Master Index of Archived Threads
2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy
Benjamin Grimm Mar 10 2014 01:47 PM |
It was moderately popular last year, so we'll try it again this year. IPP stands for Individual Player Predictions. These will be threads where we share our expectations of how a player will perform in the current year. Feel free to make your predictions as specific or as vague as you like. (You can find a listing of the 2013 IPPs here.)
|
Edgy MD Mar 10 2014 02:50 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
If he walks more, it'd be hard not give him a contract extension. He's otherwise pretty predictable from year to year, injuries aside, and it's only the lack of walks that is the difference between him being an asset and him being an asset for a good team.
|
Ceetar Mar 10 2014 03:48 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
.290/.330/.434 14 home runs. solid enough defense.
|
duan Mar 10 2014 04:33 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
I'd be thinking he should lead off against Righties (.344 obp vs RHP), and Chris Young (.363 opb vs LHP) should against Lefties and get ourselves more Juan Lageres in Centrefield.
|
smg58 Mar 10 2014 05:09 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
He'll do something close to his .290/.333/.424 career numbers. Won't get extended or traded.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 10 2014 05:30 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
Unless he goes in a more explosive Spring Training Blockbuster than even I am imagining, his year will look exactly like the back of his baseball card.
|
Ashie62 Mar 10 2014 07:06 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
Last season and this season will be his career years....
|
Zvon Mar 10 2014 07:24 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
If he stays healthy (50-50):
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Mar 10 2014 07:25 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
|
I kinda like this idea. I mean, I don't think it'll happen, but I like it. I'm feeling like SMG and JCL. I mean, if anything, his walk rate's been in steady, small decline. Unless he and Duda pull some sort of bizarre, road-trip '80s-movie body-switch thing that teaches both to be a little more like the other, I don't see that changing. 141 G, 602 PA, .292/.320/.418, 80 R, 12 HR, 63 RBI, 46 XBH, 12 SB, 5% walk rate or thereabouts
|
d'Kong76 Mar 11 2014 12:53 AM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
Agree that what we've seen is what we'll get vibe.
|
MFS62 Mar 11 2014 03:33 AM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
.290, 50 XBH. You know, the usual.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 20 2014 01:53 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
Muffy is injured for the second time this spring.
|
Edgy MD Mar 20 2014 01:56 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
Yeah. One wonders if this is the year he stumbles, Ikelike,through mystery injuries --- where "we're gonna sit him for two days; he wants to get out there and if this were September, he would be, but we want to be safe" turns into 11 weeks of headscratching.
|
sharpie Mar 20 2014 03:14 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
I think we might be seeing a fair amount of Eric Young at second base.
|
batmagadanleadoff Dec 05 2014 04:34 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
Here's the Baseball Prospectus entry from its 2014 annual, released just before last season began:
|
Vic Sage Dec 05 2014 04:50 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
|
2014= .289/9hr/37dbl with 39 BBs (which is his career average). very close to Grimm's projections, but just a hair short. and considering his career avg = .290/10/40, its a shade short of those numbers, too. And his .332 OPB isn't an improvement, nor does his .734 OPS quite match his career .752. In other words, his numbers this season were pretty consistent with his career to date. And if he were a good middle IFer (or a decent catcher or a GG-quality CFer), this would be perfectly good offensive production. But for a below-average 2bman, they're just fair and nothing to get excited about. so i agree totally with the Baseball Prospectus pre-season analysis and, despite his all star appearance, nothing changed this year.
|
Edgy MD Dec 05 2014 04:54 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
I'm just trying to figure who the other players in this "abundance" of decent hitters forced into tougher positions are?
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Dec 05 2014 05:04 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
|
'Spin, way back when? Matt Reynolds? Campbell, potentially?
|
Edgy MD Dec 05 2014 05:09 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
Valdespin was more like Alfonso Soriano, I think. Some guys you try to arrest their fall down the defensive spectrum. Some guys, you try to force their ascension up it.
|
batmagadanleadoff Dec 05 2014 05:19 PM Re: 2014 IPP: Daniel Murphy |
|
Duda, obviously. Though yeah, Duda alone doesn't constitute an abundance, even if Duda in the outfield was such an egregious miscalculation of matching skills to position. Here's BP's take on Duda in the outfield, excerpted from the team comment, rather than from the player comment section: Duda, "if there is a merciful god, will never be forced to play in the outfield again. It was like watching an eager but uncoordinated puppy trying to play catch with a Frisbee sized for a St. Bernard."
|