Master Index of Archived Threads
New York Times Baseball Map
Edgy MD Apr 24 2014 07:59 AM |
||||||||||||||||
Find out the alleged fan allegiances by zip code:
It's a shame the map only lists three teams for each zone --- and in every region east of the Mississippi, I imagine that'll be the Yankees, the Sox, and the next closest team. But outliers are where the fun is. Anyhow, it's a good time to hold onto your stock.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 24 2014 08:02 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
I get:
|
Ceetar Apr 24 2014 08:03 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
as before, Facebook likes is a stupid way to do this. 15% of Turner Field's zip is Yankees fans. yeah. sure it is.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 24 2014 08:05 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
Can someone provide a link?
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Apr 24 2014 08:06 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014 ... l-map.html
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 24 2014 08:30 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
By drifting my mouse pointer over the Long Island part of the map, it seems that 11554, East Meadow NY, is the most Metly zip code, at 30 per cent. The zip code I grew up in, 11788 (Hauppauge) is 58 per cent Evil Empire, 25 per cent Mets, 6 per cent Red Sox. Things have changed; when I was a kid just about everyone was a Mets fan. The few Yankee fans in the neighborhood were anomalies. We had Tom Seaver, they had Mel Stottlemyre.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 24 2014 08:33 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
10566=
|
TransMonk Apr 24 2014 08:50 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
This doesn't seems accurate. Looking at zips in my area of Wisconsin, the Brewers are listed first at about 66=ish%, then the Cubs and then the Red Sox. The Red Sox? Twins or White Sox maybe...I'd even believe the Cardinals, but I don't know any Red Sox fans.
|
metsmarathon Apr 24 2014 08:57 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
07871
|
Ceetar Apr 24 2014 09:14 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
If you're an out of state fan, you're more likely to pay attention if your team is good.
|
themetfairy Apr 24 2014 09:43 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
In the vortex I'm horribly outnumbered -
|
metsmarathon Apr 24 2014 11:12 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
also, a facebook "like" is forever, or at least until you "un-like" (or should it be "de-like"?) that thing. it's not so much a map of current baseball "likes", but, to a somewhat greater extent, represents a cumulative historical map of baseball "likes", covering, like, the past 5-8 years i guess.
|
TransMonk Apr 24 2014 11:15 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
I missed the Facebook connection. Makes much more sense.
|
metsmarathon Apr 24 2014 11:28 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
also, and importantly, it is quite clear from my interactions with and observations of mets fans, that a great number of them, possibly even a majority of them, do not actually like their team.
|
Edgy MD Apr 24 2014 11:58 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
|
Especially underscores the Red Sox transcendence, as they are the most successful team during the FB era. If you are an otherwise baseball-indifferent young adult that went to college during the aughts, "like"-ing the Sox means fondly recalling those celebratory nights at the Farthingminster Canteen and SWEEET CAROLINE DUH! DUH! DUH! OMIGODILUVYOUGUYS!! perhaps more than it means a deep-seated devotion to all things Rico Petrocelli.
|
G-Fafif Apr 24 2014 04:55 PM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
The Red Sox "outlike" the Mets in the Polo Grounds Zip Code, for crissake (10-7; MFYs 60). And it's 61-14-4 (MFY-Mets-Sox) where Ebbets Field stood.
|
G-Fafif Apr 24 2014 05:35 PM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
|
Bellmore gets it up to 33% Mets, which is as high as I've been able to find. As far as geographic outliers, I found a few Zips in Delaware and Vermont where the Mets come in third (with like 3%). A little Pa. action as well in that regard. But w/o having gone through the whole USA, it doesn't seem as if there's a hidden hotbed of Mets fans outside the tri-state by this metric. Checked Fresno, Virginia Beach, Las Vegas, St. Lucie -- anywhere where you'd think there might be some idiosyncratic reason to remain beholden to the Mets. Nada. I live in 58-25 territory. Sadly, I could've guessed that.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Apr 24 2014 05:39 PM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
My life in embattled fandom.
|
Ashie62 Apr 24 2014 06:28 PM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
|
Same here in 07054
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 24 2014 08:29 PM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
I did see the Mets coming in third in a couple of zip codes along Florida's East Coast.
|
G-Fafif Apr 25 2014 12:05 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
|
Palm Bay, Fla., you are a tertiary bastion of good taste! (Not all that close to PSL, but we'll take fellow travelers where we can get them.)
|
Edgy MD Apr 28 2014 07:39 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
I find four counties going for the White Sox over the Cubs, but zero going for the Athletics over the Giants.
|
Gwreck Apr 28 2014 10:18 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
I saw 5 White Sox-dominant counties: Will, Kankakee, Lake (IN), Porter (IN) and Newton (IN)>
|
Edgy MD Apr 28 2014 10:27 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
I re-checked and found two more outposts in Ventura Nation.
|
TransMonk Apr 28 2014 11:16 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
I'm surprised by the Yankee wasteland that is most of Virginia and North Carolina. Seems like a great breeding ground for Nats fans.
|
Benjamin Grimm Apr 28 2014 11:20 AM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
If any teams relocate in the near future (Tampa Bay? Oakland?) I think that Charlotte, North Carolina may be one of the best available destinations. (Tennessee is another.)
|
G-Fafif Apr 28 2014 03:07 PM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
We're No. 1 at being No. 2 in a whole bunch of places, according to the Times's second-place map.
|
bmfc1 Apr 29 2014 02:02 PM Re: New York Times Baseball Map |
Outnumbered:
|