Master Index of Archived Threads
lookout!
Nymr83 May 07 2014 08:23 AM |
Dopey fan not even watching as line drive barely misses his head.
|
seawolf17 May 07 2014 08:28 AM Re: lookout! |
Holy moley. Two inches and that guy is dead.
|
Ceetar May 07 2014 08:37 AM Re: lookout! |
Put down your phone and pay attention!
|
d'Kong76 May 07 2014 10:11 AM Re: lookout! |
I've often said that I'm surprised more people aren't
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 07 2014 10:16 AM Re: lookout! |
If you sit along the lines on field level especially, you have to watch every pitch.
|
Frayed Knot May 07 2014 10:26 AM Re: lookout! |
There were three people in that shot who absolutely were not looking--the two where the ball went right between their necks and the one in the blue hat two rows back-- and they were three of the four most likely victims. Everyone who wasn't likely to get smoked at least were paying attention enough to react.
|
Edgy MD May 07 2014 10:38 AM Re: lookout! |
That's the problem. The netting will go up after someone gets killed. Latter day stadia have placed the seats so much closer to the plate.
|
Ceetar May 07 2014 11:05 AM Re: lookout! |
|
eternally inept offense against the Marlins. That's your purgatory. Why did you drag me down here too?
|
Edgy MD May 07 2014 11:10 AM Re: lookout! |
Blame Barfield.
|
Nymr83 May 07 2014 11:19 AM Re: lookout! |
||
I don't think someone getting hurt is the problem. I think the rest of us losing out on the superior "no nets" stadium experience because some shmuck cant pay attention is the problem. Seriously, go sit somewhere else.
|
Frayed Knot May 07 2014 11:29 AM Re: lookout! |
Well, of course nets and barriers exist now, the question will be if and how far to extend them beyond the current behind the plate area.
|
Edgy MD May 07 2014 11:44 AM Re: lookout! |
|||
I understand the libertarian worldview, but I was paying full attention and with all my relatively healthy faculties and the maneuverability of sitting in an aisle seat in a mostly empty stadium, it is still a matter of pure luck that leaves me here talking to you right now. At some level, a host bears some legal responsibility for the safety of a guest. You don't know the soup you're in until you're in it. "The rest of us" would not miss out on much of anything, as netting would likely not encircle the stadium, but rather likely be two triangles of netting extending down from the top of the screen behind home plate to a point about 100-125 feet down the baselines, were the netting would meet the rail. And we don't have a "no nets" stadium experience right now.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr May 07 2014 11:52 AM Re: lookout! |
Maybe you could just have the stadium PA play "EV-RY-BO-DY WATCH THE FIELD! [clapclapclapclap...]" every thirty seconds or so.
|
Nymr83 May 07 2014 11:56 AM Re: lookout! |
|
Amazing.
|
seawolf17 May 07 2014 11:57 AM Re: lookout! |
If only there was some organized activity going on on the field that people could watch!
|
batmagadanleadoff May 07 2014 11:57 AM Re: lookout! |
Someone'll have to get killed before they start extending those nets. $$$$ and risk-reward and cost of lawsuits all that jazz. I'm surprised no one's gotten killed yet, and that's what ML is saying to itself: 100+ years of baseball and no one's ever gotten killed yet. But those seats right at the edge of the netting are dangerous. There, you should never take your eye off of the play.
|
Edgy MD May 07 2014 12:12 PM Re: lookout! |
I imagine folks have gotten killed.
|
Ceetar May 07 2014 12:19 PM Re: lookout! |
|
those ball-related ones are probably people lunching for balls...over the edge of the upper deck.
|
Benjamin Grimm May 07 2014 12:22 PM Re: lookout! |
It's not reasonable to expect every fan to pay attention to every pitch. The score may be 10 to 0 and you're chatting with your friend. You may be helping your kid put mustard on his hot dog. Or paying the vendor for your beer. Or reading the "fun facts" on the scoreboard. Or any number of things.
|
seawolf17 May 07 2014 12:31 PM Re: lookout! |
||
Still probably the scariest thing I've ever seen in person.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket May 07 2014 12:35 PM Re: lookout! |
|||
I'm surprised you survived that fall.
|
Mets – Willets Point May 07 2014 12:37 PM Re: lookout! |
At a Norfolk Tides game in the 1990s I saw a foul ball go straight back, hit the front of the upper deck, and ricochet into the back of a spectator's head on the lower level. There was blood and the fan was taken away by paramedics. Can't imagine how it could have been avoided even by the most attentive fan.
|
Zvon May 07 2014 02:52 PM Re: lookout! |
Couldn't they use a seamless plexi-glass kind of design in place of all netting set ups?
|
Benjamin Grimm May 07 2014 02:59 PM Re: lookout! |
It would be so smudged with handprints and noseprints and glare. I think a fine-mesh screen is better.
|
Frayed Knot May 07 2014 03:33 PM Re: lookout! |
Yeah, I don't think of plexiglass as any better to look through than netting. I've sat behind the netting the NHL started putting up a decade or so ago to guard the higher seats behind the goals following the death of that fan, and you don't even notice it. Since your eyes are focused for the distance of the ice, the nearer netting simply 'disappears' in the same way your thumb does if you put it up at arm's length in front of your face but focus on the scene in the middle distance.
|
Gwreck May 07 2014 04:01 PM Re: lookout! |
How about doing NOTHING. 5 ball-related fatalities from 1900 to 2003? Sounds like there's essentially no problem at all. Certainly no need to start putting up screens or some other nonsense.
|
Frayed Knot May 07 2014 05:27 PM Re: lookout! |
There wasn't a problem in the NHL either until that girl was killed. And fine print disclaimers only go so far legally and even less far from a public relations pov.
|
Frayed Knot May 21 2014 10:06 AM Re: lookout! |
Young boy plunked in the head off a vicious, sliced foul by Carlos Gomez yesterday in Atlanta.
|
Fman99 May 21 2014 10:24 AM Re: lookout! |
|
I like any gal who's willing to go lunching for balls.
|