Forum Home

Master Index of Archived Threads


How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symbol?

batmagadanleadoff
Apr 23 2015 09:16 AM

The 2015 Mets story is going national.

[fimg=233]https://s0.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/espn-grantland/img/grantland-logo@2x.png[/fimg]

Echoes of ’86: Are the Mets Really This Good?

[fimg=533]https://espngrantland.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/mets-celebrate-win.jpg?w=1011[/fimg]

Every Bartolo Colon start is an event.

Watching a soon-to-be-42-year-old pitcher do anything at the major league level should be compelling enough. But when that pitcher throws fastballs 87 percent of the time, you wonder how he can possibly survive in the big leagues with such a limited repertoire. When he’s listed at 5-foot-11, 285 pounds — but almost certainly weighs more — you rub your eyes in disbelief. And when he comes up to bat, lunges into a pitch, and bloops it into right field for a run-scoring hit — well, that’s the stuff baseball fans’ dreams are made of.

Fourteen games into the season, the New York Mets might be the most fun team in baseball — and the large, lovable, illogical Colon serves as the perfect symbol for them. The Mets own the season’s longest winning streak in the majors at nine games and the best record in the National League. Their 11-3 mark is tied for the best start in franchise history with the 1986 team, the last Mets club to win the World Series.

For a team with six straight losing seasons, no playoff berths in nine years, and just one in the past 15, this is a big deal. The Mets might actually be good, and much like their Opening Day starter’s continued success, it’s been delightfully surprising.


The Rotation

Despite a 2.25 ERA and 18-to-1 strikeout-to-walk rate, Colon still doesn’t qualify as the staff ace. That honor, of course, goes to Matt Harvey. From the moment he crashed the majors with a brilliant late-season debut in 2012, Mets fans have honored each of his starts with the moniker #HarveyDay. And when Harvey returned for his first start of 2015 after missing more than a full year because of Tommy John surgery, it escalated to a full-blown party.

Watching Harvey operate, it’s easy to understand the near-reverence for his abilities among the Mets faithful. At 6-foot-4, 215 pounds, prototypical size and strength fuel his blistering 97 mph fastball, in addition to a changeup that drops down to 88 and a beautiful Koufax-esque mid-80s curve. In his first three appearances, he’s walked one batter over 18 innings, while striking out 24 and allowing seven earned runs and 17 hits. He outdueled Washington’s Stephen Strasburg in that first start and made Bryce Harper look like an overmatched hack. Through two weeks, it’s safe to say Harvey is back: Fans are already dressing up like the Dark Knight and chanting his name before he even throws a pitch.

After Harvey, Colon probably isn’t even the no. 2 starter on the staff; that’s Jacob deGrom. A ninth-round pick by the Mets in 2010, deGrom was never considered an elite prospect, failing to garner a single top-100 ranking from any major prospects-ranking outlet. And his minor league numbers didn’t suggest future stardom, either. When the Mets called him up last May, it initially looked like deGrom would work out of the bullpen. But then starter Dillon Gee hit the DL and the Mets were forced to throw deGrom into the fire.

He earned his team’s trust and fans’ love from day one, making 22 starts and striking out 144 batters in 140.1 innings, with just 117 hits, seven homers, and 41 unintentional walks allowed en route to winning the National League Rookie of the Year. He’s shown no signs of slowing down this year, posting a microscopic 0.93 ERA through his first three starts. While his fastball doesn’t have the same blinding velocity as Harvey’s, deGrom’s 94-95 mph offering has been incredibly effective thanks to his pinpoint control: Of the 109 pitchers with as many innings pitched as the 26-year-old since the start of last season, only six have squeezed more value out of their fastballs.

We’ll blare the small-sample-size horn every day from now through July, but the numbers put up by New York’s top three starters defy belief: 59 strikeouts and just five walks, combined. Granted, MLB’s compensation system is often vague --- and young, dominant players are frequently brutally underpaid, but watching Harvey and deGrom steamroll everyone in sight for relative pennies becomes doubly mesmerizing when compared to, say, $28 million starter Justin Verlander.

Although they’ve been unbelievable, we did expect the Mets’ starting pitching to be really good. New York has so much starting pitching talent that Zack Wheeler’s absence1 hasn’t been felt at all, and the team is able to keep monster prospects Steven Matz and Noah Syndergaard waiting in the wings at Triple-A.2 Even now, with the team in first, the question coming into this season remains the same: Does the rest of the roster have enough talent to mount a playoff run?

The Rest

Last year, the Mets finished a sub-mediocre 21st in park-adjusted offense. The biggest trouble spot was left field, where the Young Black Hole sucked untold amounts of life from the offense.3 In response, the Mets signed Michael Cuddyer to a two-year, $21 million contract over the winter.

That move was puzzling, to say the least: Cuddyer turned 36 years old just before Opening Day. He has ranked as one of baseball’s worst defensive players for years and seemed far better suited for DH duty than the everyday outfield job the Mets offered. He missed all but 49 games in 2014 with thigh and shoulder injuries. And to top it all off, the Mets surrendered the 15th overall pick in the amateur draft for the right to handsomely compensate this aging, injury-prone, range-challenged outfielder.

So far, Cuddyer is batting .306/.370/.469, but much of that hot start is fueled by an off-the-charts .452 batting average on balls in play. Earlier this month, Mets GM Sandy Alderson told me that while his new left fielder wasn’t going to win any Gold Gloves, Cuddyer would likely hit well when healthy. Alderson also said that if the team hadn’t given up a draft pick to sign Cuddyer, the alternative likely would have been to trade valued prospects for a player who wasn’t necessarily much better. That second point is debatable — Nelson Cruz was available, for one — but compared with what the punchless Youngs offered, even 130 games of a healthy Cuddyer could tack a few wins onto the Mets’ ledger this year.

As the Wilpons are still digging out of the hole Bernie Madoff left them in, the rest of the offseason was basically dead quiet. The club entered Opening Day with one of the 10 least-expensive payrolls and, other than Cuddyer, the same below-average lineup as last year.

Standing pat, then, didn’t seem like the way forward, but if you squinted hard enough, you could see Alderson’s thinking, financial restrictions or not: Ruben Tejada and Wilmer Flores occupied most of the time at shortstop last season, and neither did anything of note with the bat, but the 23-year-old Flores was once a Baseball America top-50 prospect and hit a solid .292/.334/.440 in the minors. David Wright batted just .269/.324/.374 in 2014, the worst offensive season of his career, but a lot of those struggles were due to nagging shoulder injuries, and Wright, who was an elite hitter in the two previous seasons, came into the spring healthy. Combine that potential improvement from the left side of the infield with the emergence of slugging first baseman Lucas Duda and acrobatic center fielder Juan Lagares, and through the still-small sample of 14 games, the Mets are essentially a league-average offense. With top-five starting pitching and a so-far stingy bullpen, that might be all they really need.

So What Next?

Just a few weeks into the season, the team’s depth is already being tested by injuries. Wright and starting catcher Travis d’Arnaud both hit the disabled list in the past seven days. Wright’s hamstring injury isn’t expected to fully heal for at least two more weeks, and d’Arnaud is likely out until June.4 And with Jerry Blevins (forearm fracture), Vic Black (shoulder), and Bobby Parnell (recovering from Tommy John surgery) all out at least a few more weeks — in addition to Jenrry Mejia’s 80-game suspension after testing positive for Stanozolol — the bullpen is suddenly looking thinner than you’d hope.

In addition to some health-related fallback, skeptics could point to some schedule luck as a big reason the Mets’ hot start won’t continue. The Nationals were missing three of their best players when they dropped two to New York to start the season. The Marlins look so dysfunctional, they might already be considering a managerial change. And the Phillies are the terrible Phillies. With that level of competition likely to improve as the season goes on, and multiple injuries thinning out the roster, there’s an argument to be made that we’ve already seen the best of the 2015 Mets.

The good news here is that as long as Harvey and deGrom are healthy — and Colon5 continues to defy multiple laws of science — the Mets can go toe-to-toe with nearly any other team on pitching strength. Plus, there are contingency plans in place in the high minors, with Matz, Syndergaard, talented second baseman Dilson Herrera, and others just a phone call away. And there’s even enough depth for Alderson to test the trade waters if Cuddyer’s health fails him, the pen needs reinforcements, or some other problem crops up.

In other words, if the starting pitching keeps humming, look out. As ESPN Stats & Info’s Mark Simon recently noted, the Mets are 8-1 in starts made by Colon, Harvey, and deGrom. What would happen if the Mets won two-thirds of the starts made by any two of those three pitchers? According to Elias Sports Bureau, there have been 25 instances over the past 20 seasons in which a team won at least two-thirds of the starts made by at least two pitchers (minimum 30 starts per pitcher). Of those 25, 24 made the playoffs.

So go ahead, Mets fans, and do your best Bartolo impersonation. Dream big, really big.


http://grantland.com/the-triangle/mlb-n ... ob-degrom/

batmagadanleadoff
Apr 23 2015 10:31 AM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

Another How Good Are the Mets piece ledes with Colon:

[fimg=333]http://exhibitions.nypl.org/lunchhour/archive/files/c7466b6a525b9126e3130907c4b2ca35.jpg[/fimg]

Daily Intelligencer
the sports section
April 22, 2015 5:49 p.m.
Four Surprises Propelling the Mets’ Hot Start
By Joe DeLessio

[fimg=544]http://img1.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2015/04/22/22-bartolo-colon.w529.h352.2x.jpg[/fimg]

With two of the best young pitchers in baseball anchoring their pitching staff, the Mets were supposed to improve this season, but they weren't supposed to be quite this good: They're off to an 11-3 start, which includes a perfect 8-0 record at Citi Field. It's extremely early in the season, of course, but at the moment, the Mets sit atop the N.L. East standings, and are tied with Detroit and Kansas City for the best record in the majors. It's also their best start since 1986, when they'd go on to win a franchise-record 108 games en route to a World Series victory. Even without David Wright, their captain who's been on the disabled list since last Wednesday, they've put together a nine-game winning streak heading into tonight's matchup with Atlanta. They're not doing it all with smoke and mirrors, but several Mets are exceeding expectations in the early going. Here, a look at four such players — and how likely they are to keep it going.

A 41-year Old Who Is Pitching Like an All-Star

At 41 years old, it's a minor miracle that Bartolo Colon is still in the majors at all. His 285-pound frame has held up remarkably well over the past two seasons — he made 61 starts in 2013 and 2014 combined — but so far this year, he's been a lot better than serviceable. In three starts, he's pitching to a 2.25 ERA and a brilliant 0.80 WHIP. He's walked just one batter in 20 innings of work, while recording 18 strikeouts.
Can he keep it up? At that level, no chance. But he's made a habit of defying the odds late in his career, even after sitting out 50 games in 2012 and early 2013 for a PED violation. He is just two years removed from an All-Star selection with Oakland, so even relying heavily on his fastball, he could remain a key contributor to the otherwise young rotation.

A Questionable Off-Season Acquisition Who Has Been Red Hot

Michael Cuddyer, 36, signed a two-year, $21 million deal in the off-season — a move that many criticized, since it meant the Mets would surrender a first-round pick in this year's draft to his former team, the Rockies. Cuddyer, a terrible defensive outfielder, only played 49 games last year thanks to three separate trips to the disabled list. And though his offensive numbers had been impressive in recent years — he won the batting title in 2013 — they were at least partially boosted by his playing home games in the thin air of Denver's Coors Field. So far this year, though, Cuddyer's been earning his money: He's batting .306 with a very good .840 OPS. During their current winning streak (a small sample within a small sample), he's batting a team-best .379.
Can he keep it up? Probably not. As pointed out by Jonah Keri, he has a ridiculous .452 batting average on balls in play, suggesting there's an element of luck to his hot start. The sample sizes are small, but for a guy with a projected slash line of .271/.325/.450 according to the ZiPS projection model, he's almost certain to come down to earth soon.

A Slugger Who Is Unexpectedly Leading the Team in Batting

Lucas Duda doubled his previous career high with 30 home runs last season, but transforming himself into a slugger came at the expense of hitting for average. After batting .292 during his first full season in the Majors in 2011, he hasn't hit higher than .253 since. He had reason to expect his power numbers to increase even more this season: The Mets moved in the right-center field fences prior to Opening Day, and the left-handed Duda tends to hit for power to right and right-center. So what's happened so far is strange: Duda has just one home run — but has been a stellar all-around hitter, batting a team-best .327 among qualified hitters, with seven doubles and a .916 OPS.
Can he keep it up? At 29, Duda should be right in the prime of his career, so putting up his best numbers to date isn't out of the question, especially since his power numbers should improve. Worth noting: Duda has historically struggled to hit lefties, but so far this year (again, in a very small sample), he's 5-for-10. Those numbers, at the very least, will dip as the season goes on.

A Fill-In Closer Who Has Been Perfect in Save Opportunities


That Jeurys Familia has been strong early isn't a shock: He finished seventh in rookie of the year voting last year thanks to a stellar season out of the bullpen. But he's pitching in a role he wasn't expected to be in: Jenrry Mejia was supposed to start the season as the Mets' closer, but he was placed on the disabled list shortly after the season began and a few days later was suspended 80 games for testing positive for the steroid Stanozolol. Manager Terry Collins had previously suggested that the closer role would go to Bobby Parnell when he returned from Tommy John surgery. But Familia, who took over the job with Mejia unavailable, has been so reliable that Collins now says he'll keep it even when Parnell re-joins the team. In eight appearances so far, Familia has six saves in as many opportunities, with a WHIP of 0.78.
Can he keep it up? Sure. Familia, 25, proved he could pitch in the majors last year, and so far at least, he's handled the added pressure of closing just fine.


http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/20 ... start.html

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Apr 23 2015 10:58 AM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

Gee thanks Joe DeLessio for those important analyses on batting averages.

That Colon has been as sharp as he's been so far is a surprise but I've about had it with the media's Cuddyer-Actually-Sucks story where's there's almost no evidence for it. Of course he's not going to hit .380 all year just like Muffy won't hit .140 (I think). Most of us knew that Familia was at least as good as Mejia if not better and it shouldn't surprise anyone that Doodoo could lead the team in batting average (as though a good batting average is what Doodoo contributes to the club).

A Boy Named Seo
Apr 23 2015 11:41 AM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

Don't know if anyone already posted this one or not, but it's great at pointing out how huge the fast start is if the Mets do revert to that ~.500 team some peeps (foolishly) think they are.

[url]http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/so-the-mets-might-be-contenders/




So the Mets Might Be Contenders
by Dave Cameron - April 20, 2015

As it stands this morning, there are five teams in the National League that have at least a 50% chance of reaching the postseason, according to our Playoff Odds forecasts. The three top teams are the same three that everyone had winning their divisions before the year began; the Dodgers, Cardinals, and Nationals. The fourth team — or first Wild Card, if you want to make it sound a little better — is the Padres, whose winter moves made the largest splash the world has seen since Noah decided to build an ark. And finally, as you’ve likely surmised from reading the headline, there’s the New York Mets, currently given exactly a 50/50 chance of reaching the postseason this year.

Yep, that puts the Mets ahead of the Pirates and Cubs, the two young darlings of the Central, each with rosters more stacked with young talent. It also puts the Mets well ahead of the Marlins, a trendy pre-season pick to make a run this year, but instead are a team that is reportedly considering firing their manager after getting their clocks cleaned in Queens over the weekend. After that four game sweep, the Marlins now find themselves seven games behind the Mets; it’s the largest gap between any two division rivals in baseball.

Of course, it’s still really early. It’s April 19th, and because the season started a week later this year, that date is even more deceiving than usual. We’re two weeks into a 26 week race. After 13 games last year, the Brewers were 10-3, standing with the best record in baseball; they went 72-77 after that point and finished six games behind the two Wild Card teams. While the games that have been played still count and can’t be taken away, a 10-3 start doesn’t mean the Mets are really a great team.

But that’s the thing about baseball in 2015; they don’t really need to be. They don’t even need to be particularly good, because in this day and age, a hot start and a roster that doesn’t suck makes you a contender.

[fimg=750]http://cdn.fangraphs.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-national-league-projected-wins.png[/fimg]

The NL in 2015 is broken into four distinct tiers: there are the obvious division favorites, the Wild Card contenders, the Wild Card pretenders, and the Phillies. A visual representation might help.

2015-national-league-projected-wins

Thanks to a strong start and a legitimately strong pitching staff, the Mets find themselves squarely in the seoncd tier. In reality, they probably aren’t as good as the Padres, Pirates, or Cubs, but the good news is that they don’t have to be. Their 10-3 start isn’t really predictive of anything — especially since their underlying BaseRuns performance suggests that a more normal distribution of those same events would have led to a 7-6 record at this point — other than the fact that the Mets just don’t need to win as many games going forward as their competitors do.

Our forecasts have the Mets as essentially a .500 team, which lines up nicely with their context-neutral performances so far. Their offense is mostly fine — though it will be tested now that they’re losing Travis D’Arnaud and are already without David Wright — with enough decent hitters to make up for the fact that they lack great ones. Their defense is very good at some spots (think center field) and less great at others (yeah, Wilmer Flores is still their shortstop). They run the bases okay. Their bullpen is not horrible, and could be better than that if Bobby Parnell comes back as a contributor.

And the rotation could very well be excellent, especially once they kick Dillon Gee out of it. Matt Harvey and Jacob DeGrom look like a formidable pair at the front, while Bartolo Colon refuses to age, and Jon Niese is a perfectly serviceable mid-rotation starter. With Rafael Montero set to join the rotation soon, and Noah Syndergaard and/or Steven Matz coming later this summer, the Mets have one of the best starting staffs in baseball.

Combine three parts meh with one part awesome and you end up with an alright team that won’t embarrass itself, and in the 2015 National League, that’s a Wild Card contender; especially when staked to an early lead over the other race-runners. I’m not going to argue that the Mets are as good as the Padres, Pirates, or Cubs, because I don’t think they are. The Padres can hit in a way that the Mets can’t. The Pirates have the NL’s best player and a better supporting cast of position players, plus a magical wand that forces opponents to hit the ball directly into their extreme defensive alignments. The Cubs have upside stacked on top of upside. All these things have stuff the Mets don’t have.

But the Mets have 10 wins, which is something that Chicago, Pittsburgh, and San Diego don’t have, and it’s not any better to have an extra +3 WAR player on your team than it is to have an extra three wins already in the bank. If you thought the Mets were a .500 team at the start of the year, then their current position is not much different than if they’d traded a Shake Shack Concrete for Ian Desmond on Opening Day.

We go through this every April, but it’s always worth repeating; regression to the mean doesn’t mean that a team (or player) that has had a good run is due for an offsetting bad run in order to even things out. That’s the gambler’s fallacy, and life doesn’t work that way. The Mets haven’t played well enough that we should dramatically alter our expectations of what they’re going to do going forward, but now, .500 ball for 24 weeks gets you an 85 win finish. And while 85 wins probably doesn’t get you the Wild Card, that’s the mean forecast out of a range of expected outcomes, and it doesn’t take very many things going New York’s way before that 85 turns into 88 or 89.

They could almost get there by taking the ball away from Dillon Gee and being aggressive on the trade market early in the year, limiting the number of at-bats and innings that have to go to replacement level players. Right now, we’re projecting 357 plate appearances for John Mayberry, because we don’t think Michael Cuddyer or Curtis Granderson can play the outfield all year long. You don’t have to look too terribly hard to find an outfielder better than John Mayberry, and if the Mets can scrounge up a solid fourth outfielder, all of the sudden this is a team projected to end the year with 86 or 87 wins.

In reality, the Mets are probably still the 7th or 8th best team in the National League, but they’ve already collected 10 irrevocable wins, and the 4th, 5th, and 6th best teams in the NL aren’t exactly monsters. The NL Wild Cards will be won by two flawed teams that likely over-perform their actual abilities by a half dozen games or so. The Mets are already further down that path than anyone else, and while it’s easy to look at this roster and see a bunch of question marks, there really does appear to be enough here to make September interesting at Citi Field.

Edgy MD
Apr 23 2015 02:05 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

The NL in 2015 is broken into four distinct tiers: there are the obvious division favorites, the Wild Card contenders, the Wild Card pretenders, and the Phillies.

Ouch.

Ceetar
Apr 23 2015 02:14 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

Edgy MD wrote:
The NL in 2015 is broken into four distinct tiers: there are the obvious division favorites, the Wild Card contenders, the Wild Card pretenders, and the Phillies.

Ouch.


It feels like a cheap shot and then you look at the chart.

A Boy Named Seo
Apr 23 2015 02:45 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

Srsly, if they can muster no better than .500 over the next 146 games, they're still an 86-win team. 75-71 gets 'em to 90. That's way doable, yall.

dgwphotography
Apr 23 2015 02:46 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

It's also sobering to see that the bulk of this streak has been against 3 of the bottom 8 teams in that graph.

TheOldMole
Apr 23 2015 02:48 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

I really don't know what a good number is, but doesn't it make sense that your batting average is going to be higher than your overall average on balls in play? How much are you going to fatten the average on balls that you don't put in play?

Edgy MD
Apr 23 2015 03:04 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

dgwphotography wrote:
It's also sobering to see that the bulk of this streak has been against 3 of the bottom 8 teams in that graph.

Well, that graph is based in part on what the Mets did to those teams — helping drive them in a rightward direction.

MFS62
Apr 23 2015 05:56 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

I think a good symbol for the Mets so far this year is Angel Torres' hat.
The other team is laughing.
Then reality sets in and they realize they just lost.

Later

LeiterWagnerFasterStrongr
Apr 24 2015 11:01 AM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

TheOldMole wrote:
I really don't know what a good number is, but doesn't it make sense that your batting average is going to be higher than your overall average on balls in play? How much are you going to fatten the average on balls that you don't put in play?


If you hit more home runs often enough and strike out a little less/just about as much, well, quite a bit.

batmagadanleadoff
Apr 24 2015 01:25 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

More on the Amazins' in the National Press ... Rolling Stone Magazine does sports ... another Bartolo lede ... Colon is so unbelievable that he should be pitching for the Ruppert Mundys .... Extra! Extra!



The New York Mets Go to 11: Meet Baseball's Best Team
Winners of eleven straight, and headed for a battle in the Bronx, New York's 'other team' is in unfamiliar terrirory: Atop the MLB world
By Michael Weinreb April 24, 2015

[fimg=633]http://assets.rollingstone.com/assets/2015/article/the-new-york-mets-go-to-11-meet-baseballs-best-team-20150424/193628/medium_rect/1429880899/720x405-470881694.jpg[/fimg]



Believe it or not, there was a time in history when Bartolo Colon was not constructed like an overstuffed dirigible. He was just a 24-year-old pitching prospect with a slingshot of an arm back in 1997, one of several dynamic talents on a Cleveland Indians team seeking to erase years of ignominious history; and in the end, he and his teammates came up a few pitches short of breaking the curse.

Eighteen years later, Colon is still here, a miracle of alchemy, a hurler tipping the scales at nearly 300 pounds, a pear-shaped 41-year-old savior seemingly conjured from the pages of Philip Roth's Great American Novel who might also be the key to the New York Mets finally swallowing and digesting three decades of heavy-duty comic futility (luckily, Bartolo is more than willing to provide comedy of a different sort).

As I write this, the Mets have won 11 games in a row and head into this weekend's Subway Series with the Yankees as the best team in baseball, which is one of those clauses that immediately comes across as a Letterman punch line waiting to land, because the Mets are never the best team in their own city. The Mets are the team that gets caught up in bad trades and Ponzi schemes; the Mets are the team that has come to represent the overriding angst and neurosis of living in New York City.

There is a dichotomy to baseball in New York that echoes the notion of New York itself: If, at any moment, you're feeling like you've made it here and that you truly can make it anywhere – if you're vibing with the broad arrogance of a Yankees fan – someone will come along and throw an elbow into your chin on a Sixth Avenue sidewalk. That elbow to the chin is what Mets fans have felt since 1986, when a collection of misfits and malcontents formed one of the most iconic teams in baseball history. Ever since they perpetuated the Red Sox' own curse for another 18 years, the Mets have suffered Bonilla fatigue and Madoff fatigue and everything in between; the Mets flounder, and the Mets lose their best toys (see: Harvey, Matt) to injury at the moment they seem poised to capture the attention of the city.

All that has changed in the early days of this season. Harvey is back, and looks great; Colon has defied the laws of nature and a former ninth-round pick named Jacob deGrom might also be the real thing. And Mets fans are wary, of course, because Mets fans have learned to embrace wariness, the way one does when one enters a completely empty subway car, expecting to eventually be confronted by a smell that could suffocate a small canine.

And sure, some of this angst is overblown, and is based on geography and tabloid energy and the sheer amount of writers per capita. But the Mets are the New York franchise (even more so than the Jets) that seem to capture what it means to live in a 200-square-foot studio apartment above a nightclub while working a job that pays $12 an hour. The Mets are the equivalent of traffic on the George Washington Bridge. And this is why I'm not sure how I feel about the Mets actually being good, for real; this is why I wonder if New York is better off when the Mets are a hot mess, if only to serve as a reminder that this city is not the be-all, end-all of modern human existence, that [it's] a place full of suffering and self-loathing. Now that Woody Allen is filming movies in far-flung locations (and sullying his own reputation), the Mets are the closest thing New York has to a true nebbish. And I sort of dig that.

I have no idea if there will be a collapse this time around, but if there is, I'll kind of look forward to it. And deep inside, I think a lot of Mets fans will, too. It's easier when you already expect the worst.



http://www.rollingstone.com/sports/news ... m-20150424

Benjamin Grimm
Apr 24 2015 01:29 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

I have no idea if there will be a collapse this time around, but if there is, I'll kind of look forward to it. And deep inside, I think a lot of Mets fans will, too. It's easier when you already expect the worst.


First that University of Virginia thing, and now this nonsense. Maybe it's time for The Rolling Stone to stop publishing.

batmagadanleadoff
Apr 24 2015 01:30 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

Benjamin Grimm wrote:
I have no idea if there will be a collapse this time around, but if there is, I'll kind of look forward to it. And deep inside, I think a lot of Mets fans will, too. It's easier when you already expect the worst.


First that University of Virginia thing, and now this nonsense. Maybe it's time for The Rolling Stone to stop publishing.


You tell 'em, Grimm.

TransMonk
Apr 24 2015 01:40 PM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

Rolling Stone should stick to covering shitty music.

John Cougar Lunchbucket
Apr 25 2015 05:40 AM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

I have seen the future of sportswriting and its name is Michael Weinreb

Lefty Specialist
Apr 25 2015 07:19 AM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

I have no idea if there will be a collapse this time around, but if there is, I'll kind of look forward to it.

Nice to know that he enjoys the suffering of others.

And deep inside, I think a lot of Mets fans will, too.

This is the dead giveaway. This is the Yankee-fan version of how they think Met fans think. "They don't root for the Yankees, so they must secretly enjoy losing."

MFS62
Apr 25 2015 07:43 AM
Re: How good are the 2015 Mets? Is Bartolo Colon their symb

Lefty Specialist wrote:
I have no idea if there will be a collapse this time around, but if there is, I'll kind of look forward to it.

Nice to know that he enjoys the suffering of others.

And deep inside, I think a lot of Mets fans will, too.

This is the dead giveaway. This is the Yankee-fan version of how they think Met fans think. "They don't root for the Yankees, so they must secretly enjoy losing."

There's a technical term for that. I believe its called YLDB.

Later