The Fugs.
|
Ashie62 Sep 12 2013 05:26 PM Re: Who's Next |
Mike Scioscia
|
bmfc1 Sep 12 2013 06:39 PM Re: Who's Next |
Mike Scioscia, but I'd be thrilled with anybody except the return of Shorty McBunty. The GM said that he wanted the Mets to finish strong--I hope he watched the week. I know that the Mets are shorthanded without Wright but that's no excuse for getting one hit and three hit within three games. We always hear "the Mets play hard for Terry" but there has been no evidence of this of late. It's time for him to go.
|
Frayed Knot Sep 12 2013 06:44 PM Re: Who's Next |
For folks who hate bunting, I don't think Scioscia is your guy. In fact, I know he's not.
|
bmfc1 Sep 12 2013 06:47 PM Re: Who's Next |
He bunts with that lineup? Ugh. Thanks for the information. Someone's getting fired in Anaheim--either Scoscia or DiPoto.
|
Frayed Knot Sep 12 2013 07:48 PM Re: Who's Next |
All I know is that whenever I see the Angels play it seems to me that they're constantly giving away outs on the bases (bunts, sacs, overly-aggressive base-running, etc.) and this isn't just a recent thing.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 12 2013 08:14 PM Re: Who's Next |
I don't think Scioscia is realistic for us, and way too 1970s NLish. I was gonna write in Joe Maddon, who I want to fire from Tampa as a result of that team's constipation when it should have been easy to dump shovelfuls of dirt on the MFYs grave; but now you guys have me excited for Ron Gardenhire.
|
Edgy MD Sep 12 2013 08:24 PM Re: Who's Next |
If Rhon Wright has anything to say about it, it'll be McEwing.
|
d'Kong76 Sep 12 2013 08:27 PM Re: Who's Next |
Chris Rock
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Sep 12 2013 09:17 PM Re: Who's Next |
I would swallow a quart of bath salts and murder a Floridian to get Joe Maddon here.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 23 2013 01:41 PM Re: Who's Next |
Sandy and Terry reportedly set to have powwow this week in Cincy. Presumed that an extension will be under discussion but what, for the purposes of this argument, would you anticipate happening if Terry turns heel and says, "Thanks for the offer, but I'm outta here!"
|
Benjamin Grimm Sep 23 2013 01:47 PM Re: Who's Next |
If it's not Terry (and I think it will be) then my backup guess is Wally.
|
HahnSolo Sep 23 2013 01:52 PM Re: Who's Next |
If it's a health thing and they need to replace Terry, I think they'd go with Geren.
|
Ashie62 Sep 23 2013 02:22 PM Re: Who's Next |
It kinda sux the way Terry is being strung along....Either hire or fire....
|
Edgy MD Sep 23 2013 03:06 PM Re: Who's Next |
He's not being strung along. Plenty of guys (including dudes like Joe Torre!) take the team home without a contract. And nothing about Terry's performance suggests he's deserving of something more.
|
Edgy MD Sep 23 2013 04:06 PM Re: Who's Next |
|
And just like that, Adam of the Rubin reports that Backman is expected back, man.
So much for reading anything into Backs not joining the staff in September.
|
Ceetar Sep 24 2013 10:18 AM Re: Who's Next |
||
well, you can still read into it if you like. Alderson saying "We still want to keep Backman around" is pretty much the least he can say. And the wording, if that's Alderson's, about 'major league staff' is the interesting part. That seems like the carrot to keep Wally happy about 'upward mobility'. Or, it could be Sandy hinting that he's the successor should things not work out with Collins. Or hell, it could be a hint that they're not happy with Geren.
|
metirish Sep 24 2013 10:36 AM Re: Who's Next |
Bob Melvin in retrospect......
|
Edgy MD Sep 24 2013 01:03 PM Re: Who's Next |
|||
But it's not the least he can say. He said they expect to keep him around and are optimistic that he'll return. In saying that he's an option for the big league staff, whether or not there's an opening, does in fact, provide very strong evidence against concluding, based on his not joining the staff for September, that he's not expected to return, which is the notion to which I was referring.
|
Zvon Sep 24 2013 03:25 PM Re: Who's Next |
Backman needs a little seasoning. Lil bit. And this is a test. If he threatens to leave or actually leaves as a result I wouldn't want him at the helm in the future anyway. If he can stay the course he will be a Met manager someday. He may be fortunate enough to be given a contending team when he does take over. I don't think I'd really want to see him managing these Mets. For his own sake as well as ours.
|
Ashie62 Sep 24 2013 07:41 PM Re: Who's Next |
|
Since they said about three weeks ago he would be back..Id call it stringing him along
|
Edgy MD Sep 24 2013 08:06 PM Re: Who's Next |
I don't recall them saying any such thing. If they had, this wouldn't be an issue.
|