Master Index of Archived Threads
Prospect season - 2014-15
Frayed Knot Nov 10 2014 12:26 PM |
Baseball Prospectus begins with the NL East this year so they chime in first:
|
Edgy MD Nov 10 2014 12:52 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
It's a good thing we don't have a porn filter, or that list would have been blocked.
|
Frayed Knot Dec 16 2014 12:41 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
John Sickels posts his NYM list (with BA's due out tomorrow).
|
Edgy MD Dec 16 2014 01:00 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Open Conforto in St. Lucie, you think?
|
smg58 Dec 16 2014 01:16 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
I think Montero's stock has suffered a bit because he didn't make a good first impression here -- which is ironic, because Thor didn't pitch well enough to make any first impression here. I'm still bullish on him.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Dec 16 2014 01:21 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Montero looked to me like a guy who was scared to death at first but also trying not to look that way, and the preoccupation intefered with his mojo. We might get a better idea of what he's all about when he chills a little.
|
Edgy MD Dec 16 2014 02:13 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
I don't really think of Brooklyn-to-St. Lucie as necessarily skipping. It's more of a half skip. Brooklyn doesn't seem higher than Savannah, so much as a short-season version of the same level of competition.
|
Frayed Knot Dec 16 2014 02:20 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
You would think that a top-drafted player from a major college program would be able to handle it. Not sure if blowing him past low-A Savannah even qualifies as 'skipping a level' as the org sometimes uses a start in Brooklyn as more of a brief showcase than anything. Montero: What we have to remember about Montero is that he went from the DSL to the majors in three years so some adjustment period is to be expected. He even looked as if he was starting to settle down very late in the season.
|
Benjamin Grimm Dec 16 2014 02:25 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
I expect Montero is likely to be traded. When someone asks for Syndergaard, Sandy will say no, but how about Montero? Some will say no thanks, but I think eventually someone will say okay.
|
Frayed Knot Dec 16 2014 02:30 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
The comments section got an extra thumbnail sketch for Matt Reynolds who was left off of a top-20 although (another reason I like Sickels) he warns folks not to pay too much attention to the exact order as the similar grades guy in the 10-20 guys are pretty much indistinguishable from each other. And that there are more C+ or better grades (he rates C+ as an above average prospect) than could fit into the top 20 is in itself a good sign.
|
MFS62 Dec 17 2014 08:31 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
I think the Baseball America list is due out today, but haven't seen it yet.
|
Vic Sage Dec 17 2014 09:04 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
they include Cecchini over Uhrena; otherwise same top 10.
|
Frayed Knot Dec 17 2014 10:53 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Q & A session on that list here
|
Frayed Knot Dec 17 2014 01:32 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Some answers from that Q&A involving IF prospects:
|
Edgy MD Dec 17 2014 01:38 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
I'm struggling over whether or not to infer the words "this season" in this statement. The question seemed to be talking about the present status.
|
Benjamin Grimm Dec 17 2014 01:58 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
I think assuming "this season" is probably a stretch. My guess for Dilson is that they'll keep in in Las Vegas until May (the usual ploy to delay arbitration and free agency) especially since, with Murphy likely to at least start the season as a Met, they won't need to rush him.
|
Ceetar Dec 17 2014 02:00 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Given that he couldn't hit in his limited showing last year, and hasn't played at AAA at all, yeah, this season is a stretch.
|
Vic Sage Dec 17 2014 02:14 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 Edited 1 time(s), most recently on Dec 17 2014 02:15 PM |
All-Prospect lineup:
|
Edgy MD Dec 17 2014 02:15 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
Outhit Flores. Outhit Campbell. Outhit Brown. Outhit den Dekker. Heck, going by his rates, he outhit a bunch of starters --- Lagares, Young, Tejada, and Wright (WRIGHT!) --- so I wouldn't conclude at all that he couldn't hit. He hit the ball hard. A .710 from a 20-year-old is sweet.
|
Ceetar Dec 17 2014 02:30 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
||
Well, small sample and all. and it was .625 before he had 1 good game at the end and then didn't play again. (Did he get hurt? I'm blanking.) He did hit the ball hard. Nice solid contact when he connected, which is what boosted the SLG. But he didn't hit it enough. It wasn't an overall good performance. Not to say I wasn't very encouraged by what I saw though. Solid contact, and the ability to draw walks. Didn't embarrass himself as a 20 year old. Very encouraging. Definitely not ready as I see it. Wouldn't be surprised if he only needs another 20-30 games though, and certainly if he was a SS I'd almost say just give them to him at the Major League level.
|
Edgy MD Dec 17 2014 02:40 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
||||||||
Interesting that it's a meaningful sample when you conclude that he didn't hit, but it's too small when that is demonstrated to be untrue.
The bottom line is the bottom line.
Yes. Hurt his quad.
You say the opposite above.
Extrapolated for 162 games, that's 27 homers and 99 RBI. What does enough look like?
Again, you say above that he didn't hit at all.
Definitely? You didn't even recall that he got hurt? How can anybody be definite?
How do you get from definitely not ready to possibly needing only 20-30 games? I don't know what he is. I just disagree that he didn't hit at all. He did, certainly.
|
Ceetar Dec 17 2014 02:52 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
you're just arguing to argue. The default state is 'not good enough for the Major Leagues' because it's hard.
|
Edgy MD Dec 17 2014 03:06 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
I like to think I'm advocating for facts.
|
Frayed Knot Dec 17 2014 03:07 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|||
Yeah, fans tend to think more short term whereas the BA staff is geared towards taking the longer view especially since whether or not he's in the starting lineup depends on so many other factors.
Keep in mind that he already has 31 days of ML service time under his belt so, strictly from a FA/arb clock POV, the math changes on him vs someone like say Syndergaard who has yet to play. I think he can use some AAA time myself - on account of the lack of upper-minors ABs (<300 above A-ball), the low BA, and the nearly 30% K-rate during his short stint. And mainly there's the incumbent(s). I suspect that come April we'll either have Muffy still on the team OR we'll a new SS which allows Flores to play 2B. Either way the path is, at least temporarily, blocked.
|
Centerfield Dec 18 2014 07:36 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
||
He said "good team". He's obviously not talking about this season, unless, wait...OMG HERRERA'S GOING TO BE TRADED.
|
Centerfield Dec 18 2014 07:45 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
||
You'd like to think so. What you are actually doing is wasting your time. You're arguing with someone who argues simultaneously that: *He did not hit at all during the time that he was here. *He hit the ball hard. Nice contact. *It still was not good enough. *Well, maybe. I guess if you project those numbers over a full season, he hit good enough. But how can you draw conclusions on such a small sample size? *He is definitely not ready for the majors. *But he may only need 20-30 more games in the minors.
|
Vic Sage Dec 18 2014 08:06 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
forget it, Edge... it's Chinatown.
|
Ceetar Dec 18 2014 08:09 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|||
I forgot the facts only matter when they're your facts. when they're opinions formed on actual statistics (And Frayed Knot said similar things in his appraisal too, so it's not like I'm an oddball here) they're bogus.
|
Edgy MD Dec 18 2014 08:16 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
But they're not formed on actual statistics. And that's my only point, Johnny Sarcastico. I wouldn't throw him in the deep end either. He's 20, and the team has a qualified second baseman. But it's just not true to assert that he couldn't hit in his limited showing. It's perfectly OK to say "Oh, shit, I was off there. I still wouldn't hand him a job, considering his age and experience, but he acquitted himself perfectly fine in his big league opportunity, brief as it was." Because that's pretty much what you're saying, minus the "Oh shit" part.
|
Vic Sage Dec 18 2014 08:19 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
if we just disagreed with your opinions, this would be a worthwhile discussion to have. But what people are trying to point out to you is that you contradict your own "facts" and opinions from one post to the next, so much so that it becomes an infuriating waste of time for all concerned. And now you've devolved into wound-licking victimization, which is the big neon indicator that further debate is fruitless. I'd say "enough already", but you'd just reply to this with another link in your illogical ceetardian chain of thought. So i'm done playing.
|
Ceetar Dec 18 2014 08:20 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
||
My comment was directed at CF anyway, but you should know by now my default state is Sarcastico. What I'm saying is that I wouldn't give him a job, based on the raw numbers I saw from him last year, and based on the development track he's been on. What I'm also saying that from a purely amateurish scouting standpoint, I liked what I saw from him hit-tool-wise. Liking how he physically struck or 'hit' the ball is different than thinking he turned AB into the statistical measurement 'hits' at a good enough rate to be ready to be a major league 2Bman.
|
Ceetar Dec 18 2014 08:21 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
clearly you're not. And in fact, I don't contradict myself. I can't help it if you don't get the nuance.
|
Edgy MD Dec 18 2014 08:26 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
I'm still missing the "Oh shit" part.
|
Ceetar Dec 18 2014 08:43 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
so you're arguing semantics? fine. Oh Shit. I assumed that when I said he couldn't hit it was obvious I meant the statistics. I almost always mean the statistics. hit means 'ball hits grass'. 'contact' means his swing. I never meant to infer Rey Ordonezesque batting ability.
|
Edgy MD Dec 18 2014 08:47 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
No, I'm not arguing semantics.
|
Ceetar Dec 18 2014 08:51 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
fuck it, just trade the guy.
|
Benjamin Grimm Dec 18 2014 09:05 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
I can just see the headline now: METS DUMP PROSPECT DUE TO FORUM SNIT FIT
|
Vic Sage Mar 17 2015 08:11 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
SIckels has put 7 mets in his top 100:
|
Frayed Knot Mar 18 2015 11:56 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
The inclusion of Sickels' list gives a five list* average of:
|
Edgy MD Mar 18 2015 12:19 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Francisco Lindor is interesting. He's kept rising up the prospect charts for four years, despite not having one standout season or flashing one standout tool. And then you realize "Oh, he's, like, kinda good at everything. And he's very good that way."
|
batmagadanleadoff Mar 18 2015 01:20 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Mets Dominate List. Where have I read that before?
|
Nymr83 Mar 18 2015 01:43 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
SEVEN years younger? i guess that was AAA as a result of the league average being skewed by veterans who arent "prospects"? thats just damn impressive
|
Edgy MD Mar 18 2015 01:45 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Yeah, that's playing in AAA at 20, but like Reyes (or Dilson Herrera), he's been typically among the youngest two or three guys in his league.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 18 2015 02:52 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
His time in AAA skewed those numbers a bit, but he's still been between 3.5 and 5.5 years young for his league since breaking into pro ball with the NYP League as a 17 y/o in 2011. And that's all helped him be a top-50 prospect each year since pre-2012.
|
Frayed Knot Mar 18 2015 04:58 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
A bit of a fluff is developing around #1 prospect (acc to this "consensus") Kris Bryant with his agent, Scott Boras not surprisingly, calling out the Cubs and MLB in general for what he assumes will be the Cubs' strategy of keeping Bryant in the minors for at least the first 12 days of the season so as to delay his FA eligibility for an extra year (a topic we also talked about in the Zack Wheeler thread).
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 24 2015 12:42 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
Some bonerific reviews of the young guys recently in Baseball Prospectus, though sounds like Dom Smith, his crappy attitude and his fat ass are on a one-way train to Bustville.
|
Edgy MD Mar 24 2015 12:53 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
How cinematic! I may print this quote out a few dozen times and paper my cube with it. Urena didn't make mlb.com's top-ten-by-position lists, making third base the first position in which the Mets got shut out. I'm hoping this made him angry.
|
John Cougar Lunchbucket Mar 24 2015 01:33 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
I saw Urena at Brooklyn last year and was impressed. He's a fireplug kind of build, switch hitter, and really tagged one for a double.
|
LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr Mar 24 2015 06:10 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
A svelte fireplug, though, right?
|
Edgy MD Mar 31 2015 06:15 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Bryant farmed out and irate.
|
Vic Sage Apr 01 2015 09:27 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
yeah i heard about that. It's complete bullshit. No player or union can tell a team when they should or should not promote a player to a higher league, whatever their reason. Unless there is something in the CBA that requires such decisions be based on their best baseball judgment, not economic considerations. But I doubt the CBA does, though, because how could you possible prove intent? And how can you say the economic and baseball issues are unrelated... doesn't it increase a team's chance of winning over the long run if they're able to keep their best players for longer, before they become so expensive that they either lose them or keep them but are circumscribed in other moves they can make to improve the team? I would think the union would have to prove that the extra money a team saves if a star player reaches arbitration / FA 1 year later would not have otherwise be spent to improve the team's ability to win, but would instead go into the owner's pocket (as if that were a violation of the CBA). I am so rarely on the owner's side of any issue, but this is one i think is purely agent-driven. The union had the reserve clause struck down, and then won the right to arbitrate early in their careers. They have rightly gained the freedom and leverage they sought. But they don't also get to dictate to a GM who stays on the 25-man roster, or how many starts, or save opportunities, or ABs, a manager gives to a particular player, unless the union gets that right through a new CBA.... and good luck to them with THAT.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 01 2015 10:03 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
Actually I think there IS some language in the CBA about how demotions have to be done for baseball reasons, or at least how they CAN'T be done strictly for manipulation of service time which is certainly what this smells like. But of course you then run into the second part of your statement about how one goes about proving it. One thing that would add to the union's position in any theoretical litigation would be if Bryant is called up exactly on the day that would delay his FA time for an extra year so I'm betting we don't see that.
|
Edgy MD Apr 01 2015 10:49 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
The thing is that exact day is something akin to guesswork.
|
Ceetar Apr 01 2015 11:05 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
you're thinking of the Super 2 nitration date. The service time calendar is mapped out pretty precisely.
|
Edgy MD Apr 01 2015 11:47 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
That's true. The super 2 concern is first but hardly foremost, especially when it comes to hitters.
|
Ceetar Apr 01 2015 12:56 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
how did I change arbitration into nitration? is it because I was half-writing a BeerGraphs post about the Old Howling Bastard I had on nitro last weekend?
|
Frayed Knot Apr 01 2015 01:11 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
Or maybe your spellcheck program was drinking. The arbitration cut off is the one that's speculative (usually around 1/3 of the season) but it's also less important. If Bryant turns out to be as good as everyone hopes then what he's going to be paid in year 3 of his career is relatively small potatoes in the grand scheme of things, particularly when compared to the question of being a FA or not in year 7. Plus if he's that good year 3 will probably be over-ridden by a multi-year deal which will cover those carb-years anyway. As far as how things work for FA purposes: the ML season, for accounting purposes, is 182 days long, but players who are on the roster for at least 170 of them get credit for one full year which is where the 12 days thing kicks in. And once a player misses those 12 days there's no way to make them up; no way to earn 'extra credit' so to speak for being active in all 182 days in subsequent years.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 01 2015 07:51 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Back to prospect rankings for a minute: John Sickels ranks the Mets system as 6th best in MLB
|
Frayed Knot Apr 17 2015 06:04 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
||
Or maybe we do. Bryant called up to the big club, will make ML debut this afternoon at Wrigley.
|
MFS62 Apr 17 2015 07:20 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Forget about Bryant!
|
Edgy MD Apr 17 2015 07:38 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
You were told?
|
MFS62 Apr 17 2015 07:58 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Several Mets fans in the office. The Rubin tweet was last night.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 17 2015 03:33 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
Joe Madden had him batting cleanup in his debut but: 4 ABs, 0/4, 5 LOBs, 3 Ks Now we know why he spells his name with a K instead of the standard spelling.
|
d'Kong76 Apr 17 2015 03:59 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/cubs- ... 1698544054
|
Edgy MD Apr 20 2015 12:58 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
1) Noah Syndergaard
|
Centerfield Apr 21 2015 08:09 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
I have really high hopes for Conforto and Herrera. I am hoping that d'Arnaud, Duda, Conforto and Herrera will be the core of the best run in Mets history. Flores and Lagares too.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 21 2015 10:34 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
|
1) he must have had some good games since you took those stats cuz he's now up to .261/.340/.435 Early season stats will do that. 2) 'Three True Outcomes' has always implied to me a high pct of ABs that end in Ks, BBs, or HRs (often with a low BA). But, except for the ultra-high walk-rates, I don't see that in Nimmo. His Ks were high in 2013 (27%) his first year in full season ball, but fell to under 19% in 2014 even as he rose through two levels. And his HRs so far have peaked at just 10 with a .278 BA, hardly the stereotyped hit or miss swinger.
|
Edgy MD Apr 21 2015 10:54 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Your point is well taken. Only meant to note that his low batting average to that point had been somewhat mollified by walks and extra-base hits, but I overstated it.
|
Frayed Knot Apr 24 2015 10:22 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
Dilson Herrera lands in the #9 spot on BA's Prospect Watch for the week with a 15 for 34 week including 5 XBHs
|
MFS62 Apr 25 2015 07:11 AM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
From last night's Las Vegas game, a promising peek into the future:
|
Elster88 Apr 28 2015 11:54 PM Re: Prospect season - 2014-15 |
LAS VEGAS 8, ALBUQUERQUE 0
|