Master Index of Archived Threads


Split from See You in April David 1

d'Kong76 Sep 11 2014 12:13 PM Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Sep 15 2014 09:23 AM

d'Kong76 wrote: There was no way he was not getting signed and for big big money.... ....Just my opinion, and please refrain from telling me to fuck off or call me names because we disagree. Thanks in advance. There, I discussed it. Sheesh.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 11 2014 03:17 PM Re: See you in April David

d'Kong76 wrote: I think that that, more than anything else, is why Wright was re-signed -- because the Wilpons didn't have the stomach for the shitstorm that would've ensued, There was no way he was not getting signed and for big big money. You lose(t) all credibility when you keep singing the same tune in every, single, *yawn* thread. Just my opinion, and please refrain from telling me to fuck off or call me names because we disagree. Thanks in advance. You haven't addressed a hate filled post to me in about six days. I was beginning to wonder if you were comatose or something. Anyway, if you wanna challenge me and refute anything I write about (and I know that you do) you should at least, you know, challenge me. Because this ----> d'Kong76 wrote: There was no way [Wright] was not getting signed and for big big money. You lose.... sounds like you're agreeing with me. I don't know what the fuck this is supposed to mean, and how it's supposed to be a putdown of my earlier post. And then the rest of your post just degenerates into more stupidity. Losing credibility? And every single thread? I'd ask you to clarify but, really, why bother. Everything you write on this forum is dumb, mindless and not worth re-reading. You should, like, take a couple of deep breaths whenever you read one of my posts. Walk around the block. Take a nap and then come back to it tomorrow. I'm pretty sure your anger will have mellowed. Gee, imagine that. In this Mets post-Madoff era, someone has the nerve to criticize something about the Wilpons and the Mets. Jackass.

d'Kong76 Sep 11 2014 03:22 PM Re: See you in April David

Your lack of self restraint is hysterical.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 11 2014 03:25 PM Split from the David Wright Thread

d'Kong76 wrote: Your lack of self restraint is hysterical. That's priceless. You write senseless and unprovoked mean-spirited posts to me, and then on top of that, I'm also the bad guy because I respond.

Vic Sage Sep 11 2014 03:26 PM Re: See you in April David

sounds like you're agreeing with me. I don't know what the fuck this is supposed to mean, and how it's supposed to be a putdown of my earlier post. And then the rest of your post just degenerates into more stupidity. Losing credibility? And every single thread? I'd ask you to clarify but, really, why bother. Everything you write on this forum is dumb, mindless and not worth re-reading. You should, like, take a couple of deep breaths whenever you read one of my posts. Walk around the block. Take a nap and then come back to it tomorrow. I'm pretty sure your anger will have mellowed. Jackass. Mags, while i often agree with your posts, you are being a complete tool, and so i offer the following unsolicited advice... stop it.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 11 2014 03:30 PM Re: See you in April David

Vic Sage wrote: Mags, while i often agree with your posts, you are being a complete tool, and so i offer the following unsolicited advice... stop it. Often? Just often?

d'Kong76 Sep 11 2014 03:40 PM Re: See you in April David

batmagadanleadoff wrote: That's priceless. You write senseless and unprovoked mean-spirited posts to me, and then on top of that, I'm also the bad guy because I respond. There's something wrong with you. I disagreed with you and asked you not to curse me out and call me names, and then you did just that. Whatever.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 11 2014 03:49 PM Re: See you in April David

d'Kong76 wrote: batmagadanleadoff wrote: That's priceless. You write senseless and unprovoked mean-spirited posts to me, and then on top of that, I'm also the bad guy because I respond. There's something wrong with you. I disagreed with you and asked you not to curse me out and call me names, and then you did just that. Whatever. I have no idea what you're getting at. I lose credibility because I think it was dumb to re-sign Wright? How? I complain about the Wright deal in every thread? Show me. Your opinion that the Wright re-signing was inevitable undermines my opinion on that deal. Explain that one. You don't like how I answered your post? Why don't you review the history of posts you've written to me, the dozens and dozens of posts where you essentially tell me to go fuck myself without even bothering to even pretend to use the Mets as a premise to attack me. Not that I'm losing any sleep over this. But I do notice after a couple of years. I'm sure you can figure out why I respond to you the way I do.

d'Kong76 Sep 11 2014 03:54 PM Re: See you in April David

It was the "the Wilpons didn't have the stomach for the shitstorm that would've ensued" thing. You strum the same guitar on every issue. I was just sayin'. The anger, and looking to be a martyr thing, is old too.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 12 2014 08:42 AM Re: See you in April David

d'Kong76 wrote: It was the "the Wilpons didn't have the stomach for the shitstorm that would've ensued" thing. You strum the same guitar on every issue. I was just sayin'. The anger, and looking to be a martyr thing, is old too. If this were an isolated incident, you'd be mostly right. And I'd be way out of line. But it's not an isolated incident. This is the only kind of post you ever write to me: a challenge coupled with some gratuitous insult. Often, just the insult. You see my name on a post, and you're itching to confront me before you even bother to read and understand the post. And this has been going on since the Mets were still playing in Shea Stadium. And your new explanation still makes no sense to me. That the Wilpons didn't want to stomach backlash from a Wright trade undermines my post and my credibility? How? You're just scrambling and backpedaling to try and put some sense in a senseless post that you wrote out of anger.

d'Kong76 Sep 12 2014 09:04 AM Re: See you in April David

So let's leave it alone, 'cause we can't see eye to eye There ain't no good guy, there ain't no bad guy There's only you and me and we just disagree Ooh-hoo-hoo, oh-oh-ho

Edgy MD Sep 12 2014 09:07 AM Re: See you in April David

batmagadanleadoff wrote: d'Kong76 wrote: Your lack of self restraint is hysterical. That's priceless. You write senseless and unprovoked mean-spirited posts to me, and then on top of that, I'm also the bad guy because I respond. Please stop playing the provocateur/martyr game. Please. We're not dumb and we're not children.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 12 2014 09:14 AM Re: See you in April David

Edgy MD wrote: batmagadanleadoff wrote: d'Kong76 wrote: Your lack of self restraint is hysterical. That's priceless. You write senseless and unprovoked mean-spirited posts to me, and then on top of that, I'm also the bad guy because I respond. Please stop playing the provocateur/martyr game. Please. We're not dumb and we're not children. This might be the funniest thing I've ever read on this forum. The Zeus King of the Martyrs tells me to stop acting like a martyr. Did you get personally offended again reading this exchange that doesn't involve you? Or did someone stick words into your mouth when you weren't looking?

Edgy MD Sep 12 2014 09:15 AM Re: See you in April David

No, it isn't the funniest thing you've ever read on the forum. Not interested in your name calling act either. Please try to act like a decent person. I'm just the moderator. And a lack of moderation is why I have to be involved. Do you understand?

batmagadanleadoff Sep 12 2014 09:20 AM Spit

Edgy MD wrote: No, it isn't the funniest thing you've ever read on the forum. Not interested in your name calling act either. Please try to act like a decent person. I'm just the moderator. And a lack of moderation is why I have to be involved. Do you understand? Oh that's even better. The guy that writes 30 post a day ... the guy that's an expert on everything .... in every thread ... is also a moderator. No conflict there. What do you moderate? Just me?

d'Kong76 Sep 12 2014 09:41 AM Re: See you in April David

Since we've changed venues... batmagadanleadoff wrote: That the Wilpons didn't want to stomach backlash from a Wright trade undermines my post and my credibility? How? You're just scrambling and backpedaling to try and put some sense in a senseless post that you wrote out of anger. I'm not angry and wasn't yesterday. My point, and perhaps it's a silly point, is that you sound like a broken record with the Wilpon thing. There are no ownership fans here, but Jeebus man, you're obsessed over them. When you play a broken record over and over and over, yes, it lessens the message and it's credibility.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 14 2014 09:42 AM Re: Split from the David Wright Thread

d'Kong76 wrote: Since we've changed venues... batmagadanleadoff wrote: That the Wilpons didn't want to stomach backlash from a Wright trade undermines my post and my credibility? How? You're just scrambling and backpedaling to try and put some sense in a senseless post that you wrote out of anger. I'm not angry and wasn't yesterday. My point, and perhaps it's a silly point, is that you sound like a broken record with the Wilpon thing. There are no ownership fans here, but Jeebus man, you're obsessed over them. When you play a broken record over and over and over, yes, it lessens the message and it's credibility. But that's the point. It's always something and you've always got some problem with me. All the time. You don't like when I criticize the owners. And you probably don't like it when I don't criticize the owners. You've been a total, total dick to me from day one. And granted, this was a very mild post of yours that I responded to, but only compared to most of your other posts -- what kind of response were you expecting from me, given this history? This is just the tip of the iceberg. I won't even get into all of the times you come after me without even bothering to use the Mets as a premise to do so. You write me a post that's confrontational even though it's illogical, and then on top of that, you put in there write that I've lost credibility. How did you think I was gonna react to a post like that coming from you? And the post still makes no sense, even after you then wrote three or four more follow up explanatory posts. I mean, whether or not the Wilpons are bad owners, or whether or not the Wright re-signing was sound, all rests on my credibility? What does my credibility have to do with any of this stuff? I'm posting opinions, and links to written articles. How do I lose credibility by criticizing the owners? And wouldn't the opposite be true? Wouldn't someone who's always praising or defending the Wilpons, or trying to bully other posters into checking their criticism of the owners -- wouldn't that person be the one with a credibility problem? Wouldn't someone who can't say a bad thing about the Mets over tens and tens of thousands of posts and who kinda goes off the rails when someone wants to write that Jeff Francoeur or Alex Cora or Sean Green sucks, wouldn't that be the person who lacks credibility? Anyway, figure out what you wanna do because this is tiring, not only for me, but probably for everyone else here. Re-read any post you intend to send to me. Because it's totally unreasonable for you to expect me to be giving you the benefit of the doubt. Maybe that's your intent -- to start a confrontation with the mildest post possible, just so you can then plausibly deny your bad intent after I respond in the way you have to expect me to.

d'Kong76 Sep 14 2014 03:37 PM Re: Split from the David Wright Thread

The ox and lamb kept time Pa rum pum pum pum Again, When you play a broken record over and over and over, it lessens the message and it's credibility.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 14 2014 05:28 PM Re: Split from the David Wright Thread

What else could you come up with, besides gibberish, when you got nothing? Also, you're a fucking idiot. d'Kong76 wrote: Again, When you play a broken record over and over and over, it lessens the message and it's credibility. So where is it that I'm panning the Wright trade over and over, like a broken record? Let's see if your revisionist excuse mongering bullshit really jibes with your original complaint.

d'Kong76 Sep 14 2014 05:43 PM Re: Split from the David Wright Thread

The Little Drummer Boy! Ya know, 'cause you're always beating the same tune on your drum. I made a funny. The WILPONS, not Wright!! Pay attention.

cooby Sep 15 2014 06:22 AM Re: Split from the David Wright Thread

I wish they'd signed Jose Reyes instead

batmagadanleadoff Sep 15 2014 09:15 AM Re: Split from the David Wright Thread

d'Kong76 wrote: The Little Drummer Boy! Ya know, 'cause you're always beating the same tune on your drum. I made a funny. The WILPONS, not Wright!! Pay attention. So you can't discuss the Wright trade in a sane manner because I complain about the Wilpons. But you can participate in the Somebody Has to Pay thread without making a pain in the ass out of yourself because, why?, because I haven't chimed in yet? Is there a difference between me criticizing the owners two or three times vs. two or three other posters each criticizing the owners once? Are your responses based on the post or on the identity of the poster? (Like I need you to answer that question to know).

d'Kong76 Sep 15 2014 09:29 AM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

I thought I was quoting the first post in the thread but I accidently was editing it so now it's all screwy. d'Kong76 wrote: d'Kong76 wrote: There was no way he was not getting signed and for big big money.... ....Just my opinion, and please refrain from telling me to fuck off or call me names because we disagree. Thanks in advance. There, I discussed it. Sheesh.

d'Kong76 Sep 15 2014 12:21 PM Re: Split from the David Wright Thread

batmagadanleadoff wrote: So you can't discuss the Wright trade in a sane manner because I complain about the Wilpons. But you can participate in the Somebody Has to Pay thread without making a pain in the ass out of yourself because, why?, because I haven't chimed in yet? Is there a difference between me criticizing the owners two or three times vs. two or three other posters each criticizing the owners once? Are your responses based on the post or on the identity of the poster? (Like I need you to answer that question to know). I'm not posting in an insane manner. Please stop. Now you're comparing how I post in one thread as opposed to another? I can't even answer that, what makes you think you can? Seek help, please!

John Cougar Lunchbucket Sep 15 2014 01:07 PM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

I'm not taking sides here but if you children only want to continue calling one another names or being passive-aggressive douchebags, or pursue points that have long since passed worthy of proving or receiving do us all a favor and do it at some other website. Not that we can afford two fewer posters in this ghost town. Or just do what I do when I cannot tolerate a guy and pretend they don't exist. KC you could be less of a dick to Batmags seeing as whether you feel its warranted or not the perception that you're being a dick is clearly out there and you don't seem to be interested in that being a problem for anyone. Well we're here so it obviously is. Batmags, try to have a thicker skin, and expect that here on the Internet not everyone is going to understand you, your point of view, or your style, and that some battles aren't worth fighting.

d'Kong76 Sep 15 2014 01:52 PM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

I wouldn't want anyone to take sides, and thanks for the intervention. It's hard to discuss stuff with someone who fuck yous and tells you how stupid you are just because you disagree with them, and then, attacks me as an administrator telling everyone how he's so historically mistreated. Bml is much more nasty with me than I've ever been with him. I wanted to post this morning in the 'caption this' thread and didn't because I didn't want to be fucked you'd or told what was wrong with my response. Going forward, dick-level temporarily adjusted 75% out of respect for the poster asking me to do so.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 16 2014 03:36 PM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

d'Kong76 wrote: I wouldn't want anyone to take sides, and thanks for the intervention. It's hard to discuss stuff with someone who fuck yous and tells you how stupid you are just because you disagree with them, and then, attacks me as an administrator telling everyone how he's so historically mistreated. Bml is much more nasty with me than I've ever been with him. I wanted to post this morning in the 'caption this' thread and didn't because I didn't want to be fucked you'd or told what was wrong with my response. Going forward, dick-level temporarily adjusted 75% out of respect for the poster asking me to do so. Nasty to you? Me? All you've ever done to me, for more than six years running, is to confront me, and disagree with me, and mock me, and treat me like some sad sack chump who deserves to be ridiculed. And half the time, you don't even use the thread topic as a premise to scorn me. You jump in the middle of some other disagreement that doesn't involve you, and, I don't what to call it, cackle at me. Or Nelson Muntz me. Like this was some 4th grade schoolyard brawl where the winner is always the kid who has more friends jumping in on his side. If you have a problem with "fuck you", I can put together some polite words to be just as mean. If you still claim that you don't get why I tell you to go fuck yourself, you're either way dumber than I thought you were in the first place, or an even bigger scumbag than you appear to be. Would you prefer that I continue to absorb this abuse and ignore it and let it go, politely, which is what I've been doing for like the first four years of this? So that you can continue to take pot shots at me at will? And if it makes you happy, the only reason I told you to go fuck yourself in this post is out of respect for the five or six posters who told me to tell you to go fuck yourself because a) you've been a total unrepentant scumbag to me for forever; and b) you deserve to be addressed like this. I don't have a problem with opposite points of view. They might make for the best thread discussions. I'd welcome them. If they were on the level. But coming from you? Don't be ridiculous. So whaddaya wanna do with this exchange? You wanna act like you have no idea what any of this is about and that I'm totally imagining everything and making it all up as I go along?

Vic Sage Sep 16 2014 04:06 PM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

would you just STOP already? Moderators, please put this in the red-light section.

d'Kong76 Sep 16 2014 06:07 PM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

batmagadanleadoff wrote: Nasty to you? Me? All you've ever done to me, for more than six years running, is to confront me, and disagree with me, and mock me, and treat me like some sad sack chump who deserves to be ridiculed. And half the time, you don't even use the thread topic as a premise to scorn me. You jump in the middle of some other disagreement that doesn't involve you, and, I don't what to call it, cackle at me. Or Nelson Muntz me. Like this was some 4th grade schoolyard brawl where the winner is always the kid who has more friends jumping in on his side. If you have a problem with "fuck you", I can put together some polite words to be just as mean. If you still claim that you don't get why I tell you to go fuck yourself, you're either way dumber than I thought you were in the first place, or an even bigger scumbag than you appear to be. Would you prefer that I continue to absorb this abuse and ignore it and let it go, politely, which is what I've been doing for like the first four years of this? So that you can continue to take pot shots at me at will? And if it makes you happy, the only reason I told you to go fuck yourself in this post is out of respect for the five or six posters who told me to tell you to go fuck yourself because a) you've been a total unrepentant scumbag to me for forever; and b) you deserve to be addressed like this. I don't have a problem with opposite points of view. They might make for the best thread discussions. I'd welcome them. If they were on the level. But coming from you? Don't be ridiculous. So whaddaya wanna do with this exchange? You wanna act like you have no idea what any of this is about and that I'm totally imagining everything and making it all up as I go along? Unbelievable.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 17 2014 09:32 AM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

d'Kong76 wrote: batmagadanleadoff wrote: Nasty to you? Me? All you've ever done to me, for more than six years running, is to confront me, and disagree with me, and mock me, and treat me like some sad sack chump who deserves to be ridiculed. And half the time, you don't even use the thread topic as a premise to scorn me. You jump in the middle of some other disagreement that doesn't involve you, and, I don't what to call it, cackle at me. Or Nelson Muntz me. Like this was some 4th grade schoolyard brawl where the winner is always the kid who has more friends jumping in on his side. If you have a problem with "fuck you", I can put together some polite words to be just as mean. If you still claim that you don't get why I tell you to go fuck yourself, you're either way dumber than I thought you were in the first place, or an even bigger scumbag than you appear to be. Would you prefer that I continue to absorb this abuse and ignore it and let it go, politely, which is what I've been doing for like the first four years of this? So that you can continue to take pot shots at me at will? And if it makes you happy, the only reason I told you to go fuck yourself in this post is out of respect for the five or six posters who told me to tell you to go fuck yourself because a) you've been a total unrepentant scumbag to me for forever; and b) you deserve to be addressed like this. I don't have a problem with opposite points of view. They might make for the best thread discussions. I'd welcome them. If they were on the level. But coming from you? Don't be ridiculous. So whaddaya wanna do with this exchange? You wanna act like you have no idea what any of this is about and that I'm totally imagining everything and making it all up as I go along? Unbelievable. What's so unbelievable? All you have to do is scroll down this Red Light Forum to the "batmags and the admins" thread you started, just a few topics below, to see what a fucking prick you've been to me over the years. There, in 2008, FK initiated a friendly and humorous exchange to me that was good natured and silly banter. The exchange was innocent, and most notably, had nothing to do with you. But that didn't stop you from interfering, because when you see my name on a post, you become the crazed insanely irritated bull who sees red. And if I'm actually enjoying myself on this forum, well god forbid that, as far as you're concerned. Cartoon smoke must be coming out of your ears when that's happening. You had to find a way to confront me with something because you can't go a week without doing so, and I guess you were due by then. But you couldn't just simply respond to an exchange that had nothing to do with you in the first place in the thread of origin. You had to copy the dialogue and create your own special thread dedicated to another round of unprovoked hostilities -- and in the red light forum even though there was nothing red lightish about the exchange that, again, didn't even involve you. I guess you were anticipating --no, hoping for some blowout -- thus the red light designation. And then for good measure, you had to contrive some ridiculously misleading thread title that included my forum name, all to create the impression that I was in the middle of some war with all of the mods -- a war that existed only in your imagination -- some bullshit contrived thread title just to make me look bad. Anyway, your post then devolves into the usual hostile bullshit name-calling, the same crap that you've been pulling on me for six and a half years. You could see by my responses, that I was trying to avoid the whole thing politely. Because in 2008, I avoided you like last week's fish even though I was on to you from like my second or third day on this forum. If you scroll down a few posts in that thread, you can read that two years later, in 2010, you revived that thread. You had apparently met at least one poster from this forum who noticed your behavior towards me and who decided to discuss the matter with you. This prompted an apology from you to me -- probably the only decent post you ever wrote to me in the six and a half years that I've been a member of this forum. Granted, it was a half-assed apology as far as apologies go -- where you seem to be grudgingly apologizing for acts you claim you're not even aware of -- but an apology nevertheless. So at least one other poster noticed your abusive behavior, and half assed apology notwithstanding, your post is a concession of something. Anyway, your apology lasted about a week, two weeks tops. In short time, you were back to abusing me again, as if that apology incident never happened. So explain to me, what's so unbelievable?

d'Kong76 Sep 17 2014 10:29 AM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

I'm not reading all that so save your wretched fingers. I knew you'd be trouble from day one, and obviously I was spot on.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 17 2014 01:46 PM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

d'Kong76 wrote: I'm not reading all that so save your wretched fingers. I knew you'd be trouble from day one, and obviously I was spot on. So I take this as your admission that you've been a fucking asshole to me from day one. And your justification is, what, that after years of turning the other cheek, I've decided to tell you go to fuck yourself in response to your abusive posts? At least you're finally honest about things. You finally admitted you just don't like me, as opposed to pretending that you have no idea why I now respond to you the way I do, with all of your bullshit "Why are you so angry? I didn't do anything to you" posts. You should be running a blog, by the way, instead of a forum. This is how you treat posters? Oh, my!! There's trouble coming our way! This feller here doesn't like Fred Wilpon. Woe's me. Nobody's safe. It's trouble, I tell's you. Hide the women and children.

d'Kong76 Sep 17 2014 02:12 PM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

batmagadanleadoff wrote: So I take this as your admission that you've been a fucking asshole to me from day one. And your justification is, what, that after years of turning the other cheek, I've decided to tell you go to fuck yourself in response to your abusive posts? At least you're finally honest about things. You finally admitted you just don't like me, as opposed to pretending that you have no idea why I now respond to you the way I do, with all of your bullshit "Why are you so angry? I didn't do anything to you" posts. You should be running a blog, by the way, instead of a forum. This is how you treat posters? Oh, my!! There's trouble coming our way! This feller here doesn't like Fred Wilpon. Woe's me. Nobody's safe. It's trouble, I tell's you. Hide the women and children. You're incorrigible. I don't dislike you.

batmagadanleadoff Sep 18 2014 10:04 AM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

d'Kong76 wrote: I knew you'd be trouble from day one, and obviously I was spot on. Obviously? How so? d'Kong76 wrote: You're incorrigible. I don't dislike you. Glad that's all cleared up.

metirish Sep 21 2014 09:09 PM Re: Split from See You in April David 1

I like Batmags, I like Kase , I don't like these arguments that have increased over the years. There have been long periods of time where I have stopped stopping by the forum not necessarily because of these arguments but because the tone of the forum changes with them.....we are only a few here , that is the constant that brings me back, would i like to see more posters?, maybe but I do like the consistency here , just not the constant arguments.