Master Index of Archived Threads
Ike to Pittsburgh!!
Frayed Knot Apr 18 2014 04:48 PM |
So sez Heyman.
|
themetfairy Apr 18 2014 04:53 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
SNY said that Pittsburgh will send us pitching prospect Zack Thornton and a PTBNL.
|
metirish Apr 18 2014 05:00 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Wow, just saw it now on SNY,,,,,
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 18 2014 05:21 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Those K/9 numbers is tasty. Unlike most guys who start out as minor-league relievers, he seems to have gotten better as he's progressed through the system (peep the dropping walk rate).
|
Frayed Knot Apr 18 2014 05:24 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Was Thorton the guy the Mets were asking for but Pitt was balking on for a theoretical Ike trade over the winter?
|
Frayed Knot Apr 18 2014 05:34 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
K/BB are nice ... ~4.5/1 H/IP is nice ... <1/per HR/G is ridonculous ... ~1 every 20 innings and the worst ERA year was when in the hitting-happy California League (Stockon was his home park)
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 18 2014 05:38 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
So much depends
|
Frayed Knot Apr 18 2014 05:46 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
No, it was Nick Kingham I was thinking of. Gary drops the hint that the PtbNL in this deal is the "more significant" of the two.
|
Ashie62 Apr 18 2014 05:55 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
A bag of balls thus far...
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 18 2014 05:57 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
LWFS prospect-boner status: RAGING
|
TransMonk Apr 18 2014 06:03 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
d'Kong76 Apr 18 2014 06:11 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I'm guessing once someone says it everyone is saying
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 18 2014 06:19 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
It sure as hell isn't Polanco or Taillon, and probably isn't Taillons-in-waiting Kingham or Glasnow.
|
Ashie62 Apr 18 2014 06:21 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Taillon just had Tommy John...
|
Ashie62 Apr 18 2014 06:22 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
You may be very on the money with SS Hanson...
|
Frayed Knot Apr 18 2014 06:26 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
Looking forward to your scouting report on him.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 18 2014 06:30 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
The PTBNL designation at this point in the year really lends itself to a you-guys-pick-from-one-of-these-fungible-outfielders kinda situation, doesn't it?
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 18 2014 06:31 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
It's always shocking to see Ashie with a negative opinion of a player.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 18 2014 06:36 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
I would think so, thus making the speculation that someone* knows the ptbnl is someone significant. *and then two dozen others who 'follow' someone
|
Ashie62 Apr 18 2014 06:38 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Interesting that Pittsburgh took a shot on Florida Lefty slugger Gaby Sanchez who had a big year but ended up in the minors a year later and takes on Ike as a similar project..
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 18 2014 06:40 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I'd rather see this player named sooner instead of later, if only to sate my curiosity.
|
Ashie62 Apr 18 2014 06:41 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
I always look for the positive... In fact.. the Mets have so many young live arms they could go after a HR bashing type guy..
|
Zvon Apr 18 2014 06:41 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Just found out. Kinda shocked. Don't know if I like it or not. We'll see who this ptbnl is.
|
RealityChuck Apr 18 2014 06:43 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Who in Pittsburgh is on the DL or has a no-trade clause and plays short?
|
Ashie62 Apr 18 2014 06:47 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I want to know and I want to know now....
|
metirish Apr 18 2014 07:00 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Gary just reiterated that the player to be named later is the more significant part in this deal. has that ever been the case?
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 18 2014 07:02 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I think it can be when it's a player selected in the prior draft before a year has passed. Another scenario is giving the Mets time to select among several guys etc etc.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 18 2014 07:16 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I forgot that it isn't yet June.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 18 2014 07:33 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I was thinking draft picks were six months ... but maybe it's a full year.
|
Edgy MD Apr 18 2014 07:51 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Our Zack facktor is getting noticeably high.
|
MFS62 Apr 18 2014 08:44 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
That Thornton was eligible for the Rule V draft, and nobody drafted him (when many teams are looking for lefty relievers with good K/BB ratios) doesn't give me a warm and fuzzy. But the old baseball adage is that lefties take longer to develop. So maybe he can be good. Time will tell.
|
Mex17 Apr 19 2014 06:14 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I think the PTBNL candidates are:
|
Mex17 Apr 19 2014 06:21 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
. . .or Glasnow, who is currently on the 7-day DL. Maybe that is the reason why he cannot be named yet.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 19 2014 06:31 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Kingham is the guy the Mets were supposedly after during ST but were rebuffed by Pitt - so it's probably not him.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 19 2014 06:43 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Matt Cerrone at MetsBlog chimes in with "the buzz from Citi Field is that the player coming from the Pirates is likely a player they drafted with a top pick last June" -- Go nuts folks -- which does make sense in that it would prevent the choice from being named (at least officially) until early June.
|
Vic Sage Apr 19 2014 06:58 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
thornton is a rightie
|
Edgy MD Apr 19 2014 08:09 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
Stop with the details. I'm sure he could throw with his left arm if he wanted to.
One of the scenarios I'm juggling is that the PtBNL is a possible shortstop still to come to the Pirates from another deal. Meanwhile, Didi Gregorius hit a walkoff homer last night to give the Reno Aces a 10-7 win over your Las Vegas 51s.
|
Mets Guy in Michigan Apr 19 2014 08:24 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Do you think this move frees up some money to finally sign Stephen Drew? The Mets can't be thrilled with Tejada.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 19 2014 08:47 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
No. First of all Ike's money wasn't all that much ($3 and change?) to the point where it's going to make or break something like this. Plus I don't believe Drew's non-signing was about not having the money as much as it was about Sandy's feeling that Drew simply isn't worth what he's asking for ($20 mil over 2 at minimum and a draft pick to boot). That every other team seems to feel the same way only strengthens that view.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 19 2014 11:24 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Gotta like the subtlety of the front page headline in the Snooze:
|
Mex17 Apr 19 2014 02:33 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
I do not think that "significant player" or "top pick" would describe someone who was picked outside of the first round or who is outside of mlb.com's top 100 prospect list. And, with d'Arnaud and Plawecki already in the fold, I also do not think that Alderson is looking for another catching prospect such as Reese McGuire. I do however think that he would be looking for another outfield prospect, especially one with line drive type power and enough speed to cover a lot of ground in the CitiField outfield (two qualities that seem to describe this Austin Meadows kid based on what I am reading). I think that we have identified our man.
|
Edgy MD Apr 19 2014 03:14 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Wait, where are we getting "significant player"?
|
Mex17 Apr 19 2014 03:25 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
https://twitter.com/JonHeymanCBS/status ... 4485180416
|
Frayed Knot Apr 19 2014 03:38 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Yeah, I think we're in danger of grasping here.
|
MFS62 Apr 19 2014 04:17 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
Then I'm not as optimistic. Thanks. Later
|
Ashie62 Apr 19 2014 04:54 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Austin Meadows is toolsy....
|
Mex17 Apr 19 2014 04:57 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
We can quibble over what a "top pick" means and over what a fair return for Ike will be, but, given the stadium that the Mets play in, I would argue that the need for line drive hitters and outfielders who can cover ground will be pretty persistent going forward.
|
Ashie62 Apr 19 2014 05:12 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
Frayed Knot Apr 19 2014 06:09 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
||
Line drive hitters who can cover ground will ALWAYS be a need. So are catchers. What I'm saying is that your conclusion that it's Meadows based on the idea that Sandy would go after an outfield prospect but not a catcher is flawed on account of it being based on the current roster while ignoring the fact that a HS draft pick from 2013 is unlikely to even see the majors until at least 2017 and who knows what the roster will look like then. It also kind of assumes that Pittsburgh gave Sandy an either/or choice.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 19 2014 07:32 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Ike, btw, 2-for-3 plus a walk and 2 runs scored tonight in Steeltown.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 19 2014 11:17 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
It's certainly not Meadows. But it could be someone like Jacoby Jones (good baseball name, no?) or Barrett Barnes (good '40s reporter name, no?) or someone else with some potential who's a little ways away. I mean, the best counterpoint is... well, look what they gave up last year for a quarter-season of Byrd and Buck, right?
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 20 2014 02:47 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
The Ikeman Goeth
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 20 2014 02:56 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
41% of respondents in this poll taken after Ike's rookie 2010 season thought that Ike's career would mostly resemble Keith Hernandez's among the choices given:
|
Frayed Knot Apr 20 2014 07:30 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
99 percent* of respondents to polls like this one have a tendency to link players based on largely superficial traits (the more similarities the better: in this case white, LHB, 1B, Mets) and therefore reach the conclusion that B is destined to be the next A, whereas a more logical exam wouldn't see all that many similarities between Ike and Mex. It's like in the NBA where white players can only be compared to other white ones and black to black. Or where Domincan short stops are rarely said to resemble a white American one. Which isn't to say that I'm claiming to have foreseen how Ike's career arc would develop, it's just that I wouldn't for a minute have compared him to Hernandez. * unofficial statistic
|
Zvon Apr 20 2014 03:34 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
Look at that 'lil extra hitch. The bring-back would be the same if not for that 'lil extra hitch which many claim to be Ike main problem.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 21 2014 06:32 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Ike Davis: Grand Slams in April 2014 = 2
|
Frayed Knot Apr 22 2014 06:18 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
It just occurred to me that Ike got dealt from a team wearing a Ralph Kiner patch to a team wearing a Ralph Kiner patch.
|
metirish Apr 22 2014 06:19 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
fuck wow...
|
Edgy MD Apr 22 2014 06:49 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I'd like to build my house in a Kiner patch.
|
vtmet Apr 22 2014 10:44 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I realize that Ike underachieved...but as a Mets fan, I think that they traded the wrong first baseman...
|
vtmet Apr 22 2014 10:45 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
and traded from the PNC knockoff, to the real PNC...
|
Ashie62 Apr 25 2014 11:58 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
What did we get for Ike?
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 25 2014 12:02 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
We're still waiting for that other shoe to drop.
|
Edgy MD Apr 25 2014 12:04 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Patience, paduan.
|
Ashie62 Apr 25 2014 12:11 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
okie dokie
|
Frayed Knot Apr 29 2014 03:01 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Since the deal
|
Edgy MD Apr 29 2014 07:36 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Well, that ruins THAT letter to Mom.
|
Edgy MD Jun 06 2014 12:33 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
I'm guessing that the whole PtBNL-will-arrive-after-the-draft is merely unconfirmed speculation, but I'm teeing this thread up now.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jun 06 2014 12:34 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
He'll have to change the spelling of his first name. I'll accept "Alan" or "Allen" but not "Alen".
|
Ceetar Jun 06 2014 12:55 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
Is it one year after draft, or one year after contract is signed? we might have a few weeks yet.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 06 2014 12:58 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Signed!
|
Ashie62 Jun 06 2014 04:26 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Oops, thought we got a player.
|
Frayed Knot Jun 06 2014 04:53 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
We [u:16xwvzfm]WILL[/u:16xwvzfm] get a player. His identity just hasn't been revealed yet.
|
Ashie62 Jun 07 2014 11:41 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Will we get a better player if they take d'Arnaud???
|
Edgy MD Jun 07 2014 01:40 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Ashie Quits! Film at 11!
|
Ashie62 Jun 07 2014 07:19 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Since when!!!
|
Frayed Knot Jul 09 2014 07:15 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Trade Update:
|
Edgy MD Jul 09 2014 07:59 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Lucas Duda since the trade: 66 G, .251 / .349 / .474 // .824, 10 HR.
|
Centerfield Jul 09 2014 09:21 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
That's cool. I think that the knight in Indiana Jones would say we chose wisely.
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 09 2014 09:23 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
Thanks for letting me know. I'm guessing it's just 2014 stats? I've recently had to switch to a new source of in-season data, and maybe something went awry there. I'll take a look.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Jul 09 2014 11:53 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
You really can't go wrong choosing the simpler one that looks like it just might give you splinters.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Jul 09 2014 09:25 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
|
Benjamin Grimm Jul 10 2014 06:12 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
||
This has been fixed now. Thanks again for alerting me about it.
|
Frayed Knot Aug 27 2014 07:24 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Time to re-visit this thread again, especially since both Ike & Lucas have been in the news lately
|
Edgy MD Aug 27 2014 07:28 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Ike totally will end up as a Yankee next year --- start off pinch-hitting and defensive replacing. Then an injury will force him into the lineup where a run of warm weather and short-porch feasting will give him a solid four-to-six weeks, with Yankee fans a-gloating, before he Overbays back to earth.
|
HahnSolo Aug 27 2014 08:37 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
So you're saying that their regular first baseman has a problem staying on the field?
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Aug 27 2014 09:10 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
|
Future MFYs by % Certainty Matt Harvey 96 Ike Davis 77 Jose Reyes 76 Curtis Granderson 70 Carlos Gomez 68 Daniel Murphy 63 Lucas Duda 60 Jon Niese 57 Carlos Torres 56 Dillon Gee 53 Bartolo Colon 50 Travis dArnaud 48 Zack Wheeler 42 Josh Edgin 40 Juan Lagares 37 Jacob deGrom 36 Ruben Tejada 35 Brandon Nimmo 25 Anthony Recker 22 David Wright 3
|
Edgy MD Aug 27 2014 09:34 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Andrew Brown sits at about 81, I think.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Aug 27 2014 09:55 AM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
It's a complicated formula.
|
sharpie Aug 27 2014 01:11 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Ike started and homered again today.
|
sharpie Aug 27 2014 01:45 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Shoulda added Chris Young to the MFY list as he signed a minor league deal with them today.
|
G-Fafif Aug 27 2014 01:49 PM Re: Ike to Pittsburgh!! |
Angel Pagan 52
|