Master Index of Archived Threads
IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes?
Ceetar Jul 10 2015 07:30 AM |
New Han Solo movie is announced.
|
d'Kong76 Jul 10 2015 07:36 AM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Arizona at NY Mets
|
Ashie62 Jul 10 2015 11:05 AM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Gaard at home, no problem.
|
d'Kong76 Jul 10 2015 12:56 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Zeeks wasting no time posting a lineup...
|
G-Fafif Jul 10 2015 01:25 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Curtis Granderson – RF
|
Frayed Knot Jul 10 2015 01:52 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
We faced Chase Anderson in the middle of the three game series out in the desert in early June. It was one of those games where we got one or more runners on in every inning (10 hits + 2 BBs + catcher's interference) but scored nothing save for a 2nd inning Juan Lagares HR; it, of course, was a solo. The Snakes then scored twice after 2-out/none-on in the 7th and we lost 2-1.
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 02:22 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
|
I went back and checked on those double plays.
So, somehow that magic occurred without contributions from Campbell or Cuddyer, whom my eyeballs insist are our two greatest GiDP offenders. They in fact took a day off from their struggles that day, garnering two hits a piece.
|
themetfairy Jul 10 2015 05:42 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
4-1 Mets after one inning, thanks to home runs by Duda and Cuddyer.
|
Frayed Knot Jul 10 2015 06:08 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
First NYM cycle = Jim Hickman?
|
d'Kong76 Jul 10 2015 06:49 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
I can't wait for the answer, don't click on this if they haven't
|
Ashie62 Jul 10 2015 06:54 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
I like our chances
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 06:55 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Duda, Cuddyer, Campbell, Nieuwie... maybe the dead are rising.
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 07:03 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 07:04 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Matz on the bench looks like he's been crying all day.
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 07:12 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
[fimg=700:d5kt3n3q]http://img14.deviantart.net/2f93/i/2012/102/a/d/up_to_11__spinal_tap__by_siddv-d4vwq1q.jpg[/fimg:d5kt3n3q]
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 07:13 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
We may get Jenrry Mejia's debut in the eighth.
|
Frayed Knot Jul 10 2015 07:16 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
This big Viking is pretty darn good, eh?
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 07:17 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Syndergaard is so badass that he needs roman numerals.
|
Frayed Knot Jul 10 2015 07:19 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
|
So it wasn't a total ass-kicking, but it was at least a one-inning ass-kicking with a solid calf-whoopin' thrown in for good measure.
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 07:19 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Love to see Lagares hang in there on the breaking pitch after eating it two pitches earlier.
|
Zvon Jul 10 2015 07:21 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Synderguaard= nAsTy
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 07:27 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Ollietime!!
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 07:41 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
|
Keith Hernandez, ladies and gentlemen.
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 07:42 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
That's what you buy your tickets for.
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 08:06 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Congratulations, Tomás, but that I wasn't clearly convinced.
|
Frayed Knot Jul 10 2015 08:07 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Lamb lies down on a pitch right down Broadway.
|
d'Kong76 Jul 10 2015 08:09 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Didn't seem enough to overturn, and it takes way too long.
|
Frayed Knot Jul 10 2015 08:11 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Familia kept shaking Plawecki off before that RBI single.
|
themetfairy Jul 10 2015 08:14 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
|
d'Kong76 Jul 10 2015 08:14 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Nice hustle, Ahmed!
|
d'Kong76 Jul 10 2015 08:24 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Just saw Coach Cuddy's HR... lucky. Now he's doing a post-
|
Fman99 Jul 10 2015 08:39 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
This game kicked some fucking ass.
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 09:27 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Thoughts on the game:
|
Edgy MD Jul 10 2015 09:42 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
Cubbies and Natties both lose and the Mets pull within two in both the division race and the Wild Card.
|
Ceetar Jul 10 2015 09:47 PM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
||
|
Frayed Knot Jul 11 2015 05:27 AM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
|
And who'd have thunk -- especially after our pitching staff's record-setting ineptness from a couple years back when they started the season, what was it?, like 0-fer-60-ish -- that Harvey would wind up as maybe the 4th best hitter on the staff? He's certainly behind deGrom and Syndergaard, no better than Niese, and likely just sample size away from being passed by Matz. Then toss on the fact that, for this season anyway, he's beneath Colon (which is not a good thing to be no matter how you wind up parsing that statement). Back in his 2012 rookie season Harvey's hitting was a revelation to the point of being a novelty for this team. Since that first year however he's a sub-.100 hitter with a 45% K-rate who can't bunt on a staff full of guys who actually look like they know what they're doing even when they don't get hits.
|
Frayed Knot Jul 11 2015 05:31 AM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
|
Ah, it was Hickman. Wasn't watching when they revealed the answer. Not sure what that little factoid was doing hanging around in my brain, nor what piece of actual important life information was bumped out in order to keep that one around.
|
d'Kong76 Jul 11 2015 08:15 AM Re: IGT #87 7/10 Snakes? Why'd it have to be snakes? |
My guess was Agee, for some reason I knew he had one...I'm
|