Master Index of Archived Threads
The Most Valuable Man in the History of Baseball was a Met
batmagadanleadoff Jul 29 2014 10:48 AM |
|
Nate Silver at 538 approximates WAR for GM's.
If anyone doubts the positive correlation between winning percentage and payroll, look here: [fimg=533]http://espnfivethirtyeight.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/morris-feature-beane-1.png?w=863&h=690[/fimg] Teams above and to the left of the line (A's) win more with less. Teams below and to the right of the line (Mets) spend more than most but win less than most. [fimg=533]http://espnfivethirtyeight.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/morris-feature-beane-41.png?w=863&h=680[/fimg] How little bang do the Mets get for their buck? [fimg=533]http://espnfivethirtyeight.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/morris-feature-beane-51.png?w=863&h=1119[/fimg] [fimg=533]http://espnfivethirtyeight.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/morris-feature-beane-31.png?w=863&h=1193[/fimg] http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/bil ... eane/#fn-4
|
Edgy MD Jul 29 2014 11:03 AM Re: The Most Valuable Man in the History of Baseball was a M |
It's hard to distinguish how much of a GM's performance is his own and how much is the talent around him. How much of Bobby Cox's success was Leo Mazzone and how much was the pitchers Leo was putting in place.
|