Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD
Oct 09 2014 11:07 AM

Fox Sports reporting that J.J. Hardy is close to signing a highly unusual (unprecedented?) mid-post-season contract extension with the Orioles.

Good news is that Kaz Matsui is still available.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Oct 09 2014 11:44 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

To the extent it takes an option off the market, bad. But I'm not a big Hardy advocate.

He's apparently had some bouts of back trouble which I don't want our SS to have.

d'Kong76
Oct 09 2014 11:55 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

[u:27tft9hl]Shortstops[/u:27tft9hl]
Mike Aviles *
Asdrubal Cabrera
Stephen Drew
Alex Gonzalez
J.J. Hardy
Jed Lowrie
John McDonald
Hiroyuki Nakajima *
Hanley Ramirez
Jimmy Rollins *

(* – player whose current contract includes 2015 option.)

Source: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/compe ... -for-2015/

Edgy MD
Oct 09 2014 11:58 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The FA Marketplace, According to Cots' Baseball Contracts

[list]Mike Aviles *
Asdrubal Cabrera
Stephen Drew
Alex Gonzalez
J.J. Hardy (?)
Jed Lowrie
John McDonald
Hiroyuki Nakajima *
Hanley Ramirez
Jimmy Rollins * [/list:u]

* – player whose current contract includes 2015 option.

d'Kong76
Oct 09 2014 12:07 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Rmpl hee hee!

Ceetar
Oct 09 2014 12:10 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Hanley.

Edgy MD
Oct 09 2014 12:16 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

d'Kong76 wrote:
Rmpl hee hee!

I lost time formatting!

metsmarathon
Oct 09 2014 02:00 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

projected 2015 WAR for available shortstops, per steamer, as shown by fangraphs... fwiw...

hanley ramirez 2.9 WAR in 532 PA
asdrubal cabrera 1.9 WAR in 639 PA
steven drew 1.3 WAR in 558 PA
jj hardy 2.7 WAR in 620 PA
jimmy rollins 2.2 WAR in 629 PA

predicted to not really play shortstop anymore in 2015
mike aviles 0 WAR in 1 PA
alex gonzalez 0 WAR in 1 PA
jed lowrie 0 WAR in 1 PA <---- regardless, he might be a decent buy low pick...?
hiroyuki nakajima 0 WAR in 1 PA

for comparison, wilmer flores 2.1 WAR in 551 PA

Edgy MD
Oct 09 2014 02:11 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Steamer predicts Tejada to put up 0.9, which isn't so bad when you consider that he only projects 65 games from the Rube.

Which would suggest that Flores-backed-up-by-Ruben would (maybe) be a more sensible move than bringing in one of those alternatives.

Frayed Knot
Oct 09 2014 02:11 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

A recently written scouting report from the 'Minor League Ball' site (also linked in the AFL thread)

Matt Reynolds is a 2nd round pick from the 2012 draft, signing for $525,000 out of the University of Arkansas.
He kicked the year off in AA Binghamton where he hit a stout 355/430/422 with an astronomical .433 BABIP. Bumped up to AAA Las Vegas, he continued to rake where he remarkably sustained a BABIP over .400 (.404 to be exact). No doubt part of that was due to the friendly offensive environs of the Pacific Coast League, notching 25 extra base hits there while only hitting nine in AA in roughly the same amount of at bats. Combined between the two upper levels of the minor leagues, Reynolds hit 343/405/454 with a 9.2% walk rate and 18.6% strike out rate, 34 extra base hits, and 20 stolen bases. Digging into his splits, he was a bit better against lefties (359/422/468) than righties (335/396/447) but both lines were excellent. He maintained an excellent line drive rate throughout the year, hitting liners 24.4% of the time in AA (8.9 points better than the Eastern League average) and 22.3% of the time in AAA (3.5 point better than the PCL average). He's not a burner, but Reynolds just doesn't have the same speed as most short stops despite the 20 stolen bases. The lack of speed hurts his range but he is pretty sure-handed with the ones he does get to with soft hands and a plus throwing arm. He made 16 errors at short stop with a .963 fielding percentage in 431 chances while also making one error at second base where he played 21 games, getting 92 chances. Reynolds is a baseball rat and understands how to play the game the right way, being dubbed "a grinder" by AAA manager Wally Backman. He looks to be similar to LJ Mazzilli in that he will squeeze every ounce of talent out of his average tools.

Ceetar
Oct 09 2014 02:29 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

metsmarathon wrote:
projected 2015 WAR for available shortstops, per steamer, as shown by fangraphs... fwiw...

hanley ramirez 2.9 WAR in 532 PA
asdrubal cabrera 1.9 WAR in 639 PA
steven drew 1.3 WAR in 558 PA
jj hardy 2.7 WAR in 620 PA
jimmy rollins 2.2 WAR in 629 PA

predicted to not really play shortstop anymore in 2015
mike aviles 0 WAR in 1 PA
alex gonzalez 0 WAR in 1 PA
jed lowrie 0 WAR in 1 PA <---- regardless, he might be a decent buy low pick...?
hiroyuki nakajima 0 WAR in 1 PA

for comparison, wilmer flores 2.1 WAR in 551 PA


Doesn't seem to be any reliability scores available yet. I suspect it's low for Flores, especially since all his value is predicated on him playing an above average SS which unfortunately is still up in the air. Actually has him playing a better SS than Tejada, which seems like a pipe dream to me.

I guess Jed Lowrie's okay. Might be worth a bit as long as you don't have to over-commit to him. First professional HR in Citi Field after all.

Frayed Knot
Oct 09 2014 02:43 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Buzz is saying 3/$40 for Hardy to stay in Bal'mer

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Oct 09 2014 02:44 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Still waiting for that Didi Gregorius deal!

Zvon
Oct 09 2014 03:35 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

We need that shortstop and/or that outfielder. I don't know which will be resolved first, but it should effect the approach to the other. It could decide if the position can be carried (possibly as is) or really needs a big upgrade. So for now I'll just sit back and watch.

Time to get to work Sandy. We want something nice for Christmas.

Ceetar
Oct 09 2014 03:56 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Zvon wrote:
We need that shortstop and/or that outfielder. I don't know which will be resolved first, but it should effect the approach to the other. It could decide if the position can be carried (possibly as is) or really needs a big upgrade. So for now I'll just sit back and watch.

Time to get to work Sandy. We want something nice for Christmas.


nah, doesn't have to be for Christmas. we want something nice for my Birthday (3/25). Plenty of time.

Zvon
Oct 09 2014 04:01 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ceetar wrote:
Zvon wrote:
We need that shortstop and/or that outfielder. I don't know which will be resolved first, but it should effect the approach to the other. It could decide if the position can be carried (possibly as is) or really needs a big upgrade. So for now I'll just sit back and watch.

Time to get to work Sandy. We want something nice for Christmas.


nah, doesn't have to be for Christmas. we want something nice for my Birthday (3/25). Plenty of time.


Not Christmas? snif...snif...
SOB!

Lefty Specialist
Oct 09 2014 05:16 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Zvon wrote:
We need that shortstop and/or that outfielder. I don't know which will be resolved first, but it should effect the approach to the other. It could decide if the position can be carried (possibly as is) or really needs a big upgrade. So for now I'll just sit back and watch.

Time to get to work Sandy. We want something nice for Christmas.


The last time Sandy got us something for Christmas, it was Chris Young. There's some high-grade anthracite for you.

Zvon
Oct 09 2014 07:47 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I counted Grandy as an early gift.

Zvon
Oct 09 2014 07:48 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Not that it was the greatest gift....didn't totally suck though.

Edgy MD
Oct 09 2014 09:12 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ceetar wrote:
Doesn't seem to be any reliability scores available yet. I suspect it's low for Flores, especially since all his value is predicated on him playing an above average SS which unfortunately is still up in the air. Actually has him playing a better SS than Tejada, which seems like a pipe dream to me.

Yeah, I wouldn't say that's up in the air so much as off in the ether. I'd find it highly surprising to see Flores play an above-average shortstop, or an above-average anything.

seawolf17
Oct 10 2014 10:23 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm going to beat the Bring Back Jose drum all winter. Toronto owes him at least $70M ($22/$22/$22/$22 or a $4 buyout).

Tell me why some combination of Colon/Gee/Niese/Murphy/Tejada/prospect doesn't get it done.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Oct 10 2014 11:08 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I don't believe they will go with Flores except as a Plan B at short.

I think he's Plan A at second, with Hererra at AAA and Muffy traded.

I think its very likely that the deal Muffy goes in brings us a SS as that free agent class doesn't look real good. I'd kick the tires of Jed Lowrie and determine what his deal is -- he's had one solid year as a starter so far, but you could say the same about Tejada if you tried.

@Seawolf -- I could get behind Reyes as an idea but at 22M I don't think it's terribly wise.

Edgy MD
Oct 10 2014 11:19 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

That contract was signed after his outlier season, with an .877 OPS. He's been 100 points lower since then. No way Sandy takes the butt end of that contract without some generous cash-eatin' by Toronto.

Lefty Specialist
Oct 10 2014 11:34 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The FA Marketplace, According to Cots' Baseball Contracts

[list]Mike Aviles *
Asdrubal Cabrera
Stephen Drew
Alex Gonzalez
J.J. Hardy (signed)
Jed Lowrie
John McDonald
Hiroyuki Nakajima *
Hanley Ramirez
Jimmy Rollins * [/list:u]

* – player whose current contract includes 2015 option.


Ya know, that's a list that makes me want to play Wilmer Flores at shortstop for a year.

d'Kong76
Oct 10 2014 11:37 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I was going to say that too, but I was afraid someone
would chuck a sneaker at me or something.

Ceetar
Oct 10 2014 12:00 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Hanley!

dunno what type of contract he's looking for, and he's not gonna be great defensively, but better than Flores I would suspect, and he hits.

plus, can slide him to DH once that's instituted.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Oct 10 2014 12:30 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I was down on Sandy for having not pulled the trigger on a shortstop trade before the season, but as things turned out the rumored Young Gun SS candidates weren't all as good as Ruben Tejada & Flores were.

Popular early choice Nick Franklin wound up playing most of his games at second base for Seattle then wound up in Tampa as part of the 3-way David Price deal.
777 OPS in AAA but hit just .160 combined in 90 PA between Seattle and Tampa.

Seattle held onto Brad Miller but he was nothing special beyond a little pop this year either. 10-36-221/288/365//653 in 411 PA. In 100+ fewer PAs, Flores was 6-29-251/286/378 //664. Basically, the same guy.

Lunchbucket favorite Didi Gregorius eventually grabbed a job with Arizona but in 299 PA hit 6-27-226/290/363//653. Exact same OPS as Miller, yes.

Arizona's other guy, Nick Ahmed, was going to make Gregorious available, and still might. He spent nearly the whole year in AAA Reno where he OPSed at 798. That's pretty good, but (you guessed it) not Wilmer Flores good.

Edgy MD
Oct 10 2014 12:36 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Not definitive, but indicative of a minor victory --- if a pyrrhic one --- for Sandy's restraint. Now we go back to the same situation with perhaps many of the same names on his list. All maybe a year older with that much of their growing pains behind them, but the same can mostly be said of Tejada and Flores too.

What's amazing is that Tejada --- along with Duda and Grandy --- ended up having one of the highest walk rates in the league. If he even hit .250, he would have been a clear asset.

Frayed Knot
Oct 10 2014 01:41 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Not definitive, but indicative of a minor victory --- if a pyrrhic one --- for Sandy's restraint ...


As was the non-sgning of Stephen Drew
Sandy made a reference last off-season to expecting somewhat of a regression to the norm for both Drew & Tejada and that the difference you'd get from each would hardly be worth $20 million (he was assuming a 2x$10 -ish deal which was what was being rumored at the time)

Drew WAR 2013 = 3.1;
2014 = -0.3 for what turned out to be $10 million and about 2/3 of the season

Tejada WAR 2013 = -1.1;
2014 = +1.4 for $1.1 mil



Now maybe things turn out differently if SD signs during the winter (IOW, if a Boras client acts NOT like a Boras client) and plays all year, but again, probably not to the tune of close to $20 million worth.
This makes it the 2nd year in a row where shunning the fashionable "get" (the MUST get in the minds of some) turned out to be the better move. 2013 = Michael Bourn

smg58
Oct 11 2014 09:47 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The "duh" way of discouraging teams from making qualifying offers to borderline players is to make it clear that your client will take the offer.

The irony is that now Drew can probably be had for a song, and might be a bargain for precisely that reason.

The other option to consider is that there are a number of elite shortstop prospects (Scounting Book has five in the top ten), and Syndegaard would get us at least most of the way there for any of them.

Edgy MD
Oct 11 2014 11:00 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

What shortstop would you trade Syndergaard --- or Syndergaard-plus --- for?

The likes of Seagar and Addison Russell aren't big-league ready. Correa is still two steps away and sustained a leg injury which has kept him out since June. Francisco Lindor seems to need some polish too, as his bat isn't there yet.

I think signs are pointed away from the team stockpiling prospects and toward graduating them and reinforcing at the big league level. Beyond signs, Alderson has said pretty explicitly that in trades he will be looking for big-league or big-league ready talent.

Frayed Knot
Oct 11 2014 01:28 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

One caution about SS prospects is to choose which ones you expect to remain a SS - cuz those who don't often won't have to bat to be all that valuable once they're off of SS

Edgy MD
Oct 11 2014 06:49 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

And that would put Lindor at the top of the list. Near big league ready and no questions about the defense. But Steamer agrees with me that the offense isn't looking to be ready, and projects 73 games and a 0.7 WAR for 2015.

I think we have to be prepared for a return of Flores and/or Tejada to be at least be an option. Or perhaps Flores at second and the shortstop the team gets being a more seasoned dude acquired for one or more of Murphy/Niese/Gee/Colon/Tejada.

Because if I'm trading Syndergaard for an unproven young shortstop, he'd better be named Robin Ripken or Ozzie Larkin.

Centerfield
Oct 11 2014 07:01 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm fine with Flores/Reynolds/Tejada. Hopefully they can get the job done until Cechini is ready.

Get me a corner outfielder (or two) that can mash and let's win the World Series.

TheOldMole
Oct 13 2014 04:01 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

May be too early to give up on Flores developing as a hitter.

Rockin' Doc
Oct 14 2014 07:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm not pretending to know what the answer at shortstop is, but I'm fairly sure that Tejada isn't it.

Frayed Knot
Oct 14 2014 07:58 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

TheOldMole wrote:
May be too early to give up on Flores developing as a hitter.


As a hitter? ... definitely too early.
As a short-stop? ... not so sure. I have little confidence that he'll ever be anything other than an occasional fill-in there.

Vic Sage
Oct 15 2014 08:19 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I don't know what his defensive numbers were this year, but Flores certainly passed the eye test for me. He has a strong, accurate arm and soft hands. Range is obviously the issue for him, but there have been HoF SSs with less than good range, if they made up for it with intelligent positioning and consistency on D, and a productive bat. Ripken and Jeter come immediately to mind.

I think the best is yet to come with Flores, and Tejada is a utility player at best. Reynolds? Who knows.

Edgy MD
Oct 15 2014 08:30 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Not so much for me. Strong, accurate arm? Certainly. Soft hands? Mostly.

But beyond the lack of range, there seemed to be a lack of footwork, flexibility, instinct, and imagination. All that may come, of course, as most of it is improvable if the commitment is there (both by the player and the organization).

But the real question is the bat. if that doesn't come, whether he can hack it on defense is a moot point.

Ceetar
Oct 15 2014 08:44 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The 2015 Mets can't afford to play around with Flores. As of Opening Day, he's not the answer. He can't hit or field enough.

He's got no position and potential. You swap him for someone, perhaps a slugging 1B/OF that's got unrealized potential. or a CI guy that can backup David who MUST get more offdays next year and maybe play first against some of the tougher lefties.

Edgy MD
Oct 15 2014 08:47 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

He's got no potential?

Ceetar
Oct 15 2014 08:53 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
He's got no potential?


he's got no position AND he has potential.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Oct 15 2014 09:08 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

What makes you so convinced? The kid is 22 and hit the living shit out of the ball. Limited defensively I'd say, probably not a good SS over a long period even, but I'd bet he'll outproduce Muffy beginning in '15, given equal opportunity to play. What do you say? Let's bet a beer on it.

Ceetar
Oct 15 2014 09:19 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
What makes you so convinced? The kid is 22 and hit the living shit out of the ball. Limited defensively I'd say, probably not a good SS over a long period even, but I'd bet he'll outproduce Muffy beginning in '15, given equal opportunity to play. What do you say? Let's bet a beer on it.


He didn't even outproduce Tejada with the bat in 2014.

It's not that I'm convinced, it's that the facts suggest he's not a good hitter. I'm not denying he's not young and full of potential and very well might hit well in 2015, I'm just saying I don't see the 2015 Mets as a team that should make that gamble at the onset. He certainly hasn't gotten enough exposure to say boom or bust either, but nor has he gotten enough reps at SS to proclaim that either.

I'd be willing to make the bet but I'm not sure they'll get equal opportunity to play to really figure it out.

Edgy MD
Oct 15 2014 09:27 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

And he's got top-shelf taste in beer.

Ceetar
Oct 15 2014 09:34 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
And he's got top-shelf taste in beer.


hmm? I missed that.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Oct 15 2014 10:14 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Sorry I thought you said he had no potential either. As often the case, the "facts" we look at tend to matter. If you discount to irregular work Flores got over the opening months of the season where he yo-yoed up and back and was used as a bench player, it's clear he was very much a better hitter than Tejada (and Tejada, it should be noted, was actually better once his regular gig went away and his PT became sporadic).

I know you shouldn't pick and choose what data to believe but context matters in this case especially. Flores was a poor player at first, an ok player when he first got a starting job then a friggin monster once he settled in, generating a line you might expect given how well he'd been hitting in the minors. He's a good hitter, I'm convinced. Look out for this goofy bastard in 15.

Edgy MD
Oct 15 2014 10:30 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I didn't see that as much. I thought he was all arms and could do almost nothing better than grounding out on pitches away.

Great hand/eye coordination could definitely keep him in at bats, and he crushed inside pitches and curves in his wheelhouse, and he certainly can adapt to those hard sliders.

So I'm certainly not bearish on his potential. I just liked Dilson's swing better, though I disagree with Centrifuge that Dilson looks like our opening day second baseman.

Lefty Specialist
Oct 15 2014 12:07 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
What makes you so convinced? The kid is 22 and hit the living shit out of the ball. Limited defensively I'd say, probably not a good SS over a long period even, but I'd bet he'll outproduce Muffy beginning in '15, given equal opportunity to play. What do you say? Let's bet a beer on it.


If Flores was given one position and was allowed to remain in the lineup every day, I have no doubt he'd outproduce Murph over the course of a season. And that's no slight against Murphy, who is what he is- an above-average singles and doubles hitter and a less-than-average fielder.

Flores, in addition to being much younger, is a better fielder and has much more pop. He was told to play shortstop and did it passably. Now imagine Murphy at shortstop.

The problem is that you can't have both of them in the lineup as the middle infielders. One position has to be manned by a good fielder to help cover for the deficiencies of the other.

I don't think Murphy's going to get better or have more trade value than he does right now. So that, plus the realities of the Wilpons (much as we hate them) means he needs to be traded this winter.

Edgy MD
Oct 15 2014 12:11 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm not so convinced that Flores is necessarily a better fielder than Muh.

Frayed Knot
Oct 15 2014 12:39 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm not sure Flores is a better hitter than Murph either - at least not initially.
More HR pop (in a small sample) and a decent minor lg resume, but fewer doubles, less speed, neither one walks all that much

The biggest problem with Murphy is his status as a player one year removed from FA. Even setting aside the questions about the Wilpon's finances for now, the big Matzoh ball out there is still the question as to how smart it would be to commit to Muffy on a multi-year deal starting when he turns 31 (~OD - 2016)
That essentially leads you with the choices of:
- seeing if he wants to sign now for a long-ish term contract and approx how much that would entail
- keeping him for 2015 at whatever the going rate for a single year is, then either doing the same dance next year or risk losing him for nothing
- dealing him now to fill holes elsewhere while we've got (younger/cheaper) others who can play his position (whether for better or worse still to be determined)

I find it tough to make arguments for choices A or B here

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Oct 15 2014 12:54 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
So I'm certainly not bearish on his potential. I just liked Dilson's swing better, though I disagree with Centrifuge that Dilson looks like our opening day second baseman.


You shut your whorish mouth.

seawolf17
Oct 15 2014 01:19 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015


"I miss you guys so much."

Edgy MD
Oct 15 2014 01:33 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
So I'm certainly not bearish on his potential. I just liked Dilson's swing better, though I disagree with Centrifuge that Dilson looks like our opening day second baseman.


You shut your whorish mouth.

Dimson nlooks mlike a heguva flayer, but mm'm not cghure mrushing him noo the smarting wineup wibout a mnay in toople-A izh a mnood igea.

Lefty Specialist
Oct 15 2014 01:38 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

seawolf17 wrote:

"I miss you guys so much."


Even if Toronto paid 2/3 of what he's owed the Wilpons wouldn't bite. He would solve 2 problems (SS and leadoff), but I just can't imagine a scenario where this would happen.

Plus, he hasn't been quite the same player since he left. Which is too bad because he was as electric as a player can get for a couple of years there with the Mets.

Edgy MD
Oct 15 2014 01:40 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Three problems: shortstop, leadoff, and fan faith.

I mean, I don't think his acquisition would actually solve any of those three, but it would speak to them.

seawolf17
Oct 15 2014 01:44 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

For Murphy and Colon, and the Mets eat the entire salary.

MAKE IT HAPPEN, SANDY.

Edgy MD
Oct 15 2014 01:57 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Mets don't eat that way. Uh, uh.

The Mets didn't want the contract with the cheaper years and the younger Reyes coming off his best season included. Why would they want it now? It's paying top dollar for muffin stumps.

Ashie62
Oct 21 2014 07:02 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'd focus my attention talking to the Cubs about Starlin Castro or Addison Russell. Russell is likely near untouchable.

Lefty Specialist
Oct 22 2014 09:17 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Don't like Castro. When I see him play I think of this scene from Bull Durham:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYoBOhZvBEw

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Oct 22 2014 09:38 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm not a Castrophile either.

Edgy MD
Oct 22 2014 09:42 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm not sure baseball culture remembers what a good shortstop looks like. Folks may have unreasonable demands based on what can realistically be gotten.

Frayed Knot
Oct 22 2014 10:08 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

* Tough to call Addison Russell 'untouchable' - especially seeing as how he's already been touched (so to speak) and is now on a team that has several options at SS.
The price for him will be really steep, but I'm betting Theo & co will listen.

* Castro is certainly far from perfect, but nobody is and there are a number of positive things about him too.

Lefty Specialist
Oct 22 2014 11:09 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Castro's style of play isn't exactly celebrated in Chicago. They'd eat him alive in New York. He's a great talent, but he has too many brain farts and lazy plays.

Frayed Knot
Oct 22 2014 12:42 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

All true - Keith in particular got on him pretty good during a telecast this year for his bouts of lackadaisical play, particularly on defense. But he's also young and young players sometimes grow out of such habits.
On the flip side he doesn't turn 25 until next spring, has a knowable and hardly outrageous contract set for the next five seasons ($44 mil/5 or $59/6), and already has 5 seasons mostly full seasons under his belt where he averaged just under 50 XBHs/per.

Vic Sage
Oct 22 2014 02:13 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

yeah, you've got to consider a 25-year old SS with a decent glove, a good bat and a relatively affordable contract. Maybe he's a turkey, but i'd buy a slice of that for a $1.

Edgy MD
Oct 22 2014 06:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I think the price will be considerably higher.

d'Kong76
Oct 22 2014 06:10 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

And they may have turkey taste, but I'm told a bologna
(only $0.38/slice) budget.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Nov 05 2014 11:04 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Well, if you're going to plop down the premium-salumeria money-- and elbow aside 29 other jostling deli-shoppers-- for a fine Cuban, this is the one you want, isn't it?


He’s a plus-plus runner with above average raw power from both sides of the plate and the tools/skills to stick in the infield, possibly at shortstop. Moncada is the quick-twitch type with big bat speed that clubs covet and his track record of hitting at big tournaments and in Cuba’s professional leagues is excellent considering his age.


In 2012-13, Moncada made his Serie Nacional debut for Cienfuegos, where he was teammates with White Sox first baseman Jose Abreu and Dodgers shortstop Erisbel Arruebarrena. Moncada performed well for a 17-year-old, hitting .283/.414/.348 in 172 plate appearances with 13 stolen bases in 18 attempts. Moncada also made his mark at the league’s all-star game, where Cuba holds certain skill competitions in addition to a home run derby. Among the events are races to first base and around the bases. At the 2012-13 all-star game, Moncada won both races, beating Castillo, a 70 runner on the 20-80 scale, and Guillermo Heredia, a 60 runner who started in center field in the 2013 World Baseball Classic.


He just established residency in Guatemala/was granted free agency; the showcase is on November 12.

Edgy MD
Nov 05 2014 11:11 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Sounds like a lot of X-factors involved in recruiting that guy.

Ceetar
Nov 05 2014 11:27 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Sounds like a lot of X-factors involved in recruiting that guy.


Quite a few. I'd still do it though, from a Mets standpoint.

As I understand it..

It would likely mean they can't sign any of these impact/top international free agents in 2015/2016 though. At least if I'm understanding these draft pool rule/posts correctly. The drawback to that seems to be that you can blow the budget to sign guys all at once, but then you're penalized, and most of the IFA guys are 7/2 so if you sign Moncada you miss out on this year and over-paying for more than 1 impact type guy.

AND the Rays, Yankees and Red Sox can still be in on Moncada because they're already over the limit and banned from 2015-2016 guys for more than $300,000. They're already penalized and therefore have nothing to lose (besides the money) to sign Moncada.

Edgy MD
Nov 05 2014 11:35 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Those rules are amazing. How do fans tolerate it?

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Nov 05 2014 11:39 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Again, though... as a 19-year-old who's already held his own and then some for two years in the f*cking Serie Nacional (and dominated-- DOMINATED-- any and all lower levels at which he played), AND has projectable tools? If you don't blow the bank/take a budget-penalty for this guy-- at a position of need for the organization, no less-- well... why roll the dice on anyone, right?

Ceetar
Nov 05 2014 11:49 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Again, though... as a 19-year-old who's already held his own and then some for two years in the f*cking Serie Nacional (and dominated-- DOMINATED-- any and all lower levels at which he played), AND has projectable tools? If you don't blow the bank/take a budget-penalty for this guy-- at a position of need for the organization, no less-- well... why roll the dice on anyone, right?


well, 'projectable tools' perhaps is up for debate? Maybe it's over-stated. maybe he won't be able to be a SS for long, as sometimes happens as guys get bigger. And you're still competing against 29 other teams, 3 of which don't also have the drawback of losing out on the next two crops of IFA by overpaying for him. Maybe there's another SS worth it on 7/2 that you can sign AND also sign a half dozen other guys that have projectable tools. maybe that's more worth it?

Edgy MD wrote:
Those rules are amazing. How do fans tolerate it?


fans? I'd imagine the percentage of baseball fans that know the rules for international free agents, much less to that degree, is well less than 1%.

Edgy MD
Nov 05 2014 12:01 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I don't know all the rules. But I know the existence of the rules. And I know the spirit of the rules. And I know that they are anti-competitive and awful for baseball and the men and boys who play it.

The nonsense that they get away with in NFL and NBA is far more offensive.

Ceetar
Nov 05 2014 12:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
I don't know all the rules. But I know the existence of the rules. And I know the spirit of the rules. And I know that they are anti-competitive and awful for baseball and the men and boys who play it.

The nonsense that they get away with in NFL and NBA is far more offensive.


the pinnacle is the NCAA of course.

Ashie62
Nov 06 2014 08:54 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Soccer also.

Ashie62
Nov 06 2014 09:13 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Alexi Ramirez?

[url]http://www.rotoworld.com/player/mlb/5292/alexei-ramirez

Edgy MD
Nov 07 2014 06:18 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ashie62 wrote:
Soccer also.

MLS is a nightmare. You might as well tell the players that they have to play for free and be thankful for the exposure it gives them

Frayed Knot
Nov 07 2014 06:38 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ashie62 wrote:
Alexi Ramirez?


Upside:
- More pop (52 XBHs), more speed, and MUCH more glove than anything we've got right now.
- One year deal plus an option is the right amount of commitment
- plays everyday: 155+ games for five seasons running

Downside:
- Just turned 33
- even with a partial bounce-back this year the power is waning [17 HRs/yr for first 4 seasons; 10/per for 2012-14] and that's before you bring the stadium/league switch into consideration
- he's going to make more outs that what we've got now: .302 OBA for most recent three seasons

Lefty Specialist
Nov 07 2014 11:06 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Upside: He's not Ruben Tejada.

Edgy MD
Nov 07 2014 11:26 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

He was certainly the better player last season, but there's a lot he could learn from Ruben Tejada.

I mean, not Tejada was supposed to be the virtue that redeemed Stephen Drew

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 07 2014 12:16 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Speaking of Drew.

I think he could be an intriguing buy-low candidate. Obviously we were smart not to have employed him last year but maybe this year he comes at 2/15 or something like that. In my pretend fantasy GM league, he signed for 1/$2 million.

Ceetar
Nov 07 2014 12:41 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Speaking of Drew.

I think he could be an intriguing buy-low candidate. Obviously we were smart not to have employed him last year but maybe this year he comes at 2/15 or something like that. In my pretend fantasy GM league, he signed for 1/$2 million.


maybe he's more motivated now, maybe with a real Spring Training and prep and all that he's decent?

2/15 is almost 'take a flyer' territory.

edit: Not almost. That's basically what Chris Young's flyer was last year, with a lot more options to play the position.

Lefty Specialist
Nov 07 2014 01:35 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

$2 million is 'take a flyer' territory. They signed Marlon Byrd for less.

Edgy MD
Nov 07 2014 02:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Yeah, Chris Young was a commitment. Jose Valverde was a flyer. Bobby Abreu and Taylor Teagarden.

Centerfield
Nov 11 2014 08:45 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Candidates:

Starlin Castro:
Looks like a good player. But he is expensive. He doesn't walk, and his biggest asset is his power. Replace Wrigley with Citi and that probably negates a big chunk of it. Even at Wrigley, his career OPS is low .700's. Earlier reports were that the Cubs wanted Wheeler.

Alexei Ramirez:
Like Stephen Drew last year, is bound to fall back to earth a bit. Another guy who doesn't walk. Even with his good year last year, barely scraped over .700 OPS. Plus he's old.

Troy Tulowitzki:
Hurt. Older. Expensive. Will cost a boatload of prospects. But clearly the best player here.

Hanley Ramirez:
Great player, but getting older. Will only cost money and a 2nd round draft pick, now that we have signed Cuddyer. But his best days are likely behind him.

I think with the SS options, the key here is avoiding the wrong trade. I would hate to deal young pitching for a marginal increase in offense from the SS position.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 11 2014 09:25 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I still think they will eventually end up with a guy like Gregorius, who could come in helps-me-helps-you kinda trade. Move Flores to 2B with Hererra in AAA (and LJ Mazzilli in AA!!!) if he flops. Cannot lose.

Centerfield
Nov 11 2014 10:39 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

What would Gregorious cost in a trade?

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 11 2014 10:50 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I dunno. Montero? Leathersich?

One young guy who might be pretty good but not getting a shot immediately for another.

Ashie62
Nov 11 2014 12:10 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I am willing to trade an arm to bring in the offense that Starlin Castro provides. Like

1. Lagares
2. Flores
3. Wright
4. Duda
5. Cuddyer
6 Granderson
7. Castro
8. d"arnaud

Lotsa offense at the cost of Noah or so.

Centerfield
Nov 11 2014 12:28 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

You would trade Syndegaard for a #7 hitter?

seawolf17
Nov 11 2014 12:35 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Centerfield wrote:
You would trade Syndegaard for a #7 hitter?

In Ashie's defense, that #7 hitter will only be 25 years old next season, is already a three-time all-star, and will likely only get better.

Ashie62
Nov 11 2014 04:25 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Flip Castro and Flores if you like.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Nov 11 2014 05:27 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ashie62 wrote:
Lotsa offense at the cost of Noah or so.


Castro's only two years older than Thor, with a presidential term of solid-to-good major-league production in his rearview; I have a feeling it'll be Noah and something else pretty damn good (Conforto? Montero?).

Edgy MD
Nov 11 2014 06:06 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

STOP TRADING SYNDERGAARD!

Frayed Knot
Nov 11 2014 06:10 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Not that I'm looking to deal him, but if folks want someone already established player under a known contract like Castro, a promising but still unproven talent like Syndergaard is not overpaying.

bmfc1
Nov 11 2014 06:46 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Castro isn't a "number 7 hitter" even if he would be in the 2015 Mets lineup. And if he's batting seventh, then the Mets lineup is in good shape.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Nov 11 2014 07:46 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
STOP TRADING SYNDERGAARD!


Young pitcher for young hitter, all day, every day. In my head, I'm doing it right now.

Edgy MD
Nov 11 2014 08:26 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
STOP TRADING SYNDERGAARD!


Young pitcher for young hitter, all day, every day. In my head, I'm doing it right now.

I don't think you mean this regardless of which pitcher and which hitter.

'Cuz they ain't equal. Castro shmastro. Let's not get seduced by his name. His team is cashing in for a reason. He's embarrassed them couple of times. He picked up a sexual assault charge a few years ago, he was thrown under the bus by his manager for only having his head in the game "80-85% of the time," and has been benched a handful of times for not hustling. He also ended the season injured, and his durability had probably been his best asset.

While he's coming off possibly his best offensive season, he's not really progressing. Defensively, he brings about 1/3 of what Alexi Ramirez offers. His running game has been on the shelf.

The Cubs are terrible for a reason. Let's not help them trade their way out the basement.

Mets Guy in Michigan
Nov 11 2014 08:49 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Kind of agree. If we're going to trade Noah, I want a real masher.

Lefty Specialist
Nov 12 2014 06:19 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
I don't think you mean this regardless of which pitcher and which hitter.

'Cuz they ain't equal. Castro shmastro. Let's not get seduced by his name. His team is cashing in for a reason. He's embarrassed them couple of times. He picked up a sexual assault charge a few years ago, he was thrown under the bus by his manager for only having his head in the game "80-85% of the time," and has been benched a handful of times for not hustling. He also ended the season injured, and his durability had probably been his best asset.

While he's coming off possibly his best offensive season, he's not really progressing. Defensively, he brings about 1/3 of what Alexi Ramirez offers. His running game has been on the shelf.

The Cubs are terrible for a reason. Let's not help them trade their way out the basement.


This. They want to get rid of Castro because they have replacements and he's a bit of an attitude problem. This is exactly the kind of guy you don't want to a) bring to New York, where the spotlight shines a lot brighter, and b) bring to a team with a lot of young players on the verge of competing.

I would imagine that Joe Maddon will have a lot of input with Theo as to how the Cubs are constructed, and Castro doesn't play the way Maddon likes. So I'm guessing he'll be out one way or the other; I'd prefer it wasn't us overpaying for him.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 12 2014 06:23 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm also on the Castr-NO Bandwagon (oh yes I did).

If Theo Epstein wants to move the guy to the Mets he can have Scott Rice and maybe Gee. He wants a real player he better come up with more than Castro.

Frayed Knot
Nov 12 2014 06:55 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The REAL challenge trade with the Cubbies would be Syndergaard for Addison Russell -- neither has set foot in MLB yet but both were Top-15 prospects last winter (Russell slightly higher) and likely will be again this year.
I suspect Chicago would balk on that deal first: Russell is the guy they just traded for and supposedly the SS they really want. He's also a year and a half younger than Syndy plus there's the general assumption that position players are safer and more projectable.



Puma in the Post is talking Seattle again, this year it's Brad Miller and/or Chris Taylor (last year it was Miller and Nick Franklin who has since moved on to TB)

Miller - just turned 25 y/o; 673 ML ABs over 2013-14; .241/.302/.389
Taylor - hit 24 in August; 136 ML ABs this year; .287/.347/.346 - good AAA numbers before that
Not sure how they compare to each other defensively.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 12 2014 09:28 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Chris Taylor hails from Virginia Beach. CASE CLOSED!

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 12 2014 09:33 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

More on Taylor from BA:

What To Expect: Mariners SS Chris Taylor
July 24, 2014 by Vince Lara-Cinisomo

The Mariners seem intent on remaking their offense, which ranks next-to-last in the American League in runs scored and dead last in the AL with a .673 OPS. This despite adding Robinson Cano and others in the offseason.

They made two roster-altering moves on Thursday, first trading for first baseman/DH Kendrys Morales, who in 2013 hit 23 homers and led the Mariners in average (.277), hits (167), doubles (34) and RBIs (80).

The second move involved dipping into the farm system to promote shortstop Chris Taylor from Triple-A Tacoma. Through 75 games Taylor slashed .328/.397/.497 with five homers and 37 RBIs.

Scouting Report

A fifth-round pick from Virginia in 2012, Taylor signed for $500,000 following his junior season. He was considered a glove-first prospect when he entered pro ball, but he hit his way to Double-A Jackson in 2013. He handles the bat well, and though scouts say he does not possess home run-power, he has shown the ability to hit for gap power, with 34 extra-base hits this season in 302 at-bats.

At the Triple-A all-star game in Durham, he pounded two doubles, including one off the tall blue wall in left-center field, a performance for which he was singled out as “top star” for the Pacific Coast League. Taylor’s strong performance this season is not a PCL illusion. His home park in Tacoma depresses doubles and runs scored, relative to parks the Rainiers visit on the road. In fact, Taylor has done the majority of his damage away from Tacoma (.952 OPS on the road versus .815 at home).

The Mariners’ No. 8 prospect in the Midseason Prospect Update, Taylor brings positional versatility and an ability to hit for average to the Mariners, and he could carve a useful career as a utility player. But it seems the Mariners could plug him in in place of shortstop Brad Miller, who’s posted a .598 OPS thus far.

What To Expect

If Seattle is looking for an offensive upgrade at short, it seems reasonable to expect Taylor will get the majority of starts there. While he profiles better at second base because of range and arm strength, that clearly will not happen because there’s a superior offensive and defensive player there (a guy by the name of Cano).

Taylor, however, is a stolen-base threat as well as an above-average runner, and he could give a team a boost in average while not losing any home runs in the jump from Triple-A to the majors, since that’s not his game anyway.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Nov 12 2014 09:52 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Fine, then.

What about the other lil' Cub?

Frayed Knot
Nov 12 2014 10:04 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Not sure that Baez is ultimately going to be a SS - not just on SS-heavy Chicago but anywhere else.
He certainly is an interesting prospect though; lotsa powah and still only 21 y/o.
But K'd nearly 1/3 of the time in AAA, and his brief ML call-up time was just ridiculous: .169/.227/.324 with nearly half his hits going for XB [6 2Bs + 9 HRs of 36 hits] but [u:3fsinhrf]95 Ks in 213 ABs[/u:3fsinhrf]

HahnSolo
Nov 12 2014 10:32 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Since we're talking about young SS on old franchises, would the Red Sox listen if someone inquired about Xander Bogaerts? I know he didn't light up Fenway last year, but still very young and as far as I know still very prospect-y. I suppose our young pitching might interest them.

Edgy MD
Nov 12 2014 10:53 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

His stock fell, but I don't think they've soured on the guy.

What do you think the Mermen would want for Taylor?

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 12 2014 11:14 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Some guy, I guess. Seattle is apparently thinking about going all Hanley Ramirez so may have lots of shortstops to sell.

Edgy MD
Nov 12 2014 11:22 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

How much would you pay?

Murphy? Gee? Kolarek?

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 12 2014 11:44 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Yes I think I'll be willing to swap Gee for this Taylor fellow (confession: I barely heard of this guy till 2 hours ago). I don't believe Seattle would want Muffy unless looking for a kind of versatile, non-HR hitting DH, but he'd be in my offer pile as well if necessary. Kolarek, you bet. Almost any minor leaguer not in the top 10.

Frayed Knot
Nov 12 2014 11:50 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

New Arizona GM Dave Stewart is preemptively on record as saying that the Snakes aren't interested in any of the older NYM pitchers - no Niese, no Gee, and obviously no Colon
That leaves someone from the Wheeler, Syndergaard, Montero, deGrom pool, but then that gets a bit more problematic from this end.




* my auto spell-check keeps trying to turn deGrom into legroom so I might just have to start calling him that - and with his long legs it kind of fits too.

Edgy MD
Nov 12 2014 11:58 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The D-Backs spent all last year deciding whether to spit or swallow, and Stewart has them still chewing.

I'm relatively certain that Montero is the only young pitcher the Mets are willing to talk about.

batmagadanleadoff
Nov 12 2014 12:27 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:
New Arizona GM Dave Stewart is preemptively on record as saying that the Snakes aren't interested in any of the older NYM pitchers - no Niese, no Gee, and obviously no Colon


Me neither.

Edgy MD
Nov 12 2014 12:45 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I suspect nobody moves on the shortstop market until the Yoan Moncada sweepstakes is over.

Ashie62
Nov 12 2014 04:17 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
STOP TRADING SYNDERGAARD!


Whether it be Ramirez Castro or someone else you have to give o get. I don't believe Gee has much value.

I don't understand your fascination with Syndergaard. He is not the second coming.

Frayed Knot
Nov 12 2014 06:09 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ashie62 wrote:
I don't understand your fascination with Syndergaard. He is not the second coming.


Neither, most likely, will be the guy he's potentially being traded for.

Edgy MD
Nov 12 2014 07:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm not fascinated by anybody. I value him more highly than I value Starlin Castro.

Edgy MD
Nov 12 2014 07:44 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Just saw a note that said Rollins blocked a trade to the Metskills.

If true, that's a pretty exclusive club. The Larkin Bunch.

Frayed Knot
Nov 12 2014 09:30 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

It's not clear how far along Rollins trade talks were. In the reports I read it sounded more like the Mets were just kicking the tires when Rollins put a premature end to anything by saying he had no intention of waiving his 10/5 rights. He wouldn't have been terrible as a one-year stop-gap (depending on the price of course) but I'm kinda glad this idea got squashed before it ever took off no matter how close it might have been.

Going back to the Larkin deal, wasn't there a deal there that was all completed and just needing his approval when he turned it down?

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 12 2014 09:41 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ship may well have sailed but I was into this idea last spring. Most of the opposition is emotional bullshit over those "team to beat" remarks which were totally OK by me if potentially dangerous for Rollins. Great player who could have been better than the guys we used there last season.

MFS62
Nov 12 2014 09:45 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

So, of all the options being identified, the guys who can hit may not be able to play short or have been moved to other positions by their current teams. We have one of those - Flores.
And the guys mentioned who can field may not be able to become good hitters at the major league level. We have a few of those - Majia, Tovar.
So, why give up a decent asset to just keep treading water or provide marginal improvement?
Unless the Mets can acquire a real difference maker, why do anything?
Let's keep Flores at short and see if his improvement in the field was just short-sample related or something really improved by that time he spent at that special workout camp last year.
Sometimes, the best moves you can make are no moves at all.
And Sandy agrees:
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/mets/p ... p-not-dead

Later

Edgy MD
Nov 13 2014 06:07 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Alderson agrees that sticking with Flores is an authentic option --- one they might choose if a better alternative doesn't open up. I think most of us would agree, but that's hardly a deep commitment.

I don't agree that he demonstrated a particular facility at short. I have nothing to compare it to, but if that was improvement, I'm not impressed.

Who is "Majia"?

MFS62
Nov 13 2014 06:36 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:

Who is "Majia"?

He split his time between the brain fart and typo leagues last year. Meant Tejada.

Later

sharpie
Nov 13 2014 07:34 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

That article reads like it was written during last off-season. Also had a January 30 date.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Nov 13 2014 07:37 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Yes it is an old article. You lazy guys and your lazy Rubening.

MFS62
Nov 13 2014 07:59 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Yes it is an old article. You lazy guys and your lazy Rubening.

(slapping forehead)
Didn't have to search too far.
Those bastages at Yahoo sports linked to it this week like it was new.
The Flores 2013 stats should have been a giveaway, too.

Later

Vic Sage
Nov 13 2014 09:02 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

If they don't make a move for a leadoff-hitting SS, then who leads off for this team?

* EY? He's not going to start, or even play that much (barring injury);
* Lagares? Lacks discipline, so doesn't get on enough. And he lacks base-stealing instincts;
* Murphy? Maybe. He gets on ok (at least with his BA), and can run OK, and his lack of HR power is less of a problem. But he still doesn't take enough BBs to earn a high OB%. Plus, Terry won't do it, because Murph doesn't LOOK like a leadoff hitter;
* The best OB% guys in the lineup are probably Wright and Duda, but Terry's certainly not going to bat them leadoff either;
* Granderson? I suppose. He can still run, and he will take a BB, and HR power in a leadoff hitter is a nice add-on, but he's been a better hitter further down in the lineup throughout his career, and more productive, too, where his low BA and solid power are more useful than it is hitting behind the pitcher at the top of the order..

In other words, we need a leadoff-hitting SS.

Centerfield
Nov 13 2014 09:11 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

If Murphy gets traded, Dilson Herrera looks kinda leadoffy.

Or we could get that SS from Toronto. The one with the big contract they are probably looking to unload.

Centerfield
Nov 13 2014 10:46 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

You know, I wonder if the Reyes possibility is not just a pipe dream. They have a need at second base and have been said to have inquired about Chase Utley and Cole Hamels.

Daniel Murphy doesn't have the same star power, but compare his numbers last year and he is almost identical to Utley (.746 OPS vs. .734). Plus Murphy plays at CitiFiedl. Throw in ill-tempered Jon Niese and his team-friendly contract, and maybe the Jays pick up some of the money owed to Reyes.

Plus, he's got only 3 guaranteed years left, and is 31 years old.

Maybe?

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Nov 13 2014 11:30 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Centerfield wrote:
If Murphy gets traded, Dilson Herrera looks kinda leadoffy.


There y'are. Great eye, good hit tool... should be a good one, too. (At least until Nimmo comes up.)

Centerfield
Nov 14 2014 07:42 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

On the other hand, maybe Reyes is not that great an idea.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2199 ... jose-reyes

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 02 2014 01:46 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Tracky sez while Xander Boegarts is unlikely, Red Sox might part with their next SS prospect, Deven Marrero, in a deal for pitching.

Marrero is a 2012 1st round pick who hit OK (good batting average & stealing, OK obp, little power) until struggling across the board in his first taste of AAA Pawtucket last season.

Ashie62
Dec 02 2014 06:11 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I like Gregorious better.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 02 2014 11:17 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Tracky sez while Xander Boegarts is unlikely, Red Sox might part with their next SS prospect, Deven Marrero, in a deal for pitching.

Marrero is a 2012 1st round pick who hit OK (good batting average & stealing, OK obp, little power) until struggling across the board in his first taste of AAA Pawtucket last season.


That '14 sure does look like a hiccup in context. And those on-base skills. And those scouting reports. Hmm. Hmm.

Edgy MD
Dec 03 2014 12:54 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Seems to suggest not-readiness, though, don't it? He'd be behind Matt Reynolds.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 03 2014 01:11 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

There's safety-- or, at least, more safety-- in numbers. More potential, anyway. Or, at least, potential potential.

Edgy MD
Dec 03 2014 01:17 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Sure, but at what price comes that redundancy? AT WHAT PRICE?!!

They've got three or four shortstops of the future right now. Not so clear on the shortstop del presente.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 03 2014 01:42 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Another possibility from Boston's minor leagues: Garin "Older Brother" Cecchini. Not a SS, but an infield (3B/2B) prospect and potential "good fit." Definitely blocked now that Panda is in Boston.

Edgy MD
Dec 03 2014 02:05 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Oooh, add Chase d'Arnaud and let the two brothers compete for slots. Should create some real bitter competitive tension in the clubhouse.

Edgy MD
Dec 05 2014 08:27 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Twittererer says Gregorius has just become a Yankee.

Vic Sage
Dec 05 2014 08:29 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

shit

MFS62
Dec 05 2014 08:31 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Twittererer says Gregorius has just become a Yankee.

I wonder what Sterling's home run call will be.
Gregorius is gorgeous?

Later

Ceetar
Dec 05 2014 08:39 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

MFS62 wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
Twittererer says Gregorius has just become a Yankee.

I wonder what Sterling's home run call will be.
Gregorius is gorgeous?

Later


provided he hits one.

Edgy MD
Dec 05 2014 08:48 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015


THE NOTORIOUS GREGORIUS!! A BB BY DIDI!!

metsmarathon
Dec 05 2014 08:49 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

it is high. it is far. it is gone!!! didi did it! a home run from gorgeous, gregarious, gregori...uh... the shortstop settles under it for the second out.

Mets Guy in Michigan
Dec 05 2014 09:09 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The Tigers have dealt pitcher Robbie Ray to the Arizona Diamondback in exchange for New York Yankees pitcher Shane Green, Fox Sports baseball writers Ken Rosenthal and Jon Morosi reported Friday, citing sources.

The three-team deal will also send shortstop Didi Gregorius to the Yankees and a minor-leaguer to be named from Detroit to Arizona, Rosenthal reported.

d'Kong76
Dec 05 2014 09:12 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I guess when a team needs a shortstop, they go out
and get a shortstop!

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 05 2014 09:13 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Deal looks like Shane Greene to the Tigers, Gregorious to the MFYs, LHP Robbie Ray to the Dbaggs.

Tigers always looking for relievers. ALWAYS!

Ray was one of the guys the Tigers got in the Fister deal, and supposedly an OK prospect. Curious I suppose inasmuch as it becomes a challenge trade of Greene vs Ray with the MFYs getting a free shortstop.

If all Didi cost from our POV was a middling RH pitcher, I'd say this was an opportunity missed for the Flushing Nine.

Edgy MD
Dec 05 2014 09:17 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I get the idea that the bloom was off the rose from the Mets point of view. He got measurably out-OPS+'d by Tejada last year (OPS was .001 higher, but in Arizona), and he's the same age and just as out of options.

Some guys bring alternatives; some guys just make things more crowded.

From my point of view, I tend to irrationally believe anybody who comes up through the Cincinnati system was born to hit, and eventually will, given the chance. But that's silly.

seawolf17
Dec 05 2014 09:23 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Didi Gregorius sucks, kids. I'm thrilled he's a Yankee.

Mets Guy in Michigan
Dec 05 2014 09:42 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Robbie Ray was THE key to the Fister deal -- which has emerged as one of Dombrowski's big -- and rare -- blunders.

The Tigers bullpen last year was a disaster and the reason they flamed out in the playoffs. Of course, Joba played a big role in that...



How come teams demand our young guns, then go and make a deal with another team for lesser players?

seawolf17
Dec 05 2014 09:49 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Mets Guy in Michigan wrote:
How come teams demand our young guns, then go and make a deal with another team for lesser players?

Because we never know what they're actually demanding, just whatever Beat Writer X needs to say to sell papers/get clicks.

Lefty Specialist
Dec 05 2014 09:56 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

seawolf17 wrote:
Didi Gregorius sucks, kids. I'm thrilled he's a Yankee.


This. The four most common words Yankee fans will utter in 2015 will be 'He's no Derek Jeter'.

Ceetar
Dec 05 2014 10:03 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Mets Guy in Michigan wrote:


How come teams demand our young guns, then go and make a deal with another team for lesser players?


Because Sandy does his due diligence and talks to every team about potential fits, and every team asks for Syndergaard. Some teams call Sandy once a day just to ask about him. I doubt Sandy's had a conversation with another team where they haven't asked about Syndergaard.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 05 2014 10:06 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Lefty Specialist wrote:
seawolf17 wrote:
Didi Gregorius sucks, kids. I'm thrilled he's a Yankee.


This. The four most common words Yankee fans will utter in 2015 will be 'He's no Derek Jeter'.

Fans will say that, but I'd be surprised if it were so. Not because I think he's great but because his speed and range will be shocking, and that he's still young enough to improve. Trying to take emotion out of this this a good deal for the MFYs.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 05 2014 10:15 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

He's okay. Like, Tejadan-brand okay. If he improves a little more, he'll be pretty good.

For the price of, say, Dillon Gee-minus-two-years (Greene's rough equivalent)? That's workable.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 05 2014 10:24 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
He's okay. Like, Tejadan-brand okay. If he improves a little more, he'll be pretty good.

For the price of, say, Dillon Gee-minus-two-years (Greene's rough equivalent)? That's workable.


I'm hoping the Mets are aiming higher myself, but yes, that's what I'm sayin'.

Ceetar
Dec 05 2014 10:32 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I mean, I'd be surprised if he didn't put up the numbers Jeter did last year. He might not put up the numbers Tejada did though, which is why the Mets weren't really interested.

Edgy MD
Dec 05 2014 10:45 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Rubin just reported on Metly disinterest in Cabrera, who to me, was --- if not obviously better --- at least distinctive enough alternative from Tejada and potentially nettable with a minor league deal.

I'm not sure if Gregorius is the sort of upgrade that's worth giving up Jeurys Familia and a guaranteed roster spot.

If we're thinking of potentially better, I'm OK coming in low. If we're thinking of obviously better, then where do we look to next? Back to Seattle?

Ashie62
Dec 05 2014 12:14 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

At any rate Digregorious is off the board...cheaply..

Frayed Knot
Dec 05 2014 01:18 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Gregorius's biggest flaw: his 490 career OPS vs LHP [.184/.257/.233] over 180 PAs]

He split 2014 between Arizona and AAA Reno. He regressed at the big league level [704 OPS in 2013 to 653 in '14] but did hit well in Reno [.301/.389/.447 in 226 ABs] with the caveat that: it's Reno.
Don't know what his minor league splits were.




I'd be surprised if he didn't put up the numbers Jeter did last year.


That's some pretty low hanging fruit right there.



It occurs to me that this is at least the second NYY/DET/ARZ three-way trade in recent years. The deal that sent Granderson to the Bronx involved the same clubs.

Edgy MD
Dec 05 2014 01:42 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ashie62 wrote:
At any rate Digregorious is off the board...cheaply..

I don't think he'd feel cheap if the Mets gave up Familia for him.

Ashie62
Dec 05 2014 05:49 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Agreed

Frayed Knot
Dec 07 2014 06:00 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Cubs announce that they will NOT be trading Starlin Castro this winter.
Met fans can (and, I'm sure, will) view that as positive or negative news depending on their POV.

Edgy MD
Dec 08 2014 08:17 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Luis Sardinas, #7 prospect for the Texas Rangers. Some reports say the Rangers might be interested in one of the Mets' excess pitchers.

[fimg=450:1m1lwkb7]http://rangersblog.dallasnews.com/files/2013/11/C25I5690_30259028.jpg[/fimg:1m1lwkb7]

He hasn't lit it up in the minors (or 43 games in the majors this year), but he's clearly been pushed ahead of his level. (He's two years younger than Matt Reynolds.) Was the BBA #84 prospect before the 2013 season. Was the MLB.com #9 shortstop prospect before the 2014. A speedy switch-hitter with an on-base tool.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 08 2014 08:18 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Like it. Gee for Sardinas. GET IT DONE SANDY

Edgy MD
Dec 08 2014 08:28 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Worth noting is that the "on-base tool" is based on reports and numbers in the lower minors. It didn't show up this year, though, with an .021 OBP-BA difference in 81 games at AA and AAA, and an .042 differential in 40 MLB games.

Plenty of room for growth, but it's a leap of faith.

A Boy Named Seo
Dec 08 2014 09:01 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Heyman sez we're interested in 27-year old, power-hitting shortstop Jung-Ho Kang (39 HR's in Korea last year). Sounds like a mythical beast to me.

My Korean's rusty, but here he is winning an award for best female pop performance.

[youtube]TYp6zt627oA[/youtube]

Centerfield
Dec 08 2014 09:07 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Big leg kick. Fly ball hitter. I see a lot of balls dying on the Citi warning track.

The fence in one of those clips says 118 meters. That's about 387 feet.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 08 2014 09:16 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Word is there's some doubt his glove makes it as SS so it could wind up as another Flores.

Smashes those HRs, dunnie?

A Boy Named Seo
Dec 08 2014 09:27 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

If he hit 15 home runs and kicked like a Rockette, I'd be all about him.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 08 2014 10:08 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

A Boy Named Seo wrote:
If he hit 15 home runs and kicked like a Rockette, I'd be all about him.


15 Long Struck Dongs is closer to his historic norms; even including last year, he's averaging about 21.7 HR per season over the last six (since his "breakout").

Looks like an interesting skill set, with the rate stats (last year's absurd career high aside) looking good-not-great; signing him probably creates even more of a surplus at 2B/3B, though, than it does fill a shortstop hole.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 08 2014 10:15 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Long struck dongs lololllolollollool

A Boy Named Seo
Dec 08 2014 10:42 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

NO MORE YANKEE HIS WAKNEE! The Donger need FOOD!

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 08 2014 02:24 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

A Boy Named Seo wrote:
Heyman sez we're interested in 27-year old, power-hitting shortstop Jung-Ho Kang (39 HR's in Korea last year). Sounds like a mythical beast to me.


Sounds like a super-villain to me!

Frayed Knot
Dec 08 2014 02:55 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Luis Sardinas, #7 prospect for the Texas Rangers. Some reports say the Rangers might be interested in one of the Mets' excess pitchers.

[fimg=450]http://rangersblog.dallasnews.com/files/2013/11/C25I5690_30259028.jpg[/fimg].



Below is a John Sickels report on Sardinas from April 2014 so it doesn't include anything from this past year. Sickels has the Rangers report up next on his docket (with the Mets to follow) so we'll probably have a (briefer) update by the end of the week.

** Sardinas was a big-dollar signing, earning $1,200,000 out of Venezuela in 2009. He was considered a very advanced defensive player for his age with a chance to hit once he matured physically. Injuries struck almost immediately: a broken finger limited him to just 26 games in the Arizona Rookie League in 2010, and a more severe shoulder dislocation kept him to just 14 more contests in '11. He hit well both years (.311/.363/.350 and .308/.367/.385), showing contact hitting skills and good speed with 10 steals combined, but obviously needing to prove his durability.

Shoulder problems continued to nag him in '12 but he played 96 games for Low-A Hickory, hitting .291/.346/.356 with 32 steals, 29 walks, and 52 strikeouts in 374 at-bats.
He finally played a full season in '13, seeing 128 games between High-A Myrtle Beach (.298/.358/.360 in 383 at-bats) and Double-A Frisco (.258/.286/.311 in 135 at-bats) w/32 steals.

Listed at 6-1, 170, Sardinas is a switch-hitter (b: 5/16/93). His best offensive tool is speed: he could steal 20 or more bases per season if he gets on base enough. Alas, that could be a problem, at least in the short run. Although he was an effective contact hitter at lower levels, his complete lack of power has been a serious issue in Double-A and his production at that level has been inadequate. He is young enough to gain some strength and improve a great deal, but it hasn't happened yet.

His defense is well ahead of his offense at this point. His arm is very strong, his range is above average, and he has quick hands. He'll botch routine plays occasionally but he also reaches balls most infielders can't touch. With more experience he should be an excellent defender.

It is likely that Sardinas will have a long major league career, but the shape of that career is uncertain. If he maxes out his hitting skills, he could be an All-Star. If his hitting improves somewhat but not to the maximal projection, he could still be a long-term regular due to his glovework and speed contributions. If the bat remains inadequate, he could still be a useful utility player. **

Edgy MD
Dec 08 2014 05:20 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Not saying that doesn't sound like a character with as much value as a Dillon Gee, but it seems questionable whether he's ahead of Reynolds at this point. He certainly doesn't seem like he's ready to push aside Tejada and Flores and establish himself as the go-to option in 2015.

Ashie62
Dec 08 2014 05:52 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Its like Gee is blacklisted.

Matt Reynolds, moving up quick!

batmagadanleadoff
Dec 08 2014 11:43 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
A Boy Named Seo wrote:
Heyman sez we're interested in 27-year old, power-hitting shortstop Jung-Ho Kang (39 HR's in Korea last year). Sounds like a mythical beast to me.


Sounds like a super-villain to me!



Nah. He's an alien from the planet Rigel VII.




"We're Gung Ho for Jung-Ho".

Centerfield
Dec 09 2014 07:11 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Saw a blip this morning on how the Mets might be willing to trade Noah for a guy on Texas. Hey Sandy...

DON'T TRADE SYNDEGAARD FOR A GUY WHO IS NOT GOING TO HIT MORE THAN FLORES.

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 09 2014 07:21 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

If they trade Syndergaard, I want them to at least get someone as good as Victor Zambrano.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 09 2014 07:22 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm not gonna squash the Mets for dangling Syndergaard. Let's see where it could lead.

A Boy Named Seo
Dec 09 2014 09:01 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Doyers apparently wiling to trade Dee Gordon cause he can't get on base. Sandy would probably not be in love for the same reason, BUT...

He reached base 36% in the minors (though it's 31 in the majors so far.) He scored 92 and stole 64 last year. He'll be 27 in April. Is cheap and can't be a FA til 2019, so I think he'd be pretty steep. Interested?

Edgy MD
Dec 09 2014 09:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

He could be a shortstop-playing version of Eric Young --- the leadoff hitter who bats ninth.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 09 2014 09:31 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Another reason he'd be Eric Young, SS edition: he'd be a "leadoff hitter" that isn't actually, like, a good leadoff hitter.

Frayed Knot
Dec 10 2014 06:51 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

While a .326 OBA is hardly great for a leadoff hitter, in this current era it's hardly bad and it's up from .280 in 2012 and .314 in '13
My bigger concern is what kind of a SS he is. He has played there some in the past but was exclusively a 2B last season while the Dodgers went with five different SSs headed by the 235 pound Juan Uribe (98 starts) backed by Justin Turner (45)

If we're going to trade for a SS then trade for a real SS. We've already got makeshift ones.

seawolf17
Dec 10 2014 07:12 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:
If we're going to trade for a SS then trade for a real SS. We've already got makeshift ones.

That's what bothers me about a lot of this. I'm all in on Flores for '15. Let's see what happens. If we're in contention, and an Ian Desmond-type becomes available, then let's talk. But trading Thor for another team's project is dumb.

Frayed Knot
Dec 11 2014 07:11 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ken Davidoff in the Post does some detective work on Kang the Conquerer

His various observations:
- he can hit: career .298/.382/.502 with 138 homers in nine seasons, and a career-best .354/.457/.733 with 39 homers in 116 games/497 PA in 2014
- says that the Mets have scouted him via video and in person and have met with his agent - A's & Giants may also be interested
- players from Korea work via the old posting system that used to be in effect for Japanese players: teams bid for his rights and only the winner gets to negotiate with him


He then talks to Brandon Knight whose brief ML career finished with the Mets in 2008 (I have ABSOLUTELY ZERO MEMORY of this guy) but has since played four seasons with Kang in Korea, and he describes a good news/bad news situation:

- “He is the best overall position-player prospect in that league,” says Knight. “He certainly doesn’t see the same sort of fastballs that he sees in the big leagues — it’s more often in the low-90s — but I’ve seen him get after guys who are throwing in the mid-to-upper 90s ... I think the biggest thing that’s changed with Kang is his approach, he’s more patient now and better hitting the breaking ball than he used to be. He likes hitting sliders.”

but then he says:
- “I’m just not sure if he’s what you would look for as a big-league level shortstop ... He definitely has the arm [but] the actual effort level he has to play the position is the only concern there. There were times when balls were definitely a ball that a good shortstop would dive for, and he just doesn’t. With his arm, he can make those plays if he dives. I’ve certainly seen him make good plays when he does decide to dive, but not on a consistent enough basis.”

before adding:
- “He’s a fantastic kid [who] constantly does want to get better. It could be that the whole diving thing is that he’s kind of saving himself. He could be better if someone got to him and said, ‘We need more effort defensively.’ He’s certainly a well-rounded player.”

Edgy MD
Dec 11 2014 07:50 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Knight was the pilot of this looping biplane of emotional fury.

Centerfield
Dec 11 2014 08:05 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Seems like the 39 HR's was more of a career year than the norm.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 11 2014 08:13 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Knight was the pilot of this looping biplane of emotional fury.


Just curious. Did you actually remember that or just search it?

Seriously, I'm kind of worried of the effect the Google has had on my memory. It's almost as if I don't bother to recall anything anymore.

Edgy MD
Dec 11 2014 08:36 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I remembered a spot start that included a recovery after a rough first inning. I did not remember it turning into one of the excruciating LaRussa/Manuel let's-bunt-our-way-out-of-any-and-all-rallies wars of attrition.

It isn't clear from the IGT, but Carlos Muniz was the bullpen goat.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 11 2014 09:16 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:

- “He’s a fantastic kid [who] constantly does want to get better. It could be that the whole diving thing is that he’s kind of saving himself. He could be better if someone got to him and said, ‘We need more effort defensively.’”


Do coaches have... um... a different function in the Korean game?

Also... I don't know how much better the kid's attitude/defensive game/ability to wake up in time for practice is going to get, as the kid is old enough to run for Congress.

A Boy Named Seo
Dec 11 2014 09:26 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Maybe "Mr. Baseball" has tainted my perception of stuff, but how common is diving in the Asian game?

Frayed Knot
Dec 13 2014 05:56 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

A Boy Named Seo wrote:
Maybe "Mr. Baseball" has tainted my perception of stuff, but how common is diving in the Asian game?


Not sure, but remember it was back when Kaz Matsui got here that we learned of the oddity that Japanese infielders rarely played balls to the backhand (or at least that was the story at the time).



Anyway, Mr. Kang is to be posted by his Korean Lg team on Monday with the Mets, Giants, & A's being listed as the ones with the most interest.
As mentioned before, Korean players become available via the 'old' posting system that governed the early generation of Japanese players until those rules were updated a few seasons back. So interested teams will need to win a bidding process (with all that money going to the club) for the right to negotiate a deal with the player.


The article announcing this on mlb.com warns that the 1.189 OPS that Kang put up this past season [39 HRs, 115 RBI in 116 games, and a career .298/.382/.502] comes from a league where offense is much more plentiful than in MLB. Runs scored in the Korean league were 11.4 per game combined this past year as compared to 8.2 in MLB 2014. Even during the height of the steroid era in MLB teams runs scored topped out at just over 10 Runs/G
And then there's the question as to whether teams view him as a SS or 2B

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 13 2014 07:59 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Well, the Mets have an incumbent at second base whose time is almost certain to end after 2015, if not before.

Frayed Knot
Dec 13 2014 08:49 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Sure, but the idea this winter is that we need a SS.
If you sign Kang it's not going to be for him to sit around for a year waiting for Murphy to hit FA status.
And if they're going to trade Muffy first then they've already got 2B alternatives (Flores, Herrera) and we'd still be sticking a pseudo-SS out there every day.




In the meantime, Sherman in the Post is crowing: Damn the risks and go for Tulowitski

Edgy MD
Dec 13 2014 09:52 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:
A Boy Named Seo wrote:
Maybe "Mr. Baseball" has tainted my perception of stuff, but how common is diving in the Asian game?


Not sure, but remember it was back when Kaz Matsui got here that we learned of the oddity that Japanese infielders rarely played balls to the backhand (or at least that was the story at the time).

I don't remember that, but in Kang's highlight reel, the first defensive highlight they show there is him going into the hole and nailing a runner going from second to third. Nice, but his refusal to backhand the play gets him so turned around that third base was his only option.

Edgy MD
Dec 13 2014 11:14 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Reports suggest the bidding is expected to be in the (reasonable, to my eyes) $5-10 million range, with the player seeking (again, reportedly) four years and $24 million.

While that's not risk-free, it's the same (minus $750 thou) as Omar gave Luis Castillo after the 2007 season. But there's that posting fee, of course. The only thing the Mets had to post to get Castillo was Dustin Martin and Drew Butera.

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 14 2014 05:51 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:
Sure, but the idea this winter is that we need a SS.
If you sign Kang it's not going to be for him to sit around for a year waiting for Murphy to hit FA status.


My thinking was that Kang could play shortstop in 2015, and if it turns out he's better suited to second base, he could move there in 2016.

seawolf17
Dec 14 2014 05:57 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'd prefer they went after Kodos.

Frayed Knot
Dec 14 2014 06:36 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Sure, but the idea this winter is that we need a SS.
If you sign Kang it's not going to be for him to sit around for a year waiting for Murphy to hit FA status.


My thinking was that Kang could play shortstop in 2015, and if it turns out he's better suited to second base, he could move there in 2016.


I think the emphasis needs to be: if you're going to get a SS, get a SS rather than someone pretending to be one.
But as we're finding out on this great SS odyssey this off season, there are lots of choices out there but all of them have flaws in some way in the same way that the incumbent choices do.

Ashie62
Dec 14 2014 12:02 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Kang sounds a lot like Kaz. I'll pass.

Wait on the Red Sox for Xander Bogaerts.

Or, just plain wait.

Edgy MD
Dec 14 2014 01:01 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Kang may be risk-intensive and a defensive question mark like Kaz, and a shortstop who may turn into a second baseman when the exchange rate is applied, but he comes with a somewhat different skill set --- chunky slugger whomping skills versus slick-and-skinny slap-and-run skills.

I don't know if that gives him more or less of a chance to make the adjustment.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 14 2014 08:47 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

What the fark's all this you-can-always-move-him-because-there'll-be-a-vacancy-at-second shipoopi?

Ceetar
Dec 15 2014 11:47 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
What the fark's all this you-can-always-move-him-because-there'll-be-a-vacancy-at-second shipoopi?



Last I checked prospects don't always pan out.

But then, sometimes you just sign the guy you have to a nice deal and don't worry about it.

How about "You can always DH him when the NL adopts it"

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 15 2014 12:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The National League has avoided the DH for over 40 years. What makes you think that will change in the next few years?

Ceetar
Dec 15 2014 12:10 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
The National League has avoided the DH for over 40 years. What makes you think that will change in the next few years?


Because it's time. Pitchers don't take hitting seriously. They're ever looking for more ways to specialize them, much the way they don't have them hit in early Spring or early minor leagues, since they feel it's secondary (more like tertiary, at best) Interleague play is here anyway and the silliness of have two sets of teams play with different rules is that much more apparent.

Oh, and a new commish may have different thoughts on the matter. By rule, it could still happen if 2015 if he feels like it.

d'Kong76
Dec 15 2014 12:15 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ceetar wrote:
Because it's time. Pitchers don't take hitting seriously.

Is there a full moon tonight?

Ceetar
Dec 15 2014 12:18 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

d'Kong76 wrote:
Ceetar wrote:
Because it's time. Pitchers don't take hitting seriously.

Is there a full moon tonight?


next full moon is January 5th. Got a Blue one in July.

d'Kong76
Dec 15 2014 12:21 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

My wife's birthday, good to know!

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 15 2014 01:45 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Lowrie signs with Astros. I don't think he was all that sexy but is kinda affordable.

Sherman I think argued the other day that it's time for the Mets to shock the world and trade for Tulowitzski, likening it to the Carter addition.

It could be similar.

Frayed Knot
Dec 15 2014 02:13 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I was just about to bring Lowrie up as Richard Justice had him going to the Mets on his prediction sheet.
The biggest stumbling block here may have been that he wanted, and got, three years (plus an option) which was longer than the Mets wanted to go, more so than the money which wasn't all that high in total ($23 + $5 for the 4th year).

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 19 2014 07:35 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Twitter on fire again following reports that Mets have talked Tulo with the Rockies -- and that "no chance" for a deal has become "a 5% chance."

batmagadanleadoff
Dec 19 2014 07:49 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Can somebody explain to me, the difference between 0 and 5%? Not in real math and stuff, but in MetSpeak.

Ceetar
Dec 19 2014 07:59 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Can somebody explain to me, the difference between 0 and 5%? Not in real math and stuff, but in MetSpeak.


well, not MetSpeak. ReporterSpeak? Who said the 5%?

d'Kong76
Dec 19 2014 08:05 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Show us the MATH!

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 19 2014 08:29 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Can somebody explain to me, the difference between 0 and 5%? Not in real math and stuff, but in MetSpeak.


I dunno. Keith Hernandez prior to the night of June 15 was 0%. Mike Piazza once he was flipped to the Marlins was, like, 20%. I think that's what that means.

I should say though. If I'm the Rockies I'm looking at the Padres and Dodgers loading up, the Giants as defending WS champs, and Tulowitzski's lousy recent health record and future obligations, I'm a motivated seller. Very much like the Padres got Kemp, the Mets oughta be able to get this guy if they want him badly enough.

TheOldMole
Dec 19 2014 11:04 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Didn't the Padres kill the Kemp deal? My thought, deGrom makes Syndergaard expendable, Tulo when healthy a game changer.

Frayed Knot
Dec 19 2014 11:42 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

TheOldMole wrote:
Didn't the Padres kill the Kemp deal?


No. They questioned it after seeing the results of his physical (arthritis in both hips) but finally made it official last night.

Frayed Knot
Dec 19 2014 11:56 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Not sure where the "5%" started, though at least some of this story began with Heyman.

The Mets and Rockies have been quietly discussing a potential Troy Tulowitzki blockbuster for weeks, though it isn't known yet whether New York will have a decent chance to complete such a deal. Prized Mets pitching prospect Noah Syndergaard is said to be the centerpiece of discussions revolving around a potential package of young players in a possible deal for Tulo, though it seems like there is still quite a ways to go to have a chance to complete such a monster trade. New York and Colorado have been stealthily talking names for weeks, and while there's said to be some progress, it still feels like they are almost in the early stages with several hurdles to go ...

He goes on to add that GM Jeff Bridich has consistently said he is listening on both Tulowitzki & Carlos Gonzalez, though it is known that [co-owner] Dick Monfort has rebuffed earlier talks w/other teams involving Tulowitzki. Tulo does NOT have a no-trade clause although he's close to the Montfort brother owners to the point where it's possible he could kill a deal he doesn't like by appealing to them.
One person characterized the chances for a deal as still “slim” while allowing that discussions are still ongoing.

Edgy MD
Dec 23 2014 10:25 AM
Hope for Flores

Trying to adapt to the Flores-at-shortstop outlook, which would be a more enjoyable experiment if so many weren't almost rooting for it to fail.

I get this encouraging picture of his bat, which references this spirited if realistic defense of his glove.

I want to get on board, I do. But I also fear that the toxic mix of growing pains, animated gifs perpetuating him at his worst moments, and a fan base that may largely see his presence as a symbol of organizational failure may lead to a downward spiral of confidence and performance.

I also see Terry, as a sort of confidence booster, refusing to replace him for late-inning, save-situation defense (he didn't last year --- not regularly, anyhow), and that maybe backfiring in the presence of one high-profile game-turning error.

Interesting to see the "heavy feet" tag used around here (coined by Zvon? MGiM?) is one the scouts have used also.

Ceetar
Dec 23 2014 10:28 AM
Re: Hope for Flores

Honestly my biggest concern is that he won't hit. big prospect/scout guys seem to almost take this for granted.

If he's seriously got a bat and is going to hit above average (not just for a SS) I'm confident enough that he'll provide more value than he takes away (but yes, please put Tejada/backup in in the 8th) but I'm not thrilled with the prospect of betting on that right now.

Edgy MD
Dec 23 2014 10:39 AM
Re: Hope for Flores

I'm trying to remember who it was that said he just worried about finding hitters. That he could shake a tree and 10 glove guys would fall out.

But, if he stumbles as a fielder, and press and fans are getting on the team over his stumbles, that certainly can affect his hitting as well. It can also affect his speech, his driving, and his lovemaking. Confidence is confidence.

So, as with Daniel Murphy in a prior age, it's at least somewhat important that he acquits himself respectably as a fielder.

Ceetar
Dec 23 2014 11:09 AM
Re: Hope for Flores

Edgy MD wrote:
I'm trying to remember who it was that said he just worried about finding hitters. That he could shake a tree and 10 glove guys would fall out.

But, if he stumbles as a fielder, and press and fans are getting on the team over his stumbles, that certainly can affect his hitting as well. It can also affect his speech, his driving, and his lovemaking. Confidence is confidence.

So, as with Daniel Murphy in a prior age, it's at least somewhat important that he acquits himself respectably as a fielder.


A lot of it's timing I think. People don't notice the "didn't get to it" errors as much. and if he doesn't make a game-altering one that's directly attributed to the loss, he might have time to find his stroke with the bat.

And of course, if the Mets are 28-10 no one's gonna talk about his fielding much.

Zvon
Dec 23 2014 11:19 AM
Re: Hope for Flores

Like Ceets, I think if we go with Flores it's Mr. T for late D. Not that T has a great glove but he's better than Flores. Flores will be what he is. He won't suck. I consider the combination "serviceable".

Yea, I did read the heavy feet stuff. I'm gonna have to change it to lead feets.

Frayed Knot
Dec 23 2014 11:34 AM
Re: Hope for Flores

Hope for Flores


Only if the other team is willing to eat a bunch of Hope's contract, otherwise no way.

batmagadanleadoff
Dec 23 2014 02:22 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Megdal on Tulo and the Mets. Guess how many paragraphs you have to read before encountering the word "Madoff"?

_________________________________

Can the Mets afford to miss Troy Tulowitzki?

By Howard Megdal 12:25 p.m. | Dec. 23, 2014

The idea of the Mets acquiring Troy Tulowitzki is all-consuming these days—to fans, to writers, to many in the front office as well.

And judging from a conversation I had with a Mets official, the front office believes the team has the players to get a deal for Tulowitzki done.

But the team's ability to go out and get the four-time All-Star Rockies shortstop will depend on the finances of its owners. Judging by the owners' recent track record, this is not a good thing.

The Mets have spent the past half-dozen years in the baseball wilderness, as Fred Wilpon and his associates have treated the team less like a big-market contender than an asset required to finance their enormous debt load. They have had no playoff appearances or even so much as a winning record to show for their on-field efforts since the moment in December 2008 when their off-field financier, Bernie Madoff, was revealed to be a fraud.

Under general manager Sandy Alderson, the team's farm system has gotten much stronger, from bottom-five to top-five, by most credible estimates. A roster with young talent won 79 games last season, and while the team's starting pitching is its strength, the lineup is also filled with competent performers at nearly every position.

The one exception is shortstop.

There's something poetic in this. The Mets could be entering next season with precisely the team they have now, plus the best shortstop in franchise history, Jose Reyes, at short, if the team's owners hadn't been so strapped for cash that they took out an emergency loan to pay operating expenses back in the 2011 offseason, while Jose Reyes signed with the Miami Marlins.

In subsequent seasons, the payroll dropped further, but as those young players Alderson acquired in trades and drafted began to reach the major leagues, the effect of the money issue was mitigated.

The Mets have some real talent heading into next season. Add a healthy Matt Harvey and newly acquired Michael Cuddyer to a 79-win team, and they're a competent shortstop away from looking like a legitimate playoff contender.

Which brings us to that one spot, and how the Mets can fill it.

Troy Tulowitzki clearly represents a best-case scenario for the team. The Mets have a gaping hole at shortstop, with real questions about whether Wilmer Flores can play the position defensively. Tulowitzki is the finest shortstop of his generation. Over the past six seasons, he's posted a 137 OPS+. Only Hanley Ramirez, no longer really a shortstop, is close, at 130. Jose Reyes is third... at 113.

Generally speaking, the best player at a given position, let alone one where talent is as scarce as shortstop, simply isn't available in trade or free agency. Teams keep those players.

But Tulowitzki happens to play for a team in Colorado that's been utterly directionless. And the Mets, by virtue of hoarding their young, cost-controlled talent, could provide plenty of it to the Rockies to jump-start their rebuild.

The problem is money, and the owners' need to devote so much of it financing the interest on massive debt against their team and regional TV network, along with twice-annual debt balloon payments on Citi Field.

To put it in perspective: the city confirmed receiving $21.9 million from Queens Ballpark Company LLC, a subsidiary of Mets parent company Sterling Equities, on December 15, a payment made twice a year. Troy Tulowitzki will make $20 million, total, in 2015.

So for baseball ops to recommend acquiring Tulowitzki, it means evaluating risk beyond just whether the oft-injured Tulowitzki can stay healthy enough to earn the $118 million left on his contract over the next six seasons.

As it stands now, the team payroll is just under $100 million. This would be the highest it's been in several years, and accordingly, the team is looking to trim it further through a salary dump of a good starting pitcher, such as Dillon Gee.

With a payroll akin to, say, the Washington Nationals, who spent just under $135 million in 2014 on player salaries, the Mets could not only afford Tulowitzki, but also add depth to this year's team behind injury-prone catcher Travis d'Arnaud or David Wright, returning from a shoulder injury that ruined his 2014 season. They could even add some pitching down the line to replenish the depth lost in a Tulowitzki trade.

Alderson, though, isn't merely working with a smaller budget. He's working without a set budget at all, forced to get approval for each player acquisition individually.

All of which is to say much of the potential risk in a Tulowitzki deal is self-inflicted by ownership.

"I think it's fair to say most things change, including risk associated with various players' health and contract amounts if you can expand payroll that significantly," a Mets official said to me when I put forward the Nationals' example.

Another way the payroll issue can mitigate the possible upside of a Tulowitzki deal is if the Mets are forced to offload some salary to take him on. For instance, Tulowitzki would be a massive upgrade from Flores. But much of that gain could be given back if the team needs to, say, trade Daniel Murphy for salary reasons in the process, and hope young Dilson Herrera can fill in for the team's lone 2014 All-Star.

Then there is the risk inherent in Sandy Alderson losing the confidence of ownership. At the moment, cooperation is at an all-time high, with Alderson and Jeff Wilpon making the rounds together in meetings like sponsorship and even radio partner discussions.

But it is worth remembering that Omar Minaya, Alderson's predecessor, didn't lose the confidence of ownership when he failed to do things like develop a steady stream of major league talent, or leverage a then-reasonable New York payroll sufficiently to allow the Mets to avoid starting pitchers like Brian Lawrence and Dave Williams down the stretch for teams that finished a game out of the playoffs.

No, it happened once the Mets traded for Johan Santana, and in those salad days of early 2008, when the Bernie Madoff money was still flowing, signed him to a massive contract extension. Once Santana's injuries caught up with him, the relationship with Minaya soured to the point that the Mets made a change.

If the Wilpons even have the capability to add Tulowitzki's salary—they'd need to do it as they simultaneously attempt to refinance a debt of greater than $600 million coming due in 2015 against S.N.Y.—it's easy to imagine them ignoring all the work Alderson's done should a deal for Tulowitzki turn out to cost them money in exchange for an injured player. Baseball ops has yet to pose the question to ownership.

So there will likely be plenty of talk about risk in the coming weeks as it relates to Tulowitzki, a player who would lift the Mets from intriguing young team to preseason playoff contender.

But there's also the risk, without Tulowitzki, that the Mets' austerity period will prove to have left them too far behind wealthier and better-run teams to contend for anything, and that their long, painstaking rebuild will have been for nothing.


http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/m ... tulowitzki

Ceetar
Dec 23 2014 03:31 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I found it (finance is a code word for Madoff) in the third paragraph and stopped there.

d'Kong76
Dec 23 2014 03:42 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Megdearth wrote:
Tulowitzki, a player who would lift the Mets from intriguing young team to preseason playoff contender.

Unless, of course, his hip falls off and then he'll be a six
year albatross around their necks.

batmagadanleadoff
Dec 23 2014 07:35 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The same could be said about David Wright.

batmagadanleadoff
Dec 23 2014 07:37 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Or Clayton Kershaw.

batmagadanleadoff
Dec 23 2014 07:38 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Or Giancarlo Stanton.

d'Kong76
Dec 23 2014 08:48 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Yup©, I suppose.

Edgy MD
Dec 23 2014 10:21 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The problem there is that he uses "would" when the more honest term is "could" or "might."

batmagadanleadoff
Dec 24 2014 06:57 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
The problem there is that he uses "would" when the more honest term is "could" or "might."


You don't think the Mets would qualify as a contender with Tulowitzki? Yet you predicted the Mets would win about 100 games in last year's prediction thread.

Edgy MD
Dec 24 2014 12:47 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I think they qualify as a contender now. But the future is unknown.

Mets Guy in Michigan
Dec 26 2014 10:05 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

He waited until the fourth paragraph to mention Madoff? He's slipping.

I think his premise is flawed. The question isn't whether the team can afford the contract, it's whether THIS is the guy worth spending it on. The track record with injuries, the Coors-inflated stats are all solid reasons to balk at paying full price for this guy. And that's not even counting the Jeter fetish.

Edgy MD
Dec 27 2014 12:50 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Starlin Castro detained for questioning in connection to a nightclub shooting in the Dominican Republic. Six injured.

Frayed Knot
Dec 27 2014 02:29 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The update to that link specifically says that Castro was not detained, but that's also coming from within his camp so who knows.
Perhaps the more disturbing part is where it mentions that this was the second time this month that Castro was in the vicinity of a shooting.

Lefty Specialist
Dec 27 2014 03:12 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Well, maybe now we can get him without giving up too much. :)

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 27 2014 03:26 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Sure, why not? As we learned with Francisco Rodriguez, Citi Field has a jail cell.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 27 2014 04:40 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

See, the key for me is, six injured... but none critically.

I mean, you can't give up Syndergaard for that kind of accuracy.

Edgy MD
Dec 27 2014 05:46 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:
The update to that link specifically says that Castro was not detained, but that's also coming from within his camp so who knows.
Perhaps the more disturbing part is where it mentions that this was the second time this month that Castro was in the vicinity of a shooting.


The denials were not part of the story when the link went up. But that was and is the lede. I imagine what constitutes being detained for questioning and voluntarily submitting to questioning is ambiguous.

MFS62
Dec 27 2014 06:32 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:
The update to that link specifically says that Castro was not detained, but that's also coming from within his camp so who knows.
Perhaps the more disturbing part is where it mentions that this was the second time this month that Castro was in the vicinity of a shooting.

Forget baseball. He'll fit right in on the Oakland Raiders.

Later

Lefty Specialist
Dec 27 2014 06:48 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
See, the key for me is, six injured... but none critically.

I mean, you can't give up Syndergaard for that kind of accuracy.


Kinda lends a whole new meaning to 'he's got a gun for an arm'.

Edgy MD
Dec 27 2014 11:44 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Late reports suggest he's still being treated as a suspect.

http://deadspin.com/starlin-castro-arre ... socialflow

Mets Guy in Michigan
Dec 28 2014 09:15 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Castro seems like nothing but trouble.

Frayed Knot
Dec 28 2014 09:50 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Mets Guy in Michigan wrote:
Castro seems like nothing but trouble.


That's what south Florida keeps saying.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 28 2014 09:54 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:
Mets Guy in Michigan wrote:
Castro seems like nothing but trouble.


That's what south Florida keeps saying.


Alley-oop, maybe, but this still gets me out of my seat for an oh-DAMN.

Edgy MD
Dec 30 2014 09:21 PM
Ben

A lot of heat out there in response to Mark Simon at ESPN speculating that Ben Zobrist is the shortstop that Sandy's been waiting to become available all along.

Solid, durable super-utility guy with a square contract, he's an asset to about 30 teams out of 30, but is an only sometimes shortstop turning 34 in May, is not so obviously the answer for the Mets. Not stopping folks from climbing out on ledges over whether the Mets get him, despite no reports indicating actual pursuit.

One more asset: Knows. How. To party.

metirish
Dec 30 2014 09:35 PM
Re: Ben

Solid, durable super-utility guy 34


this does not light me up at all...

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Dec 30 2014 09:37 PM
Re: Ben

Would be an upgrade on Muffy but would come at a cost to acquire. Not sure if he's really a ss. I mean if he was he would be, yes?

Frayed Knot
Dec 30 2014 09:38 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

So the (not yet official) signing of Asdrubal Cabrera by Tampa Bay has the tongues of NYM watchers a-wagging about the availability of either Yunel Escobar and/or Ben Zobrist.
It's not quite clear what TB is going to do with Cabrera, he was the longtime SS for Cleveland but has lost some range and was strictly used as a 2B in his half season in Washington.

Escobar has been a more or less full-time SS for eight seasons including the last two with TB [career 162 avg = .276/.347/.381 10 HRs/28 2Bs]. Recently turned 32 and is signed for 1 year at $7mil plus an option for another at the same price w/$1mil buyout.

Zobrist has been the swiss army knife of ballplayers for nine seasons now - getting 600+ PAs every year for the last six while rarely playing 100 games or more in any one position. He's seen action almost equally at 2B, SS & RF while also seeing time in RF, CF, 3B, 1B, & DH. And no matter where he plays hIs hitting stats have been almost absurdly consistent:
BAs (last four seasons) = .269, .270, .275, .272. OBAs = .353, .377, .354, .354. And he switch-hits.
Slight dip in power recently (but then, the whole league has), turns 34 in May. Also on a one-year deal for the same money as Escobar.


Not sure that the Mets are interested in Escobar, and I'm not sure I'd want Zobrist as the primary SS. I'd see him more as a complement to Flores rather than instead of. Meanwhile he'd back up everyone everywhere except probably d'Arnaud and maybe even him in a pinch.
TB was rumored to be wanting to move him even before the Asdrubal signing so I suspect the Zobrist rumors are going to pick up.

Frayed Knot
Dec 30 2014 09:41 PM
Re: Ben

Edited 2 time(s), most recently on Dec 31 2014 06:27 AM

Avi wuz here

Frayed Knot
Dec 30 2014 09:44 PM
Re: Ben

One more asset: Knows. How. To party.


Although he and wifey, a Christian signer apparently, have a book out that talks about "the importance of his faith, life, and athletic career" and "gives fans a first look into the heart of an athlete whose talent and devotion to God, family, and baseball make him one of the most loveable figures in the Major League today" ... so maybe those parties won't be as wild as we hope.

metirish
Dec 30 2014 09:47 PM
Re: Ben

I would say he would be an asset on a team with designs of making the playoffs etc. Mets are such a team I would hope.

Frayed Knot
Dec 30 2014 09:50 PM
Re: Ben



I think the two of them need look no more.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 30 2014 11:27 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Oh. OH.

SS-hedge who plays around the diamond-- including the other middle-infield spot-- more than serviceably, has the durability of an Odin-enchanted F-150 truck (146-plus games in six straight years), AND is a workable, on-basey bat even at a corner OF position? Season-ending-injury insurance at at least four positions AND an upgrade at short?

Four-and-a-half-win utility tool? God knows I'd love to have him. Getting him, though? Como siempre... depends on the deal, doesn't it?

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 30 2014 11:48 PM
Re: Ben

Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Dec 31 2014 09:16 AM

[Meeeeerge!]

seawolf17
Dec 31 2014 04:49 AM
Re: Ben

The Rays are smart. He won't come cheap. But he's EXACTLY what we need. He's Joe McEwing, except he can actually hit.

Career WAR leaders in his range (years, age), as per BR:

23. Rafael Furcal (14, 36) 39.0
24. Adrian Gonzalez (11, 32) 38.2
25. Troy Tulowitzki (9, 29) 37.6
26. Ben Zobrist (9, 33) 36.6
27. Curtis Granderson (11, 33) 36.5
Hanley Ramirez (10, 30) 36.5
29. Jose Reyes (12, 31) 36.2

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 31 2014 05:47 AM
Re: Ben

He's in his free agent walk year, correct? I would imagine that if the Mets traded for him, it would be as a one-year rental. If the Mets really are in go-for-it mode, then getting a one-year shortstop isn't such a bad idea. I have no idea what the Mets would have to give up to get Zobrist. I imagine it would be less than Noah Syndergaard, but more than Dillon Gee.

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 31 2014 05:52 AM
Re: Ben

Also, alphabetically speaking, Don Zimmer has been the last Met on the list since April 11, 1962. Ben Zobrist would end that very long streak.

Edgy MD
Dec 31 2014 06:13 AM
Re: Ben

One more asset: Knows. How. To party.


Although he and wifey, a Christian signer apparently, have a book out that talks about "the importance of his faith, life, and athletic career" and "gives fans a first look into the heart of an athlete whose talent and devotion to God, family, and baseball make him one of the most loveable figures in the Major League today" ... so maybe those parties won't be as wild as we hope.

You haven't partied until you've partied with an athlete whose talent and devotion to God, family, and baseball make him one of the most loveable figures in the Major League today.

I'll merge this into the shorty stop thread.

Frayed Knot
Dec 31 2014 06:25 AM
Re: Ben

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
He's in his free agent walk year, correct? I would imagine that if the Mets traded for him, it would be as a one-year rental.


Yes. Zobrist's 2015 season will be the second of two option years (TB already picked up the option at season's end) that were tacked onto the end of a four year contract dating back to 2010 and it's not like he's in any position to be able to force any extension beyond that. Nor should the Mets be anxious to give an in-advance extension to a soon-to-be 34 y/o and so I assume if a trade went down that they'd simply let the season play out and take things from there.



Also, alphabetically speaking, Don Zimmer has been the last Met on the list since April 11, 1962. Ben Zobrist would end that very long streak.


Well, hell, if that isn't the last piece of evidence that this needs to get done immediately then we might as well all just pack it in!

Edgy MD
Dec 31 2014 07:09 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

So, what do you think we're talking about here? Plawecki and Campbell? Do the Rays need one of the Mets pitchers?

Benjamin Grimm
Dec 31 2014 07:17 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

It would be nice if it could be Gee plus someone else, but I have no idea what Tampa might want.

Vic Sage
Dec 31 2014 07:25 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

i wouldn't trade a young, good-hitting catching prospect for an aging utility guy on a 1-year deal, even a very good utility guy. Zobrist would be an upgrade over Murphy at 2b, but since his range is no greater than Flores', i'd like to see what Flores greater upside can produce (as long as we're not going to get a good, established SS). If we traded for Zobrist, and then traded Murphy for Castro (for example), i'd be fine with that.

Edgy MD
Dec 31 2014 07:35 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Yeah, that price would be high. But since every team in baseball can use a guy like Zobrist, he's perhaps going to be bid up. And if that happens, the Mets may be better off giving Eric Campbell a Zobrist jersey and calling the bluffs of any fans on ledges.

Frayed Knot
Dec 31 2014 07:36 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I agree. Good catching prospects, even if they're still just prospects, don't grow on trees and giving one up for a one-year player isn't a good idea IMO.
Looking at things from Tampa's POV, Gee will make less money than Zobrist in 2015, is five years younger, has a 3.85 ERA over his last 3 seasons/71 starts, and is under control for 3 more years. Would we really need to sweeten the pot much beyond that?

Do they need pitching? ... Everyone needs pitching.

Vic Sage
Dec 31 2014 07:53 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Gee for Zobrist makes sense to me; if it's not enough for TB, then pass.

Edgy MD
Dec 31 2014 08:00 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Tampa's rotation:

Alex Cobb: 10-9, 2.87 and 11-3, 2.76 in 2013.
Chris Archer: 10-9, 3.33 and 9-7, 3.22 in 2013.
Drew Smyly: 9-10, 3.24 and 6-0, 2.37 in 2013 with Detroit.
Jake Ordizzi: 11-13, 4.13 as a rookie.
Nate Karns: 1-1, 4.50 and 9-9, 5.08 in AAA

Plus: Matt Moore: 0-2, 2.70 and 17-4, 3.29 in 2013, out until late June or early July after recovering from TJ surgery.
Alex Colome: 2-0, 2.66 and 7-6, 3.77 in AAA.

So it's not like they can't use Gee (or Niese or Colon), pushing Karns and Colome back to AAA until a need arises, but that's a pretty solid young rotation.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Dec 31 2014 09:32 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Vic Sage wrote:
Gee for Zobrist makes sense to me; if it's not enough for TB, then pass.


Gee's a 29-year-old who's missed significant parts of the season in 2 of the last 3 years, and has never put up a traditionally good-- like, above-league-average-- season. Zobrist, while 34, is a guy who plays credible defense at 4-5 positions, including both middle infield slots, AND OPS-es .750 or so in down years. And, oh yeah, he's severely underpriced. Pardon my French, but zat offer is skull-fucking ridiculous, mon ami.

You see if they'd take Gee-plus-Plawecki or Niese-plus-Rosario-plus-Puello; you think long and hard when they come back with Plawecki-and-Montero, and you hope it settles somewhere in between.

Frayed Knot
Dec 31 2014 10:48 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Gee did have a terrific 'year' if you count it from June '13 through May '14, and while he's had injuries they've not been of the structural arm variety (I'd be more leery of trading for Niese if I were other teams for that very reason - lost velocity, etc.). And do keep in mind that this is for all of one year of Zobrist and it's the year he turns 34 (does he even get 600 ABs on this team?).
So while the ultimate price of this theoretical exercise might wind up as Gee-plus, it would be plus much if I were calling the shots.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 01 2015 10:36 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Again, though... as a 19-year-old who's already held his own and then some for two years in the f*cking Serie Nacional (and dominated-- DOMINATED-- any and all lower levels at which he played), AND has projectable tools? If you don't blow the bank/take a budget-penalty for this guy-- at a position of need for the organization, no less-- well... why roll the dice on anyone, right?


No, but seriously, look at this Moncada guy. The Good Face, built like he should be in our Superhero Tourney, that bat speed, that nimbleness around the bag... hell, just look at the footspeed.

Frayed Knot
Jan 01 2015 11:10 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Agreed that he should be looked at, but he may not be a SS and he's almost certainly not going to be a 2015 solution even if he is.

Edgy MD
Jan 02 2015 11:54 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Marlins acquired Dan Haren in the Dee Gordon trade. Dan Haren said he insists on playing with a west coast team or he will retire. He even declined the Fish's invite to a press conference following the deal.

So, the Marlins want a pitcher, but he's not looking to fit the bill. So, Mets send one of their three starters to Miami, Haren goes back to the west, and said west coast team (San Francisco? Seattle? Shmanaheim?) sends the Mets a shortstop.

is this a possibility?

Vic Sage
Jan 02 2015 10:12 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
Vic Sage wrote:
Gee for Zobrist makes sense to me; if it's not enough for TB, then pass.


Gee's a 29-year-old who's missed significant parts of the season in 2 of the last 3 years, and has never put up a traditionally good-- like, above-league-average-- season. Zobrist, while 34, is a guy who plays credible defense at 4-5 positions, including both middle infield slots, AND OPS-es .750 or so in down years. And, oh yeah, he's severely underpriced. Pardon my French, but zat offer is skull-fucking ridiculous, mon ami.

You see if they'd take Gee-plus-Plawecki or Niese-plus-Rosario-plus-Puello; you think long and hard when they come back with Plawecki-and-Montero, and you hope it settles somewhere in between.


the Mets don't need an excellent utility guy for 1 year; they need a SS for the next decade. If you're ok with Zobrist's D at SS, then lets just go with Flores and see how he develops there. He's got at least as much range as Zobrist at SS and is more than a decade younger, significantly cheaper, and his minor league power shows upside, whereas Zobrist's power is declining. I like Zobrist as a super utility guy for a contending team, not as a starting SS for a young, building team.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 03 2015 01:05 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Vic Sage wrote:
I like Zobrist as a super utility guy for a contending team, not as a starting SS for a young, building team.


I like Zobrist the exact same way, homes. It's just that I think he could be that for us, this year.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 04 2015 06:21 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

This is a fantasy-based assessment but gets to my point on Flores: He can hit, and the Mets need hitters. Also raises the point of his value if Wright is stinky again.

A Boy Named Seo
Jan 04 2015 07:40 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Internet commenters, I know, but that's a violently divided audience on Wilmer. Makes me want to tune in!

Edgy MD
Jan 04 2015 08:23 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I like the notion that the Mets can/should look for something between two and half months and two and a half seasons out of Flores at short, all the while believing that they can get a more well/rounded answer out of Reynolds/Cecchini/Rosario, while Flores remains a future investment at other positions around the infield --- insurance against Wright's shoulder not healing, Herrera not developing, Duda becoming mired in his enigmatic Dudaness.

d'Kong76
Jan 05 2015 10:30 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

More of the same...
http://metsblog.com/metsblog/where-do-t ... -the-mets/

Ashie62
Jan 09 2015 09:06 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Jurickson Profar to begin throwing.

Frayed Knot
Jan 10 2015 12:38 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

So the (not yet official) signing of Asdrubal Cabrera by Tampa Bay has the tongues of NYM watchers a-wagging about the availability of either Yunel Escobar and/or Ben Zobrist.


So the answer to the question as to which of Zobrist or Escobar the Rays would trade appears to be: BOTH!! ... and in the same deal no less.
The SF Chronicle reports that a swap to send both middle-IFers to the A's is nearing completion with Oakland sending catcher John Jaso eastward along with two minor leaguers.



And the Korean SS Jung-Ho Kang appears to be on the verge of a four-year deal with Pittsburgh who had previously won his negotiating rights.
The two sides have until Jan 20th to complete a deal.

Edgy MD
Jan 10 2015 01:18 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Anybody who boos Flores on opening day gets such a noogie.

G-Fafif
Jan 11 2015 08:25 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ken Rosenthal reports Mets were approached to take part in 3 way deal that would've landed Ian Desmond, Ben Zobrist and Yunel Escobar in DC & two top Mets prospects (of 3) in St. Pete. Mets needed to give up Noah S. Desmond has 1 year left to FA.

Mets said no.

http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/wash ... ade-011115

Fman99
Jan 11 2015 08:37 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Good for them. Noah S. and another top prospect for one year of Ian Desmond is too steep.

Frayed Knot
Jan 12 2015 06:33 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Yeah, that's the kind of deal you'd pull the trigger on if you're coming off an 89 win season and just know that you're one player away.
But when you're a 79 win team still hoping that you're on the cusp of contending and will have only one year of control over the only player you get out of the deal, you have every right to balk at the price.



Gotta love the inventiveness of the deal though!

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 12 2015 06:50 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The Rays did get something like what they were looking for from us-- the package the A's gave up made it seem a pretty atypical Beane trade, at least on its face.

Yeah, I'm okay with that... but if the price had been negotiable down to 2-3 sub-Syndergaard pitching prospects, or Montero/Plawecki, say...

Ceetar
Jan 12 2015 07:16 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
The Rays did get something like what they were looking for from us-- the package the A's gave up made it seem a pretty atypical Beane trade, at least on its face.

Yeah, I'm okay with that... but if the price had been negotiable down to 2-3 sub-Syndergaard pitching prospects, or Montero/Plawecki, say...


Maybe it might've been. until the A's jumped in.

My biggest concern with Sandy is that sometimes he seems aghast at current market prices. I agree in this case that this wasn't a good deal to overpay on, but at some point he's going to have to and I hope he's prepared to do so

Edgy MD
Jan 12 2015 07:22 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

"I'm building a great organization and people are going to overpay me for my assets." --- S. Alderson

Lefty Specialist
Jan 12 2015 07:59 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Anybody who boos Flores on opening day gets such a noogie.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHTUDwc1fd8

Edgy MD
Jan 12 2015 08:31 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Desmond is a little bit of fool's gold, isn't he? I mean, 24 homers from a shortstop is great, but he's not doing much else if his OPS+ is 103. Flores can do that, I think.

Pretty good glove, though I wouldn't say it's necessarily better than Tejada's.

Good player, but not for one year at those prices.

Ceetar
Jan 12 2015 08:37 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

well, that's the low end of a 3-year arc and 103 OPS+ for a SS with at least a decent glove is pretty valuable, but yeah, it's not like Desmond has a long history of being awesome.

Edgy MD
Jan 12 2015 08:53 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Certainly pretty valuable.

themetfairy
Jan 12 2015 10:37 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

How could anyone boo this face?

A Boy Named Seo
Jan 12 2015 11:13 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

themetfairy wrote:
How could anyone boo this face?



"What, me worry?"

Frayed Knot
Jan 12 2015 05:03 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I heard exactly One WFAN call today - it was a guy complaining about the Mets not making this [three-way Ian Desmond] deal.
And his complaint was not merely that they didn't do it but that not pulling the trigger on it is more proof that we're being lied to.

Edgy MD
Jan 12 2015 06:48 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I don't get that "lying" business at all.

The Mets are apparently now lying even when nobody from the Mets is saying anything.

Frayed Knot
Jan 12 2015 09:27 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Well, according to the caller anyway, the Mets [u:riswe01s]promised[/u:riswe01s] that this is their year and that they'd go all out to make it happen.
Ergo: Passing on this deal proves that they're not.

Edgy MD
Jan 13 2015 07:25 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm so entitled, I demand the Mets consummate deals I wouldn't even like ten minutes after they happened.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 13 2015 09:54 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

WHY DIDN'T THESE INTRANSIGIENT BASTIDS DO THIS DEAL I NEVER KNEW EXISTED???/?//?

smg58
Jan 13 2015 11:50 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Well doesn't the fact that nobody on the Mets is saying anything imply that they're not telling the truth? Huh?

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 13 2015 04:35 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

WHY DON'T YOU TELL US THE TRUTH, LIARS !1! TELL ME THE TRUTH SO I CAN YELL AT YOU ABOUT THE TRUTH INSTEAD

Ashie62
Jan 13 2015 06:30 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Flores wil do a lot better than this new template.

How do you change you password in the user area. Thank you.

Edgy MD
Jan 13 2015 08:37 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'd send you a private message, but who knows where to find private messages in this layout?

In the top left of the current header, click User Control Panel. From there, select the Profile tab. At the bottom of the left sidebar, select Edit Account Settings.

Frayed Knot
Jan 14 2015 07:00 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
I'd send you a private message, but who knows where to find private messages in this layout?


Click on a user's name and 'Send Private Message' is one of the choices you'll have.

Edgy MD
Jan 14 2015 07:22 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Mostly joking.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 14 2015 11:47 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Nobody else here is gonna post this one, so here goes:

Desmond non-deal shows cost of Mets' refusal to spend
By Howard Megdal 7:42 a.m. | Jan. 13, 2015

In case you haven't heard, the New York Mets still don't have a starting shortstop.

Yes, somebody will stand at the position when their 2015 season opens on April 6 in Washington, and right now, it looks like that somebody will be Wilmer Flores, a talented young hitter who no one, including essentially everyone in the Mets front office, thinks can play the position adequately defensively.

Behind Flores is Ruben Tejada, someone who the Mets have publicly disparaged for the better part of the past two seasons.

So you can understand the team's desire to get better at the position, a black hole, really, since Jose Reyes happened to hit free agency at the same time Mets ownership was lining up a bridge loan just to stay solvent through the winter of 2011.

And when Ken Rosenthal reported this weekend that the Mets had a chance to get Ian Desmond, shortstop for the Washington Nationals, in a three-way trade that would have cost the Mets pitching prospect Noah Syndergaard and one other top prospect from a list of three, it's hard to fathom exactly why the Mets were the team saying no.

But as you've probably guessed, yes, it's the money.

Let's first understand just how great a fit Ian Desmond would be on the Mets. A team with a clear need at shortstop would add the winner of the Silver Slugger award in the National League three years running. Desmond's OPS+ of 113 over the past three years at the position trails only Troy Tulowitzki and Hanley Ramirez, who isn't really a shortstop anymore. (Jose Reyes is fourth over that time.)

But while Tulowitzki has played in 264 games over those three years, Ramirez 371 and Reyes 396, Desmond's been in 442. He's also younger than the other three, and his defense is much better than that of Ramirez or Reyes.

The argument against Tulowitzki, who the Mets could have added this winter for several prospects and a willingness to take on his six years and $114 million remaining on his contract, came down to the long-term commitment and concerns about durability.

Desmond has neither issue. He's signed for one more year, at $11 million, and he's almost always in the lineup.

Not only that, the Mets could always negotiate a window to negotiate with Desmond, if they chose, giving them 72 hours to either lock him up on a contract on their terms, or let him walk away. They did this successfully with Johan Santana back in 2008, and ultimately failed to acquire Barry Larkin after not agreeing to terms with him back in 2000.

And here's where it gets tricky.

The Mets, for their part, haven't gotten into the idea of Desmond in greater detail for a simple reason: ownership probably isn't going to pay what it would take to keep him.

Desmond turned down a six-year, $90 million last winter, and with good reason. Salaries are exploding, and he is a rare commodity indeed: a power-hitting shortstop on the right side of 30 who seldom misses any time and fields his position quite well.

For the Mets to keep him, they'd have to pay him around the six years, $114 million Tulowitzki has left on his deal.

And ultimately, that was the bigger problem with Tulowitzki, even though there are justifiable concerns held by some in the Mets front office about Tulowitzki's durability and current health. The money made it a non-starter--then it simply became about finding a public justification for not paying him.

Desmond, while not quite Tulowitzki's equal when he's on the field, addresses all of the team's concerns. But this is a Mets team, right now, that can't even afford to take on Desmond's below-market $11 million contract for 2015 without dumping another salary, even with a payroll in the bottom third of major league baseball. The post-Madoff tradition of the Mets' owners paying more to finance their debts than to put together their baseball team looks safe to continue in 2015.

Realistically, Desmond for just a year probably isn't worth giving up two of the team's top three prospects, though it is tempting. Without a change in financial wherewithal, the Mets are going to see their pre-arbitration players begin to hit arbitration. If enough of them develop to turn this Mets roster into a winning core, without an ability to increase payroll, they're going to have to start trading players off once again, a kind of permanent rebuild.

So bringing in Desmond, while the gang's all here in 2015, wouldn't be the worst bet if the future holds the same level of financial limitation thanks to ownership's crippling debt load.

But the more infuriating aspect of this for Mets fans is pretty simple. They've been told for years now that the Mets are about to start spending again, as if the decision not to is some kind of front office wisdom and not enforced upon ownership by its many creditors.

Now, despite those restrictions, the Mets are a few players away from contention, since Sandy Alderson's built a farm system of note to pair with the bounty he's received from dealing some of the team's vaguely high-priced stars, like Carlos Beltran and R.A. Dickey.

But Troy Tulowitzki, a shortstop who would make the Mets favorites in the National League East if healthy? Signed for too long. Ian Desmond, who would do the same? Not signed for long enough. Jhonny Peralta, a front office favorite? Signed for too much last winter, according to Alderson, four years, $53 million with the St. Louis Cardinals. One year and a 5.8 Wins Above Replacement season later, no one is saying Peralta got overpaid anymore. (Flores, in a half-season last year, posted a WAR of 0.2.) Even the dearly departed Jose Reyes would make the Mets contenders in 2015.

These are the deals the 1980s-era Mets made, the deals that turned a young group of talented prospects into a National League juggernaut from 1984-1990. These are the deals, in general, that teams at the Mets' stage of development always make. These are deals that nearly every team in baseball is making these days, in a sport flush with television money, money that for 29 other teams goes to baseball operations, not to financing hundreds of millions in debt against the team, the television network, the stadium.

And the young, pre-arbitration shortstops who actually fit the Mets' budget? The really good ones, frankly, no one is trading. Contenders need players like that. Rebuilding teams need players like that. They simply aren't traded very often, especially in this offense-starved era.

So instead the Mets will hope that Wilmer Flores lives up to his offensive projections in 2015, and doesn't miss too many balls with what is a consensus sub-shortstop range. They'll hope that the pressure of being the stated public reason for not bringing in all star after all star doesn't make Noah Syndergaard's transition to the big leagues more difficult.

The 2015 Mets have talent, almost enough to win, but not quite. Teams like that sometimes win anyway. Not usually, though. And the Mets had a chance to put the odds in their favor, only to have the limitations of a financially compromised owner throw the chance away. We're about to see how much that ends up costing the team.


http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/m ... usal-spend

Ceetar
Jan 14 2015 11:53 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

heh, didn't even have to read beyond the title this time.

Edgy MD
Jan 14 2015 11:57 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm just not sure why somebody needed to post it. Are you saying that it says what your feelings are toward the non-Desmond deal?

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 14 2015 12:05 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Are you saying that it says what your feelings are toward the non-Desmond deal?

No, I didn't say that. But the piece does line up with my sentiments on the Mets ability to get a high priced player. It's a well balanced article, probably the best piece out there, to date, on that potential Mets-Desmond deal. Because let's be honest, you can't talk credibly about the Mets having to dole out that kind of money to get that kind of a player without referencing the financial mess that shall not be named here.


Edgy MD wrote:
I'm just not sure why somebody needed to post "this one."

Because no one would've posted that article if I didn't. There's a solid contingent on this board that acts like headless chickens at the mere sight of a Megdal piece.

Edgy MD
Jan 14 2015 12:11 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Please get the chip off your shoulder and stop with the name-calling. Please, please, to St. Lucie and back, please. I will give you such a big hug. In public. Maybe even a manly European smack on the cheek, too.

Speaking for mice elf, I didn't post it because it didn't say anything I believe to be supportable. There's a world full of literature I don't post here. That certainly doesn't make me or anybody else headless chickens.

Ceetar
Jan 14 2015 12:13 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Because they're all the same piece. Read one, read them all. Yes, some people attribute every move or non-move to the Mets maybe not having money.

Is maybe the Mets would've gone after Desmond if they could've afforded to eat the losses with no consequences really that interesting a take?

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 14 2015 12:42 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I've met the guy. He seems perfectly reasonable and charming, his daughter's like an anime character-- unbelievably adorable-- and he doesn't scan like Baseball Ahab or nothin'.

But reading a Megdal piece about anything these days is like, well... it's like asking an overly-enthusiastic organic chemist about energy production, or snack cake nutrition, or seven-card no-limit Omaha. He'll tell you, "When you boil it down, it's really ALL about carbon," and he'll be right, mostly. But, y'know...

Frayed Knot
Jan 14 2015 01:26 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Jan 14 2015 06:00 PM

Just for starters:

HM: "In case you haven't heard, the New York Mets still don't have a starting shortstop."

Yes they do. It may not be the one you want but it's the same one who started the majority of the final 50 games of last season ... just in case you hadn't heard.




HM: "And when Ken Rosenthal reported this weekend that the Mets had a chance to get Ian Desmond, shortstop for the Washington Nationals, in a three-way trade that would have cost the Mets pitching prospect Noah Syndergaard and one other top prospect from a list of three, it's hard to fathom exactly why the Mets were the team saying no. But as you've probably guessed, yes, it's the money."

It's not hard to fathom at all. Argue that it's something they should have done all you want (although I'd argue otherwise) but ...
- if you're going to use the Rosenthal article to kick off this piece, at least mention the part where he cites the unwillingness to part with the prospects as the specific reason the Mets backed away (salary was never mentioned).
- and if you're going to cite Desmond's salary as the third rail that they will not touch, at least have the decency to acknowledge that they have made three separate acquisitions in the last 14 months where the incoming salary matches or exceeds Desmond's per/year salary (Cuddyer, Colon, Granderson) and all of those for multiple years rather than just one. Geez, they went $7.5 on Chris Young fer crissakes.
But the readers probably already guessed that.

Centerfield
Jan 14 2015 01:44 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I never got the feeling that the Desmond upcoming negotiations were the holdback. It is future Cy Young Award Winner Noah Syndegaard.

Benjamin Grimm
Jan 14 2015 02:05 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I can totally understand not wanting to deal Syndergaard for only one guaranteed year of Desmond. Where Megdal says that the Mets could have simply requested a negotiating window, he neglects to mention that those windows are the exception, and most deals (for whatever reason) don't include them. You can't assume that the Mets had that option. And you can't assume that it was money that prevented this deal from happening; it's just one of several potential reasons.

Ceetar
Jan 14 2015 02:09 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I can totally understand not wanting to deal Syndergaard for only one guaranteed year of Desmond. Where Megdal says that the Mets could have simply requested a negotiating window, he neglects to mention that those windows are the exception, and most deals (for whatever reason) don't include them. You can't assume that the Mets had that option. And you can't assume that it was money that prevented this deal from happening; it's just one of several potential reasons.


Not just that, but that the Nationals got a deal they wanted while Sandy was negotiating, however tepidly. The other 29 teams are doing things too.

d'Kong76
Jan 14 2015 02:17 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

He writes the same article a lot, guess that's why he's not at a great
metropolitan newspaper fighting truth, justice, and the American way!

Howard follows the forum on Twitter, I think he should start posting and
not have someone push his stuff on us like a bunch of headless chickens.

Benjamin Grimm
Jan 14 2015 02:22 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Hmmmm....

batMEGaDAnLeadoff

G-Fafif
Jan 14 2015 02:36 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

This one's fun, too, by Jonathan Bernhardt for The Guardian. (He used to write for Sports on Earth, where I honestly don't remember anything with this much zazz to it.)

To understand the financial depravity of the New York Mets, you first have to understand why Wilmer Flores is currently a shortstop.

There will certainly be people who will try to sell you on the idea that Flores, 23, is a shortstop on merit – or at least, potential merit. They even have the depth chart on their side: the Mets have named Flores the starter at short going into camp for the 2015 season. But they are, at best, overgenerously optimistic – and regardless of what their depth chart says, the Mets have spent the last 10 months acting like they disagree.

Three years ago, it was essentially public knowledge that Flores would be moving off the position. Indeed, the Mets recognized this organizationally; in 2012 and 2013, he played second base, third base, even a little first base – pretty much everywhere in the infield except short. Everything that was true in 2012 about Flores remains true today except that he is older, and as a general rule players don’t get better defensively as they age; they get worse. There are certainly exceptions, but Flores did nothing to show that he was one of them.

Then, before the 2014 season, the Mets decided he was a shortstop again. The experiment didn’t begin particularly well; Flores, who was competing for playing time last year with luminaries such as Ruben Tejada and Dilson Herrera, did not win a job on the roster out of camp. The idea was barely entertained by the Mets coaching staff, not because of Flores’s prospect status or age (Tejada himself was a part-time player at age 20, and only a part-time player because he couldn’t stay healthy), but because Flores couldn’t play short well enough to even split time with Tejada or play a utility role around the infield. He cameoed the roster for the second game of the season in order to spell Daniel Murphy at second base during his paternity leave, then vanished down to the minors again to work on his defense.

He reappeared on the roster on 9 May after the Mets designated infielder Omar Quintanilla for assignment with the stated goal of his promotion being to add more offense to MLB roster. Flores started the next two games at short and immediately came down with some sort of illness – and that was enough for manager Terry Collins to give Ruben Tejada his job back for the next week. Flores wouldn’t appear in a game again until 17 May, when he’d be given his first substantial trial by fire against major league pitching as a starting shortstop.

It didn’t go particularly well. By early June, he’d lost the everyday job, now getting a start at short every four days or so and pinch-hitting in between. By the end of June, he’d been sent back to Triple A Las Vegas to get everyday playing time and work on his defense. Except here’s the weird thing about that demotion: he got back to Vegas, and suddenly he was playing second base and third base again. Some first base, too. In 26 games between 26 June and 23 July, Flores only spent time at short in six. Then, Ruben Tejada took a baseball to the head and suddenly, Flores was promoted again. To play shortstop.

Tejada was cleared to play very shortly afterwards -- he wouldn’t even spend time on the abbreviated seven-day disabled list for concussion or head-related injuries – but Flores would once again get the lion’s share of the work at short for the next few weeks. Then, predictably enough, in late August Daniel Murphy got hurt and Flores immediately started seeing time at second base instead. By the end of the season, the Mets had moved him off of shortstop entirely – his last seven starts of the season were all at second.

This organizational juggling routine wouldn’t be a big deal if Flores was hitting; in fact, Flores being the everyday shortstop wouldn’t be a big deal if he was hitting, bad defense and all. That’s supposed to be the one thing Flores does well, after all: hit. Does he hit in the minors? Sure – while playing in Las Vegas, one of the most notoriously hitter-friendly parks in the notoriously hitter-friendly Pacific Coast League. But in 375 MLB plate appearances, Flores is only batting .240/.275/.356 (.631 OPS). That’s at the low end of excusable for a top-three defensive shortstop league-wide. It’s unacceptable for a guy who got sent down in the middle of the season to play other positions.

This level of detail is necessary when examining Flores’ 2014 because it’s important to know the context in which the Mets have named him starter over and over again this winter, and why it seems so bewildering when judging Flores by what he’s shown on the field. But there’s one last piece of information that makes everything else slide into place: Wilmer Flores will only be paid around $500,000 next year.

That sounds like a lot of money, and it is in absolute terms; but for a shortstop at the major league level? That’s not just cheap. That’s the closest a team is permitted to free. Meanwhile, Colorado’s Troy Tulowitzki, who was constantly attached to the Mets in trade rumors last month? $20m. Chicago’s Starlin Castro, who was also a possible trade target before his recent legal troubles shut that talk down? Just over $6.8m. Stephen Drew, who signed with the Yankees to play second base but is still a competent shortstop? $5m. And Ruben Tejada, the guy who has publicly lost his job and is likely available for trade at this very moment? $1.2m last year, and in line for a raise to around $3m this offseason. Wilmer Flores is not a credible shortstop. He’s not even demonstrably a league-average bat. He is, however, the absolute smallest investment possible.

Now we consider the rest of the Mets’ moves this offseason. We’ll be brief, because there’s only two that concern the major league roster: the signing of outfielder Michael Cuddyer on 11 November to a two-year, $21m contract, and the signing of outfielder John Mayberry Jr, to a one-year, $1.75m contract a month later. That’s it. That’s all the Mets have done. It’s an old trick for them: making a couple of big-splash signings up front and disappearing for the rest of the offseason. You may remember it from last year, when they did the exact same thing with outfielders Chris Young and Curtis Granderson. At least in Granderson they signed a relatively upper-tier, name free agent. Cuddyer is three years older, only played 49 games last year and got his deal based on an age 34 season hitting in Colorado. It was an impressive season and a feel-good story for a well-liked veteran player, to be sure; it also happened two years ago in what remains the most ridiculous offensive environment in baseball.

Meanwhile, payroll in Queens looks set to either stagnate or outright decline for the fourth straight season. Arbitration commitments still haven’t been decided, but the Mets’ payroll sits at just under $68m for next year. Of the major players set for arbitration bumps – Murphy, Lucas Duda, Dillon Gee, Bobby Parnell, Jenrry Mejia – the Mets have openly discussed dealing Gee, who made $3.6m last year. If they do that, it’s hard to see those arbitration awards (or the one-year deals the Mets agree to in order to avoid arbitration) clearing $14 or $15m. Figuring in another three to four million dollars for league-minimum players and other expenses, and that leaves the Mets right around last year’s $85m budget.

That would be grudgingly acceptable, were the Mets playing baseball in Tampa, Florida instead of the largest media market in the planet, and had Major League Baseball’s massive new $12.4bn national television deal not just gone into effect. It might also be acceptable if the team was rebuilding, but it’s not: New York finished 2014 tied for second place in a division that has mostly stepped backwards or tread water this offseason. Given the young stars the team has hit on in the last few years like Matt Harvey, Jake deGrom and Juan Lagares, combined with franchise player and likely future Hall of Famer David Wright and mostly-solid group of roleplayers, the Mets should be spending the money necessary to shore up their bullpen, acquire a real everyday shortstop, and become a true Wild Card contender and an outside threat for the NL East divisional crown.

They won’t, however. We already know why they won’t. The Mets ownership is an embarrassment to their league, their fans, their employees and themselves; this is as close to established fact as sunrise tomorrow. And given that the Mets and their media apparatus are the only means by which the Wilpons can continue to live the lifestyle to which they’ve become accustomed, it’s unlikely they’re going anywhere anytime soon.

It’s sad. These Mets could’ve been something in 2015 with a reasonable budget. They could still be something, if incoming league commissioner Rob Manfred has a stronger commitment to the health of the sport than he does to the personal feelings of the Wilpon family. With Manfred’s predecessor Bud Selig remaining with the league as “Commissioner Emeritus” and “advising” Manfred on how to act, however, that seems highly unlikely.

There are a lot of things that could happen, were there other ways to remove hideously bad corporate citizens like the Wilpons from sports ownership besides something viciously embarrassing going viral.

Instead, Wilmer Flores will be the New York Mets’ starting shortstop, until like all of the other embarrassments, this too becomes too much to bear.

Edgy MD
Jan 14 2015 02:50 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

That's written like it's coming from an English guy.

He lost me at the subtitle: "Wilmer Flores, a player who barely made a dent in Triple A, will be the Mets’ starting shortstop. It says everything about the team’s ambition."

It's easy enough to check that one out, and... no.

Ceetar
Jan 14 2015 03:42 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

yeah. The guy answers his own question and doesn't realize it.

Flores was supposed to hit and if he hits it's okay if he plays SS badly. Well, perhaps that time at other positions was to get him AB to figure out if he would hit and such, to see if you could play him at SS?

Perhaps the 'many times' they've anointed him the starting SS this WINTER is merely posturing and positioning?

Frayed Knot
Jan 14 2015 06:15 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I can totally understand not wanting to deal Syndergaard for only one guaranteed year of Desmond. Where Megdal says that the Mets could have simply requested a negotiating window, he neglects to mention that those windows are the exception, and most deals (for whatever reason) don't include them. You can't assume that the Mets had that option. And you can't assume that it was money that prevented this deal from happening; it's just one of several potential reasons.


Those situations are rare because the clubs can't simply make them happen unilaterally. Both the other team AND the player have to agree to it in advance and then an agreement needs to be reached. And seeing as how Desmond has already turned down a lengthy and lucrative extension from his current team (the only one he's ever played for and one that's in the midst of the best run in its history) it certainly seems that he's intent on trying FA-gency.
The Santana case was unusual in that Johan was a rare pre-FA player who had a contract giving him full no-trade protection which in turn gave him full veto power over any trade unless he got the contract he wanted in advance.

G-Fafif
Jan 15 2015 12:17 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ken Rosenthal would like the Mets to find a way to obtain Ian Desmond without giving up Noah Syndergaard.

Mets should go all-in for Nats' Desmond & other moves that need to happen soon
Ken Rosenthal

FOX Sports

JAN 14, 2015 10:50p ET


Some quick thoughts on Wednesday's flurry of news.

*The Mets should trade for Nationals shortstop Ian Desmond.

The Nats acquired shortstop Yunel Escobar from the Athletics on Wednesday, presumably with the intention of playing him at second base.
I'm not so sure.

Escobar has not played second since 2007, his rookie season. True, Asdrubal Cabrera went from short to second after the Nats acquired him last July. But think about it: The Nats are now fully protected at short if they want to move Desmond.

Escobar is signed through 2016 with a club option for '17. Top shortstop prospect Trea Turner, the reported "player to be named" in the Nats' three-team deal with the Rays and Padres, should be ready at some point during that time.

Enter the Mets, who according to sources, recently balked at acquiring Desmond and Ben Zobrist in separate trades because they did not want to give up top prospects for a player who was under control for only one more season.

Well, what if the Mets offered second baseman Daniel Murphy, a player whom the Nats tried to acquire last July? And what if they sweetened their proposal with one prospect and took a second, lesser player back, considering that Desmond is more valuable than Murphy?

The Nats could go with Murphy at second and Escobar at short, or Murphy at third and Anthony Rendon at second (Rendon is a plus defender at both spots, while Murphy is considered better at third, the position that David Wright plays for the Mets).

The Mets, ahem, then would be obligated to go all-out to sign Desmond, which is what every other high-revenue team in their position would do.

Yes, the Nats have failed to secure Desmond long-term, but that's probably because they've failed to offer him market value. Desmond, who is coming off three straight Silver Sluggers, likely would command $150 million as a free agent next offseason.

The restrictions on the Mets' finances are obvious to anyone who follows the sport, but it's absurd that their 2015 payroll likely will be lower than those of some low-revenue clubs. Many of their fans are frustrated, and rightly so. The team seemingly is on the verge of contention, but its only major offseason acquisition was free-agent outfielder Michael Cuddyer, and shortstop remains something of a black hole.

The Mets would not suffer much financially in '15 if they exchanged Murphy's projected $8.3 million salary in arbitration for Desmond's $11 million guarantee. They also are trying to trade right-hander Dillon Gee, who is projected to earn $5.1 million — and such a trade could even put them ahead financially short-term.

Beyond '15? That's the issue, but it shouldn't be for a New York team. And if it is, incoming commissioner Rob Manfred should get involved, no matter how close Mets owner Fred Wilpon is with commissioner Bud Selig.

Enough is enough.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 15 2015 05:17 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'd give up Muffy & Gee for Dezzy.

Ceetar
Jan 15 2015 05:53 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
I'd give up Muffy & Gee for Dezzy.


yeah, that's sorta a gimme.

Of course, I'm not sure the Nationals want either player.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 15 2015 06:07 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Muffy & Vic Black? They presumably need a replacement for Clippard.

Edgy MD
Jan 15 2015 06:39 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Mets should go all-in for Nats' Desmond & other moves that need to happen soon

... The Mets, ahem, then would be obligated to go all-out to sign Desmond, which is what every other high-revenue team in their position would do.

Go all-in to go all-out!

Benjamin Grimm
Jan 15 2015 07:00 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

If the Mets trade Murphy for Desmond, and Desmond becomes the shortstop, then who plays second base? Flores, I'd assume. This trade then wouldn't be about replacing Flores in the lineup, but Murphy.

Edgy MD
Jan 15 2015 07:43 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I thinky people don't find Flores so unthinkable at second.

But of course, so much of the clamoring is really about using "shortstop" to beat up on the team for not being "serious." That article there demands the Mets pay $150 million to Ian Desmond or have the commissioner seize the team. It's stupid. If the team has $150 million to drop, I can think of a lot of other places I would have it spent without thinking too hard.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 15 2015 08:19 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
If the Mets trade Murphy for Desmond, and Desmond becomes the shortstop, then who plays second base? Flores, I'd assume. This trade then wouldn't be about replacing Flores in the lineup, but Murphy.


That's been my plan from the start. Not Desmond, necessarily, but some shortstop, paid for with Muffy's $$, allowing Flores and/or Hererra if necessary, to play there. It make a lot of sense for the Mets.

I'm not sure why the Nats would do this however. They are weird.

metirish
Jan 15 2015 09:00 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Desmond is a nice player but fuck me the $$$ amount being thrown out there is silly.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 15 2015 09:03 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:


But reading a Megdal piece about anything these days is like, well... it's like asking an overly-enthusiastic organic chemist about energy production, or snack cake nutrition, or seven-card no-limit Omaha. He'll tell you, "When you boil it down, it's really ALL about carbon," and he'll be right, mostly. But, y'know...


Yeah, but that carbon-centric conversation wouldn't be anywhere near as absurd as all these posts in this thread premised on the delusion that the Mets can afford the eight-figure a year Desmond on a long-term contract. Same with Tulo. All the nitpicking about Tulo's age and durability and whatever his other flaws might be ... as if the Mets could even afford Tulo in his present condition, let alone if he was younger and healthier.

This is like me telling you that the reason I'm not gonna purchase the Dallas Cowboys this coming weekend is mainly because I'd rather not have to spend so much of my time in Texas.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 15 2015 09:11 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I don't think an extension is realistic given what we know about how the Wilpons are spending the $$, but maybe not out of the question down the road, particularly if the deal works out.

In the meantime, you could pay for the guy with what they're throwing out there now if they only move to cut ties with 2 guys with no LT futures on this club anyway in Muffy & Gee.

I'm making this deal whether the Nats are with me or not. QUIT HOLDING IT UP IT SANDY!!!!!11

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 15 2015 09:18 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
I don't think an extension is realistic given what we know about how the Wilpons are spending the $$, but maybe not out of the question down the road, particularly if the deal works out.

In the meantime, you could pay for the guy with what they're throwing out there now if they only move to cut ties with 2 guys with no LT futures on this club anyway in Muffy & Gee.

I'm making this deal whether the Nats are with me or not. QUIT HOLDING IT UP IT SANDY!!!!!11


Interesting. Me personally, I suspect the Mets have to ditch both Murphy and Gee just to be able to afford the 2015 payroll.

d'Kong76
Jan 15 2015 10:50 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Me personally, I suspect the Mets have to ditch both Murphy and Gee just to be able to afford the 2015 payroll.

Do you really believe "the plan" is go into 2015/16 and still
spend even less and less?

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 15 2015 11:04 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

d'Kong76 wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Me personally, I suspect the Mets have to ditch both Murphy and Gee just to be able to afford the 2015 payroll.

Do you really believe "the plan" is go into 2015/16 and still
spend even less and less?


To be fair, they'd have to ditch both just to be at/about the same payroll, owing to arbies/other salary increases.

d'Kong76
Jan 15 2015 11:06 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Guess they'll have to dump more than those two then.

Edgy MD
Jan 15 2015 11:11 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Well, we certainly know Gee is on the market, and he may well be exchanged for minor league talent/salary relief. There's been little such buzz about Murphy, however. I tend to think that if the team could swap Muh or Flores for an equal-value shortstop, they would, but that deal has yet to be found.

They probably won't be the first team to field three third basemen in their infield. I mainly hope they hit like three third basemen. Three good third basemen.

I guess it's defensively better than the recent and lamentable days of four first basemen.

d'Kong76
Jan 15 2015 11:19 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Should probably have started a Wilpon's Finances in 2015
thread at the beginning of the year.

Ceetar
Jan 15 2015 11:30 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

d'Kong76 wrote:
Should probably have started a Wilpon's Finances in 2015
thread at the beginning of the year.


No need.
Unless every thread mentions it we're letting them off easy.

Centerfield
Jan 15 2015 11:59 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm intrigued by the end of Rosenthal's article. What can the commissioner do if the owners are not putting forth a large budget team?

How is that actionable?

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 15 2015 12:18 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I don't think a Commissioner can do shit unless the owners pull a Donald Sterling or worse (and I don't put that past the Wilpons, who are dumb enough to do something stupid like that) but in general the Commish works for Fred + Jeff not the other way around.

Ashie62
Jan 15 2015 12:46 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I believe the Mets are committed to Wilmer Flores getting first crack at SS.

Don't assume Dillon Gee is being shopped for a starting SS. I would guess a very good late innings bullpen guy ala Tyler Cippard may be the target.

Frayed Knot
Jan 15 2015 01:06 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
... so much of the clamoring is really about using "shortstop" to beat up on the team for not being "serious." That article there demands the Mets pay $150 million to Ian Desmond or have the commissioner seize the team. It's stupid. If the team has $150 million to drop, I can think of a lot of other places I would have it spent without thinking too hard.


Yeah, BB-Ref's 'Most Similar' list* for Desmond is topped with names such as JJ Hardy, Orlando Cabrera, Stephen Drew, Juan Uribe, Brandon Phillip & Khalil Greene.
Anyone want to be paying $20 mil/yr for any of those guys in their 30's?

Desmond will hit 30 just before becoming a FA and has seen his OPS+ slip 125 - 113 - 103 over the past three seasons. Still a serious upgrade over whatever we have there for 2015, but when it's framed as an 'All-in or bust' scenario [Best prospect PLUS another top prospect PLUS full FA deal or you're not worthy of a franchise] I think that's overstating things more than just a bit.





* Not the greatest judge of like-players IMO, but just a quickie example

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 15 2015 01:15 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr wrote:
d'Kong76 wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Me personally, I suspect the Mets have to ditch both Murphy and Gee just to be able to afford the 2015 payroll.

Do you really believe "the plan" is go into 2015/16 and still
spend even less and less?


To be fair, they'd have to ditch both just to be at/about the same payroll, owing to arbies/other salary increases.


What Leiter said. I think the payroll's gonna be at about the same embarrassing level as last year. And because several sources are reporting that the current payroll level projects at about $10M or so more than last year's, the Mets are gonna hafta dump salary to get to the mid 80's.

So I'm not necessarily predicting that 2015 payroll's gonna be even less. But if it was, why do you find this so surprising, or unbelievable? Are you saying that you're OK with a mid-80's payroll, but that you draw the line at anything less? Me, I expect the Mets to have one of baseball's top three payrolls every single season. That's the way it oughtta be, the way it must be, given the team's geographic location.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 15 2015 01:20 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
... so much of the clamoring is really about using "shortstop" to beat up on the team for not being "serious." That article there demands the Mets pay $150 million to Ian Desmond or have the commissioner seize the team. It's stupid. If the team has $150 million to drop, I can think of a lot of other places I would have it spent without thinking too hard.


Yeah, BB-Ref's 'Most Similar' list* for Desmond is topped with names such as JJ Hardy, Orlando Cabrera, Stephen Drew, Juan Uribe, Brandon Phillip & Khalil Greene.
Anyone want to be paying $20 mil/yr for any of those guys in their 30's?

Desmond will hit 30 just before becoming a FA and has seen his OPS+ slip 125 - 113 - 103 over the past three seasons. Still a serious upgrade over whatever we have there for 2015, but when it's framed as an 'All-in or bust' scenario [Best prospect PLUS another top prospect PLUS full FA deal or you're not worthy of a franchise] I think that's overstating things more than just a bit.





* Not the greatest judge of like-players IMO, but just a quickie example


See, this is where things get all absurd for me. I mean, this whole analysis about why Desmond is too flawed to play shortstop for the Mets given his current price tag. Which the Mets can't afford anyway. And if Desmond was good enough to meet your standards, he'd be that much less affordable.

Isn't it more efficient, more honest, to just recognize that the Mets can't afford Desmond and get on with hoping that their cheap bargain basement shortstop option, whoever that's gonna be, comes through?

Edgy MD
Jan 15 2015 01:33 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I don't think I was dishonest.

Ceetar
Jan 15 2015 01:36 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

no, because they could afford Desmond, in a vacuum, if they thought that's what they needed.

Look, if Tulowitzki had Desmond's contract and the Rockies were actually looking to move him like the Nats were, I'd easily give up Syndergaard and a lower level pitching prospect AND say Flores or den Dekker or someone like that to fill a stopgap hole for him. The Mets would be in at that price as well. Besides, Jim Duquette reported that the Mets were closer than was reported on Desmond, so clearly it just went a different way. You can believe whichever leak you want that fits your narrative of course, but so many facts don't jive.

But that's not the case. The MAIN problem right here is that there aren't really any easy answers to upgrade SS. Maybe they could've paid for Hanley despite his growing Not-a-SS'-itis, he wouldn't be worse than Flores defensively. That's where I wonder about payroll levels, not with guys like Drew and Desmond and Kang.

metsmarathon
Jan 15 2015 01:56 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

as far as a desmond/murphy swap goes, [u:3igu58iw]offensively[/u:3igu58iw], they're not all too dissimilar in terms of overall production. desmond gives you a little more power and a greater number of home runs, but at a lower batting average and obp.

last year, they had nearly identical OPSs, with desmond having a whopping .008 edge, albeit with more stolen bases. factor in home parks, and, well, murphy might've actually been the better offensive player. in fact, murphy had the better OPS+, 111 vs 103.

according to fangraaphs, last year, desmond produced 11.2 batting runs above average, while murphy produced 10.8 runs above average.

the steamer projections for both have desmond at 3.8 runs above average for 2015 and murphy at 3.4, while, interstingly, the crowdsourced "fans" projection has murphy at 10.9 runs to desmond's 10.3. the fan projections are typically less conservative, while steamer runs more to the conservative side.

regardless, the point is, that desmond wouldn't be much if at all of an upgrade to our offense if we swap him out for murphy, and move flores (or whatever) to second.

defensively, of course, desmond is a better fielder at short than murphy is at second. but desmond isn't really a great fieldr, i don't htink. for his career, he's slightly negative in uzr/150 at -0.8, and last year was 0.1. with an incredibly small sample size, flores was a plus defender at short, with a uzr/150 of 12.4. is that real? i have no idea. uzr thinks he's been a positive defender everywhere the past two years save 11 bad innings at 2b in 2013. lets pretend flores is an average defender for this exercise.

so, what would hte net result be? we'd have basically the same offense with desmond/flores instead of flores/murphy, with the production coming in slightly different flavors. we'd be getting maybe about hte same defense at short (but possibly worse) and we'd be getting average (or maybe better) defense at second instead of relatively poor defense.

does that really move the needle? a sum total of a slight upgrade at second base defense? burn down the wilpons for not getting this done NOW!!! TRADE ALL THE THINGS!!!!!

meh.

Frayed Knot
Jan 15 2015 02:08 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
See, this is where things get all absurd for me .. this whole analysis about why Desmond is too flawed to play shortstop for the Mets given his current price tag.


Yeah, that's not remotely what I'm saying.

Mets Guy in Michigan
Jan 15 2015 02:40 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I don't have a problem with his salary, but I think it would be crazy to trade our top pitching prospect for one guaranteed year of a middling middle infielder.

Like with the last infamous prospect trade, it wasn't that we traded the prospect, it was that all that we got in return for our top prospect was Victor Zambrano.

86-Dreamer
Jan 15 2015 04:09 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
I don't think a Commissioner can do shit unless the owners pull a Donald Sterling or worse (and I don't put that past the Wilpons, who are dumb enough to do something stupid like that) but in general the Commish works for Fred + Jeff not the other way around.



Are the Wilpon's still borrowing money from MLB? If so, and they really need that loan to keep the team afloat, then the commish does have plenty of leverage over their ability to keep the team.

Edgy MD
Jan 15 2015 04:31 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The Mets closed the MLB loan with the cash influx they got from the minority shares back in 2012.

Ashie62
Jan 16 2015 02:08 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

This whole The Mets are too cheap or broke to compete for players mantra is getting really old for me. I mean really really old.

Desmond is a highly paid slightly above mediocre SS. Pass.

The 2015 Mets will contend so Sandy must have been doing something right.

Plenty of time to act further, patience...

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 16 2015 12:37 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm curious... for those of you saying "mediocre" or "average" in regards to Desmond... who in your mind is "good," besides, say, Tulo?

Ceetar
Jan 16 2015 12:40 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Hanley, Johnny Peralta?

Castro? Reyes? Crawford?

There's not really a lot of good SS.

Edgy MD
Jan 16 2015 12:55 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Yeah, I'm not calling him mediocre or average, but I certainly have issues with saying that him winning the Silver Sluggo means he's some kind of definitive game-changer. They picked him out of crowded field of five different guys who could have won, probably getting the edge from (a) being the defending champ, and (b) having the power numbers that are particularly unusual for a shortstop, but I have no problem saying Peralta (for instance) was easily the better the asset this past season. So was Tulowitzki, as little as he played.

Hanley, too.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 16 2015 12:57 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Maybe Andrelton Simmons and J. J. Hardy, too, right?

That's just it. Desmond is a little worse offensively than the best of those, and a little more worse defensively than the best of those, and generally better than most these days, save Tulo and Peralta, Hardy (in a good year), Hanley (in a healthy one) or JoseJoseJoseJose (if you're partial).

Ceetar
Jan 16 2015 01:14 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Also, yes, Desmond is a good _ss_ but the Mets need offense more than they need plus production for that position. You don't generally get the offensive bang for your back at that position so it doesn't seem like it's worth overpaying in prospects or money.

Ashie62
Jan 18 2015 07:14 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The FA Marketplace, According to Cots' Baseball Contracts

[list]Mike Aviles *
Asdrubal Cabrera
Stephen Drew
Alex Gonzalez
J.J. Hardy (signed)
Jed Lowrie
John McDonald
Hiroyuki Nakajima *
Hanley Ramirez
Jimmy Rollins * [/list:u]

* – player whose current contract includes 2015 option.


Ya know, that's a list that makes me want to play Wilmer Flores at shortstop for a year.


Ditto..twice.

smg58
Jan 19 2015 01:57 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I don't understand the "obligated" part in the Desmond extension if the primary piece is Murphy. I love the "any team would extend him" bit, while acknowledging in the very next sentence that the Nationals haven't done that. (PS the Scherzer signing suggests that the Nats could afford it if they wanted to.)

And he's also assuming the Nats would help their primary division rival win now.

Frayed Knot
Jan 19 2015 02:42 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

"I don't understand the "obligated" part in the Desmond extension..."
--- essentially it's the authors of the various articles backing the rumored trade [Syndergaard + one other top prospect] admitting that the trade isn't worth it for the Mets unless Desmond is going to be here for multiple years. So they go ahead and treat the deal plus what amounts to a FA contract as if it's all one move and something the Mets would feel "obligated" to make (read: be forced to overpay) or else risk looking bad a year from now when Desmond's on the FA market and the Nats have Syndgaard plus [Nimmo?, Matz?, Conforto?] under control for another six years each.

TheOldMole
Jan 20 2015 01:58 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I root for the Mets, not the Mets' balance sheet. I don't care how much they pay people.

The Mets have let go infielders with a lot less promise than Wilmer Flores (Marco Scutaro, anyone?) and seen them flourish. I don't automatically assume that Flores can't flourish. Hey, his name is Flores, isn't it?

That said, if they can upgrade the position, I for one am not going to judging the deal by how many dollars it costs the Wilpons.

Vic Sage
Jan 20 2015 02:38 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

TheOldMole wrote:
I root for the Mets, not the Mets' balance sheet. I don't care how much they pay people.

The Mets have let go infielders with a lot less promise than Wilmer Flores (Marco Scutaro, anyone?) and seen them flourish. I don't automatically assume that Flores can't flourish. Hey, his name is Flores, isn't it?

That said, if they can upgrade the position, I for one am not going to judging the deal by how many dollars it costs the Wilpons.


ideally i'd agree with you, Mole. But the Pons have demonstrated an unacceptably limited willingness to spend to improve the team, so any monies they tie up in a bad deal is money they don't have for other (potentially better) deals. Its a zero-sum game, so if they overpay to improve at SS, that affects their ability to do other stuff that could help more.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 20 2015 05:29 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Scoreboard announcements vs. signings? That's tinhat worry.

Now, this sort of rumoring? Well, THAT's when I reach for my e-revolver.

Anthony DiComo wrote:

From what I can gather, #Mets have done due diligence on Cuban SS Yoan Moncada, but don't view him as a realistic option given their budget.


Y'know, the guy with plus-contact and -strike-zone-judgment, who was outrunning Rusney Castillo and Puig in workouts as a teenager?

Okay, Tulo may not be fully healthy. And Syndergaard's a lot to give up for Desmond, maybe. And we didn't even know Grigorius was available for so little. But this guy is young, extremely polished for his age (or for a 25-to-27-year-old, even), and ticks all the boxes. He just happens to wreck our nonexistent budget.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 21 2015 08:08 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Whacky suggestion of the day. Brewers just traded Gallardo to Texas for a couple guys including young SS Luis Sardinas, who can pick-em and shows at least some ability as a singles hitter.

How about we step in offering a replacement for Gallardo (Gee) and insurance for Sardinas (Tejada); in exchange for Jean Segura, who sophomore-slumped badly last year, had the tragedy of his kid dying, couldn't work out a contract deal, and could use a change of scenery?

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 21 2015 08:16 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Mets rumors: Shortstop Yoan Moncada won't fit in Mets' budget

By Steve Sypa
@SteveSypa on Jan 20 2015, 7:48p



According to Anthony DiComo, Mets beat writer for MLB.com, the Mets have done their due diligence on Cuban shortstop Yoan Moncada but do not view him as a realistic option due to budgetary constraints. If the Mets are interested in signing Moncada, funds must be drawn from their 2014-2015 international bonus pool, the MLB-assigned funds used to sign international rookies.

The Mets, for their part, have already spent roughly $2 million of their $2.7 million 2014-2015 international bonus pool, signing shortstops Kenny Hernandez ($1,000,000), Yoel Romero ($300,000), and Edgardo Fermin ($250,000), left-handed pitcher Tulio Garcia ($175,000), outfielder Daniel Guzman ($140,000(, and right-handed pitcher Jhoander Chourio ($130,000), in addition to numerous lower profile signings with no published dollar amounts made public.

According to numerous industry sources, the Cuban shortstop will command a large signing bonus, perhaps as high as $30 or $40 million. The penalty for exceeding the bonus pool allotment by 15% or more is a 100% tax on the overage and a prohibition on signing players for more than $250,000 in the next two signing periods. A 100% tax on roughly $30 or $40 million is a level of financial commitment that is simply a hurdle that many teams—including the Mets—simply cannot scale.

The Cuban shortstop was granted his free agent status by Major League Baseball back in mid-November, but he has yet to receive his unblocking license from the Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets. Because of the ongoing U.S. trade embargo with the communist island to its south, MLB teams cannot sign Moncada until he receives the clearance.

According to Baseball America's Ben Badler, if Moncada were eligible in the MLB Amateur Draft, he would undoubtedly be a top selection, perhaps even the number one selection overall. The switch-hitting youngster hit a combined .276/.391/.375 in the 52nd and 53rd Serie Nacional de Beisbol and profiles only to improve. Along with excellent awareness at the plate, Moncada has a level, line-drive swing that has already exhibited growing power. In addition, he possesses blazing speed and a strong arm, strong enough to play any infield position, including shortstop. Were the Mets to add Moncada, the Cienfuegos native would likely become their top minor league prospect and would likely be one of the top prospects in all of Major League Baseball.


http://www.amazinavenue.com/2015/1/20/7 ... oll-budget

d'Kong76
Jan 21 2015 08:29 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

http://www.baseballamerica.com/internat ... n-moncada/
"That’s why you can comfortably count out teams such as the Indians, Twins, Royals, Pirates, Athletics and Mets when it comes to handicapping the Moncada sweepstakes."

Maybe they should change their name to The Corona Mets.

Edgy MD
Jan 21 2015 08:35 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Those rules are miserable, aren't they?

Ceetar
Jan 21 2015 09:07 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Those rules are miserable, aren't they?


pretty much, yeah.

one guy saying Mancada is going to be the top prospect in MLB is just one guy saying that. Doesn't mean he's a slam dunk to be their answer this year even if he is.

While I doubt the Mets can/will afford ~$60 for a signing bonus (including fees) anyway, there is also the restraint on the next two signing periods to consider that applies to the Mets but NOT to some other teams. It's not just about money.

And even if it were, that's a hell of a lot of cash to spend on a signing bonus.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 21 2015 09:16 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ceetar wrote:
Those rules are miserable, aren't they?


pretty much, yeah.

one guy saying Mancada is going to be the top prospect in MLB is just one guy saying that. Doesn't mean he's a slam dunk to be their answer this year even if he is.

While I doubt the Mets can/will afford ~$60 for a signing bonus (including fees) anyway, there is also the restraint on the next two signing periods to consider that applies to the Mets but NOT to some other teams. It's not just about money.

And even if it were, that's a hell of a lot of cash to spend on a signing bonus.


The rules are the same for every team.

...because of the payment structure required to sign Moncada, the teams that sources consider the leaders to sign him are mostly big-market, high-revenue clubs.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/internat ... n-moncada/

You would think, logically, that "big market" and "high revenue" are synonymous, redundant ways to describe a baseball team. But leave it to the Wilpon Mets to create an exception.

Hey, Mr. Met Apologist: how would you like this story to read? Maybe the writers can write that Moncada should be avoided at any price because he's a certain-bust and a pedophile and on top of that he also likes Jennifer Aniston movies.

Ceetar
Jan 21 2015 09:22 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

the rules are NOT the same for every team.

Some teams have already violated the cap. Those teams will already be hard-capped after July 2nd. They have no further penalty to signing Mancada whereas the Mets would get hard-capped for those 2 periods.

So, money aside, if there is a player to be had in those next two signing periods the Mets could actually be better off waiting, in a signing period with less teams that can sign a guy demanding a signing bonus, to make a play on a big guy.

It's messy, and there is obvious pairing between the Mets need for a SS right now and Mancada, but it's hardly just a "nah, they're broke" situation.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 21 2015 09:25 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Let's debate my Segura idea instead.

Edgy MD
Jan 21 2015 09:41 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm not so sure there's such an obvious match there. If the Mets truly are as shortstop-poor as all that, that paucity is projected to be in the short term. In the long term, they look to be potentially graduating four shortstop prospects in the next four seasons.

At 19, Monconda doesn't really project to step in and push a team ahead a few games in the standings this year. He certainly could be a teenage wunderkind, stepping in and immediately becoming a core contributor at the big-league level, but that's hardly to be expected.

Beyond that, while all agree that he has the footspeed Flores (for instance) lacks, not all the scouts like him at shortstop, and some see him ticketed for second or third.

I'm curious about the Segura idea.

Ceetar
Jan 21 2015 09:47 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Let's debate my Segura idea instead.


Curious about Segura. Didn't know about the personal stuff last year, but the year before he was pretty good (And the year before, his first, he was Ruben Tejada) He's got more speed though, and last year his babip was a blip lower. decent walker.

I'm not trading Gee AND Tejada for that. (Tejada will be a very good SS/2B backup guy this year)

But I'd do it if they threw in a prospect of sorts. Doesn't have to be top flight guy, just someone. Or maybe a solid lefty pen guy?

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 21 2015 09:49 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ceetar wrote:
the rules are NOT the same for every team.

Some teams have already violated the cap. Those teams will already be hard-capped after July 2nd. They have no further penalty to signing Mancada whereas the Mets would get hard-capped for those 2 periods.

So, money aside, if there is a player to be had in those next two signing periods the Mets could actually be better off waiting, in a signing period with less teams that can sign a guy demanding a signing bonus, to make a play on a big guy.

It's messy, and there is obvious pairing between the Mets need for a SS right now and Mancada, but it's hardly just a "nah, they're broke" situation.


The rules are the same for every team. Some teams simply chose to play their hand differently.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 21 2015 09:54 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
I'm not so sure there's such an obvious match there. If the Mets truly are as shortstop-poor as all that, that paucity is projected to be in the short term. In the long term, they look to be potentially graduating four shortstop prospects in the next four seasons.


Well, then there you go. Now we can all go back to pretending that the Mets aren't constrained by their poverty not that money matters anyway and we can root for Flores or Tejada to hold the fort while the Mets kill time until the next wave of young Honus Wagners hits Citi Field. And maybe Wilmer FLores develops into a Honus Wagner himself giving the Mets five instead of four Honus Wagners in the near future.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Jan 21 2015 09:55 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ceetar wrote:
John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Let's debate my Segura idea instead.


Curious about Segura. Didn't know about the personal stuff last year, but the year before he was pretty good (And the year before, his first, he was Ruben Tejada) He's got more speed though, and last year his babip was a blip lower. decent walker.

I'm not trading Gee AND Tejada for that. (Tejada will be a very good SS/2B backup guy this year)

But I'd do it if they threw in a prospect of sorts. Doesn't have to be top flight guy, just someone. Or maybe a solid lefty pen guy?


Segura was the guy traded for Zach Greinke. You can't not include Tejada or expect a prospect back in getting him. In fact I'm afraid my offer is too little.

In addition to having his kid die he was hurt when douchy teammate Ryan Braun hit him in the head with a careless practice swing.

All that and he rallied to finish strong last year, due for major bounceback, my sources are predicting.

Frayed Knot
Jan 21 2015 09:57 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

One wouldn't think that Sandy would be all that high on Segura's .041 career Walk rate - essentially that's Murphy-esque coupled with a lower BA and half the 2Bs at a much better hitting park.
Is a VERY legit SS with speed though, and just 24 y/o (25 in March) with 4 years of team control.

Edgy MD
Jan 21 2015 10:00 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
I'm not so sure there's such an obvious match there. If the Mets truly are as shortstop-poor as all that, that paucity is projected to be in the short term. In the long term, they look to be potentially graduating four shortstop prospects in the next four seasons.


Well, then there you go. Now we can all go back to pretending that the Mets aren't constrained by their poverty not that money matters anyway and we can root for Flores or Tejada to hold the fort while the Mets kill time until the next wave of young Honus Wagners hits Citi Field. And maybe Wilmer FLores develops into a Honus Wagner himself giving the Mets five instead of four Honus Wagners in the near future.

And there you go. Talking to me like I'm a two-year old scoring on the wrong side of the curve on the aptitude tests.

Come on. Let's be friends. I have a lot of great things at my house.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 21 2015 10:03 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
I'm not so sure there's such an obvious match there. If the Mets truly are as shortstop-poor as all that, that paucity is projected to be in the short term. In the long term, they look to be potentially graduating four shortstop prospects in the next four seasons.


Well, then there you go. Now we can all go back to pretending that the Mets aren't constrained by their poverty not that money matters anyway and we can root for Flores or Tejada to hold the fort while the Mets kill time until the next wave of young Honus Wagners hits Citi Field. And maybe Wilmer FLores develops into a Honus Wagner himself giving the Mets five instead of four Honus Wagners in the near future.

And there you go. Talking to me like I'm a two-year old scoring on the wrong side of the curve on the aptitude tests.

Come on. Let's be friends. I have a lot of great things at my house.


What? We're not friends? I like stuff. Whatcha got at home? Answer the second question first.

I'm not into comic books.

Lefty Specialist
Jan 21 2015 12:27 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

A Boy Named Seo
Jan 22 2015 11:36 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
John Cougar Lunchbucket wrote:
Let's debate my Segura idea instead.


Curious about Segura. Didn't know about the personal stuff last year, but the year before he was pretty good (And the year before, his first, he was Ruben Tejada) He's got more speed though, and last year his babip was a blip lower. decent walker.

I'm not trading Gee AND Tejada for that. (Tejada will be a very good SS/2B backup guy this year)

But I'd do it if they threw in a prospect of sorts. Doesn't have to be top flight guy, just someone. Or maybe a solid lefty pen guy?


Segura was the guy traded for Zach Greinke. You can't not include Tejada or expect a prospect back in getting him. In fact I'm afraid my offer is too little.

In addition to having his kid die he was hurt when douchy teammate Ryan Braun hit him in the head with a careless practice swing.

All that and he rallied to finish strong last year, due for major bounceback, my sources are predicting.


Yeah, he'd command more than Gee/Tejada, but not much more, I'd imagine. Led by a trio of interchangeable mediocrities in Lohse, Garza, and Wily Peralta, an up-and-coming arm like Montero maybe (packaged with Tejada) could be sweet enough. If this was the NBA, I'd throw in a 2017 2nd round draft pick, too. Done and dusted.

Edgy MD
Jan 22 2015 12:02 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
What? We're not friends? I like stuff. Whatcha got at home? Answer the second question first.

I'm not into comic books.

To start, a complete (signed!) collection of "The Magic Is Back" horizontal subway posters.



Got the Frank Taveras one in Spanish even! Talk about porn!

Benjamin Grimm
Jan 23 2015 11:12 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Last night on Mets Hot Stove, Jim Duquette suggested that the Mets might be able to acquire Desmond from Washington by sending Murphy and one of the following: Matz, Plawecki, or Montero. (Duquette's thought is that after signing Scherzer, the Nationals will be looking for some payroll relief. I'm not sure how much this proposed deal would help with that. Murphy will make $8 million this year, and Desmond will make $11 million. Does the difference of $3 million mean all that much to a team that just committed $210 million?)

I'd be inclined to hold back on Plawecki; if they ultimately trade him I'd want more than a one-year guy. Same is true for Matz, so of the three options, I'd prefer including Montero.

Is there a new rule that would prohibit the Mets from getting a draft pick compensation if they traded for Desmond and then lost him to free agency? Or does that new rule only apply to in-season trades? I know there was something about that, but I don't recall the details.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Jan 23 2015 11:22 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
Is there a new rule that would prohibit the Mets from getting a draft pick compensation if they traded for Desmond and then lost him to free agency? Or does that new rule only apply to in-season trades? I know there was something about that, but I don't recall the details.


As long as the player's with his team for the whole pre-FA season, the team gets draft-pick compensation (provided they make him the one-year Qualifying Offer after the season and he rejects it, of course).

Murphy and Montero for Desmond, maybe. Bump it up to Matz or Plawecki, however, and they better be paying Desmond's salary this year.

Edgy MD
Jan 23 2015 11:32 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Bump it to Vic Black, I think.

Washington is short a reliever, and the Mets have Parnell coming back and presumably edging Vic down in the pecking order. Maybe Zach Thornton and Chase Bradford look to be putting some pressure in there from below, so Black might get squeezed out anyhow.

Ashie62
Jan 23 2015 11:34 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
I'm not so sure there's such an obvious match there. If the Mets truly are as shortstop-poor as all that, that paucity is projected to be in the short term. In the long term, they look to be potentially graduating four shortstop prospects in the next four seasons.

At 19, Monconda doesn't really project to step in and push a team ahead a few games in the standings this year. He certainly could be a teenage wunderkind, stepping in and immediately becoming a core contributor at the big-league level, but that's hardly to be expected.

Beyond that, while all agree that he has the footspeed Flores (for instance) lacks, not all the scouts like him at shortstop, and some see him ticketed for second or third.

I'm curious about the Segura idea.


Segura is 24 years old. He lost a son late in the season. Although his numbers were abit underwhelming I believe he has quite a bit of room before he hits his ceiling. I like him.

He will not come cheaply. I'm guessing the Brewers would ask for Noah or Wheeler.

A similar shortstop is 22 year old Xander Bogaerts of the Red Sox. He is/was a highly touted prospect. He clocked in with 12 hr 46 rbi .240 ba and a .297 obp and was considered a disappointment by the Sawx.

His cost would likely be about the same as Segura.

Personally, I would take Noah for either and bump Wheeler up for Bogaerts.

Benjamin Grimm
Jan 23 2015 11:34 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

If Matz or Plawecki were included, I'd be more interested in Desmond signing an extension than in the Nationals sending $11 million. (The Mets, of course, might very well see it differently.) I'd rather see Plawecki stay with the Mets for another year or so to make sure that d'Arnaud is for real, and then trade him for someone who will have a longer-term impact than a one-year rental.

As for Matz, I would like to keep him. Colon will be gone after the season (if not before) and Niese's health has become questionable. I can easily see a rotation in 2016 with Harvey, Wheeler, Syndergaard, and Matz.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 23 2015 11:48 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Here's what drives me nuts about all of these shortstop discussions: Remember that article FAFIF posted a few days ago claiming that the Mets will use their relief pitchers mainly to minimize the team's future salary obligations to those relievers? Well, I think the team operates like that at every single turn. Not only did that article not surprise me, but if anything, I'm a little angry with myself for not having thought of that angle before the author did. So that's where my cynical head is at.

So what does that have to do with shortstops? Well, consistent with the Mets frame of mind as portrayed in that reliever piece, I think that all of these team "negotiations" over Desmond and Tulowitzki are calculated dog and pony shows with the sole purpose of fooling the fans and media into thinking that the Mets are making a good faith effort to acquire those shortstops. The whole thing's a total sham as far as I'm concerned.

Everyone and his or her mother has already figured out that it's senseless to trade a top-tier prospect to merely rent out one of those shortstops for just the 2015 season. The Mets need to sign one of those shortstops to a multi-year contract for the potential deal to work. Even Jeff Wilpon must know that. Probably. And the Mets (here we go again) are broke, and ain't spending the thirty or fifty million it's gonna take to get one of those shortstops for a few years. I'd be happy to be wrong, but that's how I see things.

Frayed Knot
Jan 23 2015 11:59 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I think that all of these team "negotiations" over Desmond and Tulowitzki are calculated dog and pony shows with the sole purpose of fooling the fans and media into thinking that the Mets are making a good faith effort to acquire those shortstops. The whole thing's a total sham as far as I'm concerned.


Keeping in mind that most (if not all) of these stories about trades or future contracts for the likes of a Desmond or Tulowitski are coming from fans and media, those who read such stories and then claim that the team was lying or misleading them when they don't happen really need to look in the mirror if they want to know who to blame for their disappointment.

Edgy MD
Jan 23 2015 12:07 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

If it's a dog-and-pony show calculated to demonstrated false good faith to display for their fans to return with good will, it's a poorly conceived and profound failure, as everything I'm reading suggests that fans are inferring bad faith and returning it with ill will.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 23 2015 12:19 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Frayed Knot wrote:
I think that all of these team "negotiations" over Desmond and Tulowitzki are calculated dog and pony shows with the sole purpose of fooling the fans and media into thinking that the Mets are making a good faith effort to acquire those shortstops. The whole thing's a total sham as far as I'm concerned.


Keeping in mind that most (if not all) of these stories about trades or future contracts for the likes of a Desmond or Tulowitski are coming from fans and media, those who read such stories and then claim that the team was lying or misleading them when they don't happen really need to look in the mirror if they want to know who to blame for their disappointment.


Well, if those "negotiations" never took place, that's another thing.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 23 2015 12:21 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
If it's a dog-and-pony show calculated to demonstrate false good faith to display for their fans to return with good will, it's a poorly conceived and profound failure, as everything I'm reading suggests that fans are inferring bad faith and returning it with ill will.


So something the Mets did backfired on them even worse than they imagined it might. Shocking. Just shocking.

Edgy MD
Jan 23 2015 12:38 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Maybe so, but whatever Jeff Wilpon is, Alderson hardly seems stupid enough to waste his energy on shadow games that clearly aren't going to work.

I probably got this wrong, but I got the notion that the Desmond offer was initiated by the other teams, anyhow.

Frayed Knot
Jan 23 2015 01:14 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Frayed Knot wrote:
I think that all of these team "negotiations" over Desmond and Tulowitzki are calculated dog and pony shows with the sole purpose of fooling the fans and media into thinking that the Mets are making a good faith effort to acquire those shortstops. The whole thing's a total sham as far as I'm concerned.


Keeping in mind that most (if not all) of these stories about trades or future contracts for the likes of a Desmond or Tulowitski are coming from fans and media, those who read such stories and then claim that the team was lying or misleading them when they don't happen really need to look in the mirror if they want to know who to blame for their disappointment.


Well, if those "negotiations" never took place, that's another thing.


The recent stories here are being generated by the likes of Rosenthal - who said that when the three-way deal fell through that the Mets should continue to pursue Desmond and then w/should be forced into giving him a long term deal
- by Medgel who pretty much piggy-backed onto Rosenthal only eliminating parts of it so as to shoe-horn the whole thing into his usual agenda
- and now by Duquette who is clearly just speculating on his own

The only actual story where there were negotiations going on appear to be the three-way where the Mets are reported to have backed away (properly IMO) due to the high price of players not contracts.
The only stories that have come out involving Tulowitski have come from Colorado saying, multiple times now, that there's nothing to them. The Mets, to my knowledge, have said little or nothing on this topic, certainly not recently.

Ashie62
Jan 23 2015 05:49 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Flores maintains the lead in the backstretch.

d'Kong76
Jan 25 2015 06:53 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

SNY wrote:
-Sandy Alderson introduced Cal Ripken Jr. at the N.Y. Chapter of the Baseball Writers of America Awards dinner in New York last night.
It’s a big night for me and for Mets fans, who have been waiting all winter for me to introduce a shortstop,” Alderson joked, before handing the podium off to Ripken (NY Post, Jan. 25).
Alderson has repeatedly said all off season that he hoped to acquire an upgrade at shortstop.
The Mets been connected in rumor to several high-profile shortstops, including Troy Tulowitzki and Ian Desmond, but now appear likely to again enter Spring Training with Wilmer Flores and Ruben Tejada competing for the starting job.

Funny guy!

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 25 2015 12:29 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
What? We're not friends? I like stuff. Whatcha got at home? Answer the second question first.

I'm not into comic books.

To start, a complete (signed!) collection of "The Magic Is Back" horizontal subway posters.

[fimg=322]http://www.vintagesportsshoppe.com/photos/qdou1.jpg[/fimg]

Got the Frank Taveras one in Spanish even! Talk about porn!


Got one of these over your fireplace? (Ashes included)

Edgy MD
Jan 25 2015 12:32 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Nah, I'm a fan, not a nut.

batmagadanleadoff
Jan 25 2015 12:39 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Nah, I'm a fan, not a nut.


Sez you.

Edgy MD
Jan 25 2015 12:49 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

(sniff...)

d'Kong76
Jan 25 2015 01:46 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Well, we're all pretty nucking futs... I would think that's
something we could all agree on.

Ashie62
Jan 25 2015 05:56 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Wilmer Flores will become a golden God.

A Boy Named Seo
Feb 06 2015 11:52 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I still keep thinking about Segura and every time I read the MLBTradeRumors.com the last coupla weeks, it talked of the Brewers chasing Jonathan Papelbon.

Would they be tempted by Mejia + Tejada? Would you?

A Boy Named Seo
Feb 06 2015 11:53 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I still keep thinking about Segura and every time I read the MLBTradeRumors.com the last coupla weeks, it talked of the Brewers chasing Jonathan Papelbon.

Would they be tempted by Mejia + Tejada? Would you?

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Feb 06 2015 12:36 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'd be very tempted to make that deal but I'm beginning to think the Mets actually want Flores in the lineup so we'll have to find a spot for Muffy too

They... They might?

A Boy Named Seo
Feb 06 2015 12:58 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Moving Muff could be the easy part, if 1 or 2 better-than-decent prospects (to go along with the $8M in salary relief) is a fair enough return. The Angels could use him. The Dbacks and White Sox, too. Honestly, the MFY would've been a perfect fit pre-Drew. Sorry, Muff.

Edgy MD
Feb 06 2015 01:07 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Muff is moveable — consistent, versatile, and in the last year of his contract — but he sure ain't going to Milwaukee. They let Rickie Weeks walk (still available, last I checked), confident as they were in his successor Scooter F. Gennett.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Feb 06 2015 01:34 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Weeks? Hmm. There's an interesting potential minor-league-contract recipient, no? (I mean, not for short, but still.)

A Boy Named Seo
Feb 06 2015 01:46 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Muff is moveable — consistent, versatile, and in the last year of his contract — but he sure ain't going to Milwaukee. They let Rickie Weeks walk (still available, last I checked), confident as they were in his successor Scooter F. Gennett.


Agree w/ you on the Brewers. That's why I think the Angels are our patsies. They can easily absorb Muff's $8M salary, and have Rockies castoff Josh Rutledge at second and Cardinals castoff David Freese at third. So it is then I will make these two fake trades today:

Mets send Daniel Murphy to LAA for 22-year old, AA 3Bman Kaleb Cowart and 19-yo outfielder Natanael Delgado, who made his his pro debut in the Arizona Fall League last year. Neither are 'deal-breakers' for the Angels, sez me.

Then I will, acting on behalf of the Mets again, send Jenrry Mejia, Ruben Tejada, and Cory Mazzoni to Milwaukee for Jean Segura.

In: Segura, 2 kids
Out: Muff, Mejia, Tejada, 1 kid

Shortstop good til 2k19. Second can be Dilson/Flores.

THANKYOUANDGOODNIGHT.

Edgy MD
Feb 06 2015 02:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I be trigger-shy. Spaghetti-legged. That's a little more going out than coming in, from my perspective. Can you squeeze a little more out of your partners? Maybe get a minor leaguer who works more as a AAA Wright insurance policy than Cowart does?

Because, among other things, Murphy's role as Wright's backup is not to be overlooked.

A Boy Named Seo
Feb 06 2015 04:53 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Good news, I just flipped Kaleb Cowart to the Indians for Swiss Army Knife infielder Mike Aviles. The Indians do this because they're a cost-conscious middle market team, too (HAHA!) and the $3.5M salary for a declining 33, soon-to-be 34-year old Aviles not good lettuce for them.

Having moved almost $12.5M in the salaries of Muffy, Tejada, and Mejia, the Mets can absorb Aviles' $3.5M, like, no problem.

IN: Segura, Aviles, minor league outfielder (~$4M in salary)
OUT: Muffy, Mejia, Tejada, Mazzoni, minor league 3B (~12.5M in salary)

Also 'IN', my GM of the Year award.

Edgy MD
Feb 06 2015 05:16 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Me gusto Aviles.

A Boy Named Seo
Feb 06 2015 05:52 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

For the record, I don't really think Milwaukee makes that trade.

Edgy MD
Feb 06 2015 09:30 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Some GM of the Year you are.

d'Kong76
Feb 07 2015 08:38 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Flores kahnfident!
http://metsblog.com/metsblog/wilmer-flo ... -the-mets/

TheOldMole
Feb 07 2015 01:58 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Flores hits .290 this year and doesn't embarrass himself at short.

Mets Guy in Michigan
Feb 07 2015 02:15 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm with the Mole. Not too many of the guys we've talked about seem that much better that what we have. We're going to need offense.

If we have a slick-fielding backup for the late innings, an adequate glove starting at short should be OK -- as long as he's mashing.

Frayed Knot
Feb 07 2015 04:57 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I think I heard somewhere that Brian Williams has some time at shortstop on his resume.
He might be worth checking out.

Ashie62
Feb 07 2015 06:28 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Yeah, but Williams hasn't been right since returning from the moon.

Ceetar
Feb 07 2015 08:27 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

TheOldMole wrote:
Flores hits .290 this year and doesn't embarrass himself at short.



Hope that's with at least a ..330 or so OBP though.

TheOldMole
Feb 08 2015 04:06 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

.330 OBP, 50+ RBIs. You heard it here first.

Frayed Knot
Feb 19 2015 04:54 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

MLB.com -- Rangers infielder Jurickson Profar's year-long attempt to heal a strained muscle in his right shoulder without surgery has come to an end. Profar, once one of the top prospects in baseball, will undergo surgery on Monday in Arlington and there is a possibility that for the second straight year he could be out for an entire season.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 22 2015 11:16 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

If you thought the Mets decided that they were going with Flores, think again.

Wilmer Flores, Ruben Tejada to compete for Mets SS job, says Terry Collins
BY Kristie Ackert
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Updated: Monday, February 23, 2015, 12:05 AM

excerpt:

PORT ST. LUCIE — The shortstop issue never seems to die with the Mets. After being unable to trade for or sign a shortstop this winter and repeatedly saying they felt comfortable coming into spring training with Wilmer Flores there, Terry Collins said Sunday that it is still an open competition, with Ruben Tejada in the mix, too.

“Absolutely,” the Mets manager said. “I don’t think I can approach it any other way.


read the rest at http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseb ... -1.2124866

Edgy MD
Feb 23 2015 05:49 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

He's been saying it during the winter too.

MFS62
Feb 23 2015 07:40 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Red Sox sign Cuban prospect:
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/02/r ... ncada.html

Later

A Boy Named Seo
Feb 23 2015 01:43 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

A crazy amount, but maybe 20 mils or so less than the crazy amount he was projected to land.

Glad our pretend trade for Jurickson Profar fell flat. Poor dude's missing his second straight season w/ shoulder surgery.

#TeamWILMER

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Feb 23 2015 02:02 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Also looks like Everth Cabrera and the O's are romantically involved.

Frayed Knot
Feb 23 2015 02:34 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The thing about the Cuban Moncada is that, as much as we'd like to see the Mets insert themselves into some of these foreign FA hunts at some point, he was never going to be a SS solution for this season anyway.
He's going to be a star!! is the majority opinion on him, but it probably won't be as a SS and, unlike say Puig and Abreu recently, as a 19 y/o "amateur" he's unlikely to make a mark on the big league level at all this year no matter where on the field he winds up.

Vic Sage
Feb 23 2015 03:55 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

i don't care what position he plays. If he really has 5-tool all-star potential then we should have tried to acquire him. And if all he costs is money, not players or prospects, then a NY team should be able to outbid their Bostonian brethren. But nooooooooooo, not our Won'tPons.

If i've said it once, i've said it a million times.. fuck you, Freddie.

Edgy MD
Feb 23 2015 04:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Every player that costs money costs other players.

Frayed Knot
Feb 23 2015 05:20 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Vic Sage wrote:
i don't care what position he plays. If he really has 5-tool all-star potential then we should have tried to acquire him. And if all he costs is money, not players or prospects, then a NY team should be able to outbid their Bostonian brethren. But nooooooooooo, not our Won'tPons.



I'm not suggesting the Mets shouldn't at least have had their noses in on the bidding (in fact I specifically said otherwise) only that, in the context of being the answer as to who would play SS on the big club this season, he wasn't going to be in the mix.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 09:45 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Vic Sage wrote:
i don't care what position he plays. If he really has 5-tool all-star potential then we should have tried to acquire him. And if all he costs is money, not players or prospects, then a NY team should be able to outbid their Bostonian brethren. But nooooooooooo, not our Won'tPons.

If i've said it once, i've said it a million times.. fuck you, Freddie.


[fimg=444]http://media.giphy.com/media/KPdzGp8a20QbC/giphy.gif[/fimg]

Edgy MD wrote:
Every player that costs money costs other players.


I know what you mean. Keith Hernandez cost Dave Kingman. Darryl Strawberry cost Mike Howard.

Edgy MD
Feb 23 2015 09:51 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I thought it was a thoughtful, if obvious, point.

The Mets, of course, traded for Hernandez.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 09:59 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
I thought it was a thoughtful, if obvious point.

The Mets, of course, traded for Hernandez.


I thought is was the usual defend the Mets at all costs post. And the Mets traded for Keith knowing that if they wanted to keep him, they'd have to pay him what was large money for that time.

Edgy MD
Feb 23 2015 10:04 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
I thought is was the usual defend the Mets at all costs post.

Well, it wasn't. Please try harder.

I beg you and beg you.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 10:09 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
I thought is was the usual defend the Mets at all costs post.

Well, it wasn't. Please try harder.

I beg you and beg you.


Do you really believe that the Mets even got to the point where they gauged Moncada's future to determine if he was worth what it would take to sign him? An impoverished person doesn't crack open a spreadsheet to figure out whether he should buy that beachfront house in Southhampton.

Edgy MD
Feb 23 2015 10:16 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I didn't make any claim with regard to what the Mets did or did not do.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 10:27 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
I didn't make any claim with regard to what the Mets did or did not do.


Fair enough. So then, what exactly did you mean when you wrote what you wrote in response to what you repsonded to. If I may ask?

Edgy MD
Feb 23 2015 10:38 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

"Every player that costs money costs other players"?

You've said is much with your regular insistence that the Mets should not have signed David Wright. Signing Jason Bay in the 2009–2010 offseason had direct consequences in compromising their ability to I dunno, sign Cliff Lee or trade for Adrian Gonzalez in the 2010–2011 offseason. How about Victor Martinez? Mmmmmartinez.

Vic had once regularly derided the It's-only-money perspective as facile and shortsighted. Every dollar has a value in wins. If you're throwing too much after too little, you're mis-managing your team. And, far from defending the Mets at all cost, I'm perfectly willing to point out that the organization did that again and again, with a GM well out of his depth and hired for all the wrong reasons. It wasn't quite as reckless and stupid as getting in bed with Madoff, but it was reckless and stupid.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 10:45 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'd consider your points if the Mets were players, but they're not, so it's all moot. I doubt that there was any meaningful cost-benefit study undertaken over Moncada. Wake me up when the Mets are ready to join the big market teams in more than name only.

Nymr83
Feb 23 2015 10:49 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

If the Mets want to join "the big market clubs" I'd rather they do it in major league free-agency instead of giving a record-breaking deal to an amateur who has never taken a swing against a big leaguer.

I hope Moncoda sucks just to shut people who think $$$ will solve everything up.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 10:53 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The point isn't so much whether Moncada will pan out or not, but that the Mets play in fucking New York City and couldn't get this guy even if they wanted to. And that the Mets can't get this guy even if they wanted to says about a zillion other bad things about this franchise. The Red Sox aren't a dumb organization; they're one of the best run orgs in all of baseball.

Nymr83
Feb 23 2015 11:01 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
The point isn't so much whether Moncada will pan out or not, but that the Mets play in fucking New York City and couldn't get this guy even if they wanted to. And that the Mets can't get this guy even if they wanted to says about a zillion other bad things about this franchise. The Red Sox aren't a dumb organization; they're one of the best run orgs in all of baseball.


The Mets couldn't get this guy if they wanted to? says who? they spent more than this on Michael Cuddyer. I didn't want Cuddyer, but paying so much money for him kinda shows their finances arent as bad as you like to think. And, get this, THE PLAN IS WORKING. the Mets farm system has gotten better each of the last 4 years or so and has gotten to the point where building a homegrown winner is very close to being a reality. Once some combination of Harvey/Wheeler/Syndergaard/DeGrom/Matz/Montero etc and the young bats at almost every position get to the 85 win level, which i think happens this year or next at the latest, the Mets can spend the money to add the missing pieces. this is a better plan than trying to be a late 80's Steinbrenner buying a championship.

Edgy MD
Feb 23 2015 11:06 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'd consider your points if the Mets were players, but they're not, so it's all moot.

If you're not interested in considering my points, I'd ask you not solicit them.

Whatever "players" means, the Mets certainly were not too long ago. And they made a horrible mess of it, and are still paying.

I doubt that there was any meaningful cost-benefit study undertaken over Moncada.

Or maybe they did and they just didn't come to the conclusion you wanted.

Wake me up when the Mets are ready to join the big market teams in more than name only.

You don't strike me as particularly asleep. Heck, it's after 1:00.

The point isn't so much whether Moncada will pan out or not, but that the Mets play in fucking New York City and couldn't get this guy even if they wanted to.

That may be your point. Mine is that it certainly should matter whether he pans out or not. And spending money with a foolish ill-regard to whether it would pan out is what got them in this mess. Think about it. And I beg you to think hard and not answer me sarcastically. On one hand, you are deriding the organization for not undertaking "any meaningful cost-benefit study undertaken over Moncada." On the other, you insist that any meaningful analysis shouldn't matter. They should just spend money and spend it on THIS guy but they won't or can't and this is New York. Which is it?

The Red Sox aren't a dumb organization; they're one of the best run orgs in all of baseball.

I prefer the Mets. I think we're darn lucky to have the front office our team has. And I'd hate to see it blown up in the next populist revolt.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 11:06 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I root for the Mets and I've defended Alderson every chance I ever had on this board. Sandy's a savior. But that doesn't change anything or get the Wilpons off the hook. The team from New York team should be smart and rich.

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Feb 23 2015 11:08 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Yeah, and see, this is an investment that actually appears to make a LOT of sense, for this or any organization with the stuff to pony up. Even if the kid is a middling major leaguer for five years after two years in the minors, that's a plus-column ROI. If he's anything beyond, then, well, PHWOAR.

How do we know that they weren't in on it? Come now.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 11:08 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
I'd consider your points if the Mets were players, but they're not, so it's all moot.

If you're not interested in considering my points, I'd ask you not solicit them..


I had to ask you what your point was in order to decide for myself that it's a moot one.

Edgy MD
Feb 23 2015 11:23 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

So much reason has died this night.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 11:28 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
So much reason has died this night.


I don't believe there was ever room for Moncada in the Mets skimpy budget, and so therefore, the Mets were never in the market. It appears that you disagree on this point, which neither of us could prove one way or the other. So here we are.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 11:30 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
So much reason has died this night.


I don't believe there was ever room for Moncada in the Mets skimpy budget, and so therefore, the Mets were never in the market. It appears that you disagree on this point, which neither of us could prove one way or the other. So here we are.


But that no team should pay the Moncada price for a player like Moncada because he might flop ? That makes no sense to me.

Edgy MD
Feb 23 2015 11:32 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

And... we're at the point where you're more interested in talking to yourself again.

Good night.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 23 2015 11:33 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Edgy MD wrote:
So much reason has died this night.


I don't believe there was ever room for Moncada in the Mets skimpy budget, and so therefore, the Mets were never in the market. It appears that you disagree on this point, which neither of us could prove one way or the other. So here we are.


But that no team should pay the Moncada price for a player like Moncada because he might flop ? That makes no sense to me.


If you told me that a team with a very limited budget should avoid Moncada because it can't afford to make too many mistakes or can't afford to make any costly mistakes, well that's another thing. But that a team from New York should always avoid these kind of signings -- that's absurd.

Ceetar
Feb 24 2015 07:52 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Why does it have to be the Mets are broke or the Mets can spend like money doesn't matter?

It's always going to be somewhere inbetween, and yes it's probably closer to the broke (of course, it's hard to call 100 million broke) side of things.

So whether or not they can/could have/should have splurged to add a prospect to their system, even a highly touted one, there WERE a lot of ancillary considerations like potential prospects they already have to play positions, plus the hard cap on international signings the next two signing periods.

And then, you know, the actual evaluation of the guy. Just because some/many/most see him as likely impact major leaguer doesn't mean the Mets feel he is, or that he fits into their team philosophy and approach.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 24 2015 08:05 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

This is just more delusional rationalization speak as far as I'm concerned. It's like telling me that the homeless person didn't buy the mansion because he didn't like the quality of the kitchen cabinets.

Ceetar
Feb 24 2015 08:16 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
This is just more delusional rationalization speak as far as I'm concerned. It's like telling me that the homeless person didn't buy the mansion because he didn't like the quality of the kitchen cabinets.


But what you're saying is because the guy didn't buy the mansion, he must be homeless.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 24 2015 08:25 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Feb 24 2015 08:27 AM

Ceetar wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
This is just more delusional rationalization speak as far as I'm concerned. It's like telling me that the homeless person didn't buy the mansion because he didn't like the quality of the kitchen cabinets.


But what you're saying is because the guy didn't buy the mansion, he must be homeless.


Not really. See, I already know that the Mets are that homeless guy even before Moncada went on the market.

Mets fans are justified in thinking that way based on years of the team's financially embarrassing behavior --- including, among other things, taking out a bridge loan to essentially pay their electric bill. I'm still waiting for that Santana and Bay money to be re-invested in the team. You wanna give the Mets the benefit of the doubt -- which you always do? Go ahead. It's your right. You wanna express total disbelief over opinions like mine? That, I don't get.

Vic Sage
Feb 24 2015 08:26 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Obviously the evaluation of the player is paramount. Spending doesn't mean spending for the sake of spending, at least not to me. But we finally have a GM i trust to make these judgments, so if he determined that this guy is either more hype than substance, or simply not what the scouts say he is, then i'm totally fine with that. But if he really liked this guy and simply wasn't given the resources to pursue him, then i would be pissed. And whatever other prospects we have in our system is irrelevant. If you think a guy can be great, you get him if you can. And I don't think the presence of Herrera on our 40-man roster, or Uhrena or any other 2b/3b prospects in our system would be any reason not to pursue a 5-tool IFer. And a "hard cap" is bullshit. Its not a hard cap. Its a threshhold amount over which you pay a tax. So its just more money that they could choose to spend, just as Boston did in this situation where they were facing the exact same circumstance.

Of course a 19-year old from Cuba is a risk. I'd even say a high risk. But that is EXACTLY the kind of edge a big revenue team should have over other teams, the ability to take financial risks and, if they don't pan out, still be able to move on to the next plan. Budgets aren't infinite and costs matter, but they should be less of a constraint here than many other places because of a NY franchise's potential revenue streams. Yet the recent consistency of our annual payrolls in the $80-$100m range (in the lower half, and sometimes the lower third of team payrolls in all of MLB), while other top teams are in the $150m range (with 2 over $200m), along with the documented financial woes arising out of their Madoff dealings, cannot help but make reasonable people suspicious of their decision-making process.

Oh, and as far as risks go, the price of 30-year old FAs are a hell of a lot more, and are alot more short-term and alot riskier (with an established track record of failure) than pursuing a 19-year old with long term potential. so a preference for spending the money on Bonillas and Colemans of the world strikes me as the kind of thing we used to do and shouldn't do any more.

Do we know if the Mets were actively in on the bidding? No we don't, though other teams were reported to be actively in pursuit and the Mets were reported to be "not interested" from the jump. And if the Mets lack of interest was purely Sandy's player evaluation, then fine, move along, nothing more to see. But my suspicion is this more a financial constraint imposed by the corrupt WontPons than a baseball decision. I can't know, and neither can anyone else, but the circumstantial evidence supports that conclusion. To which i say, at the risk of repeating myself, Fuck you Freddie... sell the team and let me breathe again.

Ceetar
Feb 24 2015 08:37 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

it is in fact a hard cap on international signings for the next two periods.

So strictly from that sense, you're already gambling on there being no 'big time' prospects in the next two periods. So, everything else aside it's already a calculated risk. Do you want this guy, or do you have info or hope that they'll be something else you'd rather take your shot on? All the evaluation stuff plays in to that, in particular the idea that this guy isn't ready now. Everything is a risk/reward balance and that ratio is not the same for every team.

chalking up every decision as "oh, they're broke" is a knee-jerk reaction, especially when the other ones are "oh, that's just to pretend they're not broke".

But again, money or not it's not hard to see how throwing a lot of money to add a single minor leaguer is not a good way towards building the sustained revenue>expenditures balance that Sandy's working towards.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 24 2015 08:42 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ceets, we're just talking in circles. I know what the issues are. The real estate market might go flat. They're gonna have to change all the furniture because they don't like the style of the decor. It's too far away from everything. A better deal might come along if they wait a little longer. Blah blah blah. But what does all of that matter when they're penniless?

Ceetar
Feb 24 2015 08:48 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Ceets, we're just talking in circles. I know what the issues are. The real estate market might go flat. They're gonna have to change all the furniture because they don't like the style and taste of what's in there. It's too far away from everything. A better deal may come along if they wait a little longer. Blah blah blah. But what does all of that matter when they're penniless?


What if they're not penniless? And what's the point in commenting on every single thing every other team does as "The Mets could've done that if they weren't broke"? I'm more interested in if these moves make sense or not. They're not exactly slam dunks, everyone has a different opinion on how the team should be run, clearly. So if you're going to say "This is undoubtedly a thing the Mets should've done" I'm simply pointing out that that is not true. It doesn't matter if the ultimate reason they didn't do it was money, it's still true that it's not a 100% slam dunk decision or that Sandy might have felt this particular move's risks outweighted the rewards. If you simply want to say "The Mets are broke" to everything, keep posting the Megdal post-generator stuff to the finance thread.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 24 2015 08:57 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I'm not even arriving at that point of deciding whether the thing is worth doing because I think that the Mets can't do it even if they wanted to. To me, it's pointless. It's like the homeless guy shopping for mansions if I may talk in circles against my best wishes. If, for example, the Mets were asked about Moncada, do you think their spokesperson would admit that they would've loved to sign Moncada if only they had the funds in their budget? You always base your opinions on the team's politically correct comments. When they finally get a prospect or two for Gee, do you think they'll admit that they dumped salary? No. They'll say that they made the best deal possible, even if they were constrained from trading Gee for someone with a comparable or, shudder, even higher salary.

Edgy MD
Feb 24 2015 08:59 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Vic Sage wrote:
Do we know if the Mets were actively in on the bidding? No we don't, though other teams were reported to be actively in pursuit and the Mets were reported to be "not interested" from the jump.

Well, they were reported to have actively scouted him.

Ceetar
Feb 24 2015 09:05 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
I'm not even arriving at that point of deciding whether the thing is worth doing because I think that the Mets can't do it even if they wanted to. To me, it's pointless. It's like the homeless guy shopping for mansions if I may talk in circles against my best wishes. If, for example, the Mets were asked about Moncada, do you think their spokesperson would admit that they would've loved to sign Moncada if only they had the funds in their budget? You always base your opinions on the team's politically correct comments. When they finally get a prospect or two for Gee, do you think they'll admit that they dumped salary? No. They'll say that they made the best deal possible, even if they were constrained from trading Gee for someone with a comparable or, shudder, even higher salary.


Gee is NOT a salary dump, it's a value dump. They don't have room for him and if he only pitches as mostly a reliever his value drops. But it's not really a dump at all or they would've done it already. They know he's probably more valuable to another team than to the Mets, therefore they want to leverage that difference into something that helps the Mets more. That's just smart baseball.

I base none of my opinions on what the Mets say, because nothing the Mets say publicly, or 'privately but really publicly because I know you're going to publish this quote' really means much of anything.

I'm just looking at the hard facts around Moncada and certainly see ways that any team could feel like he wasn't worth it.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 24 2015 09:11 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ceetar wrote:


Gee is NOT a salary dump, it's a value dump.


That's what the Mets'll say after it happens. That's for sure.

Nymr83
Feb 24 2015 10:31 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Ceetar wrote:


Gee is NOT a salary dump, it's a value dump.


That's what the Mets'll say after it happens. That's for sure.


if they just wanted to dump the salary why isnt he gone already?
if the Mets are so cheap why wasn't Murphy dumped for nothing? the Mets could easily have "justified" it by saying Herrera is ready.

Maybe its because the Mets are actually holding onto their assets to use wisely? nah, that wouldn't fit your conspiracy theories.

batmagadanleadoff
Feb 24 2015 10:46 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Nymr83 wrote:
batmagadanleadoff wrote:
Ceetar wrote:


Gee is NOT a salary dump, it's a value dump.


That's what the Mets'll say after it happens. That's for sure.


if they just wanted to dump the salary why isnt he gone already?
if the Mets are so cheap why wasn't Murphy dumped for nothing? the Mets could easily have "justified" it by saying Herrera is ready.

Maybe its because the Mets are actually holding onto their assets to use wisely? nah, that wouldn't fit your conspiracy theories.


Maybe the Mets are waiting for the best deal possible that would still qualify as a salary dump. They're not gonna simply release those players into the wind. Why is my view a conspiracy theory? Have you been conditioned to lower your expectations? Are you justifying and accepting the status quo? Don't you think that the team from New York City should have one of the top two or three or four or five or six payrolls in baseball? Every. Single. Season. Do you really believe that there are no significant financial restraints on the Mets ability to spend? Sandy Alderson's a magician but if he could spend what a big market team ought to spend, the Mets would likely be even farther along in their progress. They might've already had that season under Sandy where they won more than half their games.

d'Kong76
Feb 27 2015 04:05 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

February 27, 2015
Jose Reyes on Mets' Ruben Tejada: 'Something is wrong'
by Igor Mello | CBSSports.com
When asked about former Mets teammate Ruben Tejada, Blue Jays shortstop Jose Reyes shook his head and said "something is wrong," per Newsday.

Reyes revealed that during his final season with the Mets he tried to pass the torch to Tejada to become his replacement. Reyes landed in Miami in the offseason, and Tejada was destined to be his permanent replacement. Now entering spring training, Wilmer Flores is viewed as the favorite to win the starting job at shortstop for the Mets.

"Every time I talk to him I try to give him some advice," Reyes said. "What can I do? I try to push him to do stuff. I don't know if he gets it or not...He had the opportunity to be the everyday shortstop for a long time there in New York. You have to work, man. When you're younger, you think you have everything there for you. But if you do something wrong, it's going to go away. Quick.

"When I was there, I always give a lot of advice to him. We were always together. My last year there, every time I talk to him: 'This is going to be your position for a long time. Don't let it go away.' See what happened now? It's 2015 and he doesn't have a position to play. When they talk about who is going to play every day, they don't talk about Tejada. They talk about Flores."

Edgy MD
Feb 27 2015 04:51 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

The original story, from Newsday, suggests a more indicting tone from Reyes, that the "something wrong" clearly is (or was ) Tejada's attitude.

Reyes has trimmed his chin fray and let his mustache come in, and looks less rabbinical.



The subtextual thesis that's crying out there is that Reyes apparently knew his whole last season that he was going to bail.

Centerfield
Feb 27 2015 05:03 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Makes it seem like Jose didn't have any intention on re-signing well before he hit free agency. Interesting.

Edgy MD
Feb 28 2015 07:58 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Jimmy Rollins apparently wasn't quite as Mets-averse as all that.

"This was my No. 1 landing spot," Rollins said from Los Angeles' spring training camp, "and I considered the Mets to be No. 2. They have some arms over there -- oh my gosh.

"I'm not saying I would have gone there. It would have taken a lot. But when I was asked, 'Write down the places you would go if you don't have any (no-trade protection),' I had one team on my list and another where I would go if it didn't work out. Fortunately it worked out here (in Los Angeles). I'm very delighted with that."

Doesn't quite say which "lot" it would have taken.

Frayed Knot
May 05 2015 06:08 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ken Davidoff at the NYPost pries the lid off the SS discussion once again. Nuthin like a few errors plus an off day to wake up slumbering spirits. (it's partly why this thread is 20 pages long!!)
Specifically he mentions:

- Alexi Ramirez (ChiSox): His team is off to a crappy start despite their off-season spending spree ... but so it Alexi [.205/.247/.295].
Only on a one-year deal and would certainly help the defense

- Asdrubal Cabrera (TBR): Off to an even crappier start [.194/.250/.269] after signing a one year deal as a FA in the off season. Notable in that the Mets weren't interested at the time.
Also like Ramirez, he's coming off a decent 2014 so maybe the slow start is just that.

- Troy Tulowitzki (Rox): You know that no article can be written about potential NYM SS without including this guy. Still going to be expensive both in terms of money and live bodies. And, look, the 30 y/o coming off hip surgery who will be your through the 2020 season is somewhat off from his elite so far this season.

- Starlin Castro (CHC): Again it's in the writers handbook that he needs to be mentioned; Mets have lots of pitching, Cubs have lots of SSs, etc.

- Jimmy Rollins (LAD): I know, he just signed there. But this is based on the idea that the Dodgers' up-and-coming SS (Corey Seager) could be ready soon and that Rollins too is off to a slow start [.176/.269/.308].
Player can veto any trade.

Edgy MD
May 05 2015 06:26 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Surprised someone's thinking about a shortstop reload and doesn't look to the teams whose season is getting away from them — specifically the Brewers and Jean Segura.

OE: Man, the Rangers stink too. And they were looking at a three-way logjam at short going into this season before Profar went down.

TransMonk
May 05 2015 06:44 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Onley had mentioned Segura to the Mets as a possible fit last week..but called it "speculation" on his part and said there were no rumors to support it.

He got off to a slow start, but is starting to come around offensively in Milwaukee. His 2014 was nowhere near his All-Star 2013.

Edgy MD
May 05 2015 07:34 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

I had generally written off 2014 as reflective of the terrible tragedy in his family. But who knows? I imagine more than a few people never recover professionally from that sort of blow.

Vic Sage
May 05 2015 10:20 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Surprised someone's thinking about a shortstop reload and doesn't look to the teams whose season is getting away from them — specifically the Brewers and Jean Segura.

OE: Man, the Rangers stink too. And they were looking at a three-way logjam at short going into this season before Profar went down.


The article DID mention Segura: "Other options may include Jean Segura and Deven Marrero, assuming the Brewers and Red Sox are willing to deal them."

Lets bring up Matt Reynolds.
He can hit the ball and he can throw to first.

d'Kong76
May 15 2015 12:18 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Ya know something... fuck him and his preferences!
Rockies SS Troy Tulowitzki would prefer to be traded to the Yankees, Dodgers, Giants or Angels, but would be amenable to going to the Red Sox, Mets and Cardinals, a person who knows him told CBSSports.com’s Jon Heyman (May 15, 1:00 pm).

seawolf17
May 15 2015 12:26 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

d'Kong76 wrote:
Ya know something... fuck him and his preferences!
Rockies SS Troy Tulowitzki would prefer to be traded to the Yankees, Dodgers, Giants or Angels, but would be amenable to going to the Red Sox, Mets and Cardinals, a person who knows him told CBSSports.com’s Jon Heyman (May 15, 1:00 pm).

Seriously. I'm sure the source is bullshit (Heyman), but now? Screw you, Tulo.

Edgy MD
May 28 2015 08:59 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Mets expected to be among the leading bidders for Cuban shortstop Alfredo Rodriguez.

Ben Bradler wrote:
Rodriguez, 21, has a long way to go as a hitter but was arguably the best defensive shortstop in Cuba. He’s an athletic, agile defender with smooth, fluid actions. He’s extremely light on his feet and has good body control and range, with an average arm.

If Rodriguez gets to the major leagues, he likely will never hit higher than the bottom of the order, if his righthanded bat improves enough to get him there…Rodriguez did have some solid offensive years in the Cuban junior leagues, but his bat is still light. Based on his present ability, he would probably start his career at one of the Class A levels.

Rodriguez should be able to agree to a contract during the upcoming signing period, which begins on July 2.

A natural plus fielder with a long way to go with the bat? From Cuba? Sign me up for some Rey-O II!!

Centerfield
May 28 2015 09:42 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Speaking of Rey-O II, is that a 48 year old Edgardo Alfonzo playing next to him at second?

batmagadanleadoff
May 28 2015 09:52 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:

A natural plus fielder with a long way to go with the bat? From Cuba? Sign me up for some Rey-O II!!



I'm already hating him.

Edgy MD
May 28 2015 09:59 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Centerfield wrote:
Speaking of Rey-O II, is that a 48 year old Edgardo Alfonzo playing next to him at second?

Seriously. The second-baseman looks middle-aged and the baserunner looks like a middle schooler.

Centerfield
May 29 2015 07:24 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

By the way, you missed a great opportunity for a thread title: METS HAVE INTEREST IN A-ROD FOR SHORTSTOP

Ceetar
May 29 2015 09:24 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Centerfield wrote:
Speaking of Rey-O II, is that a 48 year old Edgardo Alfonzo playing next to him at second?

Seriously. The second-baseman looks middle-aged and the baserunner looks like a middle schooler.


And the real Edgardo Alfonzo is only 41.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
May 29 2015 09:27 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

That 48 year old remark really hurt.

Centerfield
May 29 2015 10:36 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Wow, I didn't realize Alfonzo was that young when he retired. What a short career.

seawolf17
May 29 2015 11:10 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Centerfield wrote:
Wow, I didn't realize Alfonzo was that young when he retired. What a short career.

Bring him back in September!

Benjamin Grimm
May 29 2015 11:35 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Or next week!

Edgy MD
Jul 10 2015 08:14 PM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Good night for any supporters of Syndergaard-for-Desmond to come forward and take their beatings.

Edgy MD
Aug 25 2015 07:55 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Even after the 0-5 by Ruben last night, the Mets are fourth in the league in fWAR by shortstops. The shortstop-rich team they were supposed to be dealing with, Chicago? Dead fucking last.

[list]RK TEAM fWAR
1 Giants 4.00
2 Pirates 3.40
3 Braves 3.00
T4 Mets 2.50
T4 Reds 2.50
6 Marlins 2.00
7 Cardinals 1.90
8 Phillies 1.50
9 Dodgers 1.30
10 Diamondbacks 0.80
11 Nationals 0.40
12 Padres -0.10
T13 Brewers -0.40
T13 Rockies -0.40
15 Cubs -1.00[/list:u]

I'm less worried about finding the money to re-sign Cespedes and more concerned that there's enough to re-sign Alderson.

Ceetar
Aug 25 2015 08:07 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Even after the 0-5 by Ruben last night, the Mets are fourth in the league in fWAR by shortstops. The shortstop-rich team they were supposed to be dealing with, Chicago? Dead fucking last.

[list]RK TEAM fWAR
1 Giants 4.00
2 Pirates 3.40
3 Braves 3.00
T4 Mets 2.50
T4 Reds 2.50
6 Marlins 2.00
7 Cardinals 1.90
8 Phillies 1.50
9 Dodgers 1.30
10 Diamondbacks 0.80
11 Nationals 0.40
12 Padres -0.10
T13 Brewers -0.40
T13 Rockies -0.40
15 Cubs -1.00[/list:u]

I'm less worried about finding the money to re-sign Cespedes and more concerned that there's enough to re-sign Alderson.


I'm sketchy on this, I'm halfway sure Fangraphs is crediting all of Flores' 2B success as SS success.

Edgy MD
Aug 25 2015 08:17 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Maybe. I'd encourage you to check that out. I've got to get some work done today.

Ceetar
Aug 25 2015 08:24 AM
Re: Shortstop 2015

Edgy MD wrote:
Maybe. I'd encourage you to check that out. I've got to get some work done today.


I might, home on baby duty. I haven't been confident in any of the 'at position' splits out there. This is why I need to find the time to set up my own database of current season stuff, but I never find that time.