Master Index of Archived Threads
The Mets PR Nightmare
Centerfield Apr 23 2014 08:06 AM |
Jay Horowitz has been fired. You've been placed in charge. Because of your sterling (no pun intended) record, the Wilpons have given you broad discretion. How do you fix the Mets' image?
|
Ceetar Apr 23 2014 08:32 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
None of that. (and most of it's not my job anyway)
|
Vic Sage Apr 23 2014 09:35 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
|
all of that. plus i wouldn't let Ceetar into the stadium.
|
Gwreck Apr 23 2014 09:36 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
#5 is your best point, and exactly what should be done. That's what the director of media relations should be doing.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 23 2014 09:40 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
I honestly don't care about numbers 1 and 2, although I understand that a lot of people do.
|
Edgy MD Apr 23 2014 09:43 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
What if it's true? What if the entire front office thought Justin Turner was a lazy and problematic little gnome. You wish nobody had leaked the existence of the leadership team's consensus disposition, but if pinned down on it, you'd have to lie out loud to deny it. WHAT THEN?!!
|
Vic Sage Apr 23 2014 09:49 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
deny it anyway. deny, deny, deny.
|
Ceetar Apr 23 2014 09:57 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
doesn't matter who you have as a PR guy, those leaks are going to happen. There are roughly 6 billion reporters in the clubhouse all trying to fill space and they all are badgering any employee they can get their hands on to slap a "sources familiar" label on and use the tamest of quotes to make a story out of.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 23 2014 10:02 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
|
You can't start a post like that!!
|
Edgy MD Apr 23 2014 10:12 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
Yeah, seriously. You've got to spell the guy's name right.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 23 2014 10:27 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
|
themetfairy Apr 23 2014 10:35 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
What 5) boils down to is that the Mets should have their players' backs in public, no matter what goes on behind closed doors.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 23 2014 10:41 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
I believe the Mets last year (or maybe last month, I forget) hired someone who looked like could be Jay's successor. I really think the issue isn't the PR per se but the way the entire organization works: We've heard it a million times before but the Mets have a squirrely bullshitty corporate culture with loose boundaries on people's areas of accountability and purview, which allows the COO to act as an assistant general manager or spokesman when it suits him, or vice-versa, with an overarching motivation not to accomplish things but to appear to be accomplishing things.
|
Mets Guy in Michigan Apr 23 2014 12:14 PM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
Jay Horowitz has been fired. You've been placed in charge. Because of your sterling (no pun intended) record, the Wilpons have given you broad discretion. How do you fix the Mets' image?
|
Ceetar Apr 23 2014 12:18 PM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
|
I wonder if Jay's most important job is serving as scapegoat for all this crap.
|
TheOldMole Apr 24 2014 06:13 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
I have a problem with 3. I think it's OK for players to be quirky, uncouth and weird. If that rule were in effect, Dennis Rodman would never be able to play for the Mets.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 24 2014 06:56 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
As Gary mentioned the other night, this club's policy* is essentially the twitter version of 'don't walk this guy but don't give him anything good to hit either'; aka: We want our players to use social media we just want them to be careful when doing so.
|
Edgy MD Apr 24 2014 07:09 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
|
Good point. We're getting killed on the offensive glass.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 24 2014 05:41 PM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
||
And forget about the in with scary-drunk Las Vegans, and the connection to the North Korean talent pipeline.
|
Vic Sage Apr 25 2014 01:50 PM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
|
i don't know that this is true at all. teams have rules about dress codes, facial hair, and all sorts of public comportment. The team has given the player a public profile by giving them a job in MLB; if the player uses that platform in a way that reflects badly on the organization, i'm not sure at all they couldn't require them to forego social media while they are a member of that team (or whatever subsection of that time period they may choose), at least in any way that specifically identifies the player. Perhaps there is a contractual right in the CBA to either do (or stop teams from prohibiting) this (either specifically or in relation to the team's control over marketing, and branding, and dilution of their trademark, etc), but i don't see why its necessarily one way or the other. There are legitimate arguments both ways.
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 25 2014 02:59 PM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
||
I don't know what the CBA says about social media either, but if the CBA's silent on that, eventually some team is gonna ban either a specific player, or the whole team from using it. It's inevitable that in time, some player is going to use social media to create some national shitstorm by doing something outrageous and unjustifiable --- something that crosses every single boundary of what is reasonable -- something that would disturb even the most tolerant people. Then we'll see what happens.
|
Edgy MD Apr 25 2014 05:36 PM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
I don't think he's saying that the team can't institute such a policy, but rather that Jay Horwitz in his current role can't.
|
Mets Guy in Michigan Apr 25 2014 08:28 PM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
The team spokesman certainly cannot.
|
batmagadanleadoff Apr 25 2014 10:18 PM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
|
I'd bet that a team could impose all of those bans, so long as they don't violate the CBA. Teams may choose not to, for fear of, I dunno, alienating potential free agents. But that's another story. I know that teams already ban managers from writing books about the team, at least while the manager's still managing. This has been SOP for many years. Perhaps teams ban their active players from writing team or season accounts as well, without explicit permission from the team (i.e., a waiver of the ban depending on the circumstances). Preventing someone from writing a book as a condition of employment is not unusual. Public figures do this all the time with their domestic help, underlings and other slaves. I don't know what the CBA says about social media, but players aren't free to do whatever they want when the game's over. There are road curfews and off-limit joints and restricted activity clauses in their contracts that might prevent a player from riding a motorcycle or playing touch football, even in January, just to give a few examples.
|
TheOldMole Apr 26 2014 03:27 AM Re: The Mets PR Nightmare |
I'm not saying a team can't impose all sorts of behavior and deportment rules, dress codes, etc., imp just saying that they shouldn't. Why go out of your way to make a team boring? According to Mookie, the current Mets are trying to sweep the 86 Mets and their bad boy image under the rug. And remember what Casey Stengel said about milkshake drinkers.
|